Title: Lecture 5: Atmospheric Turbulence: r0, 0, 0
1Lecture 5Atmospheric Turbulence r0, ?0, ?0
- Claire Max
- Astro 289C, UCSC
- January 22, 2008
2Class business
- Homework number 3 due Tues Jan 29 (assignment is
on the web) - Reading assignments for Thurs January 24th and
Tuesday January 29th (on the web) - Thursday Wavefront Sensing reading (Tyson,
Chanan, Bauman) - Tuesday Deformable mirrors (Tyson, Sechaud,
Morzinski, Arsenault, Miller) - Lectures, reading assignments, and homework
assignments are on our original class web page - PDF files and discussion/chat rooms are on WebCT
- I will email to all of you the instructions for
how to log in to WebCT
3Atmospheric Turbulence Main Points from the last
lecture
- The dominant locations for index of refraction
fluctuations that affect astronomers are the
atmospheric boundary layer and the tropopause - Atmospheric turbulence (mostly) obeys Kolmogorov
statistics - Kolmogorov turbulence is derived from dimensional
analysis (heat flux in heat flux in turbulence) - Structure functions derived from Kolmogorov
turbulence are proportional to r2/3 - All else will follow from these points!
4Outline of lecture
- Part 1 Understand atmospheric turbulence
parameters - r0 (Fried parameter)
- Greenwood frequency ? 0 (typical timescale for
changes in the turbulence) - Isoplanatic angle ?0 (angle within which
turbulence is well corrected) - Part 2 Begin discussion of what determines the
total wavefront error for an AO system - Error budget concept
- Tip-tilt correction
- Strehl ratio
5From last lecture evaluated the spatial
coherence function C? (r)
For a slant path you can add factor ( sec ? )5/3
to account for dependence on zenith angle ?
6Given the spatial coherence function, calculate
effect on telescope resolution
- Define optical transfer functions of telescope,
atmosphere - Define r0 as the telescope diameter where the two
optical transfer functions are equal - Calculate expression for r0
7Define optical transfer function (OTF)
- Imaging in the presence of imperfect optics (or
aberrations in atmosphere) in intensity units - Image Object ? Point Spread Function
- I (r) O ? PSF ? ? dx O( x - r ) PSF ( x )
- Take Fourier Transform F ( I ) F (O ) F ( PSF
) - Optical Transfer Function is Fourier Transform of
PSF - OTF F ( PSF )
convolved with
8Examples of PSFs and their Optical Transfer
Functions
Seeing limited OTF
Seeing limited PSF
Intensity
?-1
?
l / r0
l / D
r0 / l
D / l
Diffraction limited PSF
Diffraction limited OTF
Intensity
?-1
?
l / r0
l / D
D / l
r0 / l
9Now describe optical transfer function of the
telescope in the presence of turbulence
- OTF for the whole imaging system (telescope plus
atmosphere) - S ( f ) B ( f ) ? T ( f )
- Here B ( f ) is the optical transfer fn. of the
atmosphere and T ( f) is the optical transfer fn.
of the telescope (units of f are cycles per
meter). - f is often normalized to cycles per
diffraction-limit angle (l / D). - Measure the resolving power of the imaging system
by - R ? df S ( f ) ? df B ( f ) ? T ( f )
10Derivation of r0
- R of a perfect telescope with a purely circular
aperture of (small) diameter d is - R ? df T ( f ) ( p / 4 ) ( d / l )2
- (uses solution for diffraction from a circular
aperture) - Define a circular aperture r0 such that the R of
the telescope (without any turbulence) is equal
to the R of the atmosphere alone - ? df B ( f ) ? df T ( f ) ? ( p / 4 ) ( r0
/ l )2 -
11Derivation of r0 , continued
- Now we have to evaluate the contribution of the
atmospheres OTF ? df B ( f ) - B ( f ) C? ( l f ) (to go from cycles per
meter to cycles per wavelength)
12Derivation of r0 , continued
- Now we need to do the integral in order to solve
for r0 - ( p / 4 ) ( r0 / l )2 ? df B ( f ) ? df
exp (- K f 5/3) - Now solve for K
- K 3.44 (r0 / l )-5/3
- B ( f ) exp - 3.44 ( l f / r0 )5/3 exp -
3.44 ( ? / r0 )5/3
Replace by r
13Derivation of r0 , concluded
14Scaling of r0
- r0 is size of subaperture, sets scale of all AO
correction - r0 gets smaller when turbulence is strong (CN2
large) - r0 gets bigger at longer wavelengths AO is
easier in the IR than with visible light - r0 gets smaller quickly as telescope looks
toward the horizon (larger zenith angles ? )
15Typical values of r0
- Usually r0 is given at a 0.5 micron wavelength
for reference purposes. Its up to you to scale
it by ?-1.2 to evaluate r0 at your favorite
wavelength. - At excellent sites such as Mauna Kea in Hawaii,
r0 at 0.5 micron is 10 - 30 cm. But there is a
big range from night to night, and at times also
within a night.
16(No Transcript)
17 r0 sets the number of degrees of freedom of an
AO system
- Divide primary mirror into subapertures of
diameter r0 - Number of subapertures (D / r0)2 where r0 is
evaluated at the desired observing wavelength - Example Keck telescope, D10m, r0 60 cm at l
2 mm. (D / r0)2 280. Actual for Keck 250.
18Several equivalent meanings for r0
- Define r0 as telescope diameter where optical
transfer functions of the telescope and
atmosphere are equal - r0 is separation on the telescope primary mirror
where phase correlation has fallen by 1/e - (D/r0)2 is approximate number of speckles in
short-exposure image of a point source - D/r0 sets the required number of degrees of
freedom of an AO system - Can you think of others?
19Next All sorts of good things come from knowing
r0
- Timescales of turbulence
- Isoplanatic angle AO performance degrades as
astronomical targets get farther from guide star -
20What about temporal behavior of turbulence?
- Questions
- What determines typical timescale without AO?
- With AO?
21A simplifying hypothesis about time behavior
- Almost all work in this field uses Taylors
Frozen Flow Hypothesis - Entire spatial pattern of a random turbulent
field is transported along with the wind velocity - Turbulent eddies do not change significantly as
they are carried across the telescope by the wind - True if typical velocities within the turbulence
are small compared with the overall fluid (wind)
velocity - Allows you to infer time behavior from measured
spatial behavior and wind speed
22Cartoon of Taylor Frozen Flow
- From Tokovinin tutorial at CTIO
- http//www.ctio.noao.edu/atokovin/tutorial/
23Order of magnitude estimate
- Time for wind to carry frozen turbulence over a
subaperture of size r0 (Taylors frozen flow
hypothesis) - t0 r0 / V
- Typical values
- l 0.5 mm, r0 10 cm, V 20 m/sec ? t0 5
msec - l 2.0 mm, r0 53 cm, V 20 m/sec ? t0 265
msec - l 10 mm, r0 36 m, V 20 m/sec ? t0
1.8 sec - Determines how fast an AO system has to run
24But what wind speed should we use?
- If there are layers of turbulence, each layer can
move with a different wind speed in a different
direction! - And each layer has different CN2
V1
Concept Question What would be a plausible way
to weight the velocities in the different layers?
V2
V3
V4
ground
25Rigorous expressions for t0 take into account
different layers
- fG ? Greenwood frequency ? 1 / t0
- What counts most are high velocities V where CN2
is big
Hardy 9.4.3
26Short exposures speckle imaging
- A speckle structure appears when the exposure is
shorter than the atmospheric coherence time ? 0 - Time for wind to carry
- frozen turbulence over
- a subaperture of size r0
27Anisoplanatism how does AO image degrade as you
move farther from guide star?
credit R. Dekany, Caltech
- Composite J, H, K band image, 30 second exposure
in each band - Field of view is 40x40 (at 0.04 arc sec/pixel)
- On-axis K-band Strehl 40, falling to 25 at
field corner
28More about anisoplanatism AO image of sun in
visible light 11 second exposure Fair
Seeing Poor high altitude conditions From T.
Rimmele
29AO image of sun in visible light 11 second
exposure Good seeing Good high altitude
conditions From T. Rimmele
30What determines how close the reference star has
to be?
- Turbulence has to be similar on path to reference
star and to science object - Common path has to be large
- Anisoplanatism sets a limit to distance of
reference star from the science object
31Expression for isoplanatic angle ?0
- Strehl 0.38 at ? ?0
- ?0 is isoplanatic angle
- ?0 is weighted by high-altitude turbulence (z5/3)
- If turbulence is only at low altitude, overlap is
very high. - If there is strong turbulence at high altitude,
not much is in common path
Common Path
Telescope
32Isoplanatic angle, continued
- Isoplanatic angle ?0 is weighted by z5/3 CN2(z)
- Simpler way to remember ?0
Hardy 3.7.2
33Review
- r0 (Fried parameter)
- Sets number of degrees of freedom of AO system
- ?0 (or Greenwood Frequency 1 / ?0 )
- ?? t0 r0 / V where
- Sets timescale needed for AO correction
- ?0 (or isoplanatic angle)
- Angle for which AO correction applies
34- Part 2
- What determines the total wavefront error for an
AO system
35How to characterize a wavefront that has been
distorted by turbulence
- Path length difference Dz where kDz is the phase
change due to turbulence - Variance s2 lt(k Dz)2 gt
- If several different effects cause changes in the
phase, - stot2 k2 lt(Dz1 Dz2 ....)2 gt
- k2 lt(Dz1)2 ( Dz2 )2 ...) gt
stot2 s12 s22 s32 ... radians2 or (Dz)2
(Dz1)2 (Dz2)2 (Dz3)2 ..... nm2
36Question
Total wavefront error stot2 s12 s22 s32
...
- List as many physical effects as you can that
might contribute to overall wavefront error stot2
37Elements of an adaptive optics system
DM fitting error
Not shown tip-tilt error, anisoplanatism error
Non-common path errors
Phase lag, noise propagation
Measurement error
38Hardy Figure 2.32
39Wavefront errors due to ? 0 , ?0
- Wavefront phase variance due to t0 fG-1
- If an AO system corrects turbulence perfectly
but with a phase lag characterized by a time t,
then - Wavefront phase variance due to ?0
- If an AO system corrects turbulence perfectly
but using a guide star an angle ? away from the
science target, then
Hardy Eqn 9.57
Hardy Eqn 3.104
40Deformable mirror fitting error
- Accuracy with which a deformable mirror with
subaperture diameter d can remove aberrations - ?sfitting2 m ( d / r0 )5/3
- Constant m depends on specific design of
deformable mirror - For segmented mirror that corrects tip, tilt, and
piston (3 degrees of freedom per segment) m
0.14 - For deformable mirror with continuous face-sheet,
m 0.28
41Image motion or tip-tilt also contributes to
total wavefront error
- Turbulence both blurs an image and makes it move
around on the sky (image motion). - Due to overall wavefront tilt component of the
turbulence across the telescope aperture - Can correct this image motion either by taking
a very short time-exposure, or by using a
tip-tilt mirror (driven by signals from an image
motion sensor) to compensate for image motion
(Hardy Eqn 3.59 - one axis)
42Scaling of tip-tilt with l and D the good news
and the bad news
- In absolute terms, rms image motion in radians is
independent of l, and decreases slowly as D
increases - But you might want to compare image motion to
diffraction limit at your wavelength - Now image motion relative to
- diffraction limit is almost D,
- and becomes larger fraction of
- diffraction limit for small l
43Long exposures, no AO correction
- Seeing limited Units are radians
- Seeing disk gets slightly smaller at longer
wavelengths FWHM ? / ?-6/5 ?-1/5 - For completely uncompensated images, wavefront
error - s2uncomp 1.02 ( D / r0 )5/3
44Scaling of tip-tilt for uncompensated or seeing
limited images
- Image motion is larger fraction of seeing disk
at longer wavelengths
45Correcting tip-tilt has relatively large effect,
for seeing-limited images
- For completely uncompensated images
- s2uncomp 1.02 ( D / r0 )5/3
- If image motion (tip-tilt) has been completely
removed - s2tiltcomp 0.134 ( D / r0 )5/3
- (Tyson, Principles of AO, eqns 2.61 and 2.62)
- Removing image motion can (in principle) improve
the wavefront variance of an uncompensated image
by a factor of 10 - Origin of statement that Tip-tilt is the single
largest contributor to wavefront error
46But you have to be careful if you want to apply
this statement to AO correction
- If tip-tilt has been completely removed
- s2tiltcomp 0.134 ( D / r0 )5/3
- But typical values of ( D / r0 ) are 10-50 in
near-IR - Keck, D10 m, r0 60 cm, ( D/r0 ) 17
- s2tiltcomp 0.134 ( 17 )5/3 15
- so wavefront phase variance is gtgt 1
- Conclusion if ( D/r0 ) gtgt 1, removing tilt
alone wont give you anywhere near a diffraction
limited image
47Effects of turbulence depend on size of telescope
- Coherence length of turbulence r0 (Frieds
parameter) - For telescope diameter D ? (2 - 3) x r0
- Dominant effect is "image wander"
- As D becomes gtgt r0
- Many small "speckles" develop
- Computer simulations by Nick Kaiser image of a
star, r0 40 cm
D 2 m
D 8 m
D 1 m
48Effect of atmosphere on long and short exposure
images of a star
- Hardy p. 94
-
- Vertical axis is image size in units of l/r0
Image motion only
FWHM l/D
49Error budget concept (sum of s2 s)
- ?stot2 s12 s22 s32 ...
- Theres not much gained by making any particular
term much smaller than all the others try to
equalize - Individual terms we know so far
- Anisoplanatism sanisop2 (? / ?0 )5/3
- Temporal error stemporal2 28.4 (t / t0 )5/3
- Fitting error sfitting2 m ( d / r0 )5/3
- Need to find out
- Measurement error (wavefront sensor)
- Non-common-path errors (calibration)
- .......
50Error budget so far
- ?stot2 sfitting2 sanisop2 stemporal2
smeas2 scalib2
v
v
v
Still need to work on these two
51We want to relate phase variance to the Strehl
ratio
- Two definitions of Strehl ratio (equivalent)
- Ratio of the maximum intensity of a point spread
function to what the maximum would be without
aberrations - The normalized volume under the optical
transfer function of an aberrated optical system
52Examples of PSFs and their Optical Transfer
Functions
Seeing limited OTF
Seeing limited PSF
1
Intensity
?-1
?
l / r0
l / D
r0 / l
D / l
Diffraction limited PSF
Diffraction limited OTF
1
Intensity
?-1
?
l / r0
l / D
D / l
r0 / l
53Relation between variance and Strehl
- Maréchal Approximation
- Strehl exp(- s?2)
- where s?2 is the total wavefront variance
- Valid when Strehl gt 10 or so
- Under-estimate of Strehl for larger values of s?2
54Relation between Strehl and residual wavefront
variance
Strehl exp(-s?2)
Dashed lines Strehl (r0/D)2 for high wavefront
variance
55Error Budgets Summary
- Individual contributors to error budget (total
mean square phase error) - Anisoplanatism sanisop2 (? / ?0 )5/3
- Temporal error stemporal2 28.4 (t / t0 )5/3
- Fitting error sfitting2 m ( d / r0 )5/3
- Measurement error
- Calibration error, .....
- In a different category
- Image motion lta2gt1/2 2.56 (D/r0)5/6 (l/D)
radians2 - Try to balance error terms if one is big, no
point struggling to make the others tiny
56Next Two Lectures
- Thursday Wavefront Sensing
- Tuesday Deformable Mirrors