Title: MAKING CHOICES TO PROTECT OUR WELFARE FUND BENEFITS
1MAKING CHOICES TO PROTECT OUR WELFARE FUND
BENEFITS
- September, 2002
- September, 2002
2Facing an operating deficit of 10 million by
2004 -- a crisis that has been building for 10
years -- the Welfare Fund Trustees are working
aggressively to restore the Funds financial
health.The crisis is a consequence of
- Skyrocketing Rx cost increases
- Underfunding of benefits
- Past failures to make necessary changes.
- We are now taking actions that should have been
taken years ago.
3Our financial problems are part of a national
health care crisis and a political climate that
is hostile to working people and their unions.
The long-term solution is political. But we have
to find some short-term solutions now.
-
- YOUR RESPONSES ARE CRUCIAL TO THE TRUSTEES
DECISIONS. - The presentation that follows is designed to
help you to respond.
4WF crisis part of US trend
- US health expenditures increased 69 in the
1990s. - Per capita spending was 2,738 at the beginning
of decade 4,637 at the end, a 69 increase.
5Rx spending increased even faster and the WF kept
pace,
- US PSC Rx costs climbing steadily
- In 2001
- PSC actives ( dependents) spent 555 per person
- PSC retirees ( dependents) spent 1,480 per
person
6making the WF crisis worse, as prescription drugs
dominate WF expenses.
- Rx spending was 55 of Fund benefit spending in
2001. - Dental services were 19
- Adjunct basic health insurance was 13.
7The new collective bargaining agreement provides
additional resources.
- 350 in cash payments for each participant.
- 200 per participant increase in rate, paid
annually. - Additional contributions for adjunct health
benefits. - A shift of some drug costs from the Fund to City
health insurance plans (the PICA drugs). - Retiring 2.5 million debt owed by WF to CUNY and
providing 1 million of that amount for a new
employees assistance program for a net savings
of 1.5 million. - But even with these new resources, we are still
facing a crisis . . .
8The CPAs balance sheet tells the story.
-
- The accountants balance sheet shows the Fund
lost 2.6 million in FY 2001..
9Most of the WF expenses are for active and
retired full-time faculty staff.
-
- 86 of benefits expenses are for full-time
active retired participants - 14 is spent for basic health benefits for
adjuncts and EOC employees.
10Using WF experience, the Segal Co., the Funds
consultant, projects deeper deficits.
-
- The projections assume
- No increase in membership
- No increase in contributions beyond the current
contractual agreements. - WF Rx benefits will continue to mirror US trends.
- Dental, major med, and other insurance will
remain in place and increase modestly.
11The Funds reserves are projected to be 2
million at the start of FY 2004.
12The WF reserve fund will be completely depleted
in FY2004.
- The deficit will nearly double each year and
reach 10.1 million in FY 2004
13The gap between income expense for actives
will grow 5x.
- In 2002, the gap is 90 per active WF
participant. - In 2004, the gap is projected to be 478 per
active participant.
14The gap is already much larger for retirees and
will more than double between 2002 and 2004.
- In 2002, the gap is already 527 per retired
participant - In 2004, the gap is projected to be 1225 per
retired participant.
15Every month of inaction increases deficits
decreases assets.
16The WF Trustees have set the goal of saving 6
million a year by restructuring the Funds
benefits
- Process used to arrive at this conclusion
- 1. Extensive review of the Funds finances and
benefit structure by Fund Trustees and
administrative staff. - 2. Advice of the Funds consultants, The Segal
Co., and the Funds legal counsel, Spivack and
Lipton (both leading specialists in the
field). - 3. Six months of intensive study by Strategic
Planning Task Force to develop proposals. - 4. Consultation with WF Advisory Council, the
PSC Executive Council and members with
expertise in health care finance.
17Guiding principles for benefit restructuring
adopted by the Trustees
- Maintain substantial equality of benefits between
active and retiree members, although
out-of-pocket costs may differ. - Make the impact of the changes on our sickest and
most plan-dependent members the least burdensome.
18In June 2002, the Trustees made the first changes
in benefits and set in motion plans for future
restructuring.
- 2. Dental Plan
- through an RFP, seek alternative providers and
modes of delivering benefits - 3. Life insurance
- through an RFP, seek an insurer that will offer
enhanced benefits - and access for all in a voluntary program
- 4. Major Medical/ Catastrophic
- through an RFP, seek an insurer that will offer
plan using both WF voluntary benefits
- 1. Prescription drug
- eliminate coverage where there are
over-the-counter counterparts (benefit change) - mandate mail order at 2nd refill (benefit change)
- coverage of estrogen for birth control (benefit
enhancement) - through an RFP seek a benefits manager that will
offer the best possible discounts.
19Rx benefit changes already made will reduce
expenses significantly.
- Eliminate OTC Counterparts
- Not covering drugs, such as Zantac ibuprofen
that are also available over the counter - save
439,000
- Mandatory Mail Order at 2nd refill
- Requiring mail order for drugs for chronic
conditions (e.g. hypertension) - save 170,000 - Coverage for Estrogen
- New benefit, including birth control pills -
cost 258,000 -
20Seek a new lower-cost prescription drug manager
(PBM) with no change in benefits.
- Net savings estimated between 1.3 million and
1.8 million.
21Such changes can add up,
- 439,000
- 170,000
- - 258,000
- 1,800,000
- 2,151,000
But it isnt enough.
22To come closer to breaking even, more changes are
being considered.
- 1. Prescription drugs
- 3-tier formulary (co-pay the greater of 5/20
for drugs in formulary with mandatory generic
price for equivalents when available, co-pay the
greater of 20/20 for non-formulary drugs)
save 800,000 - 100/family deductible for retirees only save
352,000 - 3-tier formulary with 10/20 copay structure for
formulary and 25/20 co-pay for non-formulary -
save an additional 433,000. - Reduce annual cap from 10,000 to 5,000 - save
155,000. - Mandated formulary for certain chronic diseases
(for example, ulcer program save 278,000). - Reduce annual cap from 10,000 to 2,500 per
family -- save 1.8 million.
23Each of these elements could be a building block
of a restructured benefit package.
242. Dental Plan To achieve savings from the
dental plan address dissatisfaction, the
Trustees must be clear about what the members
most want.
25Changing life insurance and supplemental major
medical coverage will achieve additional savings.
- 3. Life Insurance
- through competitive bidding, reduce cost of
current coverage - save 320,000 - eliminate current coverage and replace with
low-cost- to-member alternative - save 600,000
- create a WF death benefit of 5000 - cost
125,000 - 4. Supplemental Major Medical
- Consolidate major medical catastrophic
coverages with cost-sharing between Fund and
member -- could produce as much as 500,000 in
savings to the Fund.
26Questions to start our discussion
- Do you agree with the guiding principles
formulated by the trustees? - Which benefits are most important to you?
- What changes would you recommend?
- Are there other options that should be considered
to save Fund resources? - How much of the next collective bargaining
settlement should be devoted to the Welfare Fund? - How can you influence national and state health
care and prescription drug policies? - Can we make changes in our own lives and use of
prescription drugs to promote health and bring
down Plan costs?
27Next Steps Dialogue Action
- Dialogue with membership - Sept/Oct, 02
- Chapter meeting and discussions Sept/Oct, 02
- Contract Benefit Survey Sept/Oct, 02
- Welfare Fund Advisory Council meeting - End of
Oct. 02 - Welfare Fund Trustee decisions - early Nov. 02
- Implement changes - beginning Jan. 03