Integrated Urban Waste Management Model IUWMM - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Integrated Urban Waste Management Model IUWMM

Description:

CP2 Workshop. Leipzig, March 1-5, 2006. Integrated Urban Waste ... of knowledge of LCA remains worryingly low in the public domain, especially in Italy. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:129
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: daniel122
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Integrated Urban Waste Management Model IUWMM


1
Integrated Urban Waste Management Model (IUWMM)
  • Best practices presentation 16
  • LCA for MSW management

2
Overview
  • Best Practice Proposal n. 15
  • Title LCA for MSW management
  • Location Bologna, Italy
  • Date 2004-2005
  • IUWMM Partner Proponent DICMA - University of
    Bologna
  • Responsible DICMA - University of Bologna ARPA
    Bologna
  • ENEA Bologna

3
Practice Summary
  • Introduction
  • Method
  • Model
  • Implementation
  • Results
  • References

4
1. Introduction
  • Italian laws about waste establish dispositions
    in theme of planning for the waste management
    and make it necessary to revise planning tools,
    such as regional and provincial plans for waste
    management.
  • Waste management must have effected in optimal
    territorial circles (ATO), coincident with the
    territory of the Province in such circles the
    Provinces assure an unitary management of the
    urban waste, and they predispose the waste
    management province plans.
  • The application of the LCA methodology makes
    possible to support the development of the new
    PPGR of Bologna District and to supply a
    scientific support to the political choices

5
1. Introduction
  • For the application of the LCA methodology it has
    been used the software WISARD (Waste Integrated
    System for Assessment of Recycling), produced by
    the society Ecobilan for the English agency for
    the environment, with the purpose to study waste
    management systems.
  • The WISARD code allows to build a system
    articulated in the various phases of waste
    management, as collection, disposal and recovery,
    and allows to calculate the various environmental
    impacts.
  • Thank to the LCA methodology, the environmental
    impacts originated from different scenario of MSW
    management will be identified and suggestions for
    the improvement of the waste management province
    plan will be proposed

6
2. Method
  • The goal of this study is to evaluate and compare
    the environmental impacts of different scenarios
    of integrated waste management in the Bologna
    District using the LCA methodology.
  • The scenarios have been described using data
    extrapolated on the basis of a data collection
    that refers to 2003 the presence of 950000
    inhabitants in the District and the production of
    about 566000 t of municipal solid waste have been
    anticipated for 2006.
  • The Bologna District has been divided in five
    homogeneous areas.

7
2. Method
8
2. Method
  • Three scenarios of waste management have been
    compared. They have been chosen among the
    scenarios which are under discussion for the
    preparation of the next PPGR.
  • For each homogeneous area and scenario the
    environmental impacts have been assessed on the
    basis of the following impact categories global
    warming, air acidification, eutrophication,
    depletion of non renewable resources,
    eco-toxicity (sediment, terrestrial, aquatic),
    human toxicity.
  • In addition to these environmental impact
    categories, the consumption of primary energy,
    the consumption of electricity and the sum of the
    emissions of non-methane volatile organic
    compounds (NMVOC), contributors to the
    photochemical oxidant formation, have been
    calculated.

9
3. Model
  • The chosen functional unit is the collection and
    treatment of municipal solid waste generated by
    the inhabitants of each homogeneous area of the
    Bologna District over one year, 2006 the choice
    of including waste generated over an entire year
    enables seasonal variations in quantity and
    quality to be taken into account.
  • The waste fractions are followed through the
    waste management system, as shown in Figure.

10
3. Model
  • Each scenarios model is divided into two major
    sections collection and processing.
  • In the collection, the following elements have
    been taken into account
  • the production, use and end of life of the
    containers and refuse sacks
  • the production, maintenance, use and end of life
    of the collection vehicles
  • the collection at a transfer site including also
    the construction, use or demolition of the site
  • the transportation to a processing or recovery
    unit.

11
3. Model
  • In the processing, the following elements have
    been included
  • incineration with energy recovery
  • landfill with energy recovery from the biogas to
    produce electricity
  • composting with spreading of the compost
    produced
  • sorting and recycling of waste fractions (paper
    and cardboard, glass, iron, non ferrous metals,
    plastics, other minor fractions) from separated
    collection.
  • Construction, normal operation, which includes
    movement of machinery and consumption of fuel,
    and end of life of the sites are taken into
    account.
  • Energy and materials recovery is modelled with
    the approach of the avoided inputs and outputs.

12
4. Implementation
  • Data collection has been carried out in
    collaboration with ARPA (the Regional Agency for
    the Environment) and will consider the integrated
    waste management system of the Bologna Province,
    which includes waste collection and transport,
    sorting, recycling, composting and incineration
    plants, landfills.
  • Three scenarios referring to 2006 will be
    compared they present different types of
    collections and different waste treatment
    solutions.
  • Scenario 1 (trend) shows neither modifications of
    the existing treatment plants nor introduction of
    new measures to prevent waste production or to
    increase separated collection.

13
4. Implementation
  • Scenario 2 (new incinerator in area 2)
    anticipates a strong increase in the fraction
    sent to incineration with energy recovery equal
    to 110000 t/y, with a percentage going from 30
    to 50 of the total waste. The target could be
    achieved by scaling up the already existing
    incineration plant, placed near Bologna, in area
    2. Moreover, measures are introduced to increase
    the separated collection up to 31 of the total
    waste.
  • Scenario 3 (new incinerator in area 5)
    anticipates a lower increase of the fraction sent
    to incineration (up to 37 of the total waste)
    and a separated collection equal to 31. This
    scenario describes the situation which would
    arise from the choice of building a new
    incinerator in a mountain area at the boundaries
    of the District. With this choice the incinerator
    would be only partly fed from the urban waste
    coming from the District and would accept waste
    from outside.

14
5. Results
Three scenarios of waste management system of the
Bologna District contribution of the collection
and treatment of the waste from separated
collection and of the unsorted waste.
15
5. Results
16
5. Results
17
5. Results
  • LCA is a very powerful tool for assessing the
    potential environmental impacts of different
    waste management strategies. At European level,
    it is now being applied as decision support tool
    to policy makers, but the level of knowledge of
    LCA remains worryingly low in the public domain,
    especially in Italy.
  • The discussion of the results demonstrates the
    power of LCA not only to identify the best
    scenario, but also to identify the analytical
    contribution of each operation to the overall
    environmental performance of the system. The
    environmental beneficial effects of increasing
    the recycling and the incineration with energy
    recovery have been confirmed by this study.

18
6. References
  • Arena, U., M.L. Mastellone and F. Perugini, 2003.
    The environmental performance of alternative
    solid waste management options a life cycle
    assessment study. Chemical Engineering Journal
    96, 207222.
  • Arena, U., M.L. Mastellone and F. Perugini,
    2003a. Life cycle assessment of a plastic
    packaging recycling system. International Journal
    of LCA, 8 (3),92-98.
  • Azzurro, P., P. Masoni, L. Morselli and L.
    Ramponi, 2000. Life Cycle Assessment applicata al
    sistema incenerimento caso studio
    dellinceneritore di Bologna. Proceedings of
    RICICLA, Rimini, Italia, 8-11 November 2000.
  • Di Maria F. and S. Saetta, 2000. Life cycle
    assessment for municipal waste management the
    case study of a 100.000 inhabitants of an Italian
    town. Proceeding of 16th International Conference
    on Solid Waste Technology and Management, 1012
    December 2000, Philadelphia.
  • Di Maria, F., S. Saetta and D. Leonardi, 2003.
    Life cycle assessment of a PPV plant applied to
    an existing SUW management system. International
    Journal of Energy Research 27 (5), 481494.
  • Eriksson, O., M. Carlsson Reich, B. Frostell, A.
    Bjorklund, G. Assefa, J.-O. Sundqvist, J.
    Granath, A. Baky, L. Thyselius, 2005. Municipal
    solid waste management from a system perspective.
    Journal of Cleaner Production 13, 241-252.
  • Ramponi, L., T. Coleman, L. Morselli and P.
    Masoni, 2000. Applicazione della metodologia lca
    a sistemi di gestione integrata dei rifiuti in
    ambiti territoriali regionali e nazionali. Caso
    studio in Inghilterra e Galles. Proceedings of
    RICICLA, Rimini, Italia, 8-11 November 2000.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com