Title: Are Organic Foods More Nutritious than Conventional Foods
1Are Organic Foods More Nutritious than
Conventional Foods?
- Created by Kasey Mixon
- Georgia Agriculture
- Education Curriculum Office
- July, 2003
2Objectives
- Define organic foods
- Introduce the issue
- Look at research
- Answer Why isnt there sufficient research?
- Conclude
3Organic Food
- USDA
- emphasize use of renewable resources
- conservation of soil and water
- no conventional pesticides, fertilizers with
synthetic ingredients or sewage sludge - no bioengineering
- no ionizing radiation
4Organic Farming
- been around for decades
- during past decade
- became fastest growing sector in ag.
- annual increase 20 or more
5Organic Agriculture
- controversial claims
- one such claim organic is more nutritious than
conventional - is this true? is there proof?
6Is This True?
- The Soil Association says so Vitamin
C minerals phytonutrients less water - That sounds good, doesnt it?
7Is There Proof?
- Alex Avery Dennis Avery (Hudson Institute) say
- the organic industry is attempting to promote
their products by degrading the foods that made
Americans taller, stronger, and longer-lived than
any people in history there just isnt enough
evidence to prove their claims.
8What Does Research Conclude?
- Virginia Worthington, M.S., Sc.D., C.N.S.,
examined all of the 41 research studies on this
issue - compiled data
- calculated difference between organic and
conventional values for 35 vitamins and minerals
9Worthingtons Study
- Formula used
- organic value conventional value
- conventional value X 100
10Worthingtons Results
- Organic crops were
- Higher in
- Vitamin C
- Iron
- Magnesium
- Phosphorus
- Lower in
- Nitrates
11Nutrient Content of Organic Versus Conventional
Crops Mean Difference (Worthington, 2001)
12Worthingtons Comments
- no extensive research conducted to determine what
health effects may result from the difference in
nutrient contents if people stayed well on an
organic diet but got violently ill as a result of
consuming food grown with chemical fertilizers,
then the difference would be perfectly obvious
however, that is not the case
13Worthingtons Comments
- more research needed
- great amount of variability in agricultural
measurements - fertilizing methods, sunlight, temperature,
rainfall, shipping and storage handling
14More Research
- Consumer Reports researchers cannot give the
nutritional edge to either group - variability in crop or cropping system?
- report included quote from Willie Lockeretz,
professor at Tufts University School of Nutrition
and Science Policy the growing system you use
probably does affect nutrition, but it does it in
a way so complex you might be studying the
problem forever
15Organic Farming Research Foundation
- the definitive study has not been done
- why? too many variables to control
- like what?
- crop variety
- time after harvest
- post-harvest handling
- soil type
- climate
16The Soil Association
- Organic foods have higher levels of
- Vitamin C, minerals, phytonutrients
- less water
- makes a real difference to peoples and animals
health - good results for alternative cancer therapies
- no proof of research for these claims
17United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)
- non committal on the issue
- USDA makes no claims that organically produced
food is safer or more nutritious than
conventionally produced food - why? not enough research, most likely
18Other Journal and Magazine Articles
- Tufts University Health Nutrition Letter on
this issue - no one knows
- We just dont have enough data Kate Clancey,
PhD of the Henry Wallace Institute for
Alternative Agriculture
19Other Articles
- Andrea Chernus, MD, RN, CDN there is no
scientific proof that someone eating a
well-balanced organic diet is healthier than a
person eating a well-balanced conventional diet
20Other Articles
- Sir John Krebs, Chair of the United Kingdoms
Foods Standards Agency the current scientific
evidence does not show that organic food is any
safer or more nutritious than conventionally
produced food
21Other Articles
- Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
under the basic standards of organic farming,
there is no sufficient evidence for a
system-related effect on product quality due to
the production method (Lotter, 2003)
22Other Articles
- Journal of Sustainable Agriculture many of the
health claims for organic products remain
unresolved (Ding, Wang, Xie, Yang, 2003)
23Why Such Little Research?
- several parts to this answer
- organic farming just recently experiencing
significant growth - Sales
- 1990 - 1 billion
- 1996 - 3.3 billion
- 2000 - 7.8 billion
24Growth
- Acreage
- more than doubled between 1992-1997
- more than doubled again between 1997-2001
- The following table shows the changes by
individual years
25US Certified Organic Farmland in 1,000 of acres
(Green Kremen, 2002)
26(No Transcript)
27Why Such Little Research?
- Increased demand recognition of a need for more
research - What do you need in order to conduct research?
- FUNDS!
28U.S. Research Funding
- 1999 1.4 million
- 2000 3.6 million
- Funding is growing, so answers should come
29U.S. Research Funding
30Why Such Little Research?
- Such a complex issue with many different parts
needing to be researched - Hard to perform a fair comparison and analysis
between the two systems
31SO.
- Organic is most likely here to stay
- We need answers to the many questions about it,
so. - MORE RESEARCH NEEDS TO BE CONDUCTED!
32What Have You Learned Hopefully?
- What an organic food product is
- The issue organic vs. conventional, is there a
nutritional difference? - What research says why there is so little
33Any Questions?