Making and Meeting Requirements - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Making and Meeting Requirements

Description:

Optical assembly cannot degrade telescope image by more than 1.5 ... Relies on optician's estimate. Surface contact with polished glass. Worst case: 0.027 mm too long ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: sill6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Making and Meeting Requirements


1
Making and Meeting Requirements
  • Chris Sillman
  • National Optical Astronomy Observatory

2
NEWFIRM
  • NOAO Extremely Wide-Field Infrared Imager
  • For use on Kitt Peak
  • What is it?
  • Instrument for science
  • But what is it?
  • That is what requirements are for.

3
Image Quality Requirements
  • Top Level Requirements
  • Instrument cannot degrade telescope image by more
    than 5
  • Derived Optics Requirements
  • Optical assembly cannot degrade telescope image
    by more than 1.5
  • Must have tolerance budget showing top level
    requirement is met

4
More On Optics Requirements
  • Tolerance budget must include
  • Fabrication
  • Flexure
  • Thermal effects
  • Ghosting
  • Stray Light

5
Lets Talk About Fabrication
  • Nuthins perfect
  • Must account for manufacturing errors
  • How close does it have to be?
  • Tighter tolerances Higher cost
  • Where do you draw the line?
  • For NEWFIRM, all the weight on three lenses

6
Hierarchy of Lenses
  • Lens Group 1 (the tough ones)
  • Lens 1
  • Conic, 16 Diameter, entrance window
  • Lens 4
  • Conic, 5.5 Diameter, optical mid-point
  • Lens 8
  • Conic, 6.5 Diameter, final optical element
  • Max radius tolerance /- 0.100 mm

7
Hierarchy of Lenses
  • Lens Group 2 (the easy ones)
  • Lenses 2,3,5,6,7
  • All spherical, 7.9 Diameter Max.
  • Fold Mirror
  • Flat (half-wave at 633nm), gold coated
  • Max radius tolerance /- 1.00 mm

8
Who Should Make These Parts?
  • Specify all lens parameters
  • Build up a Bid Package
  • Complete 2-D Drawings
  • Additional specification sheet (optional)
  • Send the package out for bid

9
Bid Results
  • 10 Vendors Contacted
  • Main Factors
  • Cost
  • Lead time
  • May I have the envelope, please?
  • University of Arizona Optical Sciences Center
  • Janos Technologies

10
What is the Sticker Price?
  • Lens Group 1 (the hard ones)
  • Total delivered cost 237,000
  • Recall Only 3 elements!
  • Lens Group 2 (the easy ones)
  • Total delivered cost 112,000
  • Recall 6 elements

11
Verifying
  • Optical Sciences is still working
  • No data yet
  • Janos is almost complete
  • Precoat source inspection
  • Lenses 2,3,5 and 7
  • Flat mirror
  • Lens 6 is still being figured

12
Precoat Source Inspection
  • NOAO representative must go to Janos
  • Verify testing procedures
  • Verify results
  • Troubleshoot any problems that arise

13
Wedge (Runout)
  • Edge profile technique
  • Good points
  • Doesnt drag on surface
  • Relatively Safe
  • Bad points
  • Only uses discrete amount of points
  • Max. value recorded unlikely
  • All recorded values were 4-7X under spec.

14
Center Thickness
  • Maximum profile
  • Good points
  • Safe when the probe is lifted, not dragged
  • Bad points
  • True vertex may not have been found
  • Lens 5 and Lens 7 both FAILED this test

15
Outer Diameter
  • Large gap micrometer
  • Good points
  • High accuracy of individual reads (0.0001)
  • Bad Points
  • Multiple reads required, Lens may be oval
  • Largest deviation
  • 27 microns

16
Radius of Curvature
  • Fizeau interferometry
  • Good Points
  • Accurate
  • Bad Points
  • Relies on opticians estimate
  • Surface contact with polished glass
  • Worst case
  • 0.027 mm too long

17
Fold (Flat) Mirror
  • 12 Zygo Interferometer
  • Problem!
  • 0.592? with power included
  • 0.128? with power removed
  • Whats finish and what is irregularity?

18
Scratch and Dig
  • 80/50 specified
  • Only one scratch detected
  • Lens 7
  • 120 scratch, 4mm
  • Mechanical problem

19
Issues
  • Center thickness of lens 5 and lens 7
  • Too thin
  • Surface irregularity of flat mirror
  • Power on or power off
  • Scratch on lucky lens 7

20
Center Thickness Resolution
  • We will accept the lenses at a reduced price
  • Compensate for CT difference with lens spacing
  • Price break to pay Optical Engineer to re-optimize

21
Scratch on Lens 7 Resolution
  • Janos will rework the piece
  • Additional Requirements
  • Must maintain original OD above and below scratch
    area
  • Spring finger lens cell contact
  • No risk to NOAO
  • We havent bought it yet

22
Flat Irregularity Resolution
  • Oops, my bad
  • Optical engineer failed to check terminology
  • Industry standard
  • If not specified,
  • overall surface flatness 4 surface
    irregularity
  • Janos Technology
  • Doesnt impact operation enough to matter

23
Verification Summary
  • All optics meet specifications or are within
    acceptable overage
  • Acceptable optic components means optical image
    degradation lt1.5
  • Acceptable optical assembly means telescope image
    degradation lt 5
  • Top level requirement
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com