Title: Modifications to Heart Allocation Policy
1Modifications to Heart Allocation Policy
- Implemented July 12, 2006
- Changed the allocation order for medically urgent
(Status 1A and 1B) patients - Policy Change
- Local Status 1A
- Local Status 1B
- Zone A Status 1A
- Zone A Status 1B
- Local Status 2
- Zone B Status 1A
- Zone B Status 1B
- Zone A Status 2
- Etc.
-
- Local Status 1A
- Local Status 1B
- Local Status 2
- Zone A Status 1A
- Zone A Status 1B
- Zone A Status 2
- Zone B Status 1A
- Zone B Status 1B
- Etc.
-
2Background
- Goals of the Policy
- Reduce waiting list mortality for urgent patients
by increasing priority of urgent Status 1A and 1B
candidates - This presentation will review changes during the
first 12 months following the policy
implementation
3Composition of Heart Waiting List by Medical
Urgency7/5/2006 9/19/2007
Based on OPTN data as of September 21, 2007
4Number of Active Heart Candidates on the Waiting
List by Week and Region7/5/2006 9/19/2007
Based on OPTN data as of September 21, 2007
5Heart Transplants by recipient age
group7/12/2005-7/11/2006 vs. 7/12/2006-7/11/2007
Based on OPTN data as of September 21, 2007
6Heart Transplants by Status7/12/2005-7/11/2006
vs. 7/12/2006-7/11/2007
Based on OPTN data as of September 21, 2007
7Heart Transplants by Geographic
Location7/12/2005-7/11/2006 vs.
7/12/2006-7/11/2007
Based on OPTN data as of September 21, 2007
8Heart Transplants by Geographic Location and
Medical Urgency Status7/12/2005-7/11/2006 vs.
7/12/2006-7/11/2007
Based on OPTN data as of September 21, 2007
9Heart Transplants by Region7/12/2005-7/11/2006
vs. 7/12/2006-7/11/2007
Based on OPTN data as of September 21, 2007
10Heart Transplants by Status7/12/2005-7/11/2006
vs. 7/12/2006-7/11/2007Region 1
Based on OPTN data as of September 21, 2007
11Heart Transplants by Status7/12/2005-7/11/2006
vs. 7/12/2006-7/11/2007Region 2
Based on OPTN data as of September 21, 2007
12Heart Transplants by Status7/12/2005-7/11/2006
vs. 7/12/2006-7/11/2007Region 3
Based on OPTN data as of September 21, 2007
13Heart Transplants by Status7/12/2005-7/11/2006
vs. 7/12/2006-7/11/2007Region 4
Based on OPTN data as of September 21, 2007
14Heart Transplants by Status7/12/2005-7/11/2006
vs. 7/12/2006-7/11/2007Region 5
Based on OPTN data as of September 21, 2007
15Heart Transplants by Status7/12/2005-7/11/2006
vs. 7/12/2006-7/11/2007Region 6
Based on OPTN data as of September 21, 2007
16Heart Transplants by Status7/12/2005-7/11/2006
vs. 7/12/2006-7/11/2007Region 7
Based on OPTN data as of September 21, 2007
17Heart Transplants by Status7/12/2005-7/11/2006
vs. 7/12/2006-7/11/2007Region 8
Based on OPTN data as of September 21, 2007
18Heart Transplants by Status7/12/2005-7/11/2006
vs. 7/12/2006-7/11/2007Region 9
Based on OPTN data as of September 21, 2007
19Heart Transplants by Status7/12/2005-7/11/2006
vs. 7/12/2006-7/11/2007Region 10
Based on OPTN data as of September 21, 2007
20Heart Transplants by Status7/12/2005-7/11/2006
vs. 7/12/2006-7/11/2007Region 11
Based on OPTN data as of September 21, 2007
21Heart Transplants by Status7/12/2005-7/11/2006
vs. 7/12/2006-7/11/2007Region 1
Based on OPTN data as of September 21, 2007
22Heart Transplants by Status7/12/2005-7/11/2006
vs. 7/12/2006-7/11/2007Region 2
124
120
79
57
58
36
48
44
18
10
NJTO
PADV
PATF
Based on OPTN data as of September 21, 2007
23Heart Transplants by Status7/12/2005-7/11/2006
vs. 7/12/2006-7/11/2007Region 3
69
67
57
49
46
45
30
28
27
26
22
26
20
17
13
12
4
6
FLMP
FLUF
FLWC
GALL
LAOP
MSOP
PRLL
Based on OPTN data as of September 21, 2007
24Heart Transplants by Status7/12/2005-7/11/2006
vs. 7/12/2006-7/11/2007Region 4
86
83
77
77
32
25
23
15
Based on OPTN data as of September 21, 2007
25Heart Transplants by Status7/12/2005-7/11/2006
vs. 7/12/2006-7/11/2007Region 5
175
162
92
93
53
53
40
28
16
13
4
1
Based on OPTN data as of September 21, 2007
26Heart Transplants by Status7/12/2005-7/11/2006
vs. 7/12/2006-7/11/2007Region 6
41
31
22
23
1
1
Based on OPTN data as of September 21, 2007
27Heart Transplants by Status7/12/2005-7/11/2006
vs. 7/12/2006-7/11/2007Region 7
90
77
65
63
39
40
19
18
Based on OPTN data as of September 21, 2007
28Heart Transplants by Status7/12/2005-7/11/2006
vs. 7/12/2006-7/11/2007Region 8
59
50
47
40
33
30
19
14
9
6
Based on OPTN data as of September 21, 2007
29Heart Transplants by Status7/12/2005-7/11/2006
vs. 7/12/2006-7/11/2007Region 9
147
126
17
11
10
3
Based on OPTN data as of September 21, 2007
30Heart Transplants by Status7/12/2005-7/11/2006
vs. 7/12/2006-7/11/2007Region 10
75
71
64
38
35
32
20
22
19
14
Based on OPTN data as of September 21, 2007
31Heart Transplants by Status7/12/2005-7/11/2006
vs. 7/12/2006-7/11/2007Region 11
62
57
54
37
34
26
26
19
23
22
20
20
13
13
Based on OPTN data as of September 21, 2007
32Preliminary Results for Death Per 100 Years on
the Waiting List All Statuses Combined11/12/2005
-7/11/2006 vs. 7/12/2006-3/11/2007
Deaths include those reported to the OPTN or to
SSDMF while on waiting list or non-transplant removal.
Based on OPTN data as of July 6, 2007
33Preliminary Results for Death Per 100 Years on
the Waiting List All Ages Combined11/12/2005-7/1
1/2006 vs. 7/12/2006-3/11/2007
Deaths include those reported to the OPTN or to
SSDMF while on waiting list or non-transplant removal.
Based on OPTN data as of July 6, 2007
34Summary
- Small decline in size of total waiting list
candidates - No change in the number of heart transplants
comparing pre- and post-policy periods - Substantial change in distribution of transplants
by location and status - More Status 1A and Status 1B transplants and
fewer Status 2 transplants - Fewer local transplants and more Zone A
transplants - Preliminary data suggest a decrease in waiting
list mortality rates - Thoracic Committee and Heart Allocation Task
Force monitoring impact of policy changes.
35(No Transcript)
36Modifications to Kidney Allocation Policy
Pediatric Priority for Donors
Implemented on September 28, 2005 Priority for allocation of kidneys from donors
less than 35 years to pediatric candidates listed
prior to age 18 locally, regionally, then
nationally. 37Background
- Goal to get good kidneys to children quickly
with minimal impact on adult candidates - This presentation will review results of the
first 18 months following policy implementation
38Deceased Donor Kidney TransplantsBy Donor Age
and Recipient Age3/28/04 9/27/05 vs. 9/28/05
3/27/07
Age 11-17
39Deceased Donor Kidney Transplants, 3/28/04
3/27/07By Time Period, Donor Age and Recipient
Age
Age 18
Age 6-10
Age 0-5
Age 11-17
40Kidney Transplants, 3/28/04 3/27/07By Period,
Donor Type and Recipient Age
Age 18
Age 6-10
Age 0-5
Age 11-17
41Waiting List Removals during 3/28/04 3/27/06By
Time Period and Age at Listing
Age 0-17
Age 18
42Percent Transplanted Within 12 MonthsWL
Additions during 9/28/04 8/27/06By Policy
Period and Age at Listing
43Kidney Transplants, 3/28/04 3/27/07By Period,
DR HLA MM Level and Recipient Age
Age 0-17
Age 18
44Pediatric Kidney Waiting List Candidates at
Month End for Jan 2005 May 2007
45Pediatric Additions during the Month and Active
Pediatric Candidates Waiting at Month End, Jan
2005 May 2007
46Kaplan-Meier Graft Survival by Policy
PeriodPediatric Recipients of DD Kidney
Transplantsduring 9/28/04-9/27/06
P-value 0.21
47Kaplan-Meier Patient Survival by Policy
PeriodPediatric Recipients of DD Kidney
Transplantsduring 9/28/04-9/27/06
P-value 0.76
48Summary
- Preliminary results show that the number and
percentage of pediatric kidney transplants from
deceased donors less than age 35 has increased
since the policy change, and fewer pediatric
candidates are waiting for a transplant. - Deceased donor transplantation appears to be
occurring more rapidly among pediatric
recipients. - The number of living donor pediatric kidney
transplants appears to have decreased, and this
will be closely monitored.
49Summary
- The number and percent of less well HLA matched
transplants increased after the policy
implementation. - Graft and patient survival for transplants
performed during the 12 months before the policy
and 12 months after the policy implementation
were not significantly different. - Pediatric and Kidney Committees monitoring impact
of the policy change.