Traffic Models - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Traffic Models

Description:

Markov-Modulated Poisson Process (MMPP) Traditional Models. Autoregressive traffic models ... A Poisson process can be characterized as a renewal process. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:329
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: SITE71
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Traffic Models


1
Traffic Models
  • Shaju Stephen
  • Xin Pan
  • October 30, 2009
  • University of Ottawa
  • This report was prepared for Professor L.
    Orozco-Barbosa in partial fulfillment of the
    requirements for the course ELG/CEG 4183

2
Outline
  • Introduction
  • Improving the traffic
  • Traffic characterization
  • Traditional models
  • Recent trends
  • Comparison
  • Questions
  • References

3
Introduction
  • Traffic model
  • -Purpose
  • -Key issues
  • -Key terms
  • -Importance

4
Improving the Traffic
  • Bandwidth
  • Queue size at routers
  • Routing mechanisms
  • Admission control
  • Scheduling mechanisms

5
Traffic Characterization
  • Measurement based
  • Deterministic based
  • Statistical based

6
Traditional Models
  • Renewal traffic models
  • Poisson Processes
  • Bernoulli Processes
  • Markov-based traffic models
  • Markov-Modulated Processes (MMP)
  • Markov-Modulated Poisson Process (MMPP)

7
Traditional Models
  • Autoregressive traffic models
  • Linear Autoregressive (AR) Processes
  • Moving Average (MA) Processes
  • Autoregressive Moving Average (ARMA) Processes
  • Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA)
    Processes

8
Poisson Processes
  • Poisson model is the oldest traffic model.
  • A Poisson process can be characterized as a
    renewal process.
  • The superposition of independent Poisson
    processes results in a new Poisson process whose
    rate is the sum of the component rates.

9
Markov Model
  • MMP is continuous-state, discrete-time process,
    can model the workload arriving synchronously at
    the system.
  • In MMPP, the interarrival time can be arbitrarily
    distributed, and depend on both states straddling
    each interarrival interval.

10
Markov Model
0.5
Head
0.5
I
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
Tail
11
Recent Trends
  • TES traffic models (Transform-Expand-Sample)
  • Self-similar traffic models
  • Fractional Gaussian Noise (FGN)
  • FARIMA model

12
Self-Similar Models
  • Significance
  • Causes
  • Drawback

13
FARIMA Model
  • Describe both SR and LR
  • Model identification
  • Parameter estimation
  • Diagnostic checking

14
Comparison
  • Traditional traffic models
  • analytically tractability in the corresponding
    queuing systems.
  • generally capture short-range dependence.
  • Recent traffic models
  • are difficult to solve analytically.
  • can describe both SRD and LRD.

15
Comparison
16
Questions
  • 1)What is the purpose of a traffic model?
  • 2)Name a scheme used in traffic characterization
  • 3)Self-similar models do not describe long range
    dependence (True/false)

17
Questions
  • 4) Name two traditional traffic models
  • 5) What is the computational complexity of FARIMA
    model
  • a) O(N) b)
    O(N2)
  • 6) What are the essential differences between
    Poisson Model and Self-Similar Models

18
References
  • A. Neidhardt and J. L. Wang, The Concept of
    Relevant Time Scales and Its Application to
    Queuing Analysis of Self-similar Network
    Traffic, Proc. IEEE Intl. Conf. On Network
    Protocols, Oct. 1996.
  • D. Bertsekas and R. Gallager. Data Networks.
    Prentice-Hall, Second Edition, 1992.
  • M. E. Crovella and A Bestavros, Self-similarity
    in world wide web traffic evidence and possible
    causes, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,
    1997.
  • V. Paxson and S. Floyd, Wide Area Traffic The
    Failure of Poisson Modeling, IEEE/ACM
    Transactions on Networking, 1995.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com