Title: afa21 Task Force
1afa21 Task Force
- Phase 2 Report and Recommendations
2Background
- AFA began transformation process in late 1990s
- Board restructure
- Leadership restructure
- Field restructure
- Focus on strategic planning
- Recent performance and assessments indicated need
for additional change - Constituent review
- Field structure review
- Board and committee structure review
- Strategic planning process
3Background
- Organizational Review Group (ORG) chartered in
December 2003 - Evaluate Board structure
- Evaluate long-term field organization structure
- Evaluate tax status
- ORG recommended transformation approach
- Restructure Governance to focus on agile policy
and decision making with accountability to the
membership - Restructure the Field Organization to focus on
mission performance - Restructure Our Tax Status to become more
inclusive and more efficient
4Background
- AFA/AEF Executive Committees and Boards took the
following action in September 2004 - Concurred with the transformation approach
recommended by the ORG - Established the afa21 Task Force to lead the
concept development, approval, and implementation
processes - Directed that the aTF develop concepts for
AFA/AEF Integration and Board and Field
Restructure, and initiate tax status change
determination actions
5afa21 Task Force
- Chartered by AFA Chairman
- Consists of a Director and three teams
- Tax Status
- Governance Structure
- Field Structure
- Director selected by AFA Chairman
- Team members selected by AFA Chairman, AEF
Chairman, and TF Director
6 afa21 Task Force Composition
- Experience/background on the Task Force
- Former AFA COB/Pres (2)
- Former AFA National Secretary
- AEF Trustees, Treasurer
- AFA National Directors
- Others -- Region Presidents, State Presidents
- Staff advisors all teams
- afa 21 Advisory Group (the graybeards)
- Former AFA/AEF COBs, Presidents
- Former AFA Executive Directors
- Senior Air Force and industry leaders
7afa21 Task Force Composition
- Independent Review Team
- Former AFA COB/President
- AFA Treasurer
- Former AEF Treasurer
- National Director/former RP
- Staff advisor
8Original Objectives
- Restructure AFA/AEF tax status to be more
inclusive and more efficient - Restructure AFA/AEF governance to focus on agile
policy and decision making with accountability to
the membership - Restructure the field organization to focus on
mission performance
9Additional Objectives
- Consider other key issues
- Membership decline
- Participation decline
- Membership/participation constraints
- Slow decision-making process
- Imbalance in election of Board members
- Constituent representation on Board
- High cost of governance
- Lack of mission execution in the field
- Underperforming chapters
- Lack of quality control over field operations
- Disconnect between reporting requirements and the
strategic plan
10Additional Objectives
- Seek desirable AFA characteristics
- Few or no constraints on membership and
participation - Broad ability to generate revenue
- Efficiency in all operations
- High visibility and awareness throughout the
country - Enhanced emphasis on the aerospace education
mission - Agile decision-making
- Significant involvement of and accountability to
the membership - Chapters focused on mission execution
11Additional Objectives
- Create an AFA that
- Demographically reflects a younger, more diverse,
and larger membership - Operates with an agile governing body that
facilitates rapid response to needs and increased
efficiency in the allocation of financial
resources - Has a field organization that actively executes
the AFA mission at home
12afa21 Progress and Report Reviews
- AFA and AEF EXCOMs
- Feb 05, Aug 05, Sep 05, Dec 05, Feb 06, Aug
06, Sep 06 - AFA and AEF BODs
- Feb 05, Sep 05, Dec 05, Feb 06, Sep 06
- IRT and afa21 Advisory Group
- Two full reviews by IRT Jul 05, Jul 06
- Advisory Group reviews throughout
- Region Presidents Reviews
- Aug 05, Apr 06, Aug 06
- AFA Nominating Committee
- Apr 06 (Nomination Process)
13afa21 Changes to Reports/Recommendations
- Examples
- Inputs on the Transition Constitution and OPM,
Permanent Constitution and OPM - Size and composition of the final governance
structure -- BOD - Need for and makeup of EXCOM
- Makeup, authority, and procedures for the Field
Council and Aerospace Education Council - Size and makeup of the Nominating Committee and
nomination process - Pace and details of the phase-in plan
- Field chapter reimbursement policies
- Field need for chapter newsletter
- Retained option for state president
- Chapter reporting procedures
14afa21 Task Force 2005 Approved Recommendations
- Recommendation 1 - decision
- Combine AFA and AEF into a single 501(c)(3)
organization and retain AFAs insurance and
building businesses in the 501(c)(19) effective
April 1, 2006 or upon receipt of a positive
ruling from the IRS after that date - Establish a transition governance structure by
combining the AFA and AEF Boards and delegating
authority to the Transition Board to approve the
necessary documents and transactions to effect
the tax status change, including a Transition
Constitution
15Implementation
- Transition Constitution - Approved Unanimously
by the Board in Dec 2005 - Adds IRS (c)(3) words
- Expands membership eligibility
- Incorporates AEF Officers and Trustees
- Creates Aerospace Education Council and
Development Committee - Transition OPM
- Adds VCOB duties/procedures
- Adds AEC DC duties/procedures
- Inserts AFAVBA accountability (resolutions)
- AFAVBA Constitution - Approved Unanimously by
the Board in Feb 2006 - Specifies membership IAW (c)(19) Board members
- Uses existing AFA Officers/ExCom/Board
- Provides for accountability (petition/resolutions
process) - IRS Approval Received February 27, 2006
- Corporate Documents Filed March 30, 2006 New
AFA April 1, 2006
16afa21 Task Force 2005 Approved Recommendations
- Recommendation 2 concept approval
- Establish a combined Board of Directors to govern
the combined AFA/AEF and the new AFAVB - Board size to be reduced to 16-18 members
- Regional representation to be considered further
- Revise the AFA/AEF committee structure
- Establish a Development Committee
- Designate the Constitution Committee as ad hoc
- Further evaluate other proposed committee actions
17afa21 Task Force2005 Approved Recommendations
- Recommendation 2 concept approval
- Establish a formal council structure consisting
of the Aerospace Education and Field Councils - Further define the size, make-up and level of
empowerment of these councils - Revise the AFA/AEF officer structure
- Chairman of the Board
- Vice Chairman of the Board Field Operations
(former National President - Vice Chairman of the Board Aerospace Education
(new position) - President (former Executive Director remains a
non-voting member of the Board) - Secretary/Treasurer (combine positions)
- Implement a Director Orientation and Training
Program
18afa21 Task Force2006 Recommendations
- Recommendation 1 decision
- Approve the permanent governance structure
established by the Board of Directors in February
2006 with the refinements proposed by the Task
Force - Revise the makeup and size of the Board over a
phased transition period - Up to 19 members six at large, three geographic,
four officers, three former AF leaders, up to
three Chairman appointees - Executive Committee increased the maximum size of
the Board from 18 to 19 and the number of
appointed Directors from two to three - Executive Committee approved the recommendation
of the Task Force to identify geographic
directors as Voting Directors and assign
Regions to three areas of the country for
nomination purposes all delegates vote for these
Directors - Executive Committee added option for COB to
appoint senior AF leader to the Board in the
event immediate past CSAF or CMSAF cannot serve.
19afa21 Task Force2006 Recommendations
- Establish the formal council structure consisting
of the Aerospace Education and Field Councils - Executive Committee approved the Task Force
recommendations concerning the size, composition,
responsibilities and review procedures for the
Field Council - Revise the committee structure
- Constitution becomes ad hoc Development
Committee established Executive Committee
retained, but is reduced in size - Revise the AFA/AEF officer structure
- Chairman of the Board
- Vice Chairman of the Board Field Operations
(former National President) - Vice Chairman of the Board Aerospace Education
(new position) - Secretary/Treasurer (combined position)
- Positions combined after completion of the term
of office of the next Secretary - President (former Executive Director)
20 Updates to February BOD Decisions Approved by
Executive Committee
- Refinements to
- Empowered Field Council
- Geographic Directors
21Other Feb 06 BOD Actions (Governance)
- Requested additional input from Region Presidents
on - Empowered Field Council
- Further definition of authority, membership,
meeting frequency, etc. - Geographic Directors
- Proper title?
- Qualifications, likely candidates
- AFA President Largent 2-8-06 message RPs
review and refine - Field Council (7 questions)
- Geographic Director (4 questions)
- afa21 Governance Team chair met with RPs in
April
22Questions to the RPs -- Field Council
- Changes to the authority of the FC regarding
policy? Areas that should be added/deleted? - Changes to the authority of the FC regarding
field ops/performance? Areas that should be
added/deleted? - Is 10-12 about the right size?
- Who should serve on the FC? (generated most
discussion) - Role of RPs in nominating FC members?
- How often should the FC meet?
- 7. Other comments regarding the FC?
23Recommended Changes Field Council
- Key change -- up to one half of the Field Council
could be sitting RPs in the last (2nd) year of
their terms - Remainder those with demonstrated field
leadership experience - Including former RPs and SPs
- Rationale
- RP and Field Council duties are fundamentally
different - RPs are busy, and duties likely to expand (e.g.,
region-state merger) - (At least two major tasks already assigned to
FC by EXCOM) - RPs in their first year have steep learning
curve - Field council of 14 - 18 is too large to be
effective, efficient - No other change to makeup, authority, or
operation but - BOD should thoroughly review Field Council
structure, activities, etc. after the first year
24Questions to the RPs Geographic Directors
- Changes to the nomination process for Geographic
Directors? - Changes to the qualifications for Geographic
Directors? - 3. What should they be called? Geographic?
Area? Region? Other? - 4. Other comments regarding Geographic
Directors?
25Recommended Changes Geographic Directors
- Constitution -- refer to nine elected directors
in in same manner as today - Voting Directors
- Elected by the delegates
- OPM contains the details
- Specify six are at-large, remaining represent
three defined eastern, central, and western areas
(roughly equal in membership) - Similar to afa 21 Governance Team Report Jan
06 - Further review/update if new region structure
approved - Elect three directors each year
- Two at-large, and one geographic
26Geographic Directors Current
Regions
Central (41,000 members) Regions North Central,
Midwest, Great Lakes, South Central, Texoma
East (43,000 members) Regions New England,
Northeast, Central East,
Southeast, Florida
West (31,000 members) Regions Northwest,
Far West, Rocky Mountain,
Southwest
27Geographic DirectorsProposed Regions
Central (41,500 members) Regions North Central,
Midwest, Great Lakes, South Central, Texas, Ohio
Valley, Upper Mid West, Oklar
East (42,500 members) Regions New England,
Northeast, Pennsylvania, Central East,
Southeast, Florida
West (31,000 members) Regions Northwest,
Far West, Rocky Mountain,
Southwest
28afa21 Task Force2006 Recommendations
- Permanent Governance Structure phase-in plan -
Ground Rules approved by the Executive Committee - Officers and Directors serving on October 1, 2006
will serve their full term on the Board - Phase in period begins in October 2006 and
continues until October 2009 - Order of election of the geographic Voting
Directors is determined by membership in the
Regions whose Directors are being phased off the
Board and the corresponding loss of seats - Largest loss of membership is Central in 2007,
then East in 2008, then West in 2009 - If an unexpected vacancy occurs during the
phase-in period, and the position is to be phased
off the Board, no replacement will be designated
if the position is to be retained, a replacement
will be named
29afa21 Task Force2006 Recommendations
- Permanent Governance Structure phase-in plan
schedule for Board of Directors approved by the
Executive Committee - Current Board consists of 50 Directors
- Five AFA Officers two former AEF Officers four
at large 14 Region six LDD three former AF
leaders one past AFA Chairman three Chairman
appointees six elected AEF Trustees six
appointed AEF Trustees - 2006 - Board reduced from 50 to 43
- Three LDD three Trustee one past COB removed
- 2007 - Board reduced from 43 to 30
- Four Region three LDD AEF Treasurer six
Trustee removed - One geographic Voting Director added
- 2008 - Board reduced from 30 to 23
- Five Region three Trustee former AEF President
removed - One at large Voting Director one geographic
Voting Director added - 2009 - Board reduced from 23 to 19
- Five Region AFA Secretary removed
- One at large Voting Director one geographic
Voting Director added
30afa21 Task Force2006 Recommendations
- Permanent Governance Structure phase-in plan
schedule for Executive Committee approved by the
Executive Committee - Current Executive Committee consists of 13
members - Five AFA officers two former AEF officers three
Chairman appointees two President appointees
one Vice Chairman appointee - 2006 Executive Committee reduced from 13 to
eight - Two former AEF officers two Chairman appointees
one VCFO appointee removed - 2007 Executive Committee remains at eight
- 2008 Executive Committee reduced from eight to
five - One Chairman appointee one VCFO appointee one
VCAE appointee removed - 2009 Executive Committee reduced from five to
four - Secretary position combined with Treasurer
position
31afa21 Permanent Governance Structure (PGS)
Documents
- As Approved by the August Executive Committee
- 11/24 August 2006
- Buck Buckwalter
- 401-207-9617
- buckwald_at_nwc.navy.mil
32Permanent Governance StructurePrinciples
- Minimum Changes
- Make only those changes necessary to Transition
Docs. - Keep basic governance procedures intact
- AFA Mission
- Preserve offices, functions, procedures, add FC,
AEC, DC - Keep focused, empowered governance
- Continuity
- Documents should be good for 2010
- Other changes likely (ideally through OPM
change)
33PGS Documents Approach
- Transition Constitution Baseline
- BoD-approved ? awaiting majority by Delegates
- Fundamental governance procedures remain intact
- Enable AFA Mission
- Establish Officers/BoD/ExCom/Councils/Committees
- Define only essential roles/relationships
- Keep Flexibility to Learn
- Broad wording in Constitution
- Specificity (but not too much) in OPM
34Authorities
- December 2005 Transition Constitution
- February 2006 board unanimously
- Approved 18-member BoD
- Established/Reaffirmed FC, AEC, DC
- Past CoB ex officio to BoD
- Executive Director to President
- AFA structure also governs AFAVBA
- Constitution Committee to ad hoc
- Strategic Planning Committee to CoB
- Executive Committee to National Officers only
- Transition Plan (43 30 23 19)
35Details Beyond February
- These are the easy ones ExCom action
- Ex. Com. phase-in ? 8 (2008) 5 (2009) 4
(2010) yes - Geographical Director election order C E W
yes - Vacancies on the Board (not to be filled) yes
- VCoBs duties parallel/equal who holds gavel?
yes - Observer vs. ex officio CoB to Nominating
Committee yes - Nominating Committee description yes
36PGS Constitution Major Changes
- Adds Two co-equal Vice Chairmen
- Provides for 18-person Board
- Adds Field Council and broadly specifies
Council/Committee/Staff Roles Relationships - Nominating Committee Configuration
37Trans. OPM Approach
- Transition OPM Baseline
- Convention governance procedures intact
- Officer, Board Council/Committees are biggest
changes - Implements PGS Constitution
- Dependent on consensus/decisions
- FC/AEC/DC procedures most contentious
- Nominating Committee revision
38Trans. OPM Major Changes
- Adds FC to VCoB-FO Duties
- Clarifies Budget Inputs from FC/AEC/DC
- Adds FC ( AEC DC) Procedures
- Establishes Geographic Areas and Order of
Director Elections
39AFAVBA Approach (no real changes)
- Transition AFAVBA Constitution Virtually
Unchanged - Officer names Find/Replace
- Specified as analogous roles
- AFA Governance Governs AFAVBA
40afa21 Permanent Governance Structure (PGS)
Documents
41afa21 Task ForceRecommendation 1
- Executive Committee
- Recommends Board Approval
42afa21 Task Force2006 Recommendations
- Recommendation 2 decision
- Revise the AFA nominating process
- Refine the responsibilities, appointment
procedures, and composition of the Nominating
Committee - Appoint Nominating Committee members at the
beginning of the AFA year and consider
longer-term appointments - IRT recommends two-year appointments consistent
with committee chair tenure - Establish an application process for candidates
for office - Establish guidelines for the Nominating Committee
- Executive Committee approved the recommendation
without a designated term length for committee
members
43Nomination Process
- Committee structure and procedures
- Reviewed by 2006 Nominating Committee
- Reviewed by afa 21 Advisory Group
- Reviewed by IRT
44 Proposed Nominating Committee
- All AFA members -- represent a broad
cross-section of the Association (11 members) - Three most recent COBs (immediate past COB --
Chair) - One selected by VCOB-FO, in consultation with the
FC - One selected by VCOB-AE, in consultation with the
AEC - Three representing the AFA field structure, one
each selected by the geo directors, in
consultation with the RPs - One representing the USAF (AD, ANG, Reserve, AF
civilian) - One representing USAF Veterans
- One representing Aerospace Industry
Appointed by Chairman of the Nominating
Committee, in consultation with the COB --
Approved by BOD
45Proposed Nominating Committee
- Checks and balances
- No one person controls majority of seats
- Field input through RPs and geographic directors
- Full BOD must approve the committee chair
nominees (3) - AFA COB serves as observer (non voting) in last
year of term - Importance of continuity
- Encourage reappointment of members (similar to
successful practice -- Finance Committee)
46Proposed Nomination Process AFA Officers and
Elected Directors
- Nominating committee responsibilities
- Recruit candidates with needed background and
capabilities - Evaluate determine the most qualified, best
suited - Select at least one nominee for the officer and
elected and elected director positions - Present the committee report to the Convention
Delegates - Committee formed on/about October 1st
- Meet as necessary through the year
47Proposed Nomination Process
- Application/nomination
- Broader publicity search procedures (Air Force
magazine, Newsline, web site, etc. - Begin earlier in the year
- Expanded definition of responsibilities and
expectations of BOD members - Duty of Care and Loyalty
- Time Commitment
- Other Support -- 501(c)(3) organization
- Individual can nominate themselves, or another
can nominate - Combine background, bio, agreement to serve
- Cut-off date for nominees from the floor/write-in
candidates
48Proposed Nomination Process
- Guidance to the Nominating Committee --
considerations - Capacity to govern with vision, think
strategically, understand the business of AFA and
AFAVBA - Consider special skills/qualifications (financial
management, educational expertise, political
access, fund raising, etc.) - Understanding of the AFA mission and vision, the
needs of AFA members, and the needs of the USAF
family - Cross-section of AFAs constituencies
- Experience at and ability to represent AFAs
grassroots - Geographic Directors must
- Have demonstrated field leadership experience
(chapter/state/region) - Be from that geographic area
49afa21 Task Force2006 Recommendations
- Revised Nominating Committee Structure Phase-in
Plan - Current Nominating Committee consists of 19
members - Five most recent Chairmen of the Board and a
representative from each Region - 2006 - NC reduced from 19 to 18
- Two former chairmen removed
- VC-AE appointment added
- 2007 - NC remains at 18
- Five Region representatives removed (Central
Area) - One VC-FC appointment one geographic area
representative, three Chairman appointments added
- 2008 - NC reduced from 18 to 14
- Five Region representatives removed (East Area)
- One geographic area representative added
- 2009 - NC reduced from 14 to 11
- Four Region representatives removed (West Area)
- One geographic representative added
50afa21 Task ForceRecommendation 2
- Executive Committee
- Recommends Board Approval
51afa21 Task Force2006 Recommendations
- Recommendation 3 decision
- Establish a new Region organizational structure
- Streamline the field organizational structure
through a merger of the Region and State
organizations - Increase the number of Regions from 14 to 18
- Provide funding support for Region operations
- Executive Committee approved recommendation with
an implementation plan to be developed by the
Field Council no later than June 1, 2007
52Intermediate Organization(Background)
- ORG Recommendation
- Eliminate the present State and Region
organizations as they are known and put in place
an intermediate organization between AFA National
and the field units - Why change? Is there a Problem?
- Yes there are insufficient AFA volunteer leaders
to effectively sustain todays field structure
and, as a result, it is slowly but steadily
declining - What can be changed so existing and future AFA
leadership can be used to the max?
53Leadership Deficiency Background
- AFA has a Serious Leadership Deficit
- Result of the Lack of Leadership Volunteers
(1997-2005) - Decrease in number of chapters by 38
- Decrease in number of state organizations by 15
- One state with no AFA activity (Maine)
- Increase in the number of chapters reporting
directly to Regions - HI, ID, WY, MT, NV, WV, CT, VT, NH
- Of these, two states with a sufficient number of
chapters have no state organization due to
insufficient leadership - WV and CT
- In Operating Year 2006, 15 more chapters were
closed - 24 additional chapters have no current rosters on
file for 2006
54Leadership Requirements
- Chapters (220)
- 220 x 4 elected officers 880 elected leaders
- Appointed officers (FOG recommends 7) 220 x 7
1540 appointed leaders - States (40)
- 40 x 4 elected officers 160 elected leaders
- Appointed officers (FOG recommends 6) 40 x 6
240 appointed leaders - Region (14)
- President 14 x 1 elected officer 14
elected leaders - Directors 14 x 1 elected Director 14 elected
leaders - National
- Elected Officers 4
- Directors At-large - 18 Leadership
Development - 6 - Plus Committee members at all levels
- Total 1096 Required 1780 Recommended 2876
55Team Recommendation
- Utilize existing and potential new leadership to
the maximum - Establish a new Region organizational structure
- Increase Regions from 14 to 18
- Increase is needed due to
- Chapters
- Members
- Geographic Span
- Potential Available Leadership
- Anticipated Increased Workload
- AND
- Eliminate State organizations
- Decrease States from 40 to 0
56Region Structures
- Present States Chapters Proposed States
Chapters - NEngl CT, MA, NH, RI, VT 13 New Engl
CT, MA, NH, RI, VT 13 - NE NJ, NY, PA 30 NE NJ, NY 18
- PA PA 12
- CE DC, DE, MD, VA, WV 18 CE DC, DE,
MD, VA 16 - SE GA, NC, SC 15 SE GA, NC,
SC 15 - FL FL 17 FL FL 17
- SC AL, AR, LA, MS, TN 17 SC AL,
MS, TN 12 - Texoma TX, OK 19 TX TX 15
- OKLAR OK, LA, AR 9
- GL IN, KY, MI, OH, 20 GL IN,
MI 12 - OValley OH, KY, WV 10
- NC MN, MT, ND, SC, WI 11 NC MN, MT,
ND, SD 8 - MW KS, MO, NE, IA, IL 16 MW KS,
MO, NE 8 - UMW IA, IL, WI 11
- SW AZ, NM, NV 8 SW AZ, NM, NV 8
- RM CO, UT, WY 8 RM CO, UT, WY 8
- NW AK, WA, OR, ID 8 NW AK, WA, OR,
ID 8 - FW CA, HI 20 FW CA, HI 20
57Rationale(Based on Existing Organization)
- Retain State geographic boundaries
- Initially splitting States might be too much to
swallow - Could be a possibility as chapters become
comfortable with setup - Pennsylvania
- Single State Reduces Northeast from 30 to 18
chapters - Ohio Valley
- Ohio, Kentucky, West Virginia
- Potential Strong Leadership in Ohio
- Proximity of WV and KY Chapters
- Upper Midwest
- Iowa, Illinois, Wisconsin
- Potential Strong Iowa and Illinois Leadership
- Proximity of Wisconsin Chapters
- OKLAR
- Oklahoma, Louisiana, Arkansas
- Potential Strong Oklahoma and Arkansas Leadership
58Result of Proposed Region Structure(Combined
with other AFA Reorganization)
- National
- Elected Officers 4
- Elected Directors 9
- Regions (18)
- 18 x 3 elected officers 54 elected leaders
- Appointed Region officers (FOG recommends 6) 18
x 6 108 appointed leaders - Chapters (220)
- 220 x 3 elected officers 660 elected leaders
- Appointed chapter officers (FOG recommends 7)
220 x 7 1540 appointed leaders - Total - 727 Required 1648 Recommended 2375
- Leadership Requirement reduced by 501!
59New Region Officers
- Elected President, Exec Vice President,
Secretary, Treasurer - Secretary-Treasurer could be combined at Region
Discretion - Elected or Appointed VP for Communications, L/D,
Membership, Communications, Government
Relations/Veterans Affairs, AE - At Region Discretion
- In Multi-State Regions, State President for each
State - Primarily responsible for State oversight and
Congressional liaison - Area VPs within States
- Large Geographic States
- Region Executive Committee
60New Region Elections
- Fourteen Region Presidents are currently elected
- However, Region composition may have changed
- No election required in unchanged Regions
- New England , SE, FL, SW, RM, NW, FW
- Election could be required in those Regions where
composition is changed - NE, CE, SC, GL, NC, MW, TX
- Presiding Region President notifies States and
hosts election - Four New Regions require elections
- PA, OKLAR, Ohio Valley, Upper Midwest
- Vice Chairman Field Operations notifies States
and hosts election meeting - All Region Appointed Officers are named
- Region Officer Rosters submitted NLT 14 days
following election
61New Region Responsibilities
- Submit Region Officer Roster and Quarterly
Activity Financial Reports - Oversee Chapters and Chapter Operations
- Anticipate Extensive Travel by Region Officers
- Endorse Chapter Reports
- Administer Region Awards Program
- Host at least One Region Face-to-Face Meeting per
Year - RP Given Widespread Flexibility (Could be During
Annual AFA Meeting) - Host at least Two Additional Meetings Per Year
- Complete Flexibility as to Format
- Face-to-Face
- Telecom
- State or Area Meetings with Common Agenda set by
RP Used for All - Region Officer Attending Helps Provide Continuity
62Regions Become Operational Units
- Handle Finances
- Establish Treasuries
- Region Constitutions and Charters are Required
- A Sample Constitution has been Prepared
- A Sample Charter has been Prepared
- Possible Ceremonial Region Charter
Presentations by National Officers - OPM FOG proposed changes have been prepared
63Region Financial Support
- Two Actions are Necessary
- Disbursement of Existing State Financial Assets
- Totally an Internal State Decision
- Money could go to
- Region
- Chapters
- National (for AE)
- Combination of all Three
- Any disbursement must comply with 501 (c) (3) IRS
criteria - Establishing a Region Financial Support Plan
64Existing State Financial Assets(as of September
30, 2005)
- AL 5,359 IN 8,206 NE 4,072 RI
1,343 - AK 1,975 IA 3,723 NJ 2,136 SC
855 - AZ 3,514 KS 3,862 NM 362 SD
2,854 - AR 997 LA 2,149 NY 6,022 TN
2,917 - CA 29,010 MD 1,536 NC 5,753 TX
7,654 - CO 8,519 MA 680 ND 1,954 UT
857 - DE 1,935 MI 4,511 OH 3,913 VA
8,351 - FL 29,620 MN 863 OK 1,423 WA
5,825 - GA 2,637 MS 3,763 OR 800 WI
2,146 - IL 9,405 MO 221 PA 6,369
65What if All State Money Went to Regions?
- Central East 11,822.00 Ohio Valley 3,913.00
- Far West 29,010.00 OKLAR 4,569.00
- Florida 29,620.00 Pennsylvania 6,369.00
- Great Lakes 12,717.00 Rocky Mountain
9,376.00 - Mid West 8,155.00 South Central 12,039.00
- New England 2,023.00 Southeast 9,245.00
- North Central 5,671.00 Southwest 3,876.00
- Northeast 8,158.00 Texas 7,654.00
- Northwest 8,600.00 Upper Mid West 15,274.00
- Regions would be in Great Shape!
66Region Financial Support
- Provide each Region with Support Payment RP
Allocation - Support Payment
- All Regions Receive 1,000 Per Quarter or 4,000
Per Year - Based on a Basic Budget
- Paid Following Region Meeting Report Requirements
- Regions Could Request 1,000 Additional with
Appropriate Justification - RP Allocation (As Requested, Based on RP Voucher
Submission) - Use Existing 2,400 Per Year Baseline
- Acknowledge One Size Does Not Fit All
- 2,400 Baseline Covers Regions with up to 10
Chapters and 1 State - Regions Receive an Additional 250 Per Year
- For each Chapter Over 10
- For each State Over 1
- Allocations are Reimbursed Following Submission
of Activity Report/Receipts - Allocation Funds Support Travel by Any Region
Officer
67Region Funding
- Region RP Allocation Support
Payment Total - New England 4,150.00 4,000.00
8,150.00 - Northeast 4,650.00 4,000.00 8,650.0
0 - Pennsylvania 2,900.00 4,000.00 6,900
.00 - Ohio Valley 2,900.00
4,000.00 6,900.00 - Central East 4,650.00 4,000.00 8,650
.00 - Southeast 4,150.00 4,000.00 8,150.0
0 - Florida 4,150.00 4,000.00 8,150.00
- Great Lakes 3,150.00 4,000.00 7,150.
00 - South Central 3,400.00 4,000.00 7,40
0.00 - North Central 3,150.00 4,000.00 7,15
0.00 - Upper Mid West 3,150.00
4,000.00 7,150.00 - Mid West 2,900.00 4,000.00 6,900.00
- OKLAR 2,900.00 4,000.00 6,900.00
- Texas 3,650.00 4,000.00 7,650.00
- Rocky Mountain 2,900.00
4,000.00 6,900.00 - Southwest 2,900.00 4,000.00 6,900.0
0 - Northwest 3,150.00 4,000.00 7,150.0
0 - Far West 5,150.00 4,000.00 9,150.00
68Summary of Region Funding
- Currently the 14 Region Presidents Allocations
total 33,600 - Currently at 100 State Payment, Max State
Support Payments total 133,051 - Total that could be paid to Region RPs and States
was 166,651 per year - Teams Proposal Eliminates One Layer of
Management - Teams Region Financial Plan Requires 135,950
per year - Teams Proposal Saves AFA 30,701 Per Year (as a
minimum) - Regions can Request Additional Funding with
Appropriate Justification - Overall funding further reduced due to no SP
meeting (training) requirement - Some additive due to 4 extra RPs requiring RP
meeting travel
69New Region Implementation
- Once Recommendation is approved, a Region
Implementation Date (RID) is established - RID establishes the timeline for implementation
new Regions stand up, State organizations stand
down, etc. - Recommend Field Council Action if recommendation
is approved in September 2006 - Field Council works issue
- Field Council report due June 1, 2007
70New Region Implementation
- AFA Staff
- Update Field Operations Guide (FOG) and
Operations Procedures Manual (OPM) to reflect
changes resulting from the adoption of
Recommendation 3 (AFA Staff) - Provide boiler plate regional constitution and
bylaws, grant charter for new regions (AFA
Staff) - Update other governing documents/directives or
provide interim guidance to reflect the
dissolution of the State organizations (e.g.
Strategic Plan, etc)
71New Region Implementation
- AFA
- Provide initial quarterly funding to new region
structure - Region
- Establish regular communication channels among
region chapters - Conduct Region meeting
- Form Executive Council
- Elect officers
- Appoint State Presidents, Area and other Vice
Presidents as required
72New Region Implementation
- Region (Cont)
- Adopt submits Region Constitution to AFA
- Replace State organization as operating unit
- Assumes approval authority and responsibilities
previously assigned to state organizations - Submit officer roster and quarterly activity and
financial reports to AFA - Coordinate with states for disbursement of state
funds - Develop and implement chapter visitation schedule
73New Region Implementation
- State
- Stand down as operating unit
- Disburse funds as determined by State EXCOM
- Informs Region and Chapters and submit report on
disbursement actions to National - Chapter
- Begin submitting annual plans and quarterly
reports through Region President
74New Region Implementation(Improved Mission
Effectiveness)
- Improves Field Efficiency of Operations
- Better uses existing and potential leaders within
18 Regions - Potential to take advantage of leaders from
multiple States - Chapters currently not having subject
assistance, i.e., AE, could receive help - Association would be enhanced
- Leadership Development could be Potentially
Enhanced
75afa21 Task ForceRecommendation 3
- Executive Committee
- Recommends Board Approval
76afa21 Task Force2006 Recommendations
- Recommendation 4 decision
- Refine some chapter operating procedures
- Implement use of reporting form to align with
strategic plan - Refine chapter performance requirements
- Revise newsletter requirements
- Redefine chapter quarterly support payment
procedures - Executive Committee approved recommendation with
staff action to phase-in changes during 2007 and
full implementation by January 1, 2008 Field
Council will monitor implementation
77Refined Chapter Performance Requirements(Focused
on Mission Performance)
- Most current chapter performance measures are
administrative - Rosters, Annual Reports, Quarterly Reports
- Attend State Meeting
- Conduct one Program
- Produce and Distribute at least 3 Quarterly
Newsletters - Exception - Membership recruiting
- Add 1 of baseline per quarter for 25 support
payment incentive - Only Qualitative measure
- Chapter mission performance should be tied to
Strategic Plan so should support payments - Currently 14 chapter Strategic Plan objectives
are available - Reporting needs to be streamlined and aligned
with plan
78Chapter PerformanceStreamlined Reporting
- Annual and Quarterly reporting requirements
unchanged, but forms are simplified and
streamlined - Quarterly Support Payments are Based on Reported
Performance - Admin square filling is no longer a factor
- Revised single reporting form developed
- All chapter Strategic Plan objectives depicted
- More need to be developed and added
- Use to submit Annual Plan (previous template
eliminated) - Use each quarter as Quarterly Report to report
accomplishments - Report provides sufficient data to eliminate
Region President semi-annual Strategic Plan
Status report
79Refined Chapter Performance Requirements
- Chapter Quarterly Support Payments continue, but
are tied to mission performance, not
administrative square filling - Rosters/Plans/Reports must be submitted before
any support payments are made - 25 incentive remains for meeting membership goal
of 1 growth - Quarterly Support payments are based on
fulfilling strategic objectives - A minimum number of Strategic Plan Objectives
must be met per quarter - Based on chapter size at beginning of operating
year - Chapter Size Small Medium Lrg/Extra Lrg
- (0-200) (201-400) (401)
- ( Strategic Objectives 1 2
3 50 of Base - to be met per quarter) 2 3
4 Final 50 of Base - These minimums are easily achievable by all
chapters, but do require some chapter activity
(mission performance) in order to get support
payments - Chapter newsletters are mandatory
- Chapters lose 50 of support payments if
newsletters are not produced
80Refined Chapter Performance Requirements(Summary)
- Chapter Performance/Support Payments are tied to
the Strategic Plan (Mission Performance) - Support payments calculations are still based on
membership numbers - Thats what we were told the field desires
- 25 incentive for membership goals continues
- Strategic Planning Committee, in conjunction with
Empowered Field Council, should develop
additional Chapter Objectives - New Simplified Report Form is Provided
- Region President semi-annual Strategic Plan
Status Report N/R
81Chapter Newsletters
- Last year FST recommended eliminating newsletters
- Reducing cost and admin workloads
- Recommendation was a proposed tradeoff to no
support payments - Support Payments are back in
- IRT Newsletters are a key to effective chapter
operation - FST needs to reconsider its recommendation
- FST reconsidered and proposes a revised concept
- Reduces Cost
- Reduces Admin workload
82Chapter Newsletters
- Simple one-page listing of chapter leadership,
upcoming events, and small description of past
activities meets minimum requirement - Chapters producing larger products are encouraged
to continue - Propose newsletter distribution be revised
- Once per year each chapter make concerted effort
to determine which members want to hear from the
chapter - Contact 100 of chapter by some means
- Request return notification if member wants
quarterly newsletter - Request updated email address or request for
snail-mail product - Remaining quarterly newsletters are sent only to
respondents (email or snail) - Saves admin workload and expense
- Members not responding will not hear from chapter
until next year - But, Chapters failing to meet 3 newsletter per
year requirement reduces their support payments
by 50
83Chapter Support Payments
- Quarterly Chapter Support Payments Continue
- No change in quarterly Chapter Support Payment
calculation - All admin requirements must be submitted prior to
any payment - Roster, Annual Plans, Quarterly Reports
- 100 Payment is made (125 w/1 increased
membership) - 25 Increments are eliminated except Membership
- 25 Membership incentive is a Strategic Plan
Objective - But, Chapter Support Payment Strategic Objective
limitation, as briefed, is applied - And, Newsletter limitation, as briefed, is applied
84New Chapter Operating Procedures--
Implementation --
- Changes to Reporting Procedures, Performance
Measurements and Newsletter Requirements - To be implemented as directives and
administrative support capabilities are made
ready and provided to the chapters (AFA Staff) - Task Field Council to Monitor Implementation
85afa21 Task ForceRecommendation 4
- Executive Committee
- Recommends Board Approval
86afa21 Task Force2006 Recommendations
- Recommendation 5 concept approval
- Further develop the concept to change AFAs
Voting Method - Provide all members the opportunity to vote for
officers and directors - Revise the national convention approach to
support this change - Executive Committee decided to defer further
action on this recommendation and allow the
membership to focus on the more immediate issues
of a permanent governance structure, a revised
nominating process and field reorganization
87afa21 Task Force Working Issues
- Tax Status
- Continue to monitor tax status change
implementation (Red Team approach) - Governance
- Continue to work on the concept of changing AFAs
Voting Method - Monitor permanent governance structure
implementation (Red Team approach) - Review of Field Council operations after first
year - Field Structure
- Monitor development of phase-in plan for new
regions by Field Council - Monitor phase-in of new chapter operating
procedures - Monitor full development and implementation of
region realignment (Red Team approach) - Develop concepts to address long-term issues
pertaining to the field organizational structure,
enhanced mission execution, and performance based
financial support
88afa21 Permanent Governance Structure (PGS)
Documents
89PGS Constitution ? VCoB-FO
- Section 2. Vice Chairman of the Board for Field
Operations (VCoB-FO). The VCoB-FO shall exercise
the powers and perform the duties assigned the
office by the Constitution and the Operations and
Procedures Manual serve as Chairman of the Field
Council to guide overall direction of the
Associations field activities articulate the
Associations established policies and
objectives conduct the business sessions of the
National Convention preside at the National
Convention, Board, and Executive Committee
meetings in the absence of the Chairman of the
Board and serve as a nonvoting member of those
committees and councils for which appointment
authority exists unless otherwise provided in the
Constitution.
90PGS Constitution ? VCoB-AE
- Section 3. Vice Chairman of the Board for
Aerospace Education (VCoB-AE). The VCoB-AE shall
exercise the powers and perform the duties
assigned the office by the Constitution and the
Operations and Procedures Manual serve as
Chairman of the Aerospace Education Council to
guide overall direction of the Associations
educational mission articulate the Associations
established policies and objectives preside at
the National Convention, Board, and Executive
Committee meetings in the absence of the Chairman
of the Board and VCoB-FO and serve as a
nonvoting member of those committees and councils
for which jurisdiction exists unless otherwise
provided in the Constitution.
91PGS Constitution ? The Board
- A. Voting Directors.
- (1) The nine (9) directors elected at the
National Convention of the Association for a term
of three (3) years with one-third (1/3) being
elected each year. Two (2) directors shall be
elected on an at-large basis from across the
Association and one (1) director shall be elected
on a geographical basis each year. Geographic
areas and order of election shall be as defined
by the Board of Directors and reflected in the
Operations and Procedures Manual. Should a
National Convention be cancelled, elections shall
be authorized as defined in the Operations and
Procedures Manual. -
- Section 4. Vacancies. In case of a vacancy among
the elected or appointed directors, for any
cause, the position shall be filled by
appointment by the Chairman of the Board until
the next National Convention, at which time it
shall be filled by special election by the
delegates. Directors so elected shall serve only
until the end of the term of the director whom
they replaced. The sole exception to this
provision shall be in the case of those
Leadership Development or Regional Directors
appointed or elected prior to 1 October 2006
under the provisions of any earlier Constitution.
Vacancies in these offices will not be replaced
as the Association transitions to the governance
structure enacted by this document.
92PGS Constitution ? The Field Council
- C. Field Council (FC). The membership of AFA
Field Council shall consist of at least eight (8)
persons. These members shall be appointed by the
Vice Chairman of the Board for Field Operations
in consultation with the Chairman of the Board
and the Region Presidents and confirmed by the
Board of Directors. The Vice Chairman of the
Board for Field Operations chairs the FC to guide
overall direction and will be responsible for
developing programs, policy, goals, and fiscal
guidance for the Associations field activities.
The FC will work closely with the Aerospace
Education Council and other committees and may
establish and populate subcommittees as
appropriate.
93PGS Constitution ? The Aerospace Education
Council
- D. Aerospace Education Council (AEC). The
membership of the Aerospace Education Council
shall consist of a Chairman and at least six (6)
persons, two (2) of whom must be voting directors
of the Association. These members shall be
appointed by the Vice Chairman of the Board for
Aerospace Education in consultation with the
Chairman of the Board and confirmed by the Board
of Directors. The Vice Chairman of the Board for
Aerospace Education chairs the AEC to guide
overall direction and will be responsible for
developing programs, policy, goals, and fiscal
guidance for the Associations educational
activities. The AEC will work closely with the
Field Council and other committees to ensure the
Associations educational programs are being
aggressively executed in the field and may
establish and populate subcommittees as
appropriate. Development Committee to ensure fund
raising goals will support the Associations
educational programs.
94PGS Constitution ? The Development Committee
- E. Development Committee. The membership of the
Development Committee shall consist of a Chairman
and at least six (6) persons, two (2) of whom
must be voting directors of the Association. The
Development Committee shall work closely with the
FC, AEC, and Association staff to acquire funds
to support the Associations mission.
95PGS Constitution ? The FC/AEC/DC (cont.)
- Section 6. Responsibilities. Each committee or
council shall be charged with the
responsibilities assigned to it by the Operations
and Procedures Manual and the appointing
authority. Additionally, the Field Council (FC)
provides a direct link between field leaders and
the Board of Directors on matters affecting field
operations and shall be empowered to develop
programs, policy recommendations, goals, and
fiscal guidance for the Associations field
activities in accordance with th