Valuation Consulting - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Valuation Consulting

Description:

Problems of extrapolating from past performance. Decline & other key variables ... Generic or unbranded. Branded. Prices. Volumes. Maintenance. VALUATION CONSULTING ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: Kel9158
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Valuation Consulting


1
Valuation Consulting 49-50 The Hop Exchange, 24
Southwark Street, London, SE1 1TY Tel 020 7403
3344 Fax 0207 499 2266 e-mail
valconsult_at_valconsulting.co.uk www.valuation-consu
lting.co.uk
2
VALUATION CONSULTING
STARTING AT THE TOP AND TRYING TO BUILD
DOWN. THE LAWS OF PHYSICS AND VALUATION
SUGGEST THAT THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE.
3
VALUATION CONSULTING
  • OCCASIONS FOR VALUING
  • INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
  • Mergers Acquisitions
  • Portfolio Review and risk assessments
  • Arrange a loan - securitisation
  • Tax purposes
  • Licensing
  • Balance Sheet purposes

  • Joint Ventures
  • Selling your Company
  • Selling your IP
  • Insurance

4
VALUATION CONSULTING
  • METHODS OF VALUATION
  • Market Based
  • Comparable market transactions

5
VALUATION CONSULTING
  • COMPARABLE MARKET TRANSACTIONS
  • Few Sales
  • Lack of Information
  • Separate Values
  • Special Purchasers
  • Different Negotiating Skills
  • Distorting Effects of Varying Values
  • Assets Not Always Comparable

6
VALUATION CONSULTING
  • METHODS OF VALUATION
  • Cost Based
  • Historical or replacement cost

7
VALUATION CONSULTING
  • HISTORICAL OR REPLACEMENT COST
  • Caveats
  • Economic Benefits Excluded
  • Duration of benefit-economic life
  • Obsolescence difficult to quantify
  • Maintenance
  • Time value of money

8
VALUATION CONSULTING
  • METHODS OF VALUATION
  • Income Approach
  • Capitalisation of historical profits
  • Future economic benefits

9
VALUATION CONSULTING
  • CAPITALISATION OF HISTORICAL PROFITS
  • DRAWBACKS
  • Profitability
  • Problems of averaging
  • Problems of extrapolating from past
    performance
  • Decline other key variables
  • Net tangible assets not separately
    assessedMultiple
  • No reference point for price earnings multiple
  • Often no regard to established marketplace
  • Often no reconciliation with market
    capitalisation

10
VALUATION CONSULTING
  • MODERN VALUATION ANALYSIS IS EFFECTIVELY DCF
    APPLIED TO THE BUSINESS ENTERPRISE UNDER
    CONSIDERATION
  • The Net Present Value (NPV) of a strategy or
    business is the sum of its expected free cash
    flows to a horizon (H) discounted by its cost of
    capital (r)
  • NPV Year 1 Cash Flow Year 2 Cash Flow ... to
    say Year 5 Cash Flow
  • (1 r)
    (1 r) ² (1
    r)H
  • PLUS
  • The terminal value which is the value of the
    business at a horizon (HV)
  • HV Cash Flow
  • (r - growth)
  • Also discounted back to present value

11
VALUATION CONSULTING
HOW MUCH? (CASHFLOWS)
12
VALUATION CONSULTING
  • GROSS PROFIT DIFFERENTIAL METHOD
  • Assessment of margins
  • Generic or unbranded
  • Branded
  • Prices
  • Volumes
  • Maintenance

13
VALUATION CONSULTING
  • GROSS PROFIT DIFFERENTIAL METHOD
  • Limitations
  • Net Tangible Assets and Rate of Return ignored
  • Cost production efficiencies not isolated
  • Economies of scale not considered
  • Information about other products cost,
    volumes, etc not available
  • No generic brand name for comparison
  • If so differences in quantity, quality,
    availability
  • Market trends over time
  • Bias towards industries with lower variable
    costs to total costs

14
VALUATION CONSULTING
  • EXCESS PROFITS METHOD
  • Features
  • Calculate current market value of Net Tangible
    Assets
  • Estimate Rate of Return to calculate required
    profits
  • Excess above required level to induce
    investment
  • Attribute excess to intangibles
  • Capitalise this return
  • Ensure careful segregation to identifiable
    products
  • Those unidentifiable must be goodwill

15
VALUATION CONSULTING
  • EXCESS PROFITS METHOD
  • Limitations
  • Rate of Return can be a reflection of other
    factors
  • Does not allocate between parts
  • Tangible assets often incorporate intangible
    value ie value in use basis
  • Information about technological developments
    often not available
  • Assets being valued not employed in best
    manner
  • Asset values reported profits often
    calculated on a different basis
  • Erosion of margin over time by competitive
    pressures
  • Benefit of lower depreciation of branded
    products
  • Required Rate of Return often an ingredient in
    sale price
  • Method ignores potential profit from extensions

16
VALUATION CONSULTING
  • ROYALTIES FOREGONE/RELIEF FROM ROYALTY
  • Features
  • Estimate future royalty stream
  • Basic premise sale lease-back
  • Usually maximum basis with acceptable Rate of
    Return
  • Alternatively payment for your use
  • Royalty equivalent to excess profit component
  • Greater availability of independent economic
    trade association forecasts
  • Facilitates comparison with Royalty Rates of
  • similar intellectual property in marketplace

17
VALUATION CONSULTING
  • ROYALTIES FOREGONE/RELIEF
  • FROM ROYALTY
  • Problems
  • Separation of intangible components
  • Other factors often an ingredient in
    determining current Royalty Rate
    eg geographical goodwill or monopoly
  • Comparable may be out of
    date lack of detailed
    information arrangements may
    preclude extensions

18
VALUATION CONSULTING
HOW LONG FOR? (TIME PERIODS)
19
VALUATION CONSULTING
AT WHAT RISK? (COST OF CAPITAL)
20
VALUATION CONSULTING
  • MONTE CARLO
  • Effectively a DCF multiplier
  • Numerous DCF calculations accounting for
  • various scenarios, say of revenue, market
  • share, costs, internationality and other
  • risks
  • With just 4 scenario changes of the stated
  • assumptions above this means 256 models!
  • That is 4 values for each of income,
    different market share, costs,
    international penetration
  • i.e. 4 x 4 x 4 x 4 256

21
VALUATION CONSULTING
  • 1-10 100 RULE
  • Often scarce capital resources
  • Each stage in a technical development
  • costs 10 times as much as the previous
  • one
  • Assumption of success the probability of
    failure
  • at each stage could be 90
  • Even with 50 probability an inventor needs
    two
  • up his sleeve, at each stage
  • Multiplier effect
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com