THE ICRP APPROACH TO LOW LEVEL RADIATION RISK - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

THE ICRP APPROACH TO LOW LEVEL RADIATION RISK

Description:

Recognition of the existence of deterministic effects. Quantification of dose thresholds for these effects ... Optimisation of radiation protection (ALARA) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:107
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: caroline77
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: THE ICRP APPROACH TO LOW LEVEL RADIATION RISK


1
THE ICRP APPROACH TO LOW LEVEL RADIATION RISK
  • Caroline SCHIEBER
  • 2nd International ILK Symposium
  • Munich, 28-29 October 2003

2
THE RECOGNITION OF RADIATION RISK (1)
  • First part of 20th Century
  • Recognition of the existence of deterministic
    effects
  • Quantification of dose thresholds for these
    effects
  • Set up of dose limits to avoid deterministic
    effects ("maximum tolerable doses")
  • In the same time, first signs of existence of
    medium and long term effects (leukaemia, genetic
    effects)

3
THE RECOGNITION OF RADIATION RISK (2)
  •  The Fifties "first step of precaution"
  •  ICRP 1954
  • "In view of the incomplete evidence on which the
    values are based, coupled with the knowledge that
    certain radiation effects are irreversible and
    cumulative,
  • it is strongly recommended that every effort be
    made to reduce exposure to all types of ionising
    radiations to the lowest possible level.
  • The Commission will continually review the
    recommended permissible levels as new information
    becomes available"

4
THE RECOGNITION OF RADIATION RISK (3)
  •  ICRP 1 (1958)
  • " The most conservative approach would be to
    assume that there is no threshold and no
    recovery, in which case even low doses would
    induce leukaemia in some susceptible individuals,
    and the incidence might be proportional to the
    accumulated dose"
  • "The Commission recommends that all doses be kept
    as low as practicable, and
  • that any unnecessary exposure be avoided"

5
THE RECOGNITION OF RADIATION RISK (4)
  •  ICRP 9 (1965)
  • Dose-effect relationship "clearly established
    after doses of more than 100 rads", but "it is
    unknown whether a threshold of dose exists"
  • Because of the lack of knowledge of the nature of
    the dose-effect relationship, the Commission sees
    no practical alternative, for the purpose of
    radiological protection, to assuming a linear
    relationship between dose and effect, and that
    doses act cumulatively."
  • "The Commission recommends that any unnecessary
    exposure be avoided, and that all doses be kept
    as low as is readily achievable, economic and
    social considerations being taken into account."

6
THE MANAGEMENT OF RADIATION RISK (1)
  • Since the Fifties
  • Development of scientific research in
    radiobiology and epidemiology
  • Reduction of uncertainty
  • the risk coefficient is progressively delimited
  • the dose level above which epidemiology
    demonstrates a significant risk is progressively
    reduced
  • 1965 1 Sv - 1980 0.5 Sv - 1990 0.2 Sv -
  • 2000 0.1 Sv
  • results from radiobiology do not invalidate nor
    conflict with the linear non threshold
    dose-effect relation-ship

7
THE MANAGEMENT OF RADIATION RISK (2)
  • Development of a "philosophy of action" for a
    responsible risk management
  • Three principles
  • Justification of risk activities
  • Avoid all unnecessary exposure or exposures non
    justified according to a detriment/benefit
    balance
  • Optimisation of radiation protection (ALARA)
  • Search for the acceptable and accepted level of
    risk according to each exposure situation
  • Limitation of individual exposures
  • Boarder of the unacceptable levels of risks

8
Conclusion
  • The early adoption of the precautionary principle
    didn't stop the development of radiation risk
    activities
  • It allowed to develop a responsible management of
    the radiation risk
  • The main challenge remains in the process to be
    adopted to reach the acceptable levels of risk
    according to the exposure situations
  • After a first period focussed on the
    "cost-benefit model", there is a trend for giving
    more importance to stakeholder involvement
    processes for both public and worker exposures in
    complex situations
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com