Title: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality
1Radiological ResponseMyth vs. Reality
- James Barnes
- Certified Health Physicist
- Chairperson, Homeland Security Committee, Health
Physics Society - Bobbie Walton
- Governors Office of Emergency Services
- State of California
2Health Physics SocietyHomeland Security Committee
http//hps.org/hsc/
3Radiation and the First Responder
4Visualizing Radiation
For best viewing, turn brightness and contrast on
the monitor to maximum values
http//faraday.physics.uiowa.edu/modern/7D30.60b.h
tm
5Average Exposures From Background Radiation
Average Exposure 0.360 rem/year
6Radiation Risk High Dose
7Radiation Risk Low Dose
In our society, about 20 of the population will
die of cancer. In 10,000 people, this means that
2,000 will die from cancer. If 10,000 people were
to be given 1 REM of radiation, statistics
suggest that 2,004 will die of cancer. This
suggests that the risk of excess cancer deaths is
increased by a factor of about 0.0004 per rem.
8Myth 1
- Radiation is so deadly that an attack using
radioactive materials will kill thousands of
people.
9The Goiania Experience (Sept, 1987)
Rozental, J. J. Radiological Accident in Goiana -
An Overview.
10The Goiania Experience
- A mothballed tele-therapy irradiator was present
in an abandoned hospital building. - Two men decided to mine the metal in the
irradiator. - The unit (containing 1400 curies of Cs-137) was
dismantled. The source capsule was ruptured and
the cesium was released. - The glowing crystals (due the the extremely
high radioactivity of the material) was taken
home and shared with family and friends. - There was widespread contamination of the
neighborhood.
11Initial Response
- 112,000 people (10 of Goianias population)
were surveyed at an Olympic Stadium. - 250 were identified as contaminated
- 50 contaminated people were isolated in a camping
area inside the Olympic Stadium for more detailed
screening - 20 people were hospitalized or transferred to
special housing with medicaland nursing
assistance - 8 patients transferredto the Navy Hospital
inRio de Janeiro - Residential contamination surveywas initiated
12Early Consequences
- Widespread contamination of downtown Goiania
- 85 residences found to have significant
contamination (41 of these were evacuated and a
few were completely or partially demolished) - People cross-contaminated houses 100 miles away
- Hot Spots at 3 scrap metal yards and one house
13Radiation Injuries and Uptakes
- 4 fatalities (2 men, 1 woman and 1 child)
- 28 patients had radiation induced skin
injuries(they held/played with the source for
extended periods) - 50 people had internaldeposition (ingestion)
14The Goiania Experience (cont.)
- Significant psychological consequences amongst
the population such as fear and depression. - Discrimination against the victims and key
products of local economy - Psychomatic illnesses related to the accident
stress. - In first 60,000 monitored individuals
- 5,000 presented symptoms consistent with Acute
Radiation Syndrome (i.e, rash, nausea, vomiting,
diarrhea, weakness, etc.). - Of these 5,000 persons, NONE were contaminated.
Salter (citing Peterson in Nuclear News 1988).
Helping to Prevent Terror Following A
Radiological Incident. HPS Annual Meeting 2001.
15Conclusions
- Long and expensive clean-up effort.
- Profound psychological effects such as fear and
depression on large populations - Isolation and boycott of goods by neighbors
16The Reality
- The primary effect of this dispersed
radioactivity was psychological and sociological,
not radiological. - The true radiation effects were limited to those
in the immediate vicinity of the source remnants - They were exposed the longest
- They were closest to the source material
- They had little protection from the source
17The Radiation Terrorist
18The term "terrorism" means an activity that --
19The Nuclear Weapon
20(No Transcript)
21What was your reaction to that last slide?
22Myth 2
- Nobody can survive the aftermath of a nuclear
weapon. There is so much radiation that it will
scorch the earth.
23Blast and Fire create high levels of destruction
24(No Transcript)
25 The process (nuclear fission), creates
radioactive materials and distributes them over a
wide area (fallout).
26(No Transcript)
27 28The Reality
- Terrorists do not have thermonuclear weapons.
They may have small yield nuclear (fission)
weapons. - The levels of an atomic weapons dispersion are
NOT as severe as a hydrogen bombs, and CAN be
survived. - While such an attack would be devastating, it
does not create an inescapable environment in the
surrounding areas (i.e., survive the blast, and
you have a good chance of escaping). - With proper planning and preparation, people can
escape from fallout affected areas without
incurring serious exposures.
29Radiological Dispersal Device
30Myth 3
- Thousands will die if a dirty bomb is exploded
in a major city.
31The Radiological Dispersal Device (RDD)
Radioactive Material
High Explosive
32Detectable Ground Contamination Can be Found
Miles Downwind
0.2 uCi/m2 Can be detected with thin window G-M
meter
2 uCi/m2 Can be detected with dose rate meter
33Despite Widespread Contamination, There Are
Relatively Small Exposures
1 REM EPA Shelter Area Less than 0.1
miles downwind
0.01 0.1 REM out to 2 miles Dose similar to a
chest x ray or 30 of natural background
34Los Angeles Example EPA PAG Would Recommend
Shelter/Evacuation of a Few Residential Blocks
Release 1.3 KCi CS-137 RDDwith 5 lbs HE 4-Day
Dose (Internal External)Evacuation/Relocation
PAG
HYPOTHETICAL
Color Level (Rem) Area (km2) Description
1 0.026 Consider evacuation. Shelter in place if no evacuation.
0.1 .42
0.01 3.84
Release location Burbank Police Department 34
10' 60"N, 118 18' 31"W 100 Aerosolized release
fraction Normal summertime west-northwest winds,
10-12 mph. Map size 6 x 6 km
35The Reality
- The Dirty Bomb is a weapon of mass disruption,
not mass destruction. - It is effective to the degree that it would
- Deny area access
- Induce psychological stress in a population
- Create economic disruption
36What Will You Need to Know?
37Know the Basics About Radiation
- Lack of trained personnel is the primary reason
for loss of control of radiation / radioactive
environments - Responders FEAR radiation about as much as the
public - Training should be tailored to the mission /
scope of the responder (Firefighter vs. EMT vs.
Haz Matl Team)
38Where do you get this information?
http//training.fema.gov/EMIWeb/IS/is301.asp
39Where do you get this information?
Many local HPS Chapters will provide training
(general or specific) as a public service
(especially to small (poor) organizations).
http//hps.org/aboutthesociety/organization/chapte
rs.html
40Where do you get this information?
http//hps.org/hsc/documents/
41Know Your Response Mission Precisely
- Examples
- Fire fighters Set Perimeter Recover Victims
- Police Secure Perimeter / Scene Investigation
- FBI Scene Management
- Red Cross (and others) Mass Shelter and Feeding
- EMTs / Medical Victim Triage and Medical
Services Management
Each Mission Requires a Different Radiation
Protection Approach
42Where do you get this information?
http//www.usfa.fema.gov/applications/nfacsd
43Where do you get this information?
http//terrorism.spjc.edu/ceu/blurb.asp?examid11
44Where do you get this information?
http//hps.org/publicinformation/asktheexperts.cfm
45Obtain and Maintain Instruments
- Simple works
- Match the Instrument to the Mission
- Dose Rate instrument for scene entry
- Contamination instruments for perimeters
- No one instrument does it all
- Cover a range of levels / doses
- Dose Rates 0.010 50,000 millirem
- Contamination 100 100,000 dpm
- Keep them working and calibrated
46Can I get instruments with no budget?
http//www.ojp.usdoj.gov/odp/equipment_hder.htm
47Know Your Radiation Exposure Limits for a
Terrorist Scene
- What is a safe dose level for a member of the
public? - What dose level should a responder not exceed?
- What dose level would make a rescue too dangerous
to attempt? - When would the dose levels apply?
These levels should be formally described. If
youre trying to figure this out AT THE SCENE,
its TOO LATE!
48Emergency Limits
- No dose Anecdotally reported to be the limit in
several U.S. cities - 100 mrem Limit listed for first responders in
several emergency response guidance documents
(some in draft stage) - 5,000 mrem OSHA limit, (first responders to be
engaged in occupational exposure in an emergency
scenario) - 10,000 mrem EPA guidance for property
protection - 25,000 mrem EPA guidance for lifesaving
activities - 50,000 mrem NCRP Report 138
- 75,000 mrem Old military limit for lifesaving
activities - No upper limit Draft ICRP Guidance for
lifesaving activities
49Know Where to Get Expert Help
- Local Radiation Regulatory Organizations (City,
County, State) - Federal Organizations with Radiation Expertise
(NRC, DOE, EPA) - Local Professional Societies (Health Physics
Society Chapters, Medical Physicists, Radiation
Oncologists, etc.)
Do it NOW! Dont wait until the event happens!
50(No Transcript)
51RAP Team Configuration
- Each region has a minimum of 3 teams
- RAP teams consist of trained employees from DOE
and DOE contractors/facilities - Each team consists of 9 members one Team Leader,
one Public Information Officer, one Team Captain,
one Senior Scientist, and five Health Physics
Survey/Support personnel - Additional personnel are available, such as
industrial hygienists, transportation
specialists, logistics support, etc.
52Standard Response Equipment
- Alpha Detection
- Beta Detection
- Gamma Detection
- Neutron Detection
- Gamma spectroscopy systems (NaI and HPGe)
- Air samplers (high and low volume)
53RAP RegionalContact Numbers
- Region 1, Brookhaven Area Office (631) 344-2200
- Region 2, Oak Ridge Operations Office (865)
576-1005 - Region 3, Savannah River Operations Office (803)
725-3333 - Region 4, NNSA Service Ctr. Albuquerque (505)
845-4667 - Region 5, Chicago Operations Office (630)
252-4800 - Region 6, Idaho Operations Office (208) 526-1515
- Region 7, Livermore Site Office (925) 422-8951
- Region 8, Richland Operations Office (509)
373-3800 - DOE HQ (202) 586-8100
54Any Questions?