Measuring Socially and Economically Sustainable Rural Communities - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Measuring Socially and Economically Sustainable Rural Communities

Description:

Every postal address grouped into hectare cell into which it falls ... Averages mask localised disadvantage? Share results with lead Department ' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: pippag7
Learn more at: https://www.fao.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Measuring Socially and Economically Sustainable Rural Communities


1
Measuring Socially and Economically Sustainable
Rural Communities
  • A policy based approach
  • Pippa Gibson
  • Defra

2
Overview
  • Rural definitions
  • Definition
  • Classification
  • Measuring Socially and Economically Sustainable
    Rural Communities
  • Background
  • Selecting indicators
  • Measuring success
  • Examples
  • Next steps
  • Conclusions

3
How to define rural?
  • Rural Definition developed in 2004
  • Start by dividing England into a grid of hectare
    square cells (100m x 100m)
  • Every postal address grouped into hectare cell
    into which it falls
  • Residential density is calculated for all cells
    for a series of radii around each cell
  • Based on the residential density and the
    relationships between radii, the underlying
    settlement classification is created

4
How to define rural?
  • Settlements are defined by morphology and context
  • Urban cut off is 10,000 population
  • Within rural, there are three settlement types
    town and fringe, villages, and hamlets and
    isolated dwellings.
  • The context of each settlement is also taken into
    account. The most remote areas are defined as
    being in a sparse context.

5
How to define rural?
  • The definition takes the form of

England
Urban
Rural
Sparse
Less sparse
Sparse
Less sparse
Town/ fringe
Village
Isolated dwellings
Town/ fringe
Village
Isolated dwellings
6
How to define rural?
  • Can group by settlement type

England
Urban
Rural
Sparse
Less sparse
Sparse
Less sparse
Town/ fringe
Village
Isolated dwellings
Town/ fringe
Village
Isolated dwellings
7
How to define rural?
  • Can group by settlement type

England
Urban
Rural
Sparse
Less sparse
Sparse
Less sparse
Town/ fringe
Village
Isolated dwellings
Town/ fringe
Village
Isolated dwellings
8
How to define rural?
  • Can group by settlement type

England
Urban
Rural
Sparse
Less sparse
Sparse
Less sparse
Town/ fringe
Village
Isolated dwellings
Town/ fringe
Village
Isolated dwellings
9
How to define rural?
  • Or by sparsity

England
Urban
Rural
Sparse
Less sparse
Sparse
Less sparse
Town/ fringe
Village
Isolated dwellings
Town/ fringe
Village
Isolated dwellings
10
How to define rural?
  • Or by sparsity

England
Urban
Rural
Sparse
Less sparse
Sparse
Less sparse
Town/ fringe
Village
Isolated dwellings
Town/ fringe
Village
Isolated dwellings
11
(No Transcript)
12
How to define rural?
  • This is very useful to examine differences
    between different types of rural settlement -
    doesnt assume that all rural areas are the same
  • Data need to be at a sufficiently small spatial
    scale to apply this definition
  • Often data are published at a higher geographical
    level so need classification to take account of
    this

13
Local Authority classification
  • Data are often only published at local authority
    level (equivalent to NUTS4)
  • Disclosure
  • Coverage
  • Using the Rural Definition as a base, we can
    classify local authorities on a six-point scale
    of rural to urban

14
Criteria behind the LA classification
  • Major Urban districts with either 100,000 people
    or 50 percent of their population in an urban
    area with a population of more than 750,000
  • Large Urban districts with either 50,000 people
    or 50 percent of their population in one of 17
    urban areas with a population between 250,000 and
    750,000
  • Other Urban districts with less than 26 percent
    of their population in rural settlements and
    larger market towns
  • Significant Rural districts with more than 26
    percent of their population in rural settlements
    and larger market towns
  • Rural-50 districts with at least 50 percent but
    less than 80 percent of their population in rural
    settlements and larger market towns
  • Rural-80 districts with at least 80 percent of
    their population in rural settlements and larger
    market towns

15
Aggregating the LA classification
16
(No Transcript)
17
Measuring Socially and Economically Sustainable
Rural Communities
  • One of Defra's key objectives
  • Measured in two parts
  • The evidenced needs of rural people and
    communities are addressed through mainstream
    public policy and delivery
  • Economic growth is supported in rural areas with
    the lowest levels of performance

18
Mainstreaming objective - theory
  • Government targets policy in all areas,
    regardless of whether they are urban or rural
  • Defra aims to monitor whether a range of
    Government policies are impacting in rural areas
    as much as in urban areas
  • A range of policy areas are monitored education,
    health, housing, crime, social capital and poverty

19
Economic objective
  • This also looks at whether rural areas are at a
    disadvantage compared with England as a whole,
    but focus on economic indicators
  • A variety of economic areas are monitored
    earnings, employment, adult skills, business
    investment and enterprise.

20
Measuring these indicators
  • Indicators were chosen not only for their
    relevance but also for their availability
  • Data must ideally be available at a low spatial
    level to apply the Definition
  • Census output areas (population 300)
  • Super output areas (population 1,500)
  • Wards (population 5000)
  • Only if this is not available, use local
    authority level data

21
Selection of indicators
  • Within each sub-theme a range of measureable
    indicators is selected
  • E.g. Health sub-theme measured by
  • Life expectancy
  • Potential years of life lost from cancer, stroke,
    heart disease, suicide
  • Infant mortality
  • Data on provision of social care not available so
    this indicator not selected

22
Measuring success
  • Aim is NOT for rural areas to out-perform urban
    areas or the national average
  • Rural areas should perform as well as the England
    average
  • If they perform below average, the trend should
    suggest improvement

23
Measuring success traffic lights
24
Example results
  • Number of entrants to higher education
  • Data are available by ward, so can use the Rural
    Definition
  • Aggregate number of entrants for each category
  • Present as a rate per 1,000 18-20 year olds
    (because populations are very different in rural
    and urban areas)

25
Education
  • Number of entrants to higher education

26
Housing affordability
  • Ratio of earnings to house prices
  • Data only available by local authority, so use LA
    classification
  • Present as a population weighted average of
    earnings house price ratio

27
Housing affordability
  • Ratio of earnings to house prices

28
Economic growth
  • Productivity
  • Gross Value Added data available but not
    published at local authority level
  • When aggregated to the LA classification we can
    publish the figures
  • Advantage of having lower level data is that we
    can separate out the London authorities which
    tells a very different story

29
Economic growth
  • Productivity

30
Economic growth
  • Productivity

31
Next steps/future work
  • Mainstreaming indicators research programme
  • Reasons for differences?
  • Averages mask localised disadvantage?
  • Share results with lead Department
  • Lowest performing rural areas?
  • Which areas are performing as well as they can?
  • Which areas could perform better?

32
Conclusions
  • No single indicator can measure socially and
    economically sustainable rural communities
  • Nor can a set of indicators fully reflect every
    aspect of rural life
  • BUT a range of Government priorities can be
    monitored using available data and robust rural
    definition/classifications
  • Sound evidence base enables Government to focus
    on areas with greatest indication of need

33
  • Thank you
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com