Title: Governmentwide monitoring and evaluation system GWM
1Government-wide monitoring and evaluation system
(GWME)
- Presentation to the Public Service and
Administration Portfolio Committee - 18 October 06
2Presentation outline
- Aim of GWME
- GWME Results
- Implementation phases
- Management structures
- Achievements
3Government-wide monitoring and evaluation system
(GWME)
- The aim of the GWME system is to contribute to
improved governance, promote learning and enhance
the effectiveness of public sector organisations
and institutions and accountability reporting - The system objectives are the collection and
collation, analysis and dissemination and the
application of information on the progress and
impact of programmes in order to - Ensure transparency and accountability
- Promote service delivery improvement
- Ensure compliance with statutory and other
requirements and - Promote the emergence of a learning culture in
the public sector
4Results to be achieved
- Result one Accurate and reliable information on
progress in the implementation of government and
other public sector programmes are collected and
updated on an ongoing basis - Result two Information on the outputs, outcomes
and impact achieved by government and other
public bodies are periodically collected and
presented - Result three The quality of monitoring and
evaluation practices in government and public
bodies is continuously improved
5GWMES Proposal and Schedule Implementation
Plan
- Phase One Setting the basis for implementing the
reporting practice - Development of Principles Practices
- Compendium of Development Indicators for SA
- OPSC assessment of departmental ME Systems
- Capacity Building and Accreditation
- Phase Two System Functionality, Alignment and
Standardisation. - Drafting, consultation finalization of data
gathering templates and reporting formats - Develop ICT platform architecture to receive,
collate, and report on data collected. - Ensuring the interoperability and integration
between this ICT platform (GWMES) and existing
departmental ICT systems.
6GWMES Proposal and Schedule Implementation Plan
- Phase Three System Functionality, Alignment and
Standardisation. - Initiate a pilot with a few departments to test
system functionality. - Develop a detailed project plan to serve as a
template for later roll-out. - Independent evaluation of the pilot system
roll-out using the evaluator's findings and
recommendations to make system adjustments. - Gradual extension of the system to all government
bodies, starting with national departments, then
provincial departments, local authorities, and
all SOEs.
7GWMES Proposal and Schedule Implementation
Plan
Phase One Setting the basis for implementing the
reporting practice 1. Development of
Principles Practices
- What are principles and practices?
- Government is adopting an implementation approach
based on shared principles and common practices - This is a different strategy to one based on
rules and prescriptions (old-style public
administration) - Basing our emergent system on principles provides
a clear framework while it encourages adaptive
thinking, consultation and communication
8Purpose of ME Principles Practices
- The document sets out the national ME
principles and practices, including minimum norms
and standards for monitoring and evaluating
government policies, projects and programmes. - It also focuses on procedures to be adopted by
national, provincial, local and public entities
in the monitoring and evaluation of
implementation of government policies and
programmes/projects
9Core principles
- Principles are the unchanging, non-negotiable
values that underlie the system - Although proposed, the GWMESs core principles
have not yet been determined - The system will have different kinds of
principles at its heart
10Types of principles
- The GWMES must be built on
- Ethical principles Rights-based transparent and
accountable - Managerial principles A balance of efficiency,
economy, effectiveness service delivery oriented - Technical principles Indicator based,
participatory, people-centered, developmental,
inclusive etc. - Proprietary Principles are intended to ensure
that an evaluation will be conducted legally,
ethically, and with due regard for the welfare of
those involved in the evaluation, as well as
those affected by its results - Feasibility Principles The feasibility
principles are intended to ensure that an
evaluation will be realistic, prudent, diplomatic
and frugal The evaluation procedures should be
practical, to keep disruption to a minimum while
needed information is obtained Be cost effective
11GWMES Proposal and Schedule Implementation
Plan
Phase One Setting the basis for implementing the
reporting practice 1. Development of
Principles Standards
- Milestones Achieved
- Initial Draft completed May 2006
- Workstream established June 2006
- TORs for the work stream approved by ME Task
Team July 2006 - Conference to deliberate on the matter held
19-23 June 2005 - Comments/Input from conference incorporated July
2006 - Consultations with Relevant Stakeholders
completed August 2006 - Ongoing progress on the activity reported to
Cluster Cabinet via POA Bi-monthly
12GWMES Proposal and Schedule Implementation
Plan
Phase One Setting the basis for implementing the
reporting practice 1. Development of
Principles Practices (including Norms
Standards)
- Milestones Achieved
- Draft Guidelines for ME being discussed at Work
Stream level - Key Glossary of ME Terms completed August 2006
13GWMES Proposal and Schedule Implementation
Plan
Phase One Setting the basis for implementing the
reporting practice 2. Compendium of
development Indicators for SA
- Milestones Achieved
- Based on the Ten Year Review, appropriate set of
the indicators for five clusters have been
defined, which comprise of 163 indicators and a
total of 335 subset indicators that would be used
to measure the impact of government performance
in the long term. - The matrix constitutes eight significant
variables namely - Index (Category) Index Description Indicator
Subset Indicators frequency of data collection
data source data Sets and Level of
disaggregation - Deliberated upon at a workshop in November 2005
Conference in June 2006 - Indicator refinement definitions by PCAS/NSSD
Ongoing work - Discussed at Cluster Level January/March 2006
- Draft baseline document completed circulated
for comments May Sept 2006 - Baseline data collection completed Sept- 2006
(for quantitative indicators)
14GWMES Proposal and Schedule Implementation
Plan
Phase One Setting the basis for implementing the
reporting practice 2. Compendium of
development Indicators for SA (Cont)
- Milestones Achieved
- Data has been collected and has been captured in
several computer packages (MS Access, MS Excel,
MS Word and SPSS) - Integrated all the available databases into one
usable database - DevInfo in order to achieve a
- a common understanding of indicators programme
- Analysis, assessment and evaluation of the
validity and reliability of SA information - Ability to collate, disseminate and present both
government, millennium development goals and
other international commitments - The software is available to SADC countries at no
cost
15GWMES Proposal and Schedule Implementation
Plan
Phase One Setting the basis for implementing the
reporting practice 3. OPSC assessment of
departmental ME Systems
- Description
- The OPSC was requested to undertake an audit of
departmental ME systems and reporting
requirements. The purpose of this report is to
provide an assessment of what exists in terms of
ME at a departmental level and an understanding
of how departments undertake their reporting
requirements. - The report is currently being finalised and will
be presented to various stakeholders soon. - In the context of the above, it should be noted
that the PSC is implementing its governance
monitoring system across departments. To-date
over 35 such reports have been completed.
16GWMES Proposal and Schedule Implementation
Plan
- Phase One Setting the basis for implementing the
reporting practice - 4. Capacity Building and Accreditation
- Approach
- One core training manual will be developed
(based on the Oxfam model) in the GWMES, the
training will be based on the system in
particular, not just on ME in general. - Adopting this approach will ensure that many
self proclaimed ME experts will not be allowed
to market their training as GWMES training,
this will be done for government, by government
agencies. - Different facilitation guides will ensure that
the level and complexity target beneficiaries
will be addressed, in other words, if an ME
manager is being trained, the complexity and
depth of the training will be commensurate with
the ME responsibilities that she has to fulfill.
The same applies to frontline staff who have very
basic ME responsibilities, for instance,
recording information on client contact or
services rendered.
17The Proposed Capacity Building Strategy
Assessment of ME capacity needs at provincial
level
- Does the province have an ME Strategy that is
clearly articulated?
- Has the province conducted departmental ME
Audits?
- Does the province have an ME Strategy that is
clearly articulated?
- Does the province have an ME Learning Network?
- What provincial ME capacity building
initiatives have taken place thus far?
- Is the provincial ME Strategy clearly aligned
with principles and standards of the GWMES?
- Does the provincial ME Strategy accommodate
cluster reporting
- Does the provincial ME Strategy provide useful
information on the Service Delivery Objectives of
the Office of the Premiere?
- Has the province launched its IDP nerve centre?
18Conceptual learning framework - capacity
building consist of three dimensions
- Training and development
- Competency-based training - Knowledge, skills and
values - Additional seminars/ workshops more detail eg
Advanced Statistics - Accredited training to be recognised at tertiary
institutions further studies - Morning sessions for Chief directors and above
advocacy for GWME - Organisation development
- Consultation and support with development of
systems, data and reporting - Change management
- Community of practice
- Principles and practices, learning networks to
support. - SAMEA to support the ME Forum for Government
officials and recognition for officials declared
competent on training
19Development of training material
- Focus group engagement to determine learning
outcomes / topical issues and methodology as
design framework for training material - Consultation workshop with Premiers offices and
key stakeholders on the Curriculum framework - Approval from ME task team and SAMDI Curriculum
Review Committee - Submit funding proposal for development of
training material (and implementation in key
departments) - One training manual differentiate through
facilitators guidelines and target groups
identified (Application of learning exercises
action plans) - Appointment of persons (internal or external) to
develop training material and obtain approval
from Curriculum Committee. - Quality Assurance and Research on capacity
development to enhance training and development
adding value to relevance and implementation.
20GWMES Proposal and Schedule Implementation
Plan
Phase Two System Functionality, Alignment and
Standardisation. 1. Drafting, consultation
finalization of reporting formats
- Milestones Achieved
- The joint team of NT and DPSA have commenced
with the development of the requirements of a
system that would ensure the monitoring of the
departmental strategic plans The requirements
will be finalised by the end of October 2006 - The work stream has commenced with the
development of the framework of an end of year
report that would complement the current report
with information currently within the transversal
systems The framework will be finalised at the
end of November 2006
21Annual State of the Nation Report(End of year
report)
- This report will inform/support the January
Lekgotla and the SONA - Content
- Cluster annual progress reports based on POA
- Combination of transversal systems information
- Aggregation of departmental strategic plans,
annual reports and departmental individual
performance plans - The reporting format, indicators, collection
reporting system are still being developed
22Cluster Performance
Strategic Plan
Admin Manag
Human Resource
Batho Pele
Outcome/Impact
Outputs
Financial
Sector Performance
Dept/Prov Performance
Annual Reports Quarterly Rep.
Reporting Requirements
Reporting Formats 2009
HR Utilisation
Public Man Watch
OPSC
GWME Database
National Treasury
DPLG
POA
23Current Transversal ME Systems
24Public Service ME System (OPSC)
- SA Constitution lists 9 basic values and
principles that govern the public service - The PS ME System looks at the extent to which
public service departments comply with these
principles - The system aims to
- Gather info that can be used to identify areas
needing attention, ultimately contributing to
improved public service performance - This information is published on an annual basis
in the State of the Public Service Report
25Cluster progress Presidency
- This system is based on the matrix of indicators
which is a set of indicators for each of the
clusters - The aim of the system is to track the progress of
the different clusters in reaching their outcomes - The system indicates
- Those areas where progress is slow and
intervention is needed - Those areas of good progress as examples of best
practices - This system is supported by the NSS and reports
are updated on a quarterly basis
26Programme of Action (Presidency)
- The system is based on the Government Programme
of Action that flows from the Presidents State
of the Nation Address that provides the strategic
direction for the Public Service - The aim of the system is to provide an indication
for progress in implementing the priorities of
government. - The system indicates
- Those areas where progress is slow and
intervention is needed - Those areas of good progress as examples of best
practices - The system is electronic database Excel templates
and are updated every quarter with a two-month
lag per quarter as due date for reporting - Feedback on progress is given on a quarterly
basis by means of consolidated reports on the
intranet of Treasury once the quality of the data
is credible it will be available on the internet
27In Year Monitoring (National Treasury)
- Monthly monitoring reports
- Focus on performance against budget
- Alert managers where remedial action is required
- Reports consolidated and published
- National Departments monthly publication in the
national Government Gazette - Provinces Monthly reporting and monitoring BUT
quarterly publication in the national Government
Gazette - Section 32 Reports
28Non Financial Reporting (National Treasury)
- This system is based on provincial departments
reporting against targets set in their Annual
Performance / Strategic Plans - The provincial indicators are set per sector to
enable cross- provincial comparison - The system indicates
- Those areas where progress is slow and
intervention is needed - Those areas of good progress as examples of best
practices - This system together with the In Year Monitoring
System would facilitate cost benefit analysis - The system is updated on a quarterly basis
- The system has been rolled out but there is still
a problem with the quality of the data provided
by departments
29Public Management Watch (DPSA)
- Early warning type system with regard to
management within departments - Consists of the following processes
- Statistical rating based on payroll and financial
information - Communication to and self assessment by
identified departments - On site assessment of selected department
- Intervention into the management of departments
- The system is functional and will be applied
every quarter - The system -
- Indicates those departments/areas in need of
intervention - Indicates those departments that have proven to
be examples of best practices - Facilitate the knowledge exchange between
departments - This system aims to direct the interventions of
the centre of government to those departments
that require assistance
30Annual HR Report (DPSA)
- Annual analysis of the status of HR in the Public
Service - The following would serve as information sources
for this report - Departmental annual reports
- Public Management Watch findings
- Payroll and Financial Systems
- Reports OPSC, AG, DPSA, etc.
- The system -
- Indicates trends within the HR environment
- Identifies those bottlenecks effecting the
efficient and effective utilisation of HR - Identifies those remedial steps taken to address
the bottlenecks between departments - This system aims to guide the centre of
government and HR managers on the areas in need
of attention
31GWMES Proposal and Schedule Implementation
Plan
Phase Two System Functionality, Alignment and
Standardisation. 2. Develop ICT platform
architecture to receive, collate, and report on
data collected
- Milestones Achieved
- The development of the IT system is dependent
upon the finalisation of the user requirements
(data and reporting requirements)
32GWME Proposed reporting outputs
- Bi-monthly reports against the government
Programme of Action (POA) - Mid-year progress report
- Annual State of the Nation Report (End of year
report) - Term of office PS Annual report
- 2014 Review
- Special sector ME reports eg Education and
Health
33Management structure of the Institutional
Framework for Implementing the GWMES
Governance Administration Cluster
The Presidency
Intellectual Leadership Strategic Direction
Project Steering Committee
Project Management, Systemic Gearing and Capacity
Building
Project Implementation Tools, Standards,
Templates, Platforms, Training Interventions
ME Task Team
Capacity Building Work Stream guided by a TOR
Principles and Standards Work Stream guided by a
TOR
Reporting and Databases Work Stream guided by a
TOR
34Institutions Responsible for Implementing Work
Streams
Reporting and Databases
Capacity Building
Principles and Practices
Lead Agency
DPSA
Presidency
SAMDI
Partner Agencies
OPSC
Presidency
Presidency
Stats SA
Stats SA
Stats SA
National Treasury
SITA
DPSA
DPLG
DPLG
DPSA
National Treasury
35Overall Achievements to date
- A public commitment to creating the system is an
important first step and is shown in Cabinets
adoption of the Strategy and Implementation Plan - Political support (key to public service reform
at this level) has been consistently provided - Consistent, sustained membership and involvement
of core task team members - Recent agreements on appointment of task teams
and identification of members to facilitate
reporting on the programme of action 2006 - POA system is fully functional and promotes
transparency and accountability - Indicator development
- Transversal systems have been developed and are
operational