AngloAmerican Democracy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

AngloAmerican Democracy

Description:

What is the balance between state and individual? How is economic ... Deliberately keeping second chamber impotent? Deliberately keeping local government weak? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:66
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: watu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: AngloAmerican Democracy


1
Anglo-American Democracy
  • Is there such a thing?

2
Regimes of the Modern World
  • Claires Criteria for a new typology
  • Who rules?
  • How is compliance assured?
  • Is government centralised or fragmented?
  • How is power acquired?
  • What is the balance between state and individual?
  • How is economic life organised?
  • Is the regime stable?

3
What have they in common?
  • White
  • Anglo-Saxon
  • Protestant
  • Two-party dominant
  • First past the post electoral systems
  • Sea Traders so sea empires not land
  • Island isolationism

4
What separates them?
  • Federalism
  • Monarchy
  • Separation of powers
  • Fixed-term elections
  • Elected second chamber
  • Mid-term elections
  • size

5
Are they really so white and Anglo-Saxon?
  • Increasing number of Hispanics in USA
  • Black population electorally significant
  • Celtic population of UK forgotten by political
    scientists. Now joined by immigrants. Will these
    ethnic cleavages become electorally significant?
  • US Irish Italians and Jews still important

6
Religion
  • Decline of organised religion in UK
  • Still strong in US, but more the evangelical
    churches
  • Islam significant in UK in terms of number of
    worshippers
  • Catholicism and abortion issue
  • Religious right electorally important in US
  • Could this come to UK?

7
Party systems
  • Yes, its still Republicans and Democrats, but
    Ross Perot killed Bush I and Nader in many ways
    killed Gore
  • So third party candidates are having an effect on
    outcomes.
  • UK! Heading for a three-party system and has had
    an important third party since the 70s
  • And what about Nats? Especially UKIP

8
Party systems 2
  • Senate 2004 55 R 44 D 1 Independent
  • Congress 231 R 200 D 1independent
  • So legislature 2 party even though Presdiency
    affected by third party candidates
  • UK 2001 Lab 412 Con 166 Lib Dem 52 Others 29

9
Differences Federalism
  • US fairly easy to understand
  • Sttes have powers and own legislatures etc.
  • Central governments powers clearly designated by
    constitution
  • If a policy making area not specified, then its
    a State matter,
  • To be central, constitutional amendment required

10
U.K
  • What are we?
  • A Union of the kingdoms of Scotland and England
    plus the Principality of Wales and the Province
    of Ulster
  • Two parliaments and two assemblies, one suspended
  • England has a number of unelected Regional
    governments
  • Dont mention the Channel isles and the Isle of
    Man

11
Monarchy
  • UK one of seven remaining European monarchies
  • PM exercises monarchs powers
  • Hereditary Head of State
  • US President both Head of Executive and Head of
    State. V-P Chairs Senate House of Reps has
    Speaker, third in line in emergency

12
Separation of Powers
  • President, Congress, States, Supreme Court,
    Constitution
  • Queen, Prime Minister, Cabinet, Commons, Lords
    both judiciary and assembly!, EConHR, ECourtHR,
    Scots Welsh, Northern Irishits a mess!
  • But it provides checks and balances in its own
    way.

13
Elections
  • PM decides unless loses majority or vote of
    confidence
  • Could Queen decide? Feb 1974
  • US all fixed two year, four year or six year
    Governors
  • Mid-terms likely to go against President so
    reduce power of exec.
  • Having an elected second chamber with states as
    constituencies also keeps Pres in check

14
Constitutional and political checks
  • Are there any checks on PM other than media?
  • Can she ignore own party?
  • Deliberately keeping second chamber impotent?
  • Deliberately keeping local government weak?
  • ECHR and ECJ only checks?
  • Or take to the streets? countryside alliance

15
Administrative oversight
  • Committee systems
  • Some legal/judicial overview

16
Collective responsibility
  • Cabinet ministers supposed to accept
    responsibility for cabinet policy
  • Supposed to support it in public
  • But brief and leak away merrily
  • Does anyone accept individual responsibility any
    more?
  • Other than being caught without underclothes, why
    should anyone resign

17
Collective responsibility in the US
  • Given president appoints cabinet, wont they all
    agree with him her?
  • Condoleeza Rice v Donald Rumsfeld v Colin Powell
    bye Colin
  • Genuine disputes about policy now fought out in
    the media
  • Not in Congress or parliament

18
Judicial policy making
  • US Supreme Court and written constitution
  • Lord Denning
  • Judicial Review of legislation
  • ECHR and European Court of Human Rights
  • European Union Constitution and European Court of
    Justice
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com