MANAGING FOR DEVELOPMENT RESULTS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

MANAGING FOR DEVELOPMENT RESULTS

Description:

Managing for results requires good indicators to measure, monitor and ... Advise countries where weak governance acts as an impediment to development and growth ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:60
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: mfdr
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MANAGING FOR DEVELOPMENT RESULTS


1
MANAGING FOR DEVELOPMENT RESULTS
  • INFRASTRUCTURE, PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT AND
    GOVERNANCE WHAT CAN WE MEASURE?
  • Rapporteurs Report
  • Thursday, 5 February, 2004

2
WHY MEASURE?
  • Managing for results requires good indicators to
    measure, monitor and evaluate performance
  • Compare indicators across time, sectors and
    countries
  • Document and transfer best practice
  • Improve project, sector strategy, and country
    programme design.

3
OBJECTIVES OFINFRASTRUCTURE INDICATORS
  • Assess project and sector performance against
    benchmarks
  • Improve understanding of the link between
    infrastructure and country outcomes (MDGs,
    poverty,economic growth)
  • Identify population segments in most need of
    infrastructure services.

4
OBJECTIVES OF PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
INDICATORS
  • Benchmark institutional performance and business
    environment
  • Identify bottlenecks for doing business
  • Identify and transfer best practice
    (e.g.regulations to set up new businesses)
  • Monitor progress over time

5
OBJECTIVES OF GOVERNANCE INDICATORS
  • Examine link between governance (both public
    sector and corporate governance) and growth and
    development
  • Identify governance problems (political and
    social factors)
  • Advise countries where weak governance acts as an
    impediment to development and growth

6
EMERGING LESSONS
  • Infrastructure indicators should cover several
    policy areas beyond access (i.e. affordability,
    service quality, cost effectiveness, fiscal
    costs)
  • Motivate reforms through benchmarking against
    best practice and link aid to performance (from
    Doing Business Report)
  • Governance indicators require specificity,
    transparency and replicability (which in turn
    require country ownership)

7
ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION AND FURTHER WORK
  • Tailor-made versus standardized indicators
  • Qualitative and/or quantitative indicators
  • Risk of measurement becoming the objective rather
    than the tool
  • Use of performance indicators for allocating
    resources (e.g. CPIA, IDA)
  • Cost of retrieving and maintaining indicators
  • Public private partnership (PPPs) where does
    their performance stand?

8
SOME CONCLUSIONS
  • Defining indicators in the area of
    infrastructure, private sector development and
    governance is work in progress
  • Expand data sources and joint efforts across
    partners to support country and stakeholder
    capacity to maximize comparability and avoid
    duplication
  • Country ownership and harmonization are necessary
    in all measurement efforts, but especially for
    indicators of policy and institutional performance
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com