Manipulating the diversity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Manipulating the diversity

Description:

In infinitely large populations LD would continue to decay over time due to high ... No population is infinitely large as assumed in HW equilibrium. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: hendrik6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Manipulating the diversity


1
Chapter 5
  • Manipulating the diversity

2
Models of populations vs molecules
  • Allele frequencies change over time- by chance
    (drift) by choice (selection).
  • These changes can be investigated using models
    that approximate the reality.
  • Understand the forces at play which explain these
    changes

3
Models to derive equations
  • These equations allow us to estimate parameters
    of interest from the data
  • Population growth rate
  • Migration rate between two populations
  • Age of an allele

4
Think of alleles as populations
  • Think of alleles as populations- since this is
    what evolution acts upon.
  • How is population defined
  • Individuals grouped together for the sake of
    analysis
  • Idealized group adhering to a certain
    mathematical model (I.e. random mating)
  • Pratical population or theoretical population?

5
Dominant (A) vs Recessive (a) Alleles
  • Do dominant alleles become more frequent over
    time?
  • No inherent tendency for dominant alleles to
    become more frequent or recessive ones to become
    less frequent
  • Given certain assumptions, genotype and allele
    frequencies will remain constant from one
    generation to next
  • Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium

6
Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium Model
  • Mathematical statement relating allele
    frequencies to expected genotype frequencies in
    the next generation
  • 1 p2 2pq q2
  • Where
  • p frequency of the A allele
  • q frequency of the a allele
  • ? Model predicts that at equilibrium there is no
    change in allele frequency in a population over
    time

7
Observed Changes ? Predictions
  • ? one or more of the assumption of the model must
    be incorrect.
  • ASSUMPTIONS
  • Random mating
  • No mutation
  • No selection
  • No gene flow
  • No genetic drift

8
Not in Equilibrium? Why?
  • Observed vs expected genotype frequencies differ
    b/c of effects of evolutionary forces and/or
    nonrandom mating
  • Four evolutionary forces are the only mechanisms
    that can cause frequency of an allele to change
    over time
  • Nonrandom mating can cause genotype change
    without changing allele frequencies
  • - inbreeding (biologically related individuals)
  • - assortative mating (based on phenotype)

9
In more depth.What changes allele frequencies
  • Mutation pressure- random changes, polymorphisms
    could change frequencies by making new alleles.
  • Even after 1000 generations a wild type gene
    would change from a frequency of 1.0 to 0.998.so
    not very much

10
Models for mutational processes
  • Infinite alleles model- each mutation generates a
    new allele not previously found in the
    population-
  • Stepwise mutation model - for microsatellites

11
Complex models of sequence evolution
  • More realistic- as multiple mutations will happen
    at the same time across the genome. The question
    than becomes what is the probability that an A
    will change into a G or a C into a T and so on.

12
(No Transcript)
13
Complex models neglect..
  • Indels
  • CpG hotspots
  • Hotspots of mutation generally
  • Sequence context

14
Recombination
  • Sexual reproduction- Provides advantageous
    alleles for populations to adapt to their
    environment.
  • Asexual reproduction- accumulation of deleterious
    mutations leads to mullers ratchet- good example
    of this the Y chromosomes non-recombining region.

15
Mullers ratchet
16
(No Transcript)
17
Linkage Disequilibrium (LD)
  • Non-random association between alleles in a
    population due to their tendency to be
    coinherited because of reduced recombination
    between them.
  • The greater the distance between two alleles less
    likely they will remain associated with each
    other.
  • LD occurs when alleles are found together more
    often than would be expected if alleles were
    segregating at random.
  • LD is high when association is high
  • LD is low when association breaks down
  • Diversity is low within blocks and high between
    blocks

18
Recombination in populations
  • Consider A and B allele (a, b) with no
    association.
  • Only factor determining whether we find them on
    the same haplotype is their relative frequencies.
  • Frequency of AB A B
  • If yes than the two loci are in Linkage
    equilibrium.
  • The difference between the observed and expected
    frequencies of AB D.
  • D 0 than Linkage equilibrium
  • D gt 0 than Linkage disequilibrium

19
Recombination and LD
  • As time increases, D tends towards 0- less and
    less association of alleles.
  • In infinitely large populations LD would continue
    to decay over time due to high frequency of
    recombination.
  • Does this occur in most populations??? We will
    revist this later.

20
Models of Recombination
21
Eliminating diversityGenetic Drift
  • No population is infinitely large as assumed in
    HW equilibrium. Each generation is a finite
    sample from the previous one. There is stochastic
    variation from one generation to the next
  • Genetic drift the random change in allele
    frequency from one generation to the next because
    of basic probability.
  • Allele frequencies may increase, decrease or stay
    the same all because of chance events.

22
Simulations of drift
  • Random process!
  • Occurring in the population
  • Hence allele frequencies will change from one
    generation to the next
  • 100 generations, initial allele frequency of 0.5
    and 50 (25F 25M) individuals.

23
50 individuals
24
50 individuals
25
50 individuals
26
Wright-Fisher Model
  • Simple idealized population model that helps
    describe the amount of drift populations of
    different sizes will have.
  • Assumptions
  • Population has constant size
  • Equal sex ratios
  • Non-overlapping generations
  • Random mating
  • Each individual has same probability of
    contributing to the next generation

27
Effective Population Size (Ne)
  • Effective population size- a quotient prepared
    by Sewall Wright to compare genetic drift
    experienced in different populations as they
    contrast with census population size.
  • Wrights concept of Ne allows us to compare the
    amount of drift experienced by different
    population sizes.
  • Difficult to relate Ne to Nc (Census size)

28
What about genetic drift and population size
  • Given enough time all alleles will tend to go
    towards fixation or extinction.
  • Some will drift more, and others less
  • 1 of the most important factors is POPULATION
    SIZE
  • The smaller the population the greater the effect
    of drift.

29
1000 Individuals
30
1000 Individuals
31
1000 Individuals
32
Fixation or elimination of alleles
  • t 4Ne
  • t time to fixation
  • Smaller Ne the quicker it will go to fixation or
    elimination.
  • Lower mutation rate- the time to fixation is the
    same but the time between fixation of new alleles
    is greater

33
Impact of Pop size on Ne
  • Few populations are constant in size-The long
    term population size is harmonic mean of the
    pop size over time.
  • Ne is disproportionately affected by smaller
    population sizes
  • Recent human populations which have been
    expanding, Ne is determined by our small
    ancestral populations sizes (come back later to
    this)

34
Expression
35
Genetic Drift
  • Genetic drift Change in the gene pool of a small
    population due to chance. Two examples
  • Bottleneck effect
  • Genetic drift (reduction of alleles in a
    population) resulting from a disaster that
    drastically reduces population size.
  • Founder effect
  • Genetic drift resulting from the colonization of
    a new location by a small number of individuals.
  • Results in random change of the gene pool.

36
Expression
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com