linda1'ppt - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 68
About This Presentation
Title:

linda1'ppt

Description:

Angle Pull. TOP VIEW. Tension. Tension. Networking. the WorldTM ... Unbalanced pulls. Unequal spans. Deadends. Simultaneous Application of Loads. Networking ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:84
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 69
Provided by: lindaga8
Category:
Tags: linda1 | ppt | pulls | rated

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: linda1'ppt


1
NESC 2002 Overhead Lines-Strength Loading
IEEE
Larry Slavin Telcordia Technologies, Inc. July
18, 2001
2
NESC 2002Strength Loading Review
  • NESC 1997
  • NESC 2002 (Resolved/Final)
  • Comparison

3
NESC 1997Winter Storm
  • Combined Ice and Wind Loading (Rule 250B)
  • Heavy (0.5-in. radial ice, 40 mph wind, 0F)
  • Medium (0.25-in. radial ice, 40 mph wind, 15F)
  • Light (0-in. radial ice, 60 mph wind, 30F)

4
(No Transcript)
5
NESC 1997Summer Storm
  • Extreme Wind (Structures gt60 ft Height) (Rule
    250C)
  • 50 year recurrence (0.02 annual probability)
  • Fastest-mile average speed
  • Exposure C (open terrain)
  • 33 ft. elevation

6
Extreme Wind Map Rule 250C
7
Conductor Loading
  • Combined Ice and Wind, or Extreme Wind
  • Vertical weight of bare conductor plus ice
  • Horizontal force of wind on conductor plus ice
  • Added constant to resultant (for tension, not
    sag)
  • Corresponding temperature (0F, 15F, 30F 60F)

8
Conductor Loading
ice
wind force
conductor
weight
9
Loads on Line Supports
  • Vertical Loads
  • Dead weight of bare supports and conductors, ...
  • Ice load on conductors and wires (not supports)
  • Transverse Loads
  • Wind force on bare structures (without ice)
  • Wind force on ice-covered conductors and wires

10
Loads on Line Supports
Tension
Transverse
Vertical
TOP VIEW
Tension
Angle Pull
11
Loads on Line Supports
  • Angles
  • Unbalanced tension at corners
  • Longitudinal Loads
  • Unbalanced pulls
  • Unequal spans
  • Deadends
  • ..
  • Simultaneous Application of Loads

12
Strength Overload FactorsSupports (Structures,
Guys, )
  • Load x Overload Factor ? Strength x Strength
    Reduction Factor
  • Overload Factor (typ.) ? 1
  • Strength Reduction Factor (typ.) ? 1
  • e.g., 1.0 for 50 year extreme event loadings,
    or some components (conductors, )
  • e.g., 1.0 for metal

13
Overload Factors
  • Grade of Construction
  • Grade B
  • Grade C
  • Combined Ice-Wind vs. Extreme Wind
  • Loads
  • Vertical
  • Transverse Loads
  • Longitudinal
  • Materials
  • Wood
  • Metal

14
Strength (Reduction) Factors
  • Grade of Construction
  • Grade B
  • Grade C
  • ..
  • Combined Ice-Wind vs. Extreme Wind
  • Materials
  • Wood
  • Metal
  • Concrete

15
Conductor/Messenger Tension
  • Combined Ice-Wind (60 rated strength)
  • Extreme Wind (80 rated strength)
  • Criteria applied with Overload Factor 1.0
  • Initial unloaded tension (60F) ? 35 rated
    strength
  • Final unloaded tension (60F) ? 24 rated
    strength

16
Insulators
  • Combined Ice and Wind
  • Cantilever (40 rated strength)
  • Compression (50 rated strength)
  • Tension (50 rated strength)
  • Criteria applied without overload factors
  • Extreme Wind
  • Proper allowance should be made

17
NESC 2002
Strength and Loading Requirements (Modifications)
18
Status of MajorChange Proposals
  • Eliminate 60 ft. exemption for Extreme Wind (CP
    2151)
  • Rejected (WG 5.8 to study for 2007)
  • Introduce New Combined Ice and Wind Map as
    alternative to present Storm Loading Map, Rule
    250B (CP 2309)
  • Rejected (map incomplete, premature, inaccurate?)

19
Status of MajorChange Proposals (Contd)
  • New Materials Fiber-Reinforced Composite Poles
    (CP 2219, )
  • Rejected (insufficient material data)
  • Major Revision of Strength Loading Sections 25
    - 27 (CP 2372)
  • Rejected (WG 5.2 to continue developing for 2007)

20
Status of MajorChange Proposals (Contd)
  • Uniform Treatment of Wood, Metal, Concrete
    (Reinforced, Prestressed)
  • Consistent Overload Factors (CP 2233)
  • Accepted
  • All structures without conductors subject
  • to Extreme Wind (CP 2306)
  • Accepted

21
Consistent Overload Factors(Wood, Metal,
Concrete)
22
Status of MajorChange Proposals (Contd)
  • New Extreme Wind Map (CP 2363)
  • Accepted
  • New Calculation Procedure

23
New Extreme Wind Map Calculation Procedure
  • ASCE 7-98 Extreme Wind Map
  • 50 year recurrence (0.02 annual probability)
  • Gusts (3-second average)
  • Open terrain
  • 33 ft. elevation
  • Includes Gust Response Factors
  • Height
  • Span length

24
New Extreme Wind Map Calculation Procedure
  • Retains 60 ft. Exemption (Distribution)

25
1997 Extreme Wind Map Rule 250C
26
New (2002) Extreme Wind Map(3 Second Gusts)
Nominal speed, 33 ft. above ground, Exposure C
27
New Extreme Wind Map Calculation Procedure
  • NESC-1997
  • load (lbs) 0.00256 (Vmph)2 x shape factor x
    projected area (ft2)
  • where Vmph fastest-mile (Figure 250-2, 1997)
  • NESC-2002
  • load (lbs) 0.00256 (Vmph)2 x shape factor x
    projected area (ft2)
  • x kz x GRF x I
  • where Vmph 3-sec. gust (New Extreme Wind
    Map),
  • kz velocity pressure exposure coefficient,
  • GRF gust response factor, and
  • I importance factor (1.0)

28
New Extreme Wind Map Calculation Procedure
(Contd)
  • Structure kz 2.01 x (0.67h/900)(2/9.5), 60 ft
    ? h ? 900 ft
  • where h height structure (ft)
  • Wire kz 2.01 x (h/900)(2/9.5), 33 ft ? h
    ? 900 ft
  • where h height attachment point (ft)
  • minimum kz 0.85

29
New Extreme Wind Map Calculation Procedure
(Contd)
  • Structure GRF 1 2.7Es(Bs)0.5/kv2
  • Wire GRF 1 2.7Ew(Bw)0.5/kv2
  • where
  • Es 0.346 x 33/(0.67h)1/7
  • Ew 0.346 x 33/h1/7
  • Bs 1/1 0.375h/220
  • Bw 1/1 0.8L/220
  • kv 1.43
  • L Design Wind Span (ft)

30
New Extreme Wind Map Calculation Procedure
(Contd)
Gust Response Factor, GRF Tabulated Values
(Structure and Wire)

31
NESC
NESC 2002 vs. NESC 1997 (Comparison)
32
NESC 2002 vs. NESC 1997 Comparison
  • Reduced Overload Factor for Metal,
    Prestressed-Concrete
  • Rule 250B (Combined Ice Wind)
  • Transverse wind
  • Grade C (not crossing)
  • 1.75 vs. previous 2.20
  • Affects distribution and transmission
  • Extreme Wind Loading (Rule 250C)
  • 3-sec. gust map calculation procedure
  • Affects transmission design only (gt60 ft.)

33
NESC 2002 vs. NESC 1997 Comparison (Contd)
  • Distribution Lines (Combined Ice-Wind)
  • Wood, Reinforced-Concrete
  • no change
  • Metal, Prestressed-Concrete
  • reduced design load (transverse, Grade C, )

34
NESC 2002 vs. NESC 1997 Comparison (Contd)
  • Transmission Lines
  • Wood, Reinforced-Concrete
  • no change in Combined Ice/Wind design loads
  • new Extreme Wind design loads
  • Metal, Prestressed-Concrete
  • reduced Combined Ice/Wind design loads
    (transverse, Grade C, ) -- 0.80 factor
  • new Extreme Wind design loads

35
Transmission LinesStructures - Combined Ice
Wind
Transverse Wind Load
36
Transmission LinesStructures - Extreme Wind
Transverse Wind Load
37
Transmission LinesStructures - Extreme Wind
Transverse Wind Load
38
Transmission LinesConductors - Combined Ice
Wind
Transverse Wind Load
39
Transmission Lines Conductors - Extreme Wind
Transverse Wind Load
40
Transmission LinesConductors
  • Examples
  • (Transverse Wind Load)

Woo
41
Transmission Lines - ExamplesStorm Loadings
Selected
42
Transmission LinesConductors
  • Heavy Storm District
  • (Wood)

Woo
43
Wood Transmission Heavy Storm Area, Grade B,
250 x 500
250B (ice wind) -1997
250B (ice wind) -2002
250C (extreme wind) -1997
250C (extreme wind) -2002
44
Wood Transmission Heavy Storm Area, Grade B,
100 x 2000
250B (ice wind) -1997
250B (ice wind) -2002
250C (extreme wind) -1997
250C (extreme wind) -2002
45
Wood Transmission Heavy Storm Area, Grade B, 50
x 2000
250B (ice wind) -1997
250B (ice wind) -2002
250C (extreme wind) -1997
250C (extreme wind) -2002
46
Wood Transmission Heavy Storm Area, Grade C,
250 x 500
250B (ice wind) -1997
250B (ice wind) -2002
250C (extreme wind) -1997
250C (extreme wind) -2002
47
Wood Transmission Heavy Storm Area, Grade C,
100 x 2000
250B (ice wind) -1997
250B (ice wind) -2002
250C (extreme wind) -1997
250C (extreme wind) -2002
48
Wood Transmission Heavy Storm Area, Grade C, 50
x 2000
250B (ice wind) -1997
250B (ice wind) -2002
250C (extreme wind) -1997
250C (extreme wind) -2002
49
Transmission LinesConductors
  • Heavy Storm District
  • (Steel)

Woo
50
Steel Transmission Heavy Storm Area, Grade B,
250 x 500
250B (ice wind) -1997
250B (ice wind) -2002
250C (extreme wind) -1997
250C (extreme wind) -2002
51
Steel Transmission Heavy Storm Area, Grade B,
100 x 2000
250B (ice wind) -1997
250B (ice wind) -2002
250C (extreme wind) -1997
250C (extreme wind) -2002
52
Steel Transmission Heavy Storm Area, Grade B,
50 x 2000
250B (ice wind) -1997
250B (ice wind) -2002
250C (extreme wind) -1997
250C (extreme wind) -2002
53
Steel Transmission Heavy Storm Area, Grade C,
250 x 500
250B (ice wind) -1997
250B (ice wind) -2002
250C (extreme wind) -1997
250C (extreme wind) -2002
54
Steel Transmission Heavy Storm Area, Grade C,
100 x 2000
250B (ice wind) -1997
250B (ice wind) -2002
250C (extreme wind) -1997
250C (extreme wind) -2002
55
Steel Transmission Heavy Storm Area, Grade C,
50 x 2000
250B (ice wind) -1997
250B (ice wind) -2002
250C (extreme wind) -1997
250C (extreme wind) -2002
56
Transmission LinesConductors
  • Medium Storm District
  • (Wood)

Woo
57
Wood Transmission Medium Storm Area, Grade B,
250 x 500
250B (ice wind) -1997
250B (ice wind) -2002
250C (extreme wind) -1997
250C (extreme wind) -2002
58
Wood Transmission Medium Storm Area, Grade B,
100 x 2000
250B (ice wind) -1997
250B (ice wind) -2002
250C (extreme wind) -1997
250C (extreme wind) -2002
59
Wood Transmission Medium Storm Area, Grade C,
250 x 500
250B (ice wind) -1997
250B (ice wind) -2002
250C (extreme wind) -1997
250C (extreme wind) -2002
60
Wood Transmission Medium Storm Area, Grade C,
100x2000
250B (ice wind) -1997
250B (ice wind) -2002
250C (extreme wind) -1997
250C (extreme wind) -2002
61
Transmission LinesConductors
  • Medium Storm District
  • (Steel)

Woo
62
Steel Transmission Medium Storm Area, Grade B,
250 x 500
250B (ice wind) -1997
250B (ice wind) -2002
250C (extreme wind) -1997
250C (extreme wind) -2002
63
Steel Transmission Medium Storm Area, Grade B,
100x2000
250B (ice wind) -1997
250B (ice wind) -2002
250C (extreme wind) -1997
250C (extreme wind) -2002
64
Steel Transmission Medium Storm Area, Grade C,
250 x 500
250B (ice wind) -1997
250B (ice wind) -2002
250C (extreme wind) -1997
250C (extreme wind) -2002
65
Steel Transmission Medium Storm Area, Grade C,
100x2000
250B (ice wind) -1997
250B (ice wind) -2002
250C (extreme wind) -1997
250C (extreme wind) -2002
66
Transmission LinesConductors
  • Light Storm District
  • (Wood)

Woo
67
Wood Transmission Light Storm Area, Grade B,
250 x 500
250B (ice wind) -1997
250B (ice wind) -2002
250C (extreme wind) -1997
250C (extreme wind) -2002
68
Wood Transmission Light Storm Area, Grade B,
100 x 2000
250B (ice wind) -1997
250B (ice wind) -2002
250C (extreme wind) -1997
250C (extreme wind) -2002
69
Wood Transmission Light Storm Area, Grade C,
250 x 500
250B (ice wind) -1997
250B (ice wind) -2002
250C (extreme wind) -1997
250C (extreme wind) -2002
70
Wood Transmission Light Storm Area, Grade C,
100 x 2000
250B (ice wind) -1997
250B (ice wind) -2002
250C (extreme wind) -1997
250C (extreme wind) -2002
71
Transmission LinesConductors
  • Light Storm District
  • (Steel)

Woo
72
Steel Transmission Light Storm Area, Grade B,
250 x 500
250B (ice wind) -1997
250B (ice wind) -2002
250C (extreme wind) -1997
250C (extreme wind) -2002
73
Steel Transmission Light Storm Area, Grade B,
100 x 2000
250B (ice wind) -1997
250B (ice wind) -2002
250C (extreme wind) -1997
250C (extreme wind) -2002
74
Steel Transmission Light Storm Area, Grade C,
250 x 500
250B (ice wind) -1997
250B (ice wind) -2002
250C (extreme wind) -1997
250C (extreme wind) -2002
75
Steel Transmission Light Storm Area, Grade C,
100 x 2000
250B (ice wind) -1997
250B (ice wind) -2002
250C (extreme wind) -1997
250C (extreme wind) -2002
76
NESC
NESC 2002 vs. NESC 1997 (Conclusions)
77
NESC 2002 vs. NESC 1997 Conclusions
  • Distribution Design Loads
  • Wood ? Same
  • Reinforced-concrete ? Same
  • Metal (Grade C) ? Reduced in Grade C
  • Prestressed-concrete (Grade C) ?Reduced
    in Grade C

78
NESC 2002 vs. NESC 1997 Conclusions
  • Transmission design loads depend upon combination
    of parameters
  • - geographic area
  • - grade of construction
  • - material
  • - conductor diameter
  • - attachment height
  • - span length

79
NESC
NESC 2007 (?) Integrated Re-Write of Strength
Loading
80
Integrated Re-Write of Strength Loading
  • Based upon CP 2372 (Rejected for NESC-2002)
  • Sags and Clearances also impacted
  • Modified version proposed for NESC-2007 Edition
  • To be available on NESC website (when?)
  • Response form provided for reporting results of
    application to actual cases!

81
Integrated Re-Write of Strength Loading
  • New Extreme Wind Map and wind pressure
    calculation procedure
  • (Rule 250C, NESC-2002)
  • Upgraded ASCE 7-98 Combined Ice and Wind Map
  • Replaces Fig.250-1 Loading Districts
  • Construction and Maintenance Loads

82
Integrated Re-Write of Strength Loading
  • All loads apply to all structures independent of
    height, but ...
  • Possible wind reduction if urban/suburban and ?
    60 ft. (Ref Working Group 5.8)
  • Ice thickness reduction for Grade C
  • Velocity pressure exposure coefficient kz and
    gust response factor GRF (functions of height and
    span length) applied to wind pressure for both
    storm loads

83
Integrated Re-Write of Strength Loading
  • Consistent Overload and Strength Factors
  • Alternative (Option) to Present (NESC-2002)
    Method ?

84
Integrated Re-write of Strength Loading (Contd)
  • Results from actual applications (as reported on
    response forms) will be considered in developing
    final proposal for 2007 Edition
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com