The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 47
About This Presentation
Title:

The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

Description:

Real case test of system on the Bai-yun International Airport in Guangzhou, China ... the Joint Airport Weather Studies (JAWS) Started at Denver, Colorado in ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:109
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 48
Provided by: personal99
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology


1
The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Department of Mathematics
Presented by
HUI Kin Yip Ronald
2
Low Level Wind Field Analysis Around an
International Airport
3
Contents
  • Introduction and Background
  • Methodology
  • LLWAS model
  • Ideal Cases
  • Gust Front model
  • Microburst model
  • Real Cases
  • Conclusions

4
What is Windshear?
  • Any change of wind speed and/or direction
  • Can appear suddenly in thunderstorms
  • Associated with gust fronts and microbursts

Why is windshear so dangerous?
  • Dangerous when an aircraft near the ground
  • Unbalanced forces appeared suddenly
  • Difficult to predict
  • Hard for a pilot to make corrections

5
CRASH!!!
6
(No Transcript)
7
Objectives
  • Study the model of a windshear alerting system
    and test in real time situation by studying the
    wind field model
  • Design a windshear warning system
  • Detect the occurrence of strong windshear
  • Real case test of system on the Bai-yun
    International Airport in Guangzhou, China

8
Methodology
  • Use Automatic Weather Station (AWS)
  • It is low-cost, easy to maintain and easy to
    install at any places

9
(No Transcript)
10
Introduction and History of LLWAS
  • LLWAS Low Level Windshear Alerting System
  • Developed in 1970s by the US Government
  • Developed under the Joint Airport Weather Studies
    (JAWS)
  • Started at Denver, Colorado in 1982
  • Most commonly used method for detecting windshear
    in US nowadays
  • It is not well-tested in Asia-Pacific region

11
Methodology on Ideal Case
  • Only two phenomena will be focused
  • Gust Front
  • Microburst
  • Calculation of Global Wind Difference (GWD)

12
Gust Front
  • A leading edge of a mesoscale pressure dome
    followed by a surge of gusty winds on or near the
    ground (Wakimoto, 1982)
  • Typical length 12 km (along front) and 0.5 km
    (across front)
  • Propagation speed 5 to 20 m/s (Uyeda and Zrnic,
    1985)

13
Gust Front Model
  • Assumptions
  • Wind speed at head 0 m/s
  • Wind speed in the front 10 m/s
  • Wind speed is increasing linearly for 400 m
  • The front is propagating in a constant direction
  • Background wind speed is added

14
Comparisons
  • Skew angle of a gust front is the angle between
    the runway and the path of the gust
  • Different skew angles of the gust fronts are
    applied
  • GWD values of different gust locations are
    calculated in both cases

15
Gust Front with 0 skew angle
16
Gust Front with 30 skew angle
17
Gust Front with 90 skew angle
18
Results
  • Facts
  • Errors apeared near the ends of the runway when
    the skew angle is small
  • Errors near the centre of the runway increases
    with the skew angle
  • Maximum error ? 3 m/s
  • Conclusion
  • Reasonable estimate for the gust passing through
    the runway nearly from one end to another

19
Microburst
  • An outward-moving airflow induced by the
    evaporatively cooled downdraft from a
    thunderstorm or heavy rain.
  • Typical duration 10 min
  • Typical radius 2 to 3 km

20
Microburst Model
  • A simplified mathematical microburst model from
    Wilson and Flueck (1986) is used
  • Assumptions
  • it satisfies the mass continuity equation
  • it exhibits realistic radial outflow at ground
    level
  • it is symmetric about its centre
  • it is radially symmetric about the origin
  • Background wind speed is added

21
Microburst Model
22
(No Transcript)
23
Comparisons
  • 8 different locations
  • Locations of the microbursts are lying on a line
    perpendicular to the runway
  • 10 different size of the microbursts
  • Radius of microburst 1.8 to 3.8 km

24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
(No Transcript)
30
Results
  • Facts
  • Both 16-AWS and 18-AWS networks give reasonable
    descirptions to the ideal situation
  • However, 16-AWS gives a relatively better result
  • Conclusion
  • Resonable estimate for idealized microbursts

31
Availability of the Real Data
  • Operation Period
  • 27th June 1998 to 26th October 1998
  • a total of 122 days
  • Daily Data Monitoring is applied
  • Data is collected in different time intervals
  • BY1,3,5,6,7,8 every ONE second
  • BY2,4 every FIVE seconds
  • Time averaging is used to remove high frequency
    fluctuations with periods shorter than 1 minute
    (e.g. jet wash)

32
ONE minute
33
Case Selection
  • All data was averaged by every minute
  • GWD is found in each minute
  • Criteria for case study
  • Failure Periods
  • Testing Periods
  • Thunderstorm and rainy Days
  • High wind speed Periods
  • METAR information is used

34
(No Transcript)
35
Case Selection
Case Date METAR info GWD No. of AWS I 0701
TS, RA, 11 8.10 5 II 0712 TS, RA, 7
9.22 8 III 0714 TS, RA, 4 7.74 8 IV 0722
N/A 7.41 6 V 0911 TS, RA, 5
7.21 7 VI 0913 NIL, 5 7.20 7 VII 1007
NIL, 5 11.39 7 VIII 1013 NIL, 1
9.68 7
36
Methodology
  • Divergence (DIV) along the runway is used
  • Windshear is associated with a pair of
    convergence and divergence zones
  • If the pair is moving, it is gust-front like
  • If the pair is nearly stationary, it is more
    likely a microburst

37
(No Transcript)
38
(No Transcript)
39
Case I 980701
1440
1520
40
(No Transcript)
41
Results
  • There is a pair of moving divergence and
    convergence zones from 1452 to 1500
  • It had gust-front features
  • Figures about this case
  • GWD ? 8.10 m/s
  • Length of Gust ? 195.65 m
  • Duration ? 10 minutes
  • Skew angle ? 10.49

42
Case VII 981007
0230
0300
43
(No Transcript)
44
Results
  • There is a pair of nearly stationary divergence
    and convergence zones
  • It had microburst features
  • Figures about this case
  • GWD ? 11.39 m/s
  • Radius of Microburst ? 1.5 km
  • Duration ? 8 minutes

45
Conclusions
  • Our mathematical model can describe and detect
    the occurrence of windshear in both idealized and
    real cases
  • It registers a few cases of interesting
    meteorological phenomena which had similar (but
    weaker) characteristics
  • Its setup price is relatively cheap, but it is
    reliable and easy to install
  • A denser AWS network (with more AWS) can improve
    the skill of the system
  • It is suitable detecting windshear for airports
    in the Asia-Pacific Region

46
Acknowledgements
  • Department of Mathematics, HKUST
  • Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC)
  • Center for Coastal and Atmospheric Research
    (CCAR), HKUST
  • 'Operational Windshear Warning System (OWWS)'
    consultancy project
  • Your participation

47
Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com