Western Massachusetts Electric Companys - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Western Massachusetts Electric Companys

Description:

Not a consideration in chiller selection. WMECO' s chiller program: ... 'No brainer' Selected most efficient option. Basketball Hall of Fame. Basketball Hall of Fame ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:42
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: robertsd
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Western Massachusetts Electric Companys


1
Western Massachusetts Electric Companys
  • Chiller Efficiency Program

2
Efficiency as a component of equipment selection
  • Look at 2 case studies
  • Review WMECO incentive eligibility requirements
  • Discuss influencing key decision makers

3
BERKSHIRE MEDICAL CENTER
4
Berkshire Medical Center
  • Required new 530 ton chiller
  • Preliminary selection IPLV _at_
  • 0.48 kW/ton

5
Original selection criteria
  • First cost
  • Physical size
  • Meet minimum efficiency requirement of MA
    Building Code

6
Energy operating cost
  • Not estimated
  • Not a consideration in chiller selection

7
WMECO s chiller program
  • Provided estimate of operating cost _at_ 1,164,000
    kWh, 112,000 / year
  • Recommended consideration of more efficient
    chiller

8
WMECO s chiller program
  • Recommended VFD control
  • Offered to contribute conservation incentive
    payment for greater efficiency

9
Design teams response
  • Submitted six alternate chillers for WMECO
    evaluation
  • IPLV ranged from original 0.48 to 0.33 kW / ton

10
WMECO Incentive Eligibility
  • Based on IPLV certified at ARI 550/590-98
  • Contract agreement signed before equipment
    ordered
  • Incentive must be the significant factor in
    customers equipment selection
  • Manufacturer neutral

11
WMECOs offer to Berkshire Medical Center
  • 67,000 incentive offered for
  • Centrifugal chiller with VFD
  • IPLV 0.33 kW/ton
  • Reduced operating cost by 9, 10,000
    annual savings

12
BMCs decision making process
  • Made by financial committee.
  • Considered
  • WMECO incentive offer covered a significant
    portion but not entire upgrade cost
  • Reduction in long term energy operating cost

13
BMCs final decision
  • No brainer
  • Selected most efficient option

14
Basketball Hall of Fame
15
Basketball Hall of Fame
  • WMECO met with design team early in concept
    development
  • Original plan
  • Central chiller for exhibit area only
  • Independent roof top units all other areas

16
Basketball Hall of Fame
  • First cost the major criteria of equipment
    selection
  • HVAC budget could not be substantially increased

17
WMECO s chiller program
  • Recommended
  • Energy operating cost be considered
  • Revise HVAC design to chillers serving entire
    building, eliminate RTUs
  • Consider other conservation opportunities

18
Basketball Hall of Fame
  • Agreement signed to install
  • (2) Centrifugal chillers _at_ 350 tons each
  • VFD on each chiller
  • IPLV _at_ 0.361 kW/ ton
  • VFD on each of (3) 20 HP chilled water pumps
  • (10) VFDs on air handlers hot water pumps, 5
    75 HP
  • Premium efficiency electric motors

19
Basketball Hall of Fame
  • As compared to original design
  • kWh reduction of 26, 715,000 kWh / year savings
  • kW demand reduction of 30
  • 68,000 / year reduction in electric energy
    operating cost

20
Basketball Hall of Fame
  • Energy design collaboration between
  • WMECO
  • Naismith Basketball Hall of Fame
  • Bargmann, Hendrie, Archetype
  • AHA Consulting Engineers
  • OConnell Development Group

21
Basketball Hall of Fame
  • Also produced significant reduction in fossil
    fuel operating cost
  • Achieved 160,000 conservation incentive payment
    from WMECO

22
Information needed for WMECO chiller incentive
evaluation
  • Operating schedule
  • Building cooling load
  • Refrigerant type
  • Compressor type screw or centrifugal

23
Information needed for WMECO chiller incentive
evaluation
  • ARI rated ton capacity
  • kW / ton _at_ 25, 50, 75, 100 loading
  • Auxiliaries BHP of
  • Secondary primary chilled water pumps
  • Condenser water pump
  • Tower fan

24
Conclusions
  • Involve WMECO early
  • Identify several equipment options of varying
    efficiency
  • Estimate the energy operating cost of each option
  • Advocate operating cost as a component of
    equipment selection
  • Utilize available WMECO incentive
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com