Lecture 5: Atmospheric Turbulence: r0, 0, 0 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 56
About This Presentation
Title:

Lecture 5: Atmospheric Turbulence: r0, 0, 0

Description:

Homework number 3 due Tues Jan 29 (assignment is on the web) Reading assignments for Thurs January 24th and ... PDF files and discussion/chat rooms are on WebCT ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:628
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 57
Provided by: MaxCl8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lecture 5: Atmospheric Turbulence: r0, 0, 0


1
Lecture 5Atmospheric Turbulence r0, ?0, ?0
  • Claire Max
  • Astro 289C, UCSC
  • January 22, 2008

2
Class business
  • Homework number 3 due Tues Jan 29 (assignment is
    on the web)
  • Reading assignments for Thurs January 24th and
    Tuesday January 29th (on the web)
  • Thursday Wavefront Sensing reading (Tyson,
    Chanan, Bauman)
  • Tuesday Deformable mirrors (Tyson, Sechaud,
    Morzinski, Arsenault, Miller)
  • Lectures, reading assignments, and homework
    assignments are on our original class web page
  • PDF files and discussion/chat rooms are on WebCT
  • I will email to all of you the instructions for
    how to log in to WebCT

3
Atmospheric Turbulence Main Points from the last
lecture
  • The dominant locations for index of refraction
    fluctuations that affect astronomers are the
    atmospheric boundary layer and the tropopause
  • Atmospheric turbulence (mostly) obeys Kolmogorov
    statistics
  • Kolmogorov turbulence is derived from dimensional
    analysis (heat flux in heat flux in turbulence)
  • Structure functions derived from Kolmogorov
    turbulence are proportional to r2/3
  • All else will follow from these points!

4
Outline of lecture
  • Part 1 Understand atmospheric turbulence
    parameters
  • r0 (Fried parameter)
  • Greenwood frequency ? 0 (typical timescale for
    changes in the turbulence)
  • Isoplanatic angle ?0 (angle within which
    turbulence is well corrected)
  • Part 2 Begin discussion of what determines the
    total wavefront error for an AO system
  • Error budget concept
  • Tip-tilt correction
  • Strehl ratio

5
From last lecture evaluated the spatial
coherence function C? (r)
For a slant path you can add factor ( sec ? )5/3
to account for dependence on zenith angle ?
6
Given the spatial coherence function, calculate
effect on telescope resolution
  • Define optical transfer functions of telescope,
    atmosphere
  • Define r0 as the telescope diameter where the two
    optical transfer functions are equal
  • Calculate expression for r0

7
Define optical transfer function (OTF)
  • Imaging in the presence of imperfect optics (or
    aberrations in atmosphere) in intensity units
  • Image Object ? Point Spread Function
  • I (r) O ? PSF ? ? dx O( x - r ) PSF ( x )
  • Take Fourier Transform F ( I ) F (O ) F ( PSF
    )
  • Optical Transfer Function is Fourier Transform of
    PSF
  • OTF F ( PSF )

convolved with
8
Examples of PSFs and their Optical Transfer
Functions
Seeing limited OTF
Seeing limited PSF
Intensity
?-1
?
l / r0
l / D
r0 / l
D / l
Diffraction limited PSF
Diffraction limited OTF
Intensity
?-1
?
l / r0
l / D
D / l
r0 / l
9
Now describe optical transfer function of the
telescope in the presence of turbulence
  • OTF for the whole imaging system (telescope plus
    atmosphere)
  • S ( f ) B ( f ) ? T ( f )
  • Here B ( f ) is the optical transfer fn. of the
    atmosphere and T ( f) is the optical transfer fn.
    of the telescope (units of f are cycles per
    meter).
  • f is often normalized to cycles per
    diffraction-limit angle (l / D).
  • Measure the resolving power of the imaging system
    by
  • R ? df S ( f ) ? df B ( f ) ? T ( f )

10
Derivation of r0
  • R of a perfect telescope with a purely circular
    aperture of (small) diameter d is
  • R ? df T ( f ) ( p / 4 ) ( d / l )2
  • (uses solution for diffraction from a circular
    aperture)
  • Define a circular aperture r0 such that the R of
    the telescope (without any turbulence) is equal
    to the R of the atmosphere alone
  • ? df B ( f ) ? df T ( f ) ? ( p / 4 ) ( r0
    / l )2

11
Derivation of r0 , continued
  • Now we have to evaluate the contribution of the
    atmospheres OTF ? df B ( f )
  • B ( f ) C? ( l f ) (to go from cycles per
    meter to cycles per wavelength)

12
Derivation of r0 , continued
  • Now we need to do the integral in order to solve
    for r0
  • ( p / 4 ) ( r0 / l )2 ? df B ( f ) ? df
    exp (- K f 5/3)
  • Now solve for K
  • K 3.44 (r0 / l )-5/3
  • B ( f ) exp - 3.44 ( l f / r0 )5/3 exp -
    3.44 ( ? / r0 )5/3

Replace by r
13
Derivation of r0 , concluded
14
Scaling of r0
  • r0 is size of subaperture, sets scale of all AO
    correction
  • r0 gets smaller when turbulence is strong (CN2
    large)
  • r0 gets bigger at longer wavelengths AO is
    easier in the IR than with visible light
  • r0 gets smaller quickly as telescope looks
    toward the horizon (larger zenith angles ? )

15
Typical values of r0
  • Usually r0 is given at a 0.5 micron wavelength
    for reference purposes. Its up to you to scale
    it by ?-1.2 to evaluate r0 at your favorite
    wavelength.
  • At excellent sites such as Mauna Kea in Hawaii,
    r0 at 0.5 micron is 10 - 30 cm. But there is a
    big range from night to night, and at times also
    within a night.

16
(No Transcript)
17
r0 sets the number of degrees of freedom of an
AO system
  • Divide primary mirror into subapertures of
    diameter r0
  • Number of subapertures (D / r0)2 where r0 is
    evaluated at the desired observing wavelength
  • Example Keck telescope, D10m, r0 60 cm at l
    2 mm. (D / r0)2 280. Actual for Keck 250.

18
Several equivalent meanings for r0
  • Define r0 as telescope diameter where optical
    transfer functions of the telescope and
    atmosphere are equal
  • r0 is separation on the telescope primary mirror
    where phase correlation has fallen by 1/e
  • (D/r0)2 is approximate number of speckles in
    short-exposure image of a point source
  • D/r0 sets the required number of degrees of
    freedom of an AO system
  • Can you think of others?

19
Next All sorts of good things come from knowing
r0
  • Timescales of turbulence
  • Isoplanatic angle AO performance degrades as
    astronomical targets get farther from guide star

20
What about temporal behavior of turbulence?
  • Questions
  • What determines typical timescale without AO?
  • With AO?

21
A simplifying hypothesis about time behavior
  • Almost all work in this field uses Taylors
    Frozen Flow Hypothesis
  • Entire spatial pattern of a random turbulent
    field is transported along with the wind velocity
  • Turbulent eddies do not change significantly as
    they are carried across the telescope by the wind
  • True if typical velocities within the turbulence
    are small compared with the overall fluid (wind)
    velocity
  • Allows you to infer time behavior from measured
    spatial behavior and wind speed

22
Cartoon of Taylor Frozen Flow
  • From Tokovinin tutorial at CTIO
  • http//www.ctio.noao.edu/atokovin/tutorial/

23
Order of magnitude estimate
  • Time for wind to carry frozen turbulence over a
    subaperture of size r0 (Taylors frozen flow
    hypothesis)
  • t0 r0 / V
  • Typical values
  • l 0.5 mm, r0 10 cm, V 20 m/sec ? t0 5
    msec
  • l 2.0 mm, r0 53 cm, V 20 m/sec ? t0 265
    msec
  • l 10 mm, r0 36 m, V 20 m/sec ? t0
    1.8 sec
  • Determines how fast an AO system has to run

24
But what wind speed should we use?
  • If there are layers of turbulence, each layer can
    move with a different wind speed in a different
    direction!
  • And each layer has different CN2

V1
Concept Question What would be a plausible way
to weight the velocities in the different layers?
V2
V3
V4
ground
25
Rigorous expressions for t0 take into account
different layers
  • fG ? Greenwood frequency ? 1 / t0
  • What counts most are high velocities V where CN2
    is big

Hardy 9.4.3
26
Short exposures speckle imaging
  • A speckle structure appears when the exposure is
    shorter than the atmospheric coherence time ? 0
  • Time for wind to carry
  • frozen turbulence over
  • a subaperture of size r0

27
Anisoplanatism how does AO image degrade as you
move farther from guide star?
credit R. Dekany, Caltech
  • Composite J, H, K band image, 30 second exposure
    in each band
  • Field of view is 40x40 (at 0.04 arc sec/pixel)
  • On-axis K-band Strehl 40, falling to 25 at
    field corner

28
More about anisoplanatism AO image of sun in
visible light 11 second exposure Fair
Seeing Poor high altitude conditions From T.
Rimmele
29
AO image of sun in visible light 11 second
exposure Good seeing Good high altitude
conditions From T. Rimmele
30
What determines how close the reference star has
to be?
  • Turbulence has to be similar on path to reference
    star and to science object
  • Common path has to be large
  • Anisoplanatism sets a limit to distance of
    reference star from the science object

31
Expression for isoplanatic angle ?0
  • Strehl 0.38 at ? ?0
  • ?0 is isoplanatic angle
  • ?0 is weighted by high-altitude turbulence (z5/3)
  • If turbulence is only at low altitude, overlap is
    very high.
  • If there is strong turbulence at high altitude,
    not much is in common path

Common Path
Telescope
32
Isoplanatic angle, continued
  • Isoplanatic angle ?0 is weighted by z5/3 CN2(z)
  • Simpler way to remember ?0

Hardy 3.7.2
33
Review
  • r0 (Fried parameter)
  • Sets number of degrees of freedom of AO system
  • ?0 (or Greenwood Frequency 1 / ?0 )
  • ?? t0 r0 / V where
  • Sets timescale needed for AO correction
  • ?0 (or isoplanatic angle)
  • Angle for which AO correction applies

34
  • Part 2
  • What determines the total wavefront error for an
    AO system

35
How to characterize a wavefront that has been
distorted by turbulence
  • Path length difference Dz where kDz is the phase
    change due to turbulence
  • Variance s2 lt(k Dz)2 gt
  • If several different effects cause changes in the
    phase,
  • stot2 k2 lt(Dz1 Dz2 ....)2 gt
  • k2 lt(Dz1)2 ( Dz2 )2 ...) gt

stot2 s12 s22 s32 ... radians2 or (Dz)2
(Dz1)2 (Dz2)2 (Dz3)2 ..... nm2
36
Question
Total wavefront error stot2 s12 s22 s32
...
  • List as many physical effects as you can that
    might contribute to overall wavefront error stot2

37
Elements of an adaptive optics system
DM fitting error
Not shown tip-tilt error, anisoplanatism error
Non-common path errors
Phase lag, noise propagation
Measurement error
38
Hardy Figure 2.32
39
Wavefront errors due to ? 0 , ?0
  • Wavefront phase variance due to t0 fG-1
  • If an AO system corrects turbulence perfectly
    but with a phase lag characterized by a time t,
    then
  • Wavefront phase variance due to ?0
  • If an AO system corrects turbulence perfectly
    but using a guide star an angle ? away from the
    science target, then

Hardy Eqn 9.57
Hardy Eqn 3.104
40
Deformable mirror fitting error
  • Accuracy with which a deformable mirror with
    subaperture diameter d can remove aberrations
  • ?sfitting2 m ( d / r0 )5/3
  • Constant m depends on specific design of
    deformable mirror
  • For segmented mirror that corrects tip, tilt, and
    piston (3 degrees of freedom per segment) m
    0.14
  • For deformable mirror with continuous face-sheet,
    m 0.28

41
Image motion or tip-tilt also contributes to
total wavefront error
  • Turbulence both blurs an image and makes it move
    around on the sky (image motion).
  • Due to overall wavefront tilt component of the
    turbulence across the telescope aperture
  • Can correct this image motion either by taking
    a very short time-exposure, or by using a
    tip-tilt mirror (driven by signals from an image
    motion sensor) to compensate for image motion

(Hardy Eqn 3.59 - one axis)
42
Scaling of tip-tilt with l and D the good news
and the bad news
  • In absolute terms, rms image motion in radians is
    independent of l, and decreases slowly as D
    increases
  • But you might want to compare image motion to
    diffraction limit at your wavelength
  • Now image motion relative to
  • diffraction limit is almost D,
  • and becomes larger fraction of
  • diffraction limit for small l

43
Long exposures, no AO correction
  • Seeing limited Units are radians
  • Seeing disk gets slightly smaller at longer
    wavelengths FWHM ? / ?-6/5 ?-1/5
  • For completely uncompensated images, wavefront
    error
  • s2uncomp 1.02 ( D / r0 )5/3

44
Scaling of tip-tilt for uncompensated or seeing
limited images
  • Image motion is larger fraction of seeing disk
    at longer wavelengths

45
Correcting tip-tilt has relatively large effect,
for seeing-limited images
  • For completely uncompensated images
  • s2uncomp 1.02 ( D / r0 )5/3
  • If image motion (tip-tilt) has been completely
    removed
  • s2tiltcomp 0.134 ( D / r0 )5/3
  • (Tyson, Principles of AO, eqns 2.61 and 2.62)
  • Removing image motion can (in principle) improve
    the wavefront variance of an uncompensated image
    by a factor of 10
  • Origin of statement that Tip-tilt is the single
    largest contributor to wavefront error

46
But you have to be careful if you want to apply
this statement to AO correction
  • If tip-tilt has been completely removed
  • s2tiltcomp 0.134 ( D / r0 )5/3
  • But typical values of ( D / r0 ) are 10-50 in
    near-IR
  • Keck, D10 m, r0 60 cm, ( D/r0 ) 17
  • s2tiltcomp 0.134 ( 17 )5/3 15
  • so wavefront phase variance is gtgt 1
  • Conclusion if ( D/r0 ) gtgt 1, removing tilt
    alone wont give you anywhere near a diffraction
    limited image

47
Effects of turbulence depend on size of telescope
  • Coherence length of turbulence r0 (Frieds
    parameter)
  • For telescope diameter D ? (2 - 3) x r0
  • Dominant effect is "image wander"
  • As D becomes gtgt r0
  • Many small "speckles" develop
  • Computer simulations by Nick Kaiser image of a
    star, r0 40 cm

D 2 m
D 8 m
D 1 m
48
Effect of atmosphere on long and short exposure
images of a star
  • Hardy p. 94
  • Vertical axis is image size in units of l/r0

Image motion only
FWHM l/D
49
Error budget concept (sum of s2 s)
  • ?stot2 s12 s22 s32 ...
  • Theres not much gained by making any particular
    term much smaller than all the others try to
    equalize
  • Individual terms we know so far
  • Anisoplanatism sanisop2 (? / ?0 )5/3
  • Temporal error stemporal2 28.4 (t / t0 )5/3
  • Fitting error sfitting2 m ( d / r0 )5/3
  • Need to find out
  • Measurement error (wavefront sensor)
  • Non-common-path errors (calibration)
  • .......

50
Error budget so far
  • ?stot2 sfitting2 sanisop2 stemporal2
    smeas2 scalib2

v
v
v
Still need to work on these two
51
We want to relate phase variance to the Strehl
ratio
  • Two definitions of Strehl ratio (equivalent)
  • Ratio of the maximum intensity of a point spread
    function to what the maximum would be without
    aberrations
  • The normalized volume under the optical
    transfer function of an aberrated optical system

52
Examples of PSFs and their Optical Transfer
Functions
Seeing limited OTF
Seeing limited PSF
1
Intensity
?-1
?
l / r0
l / D
r0 / l
D / l
Diffraction limited PSF
Diffraction limited OTF
1
Intensity
?-1
?
l / r0
l / D
D / l
r0 / l
53
Relation between variance and Strehl
  • Maréchal Approximation
  • Strehl exp(- s?2)
  • where s?2 is the total wavefront variance
  • Valid when Strehl gt 10 or so
  • Under-estimate of Strehl for larger values of s?2

54
Relation between Strehl and residual wavefront
variance
Strehl exp(-s?2)
Dashed lines Strehl (r0/D)2 for high wavefront
variance
55
Error Budgets Summary
  • Individual contributors to error budget (total
    mean square phase error)
  • Anisoplanatism sanisop2 (? / ?0 )5/3
  • Temporal error stemporal2 28.4 (t / t0 )5/3
  • Fitting error sfitting2 m ( d / r0 )5/3
  • Measurement error
  • Calibration error, .....
  • In a different category
  • Image motion lta2gt1/2 2.56 (D/r0)5/6 (l/D)
    radians2
  • Try to balance error terms if one is big, no
    point struggling to make the others tiny

56
Next Two Lectures
  • Thursday Wavefront Sensing
  • Tuesday Deformable Mirrors
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com