Title: Localised Clusters in Global Networks
1Localised Clusters inGlobal Networks
Anders Malmberg Regional Economies in a
Globalising World Enhancing Intellectual
Capacity and InnovationCardiff, 21 November 2008
2Outline
- What we (think we) know about spatial clustering,
innovation and competitiveness - Some experiences and lessons from recent cluster
initiatives and polices in the small and open
economy of Sweden
3At the core key questionsin economic geography
- How do characteristics of the place of location
affect the competitive (innovative) performance
of firms? - Why is economic development spatially uneven?
- Why do similar and related economic activity so
often agglomerate in space to form localised
clusters? - Why is there regional economic specialization,
and how are such patterns reproduced over time?
4Dominating approach
- Innovation cost efficiency
- Innovation high-tech
- Innovation result of interaction
- Proximity plays a role in such interaction
- Industrial systems localised
- Local knowledge structures raw material and
wages? Shifting focus from production
cost/transport cost/market size to the innovative
performance of localised clusters of firms
5Michael Porters grand claim
Clusters are geographic concentrations of
interconnected companies, specialised suppliers,
service producers, firms in related industries,
and associated institutions (for example,
universities, standard agencies, and trade
associations) in particular fields that compete
but also cooperate. Critical masses of unusual
competitive success in particular business areas,
clusters are a striking feature of virtually
every national, state, and even metropolitan
economy, especially those of more economically
advanced nations (Porter 1998)
6So, what factors make firms/industries in spatial
clusters innovative/competitive?
- Local inter-firm interaction business
transactions, collaboration (not really) - Local inter-firm rivalry monitoring, comparison
(possibly) - Local labour market processes (probably)
- Localised learning processes (probably)
- Institutions 1 Public RD network creating
organisations, Triple Helix (yes, but ) - Institutions 2 rules, norms, conventions (yes,
but )
7Conclusions on clusters
- Spatial clustering of similar and related firms
does seem to contribute to regional growth and
prosperity - Such clusters are often less locally integrated
than some of us have believed - Local rivalry and labour market dynamics are
often more important than inter-firm
collaboration - The more developed their global links, the more
successful clusters tend to be - Policy implications?
8Some lessons from three recent Swedish Cluster
Initiatives
- Uppsala Bio a life science initiative
- Linköping Socware a systems on chip initiative
- IVSS Gothenburg intelligent vehicle safety
systemsInitiative/funding from - Vinnova
- Invest in Sweden Agency
9Lessons general
- Modest resources can generate large activity
the tail that wags the dog UB 1 vs 1500 mil
Euro - Long-term and sometimes diffuse effects (changing
attitudes, mutual learning, network creation etc)
are most important, but short-term and concrete
results (new firm formation, FDI or VC
attraction, new jobs) are necessary to keep up
enthusiasm (internally and externally) and
momentum - Pick-the winner problem at several scales (which
region, which sector, which project?) - Generally it helps if you have a cluster to start
with
10Lessons regional approaches
- Dense, dynamic regional milieus intimately
linked to the outside world (industry and
academia completely global, policy making is
national/local) - Presence of global firms pressure to improve
quality both of the cluster and the cluster
initiative - Key people and skilled labour are rooted in the
milieu need for attractive people climate (cf
R. Florida) - Broad regions (e.g. the wider Stockholm region
rather than Uppsala) when it comes to
international marketing - Openness is key Too narrow and strict regional
delimitations restrict project potential - Some of the most impressive cluster initiatives
were born out to the wish to attract investment,
people and and knowledge from abroad into Swedish
clusters
11So, by way of conclusion
- Clustering is important, and
- Cluster initiatives may play a role, but
- Aim for global reach and nurture international
links and inflows rather than just local
networking