Title: Welcome
1Welcome IntroductionAnnette Laban Director
of Commissioning Yorkshire Humber SHA
2Yorkshire Humber SHA Commissioners workshop
1Tuesday 30th October 2007
3New NHS Contract For 2008 and beyond
- Operating Framework
- 13.55-14.20
4Context
- CSR07 average 4 real terms growth over three
years, compared to 1.9 for total public
expenditure - Three Departmental Strategic Objectives
Promoting Better Health Well-Being For All
(PSA) Ensuring Better Care For All (PSA) Better
Value For All - Contribution on six PSAs led by other Departments
- Assumption of 3 annual cashable efficiency
savings to be reflected in tariff
5Key Areas to Address
- Allocations
- Efficiency
- Strategy for surplus
- Contingencies and risk
- Loans regime
- Capital
6Four Strands
- Priorities Freeing up the front line while
maintaining a focus on the issues of most concern
to the public. - Enablers Developing world class commissioning
and using reform levers to help transform
services. - Financial regime A framework that fully
supports reform goals and incentivises
improvements in services and choice. - Business processes for 2008/09 A business-like
and transparent approach to planning and
management of risk
7Process and Stakeholders
- DH process up and running, led by David Flory and
overseen by the NHS Management Board - Stakeholders will be fully engaged Monitor,
Healthcare Commission, NHS Confederation etc - Important links with Department of Communities
and Local Government (LAAs) - Planned publication December 2007
8Priorities
- Will need to take account of
- PSAs
- Existing commitments
- LAAs
- Direction of travel
9Priorities
- Aim is to create greater local freedom for PCTs
to respond to local need and expectations,
coupled with clear accountability and continued
focus on national priorities. - Increasing focus on outcomes
- Better Health For All Life expectancy,
inequalities, smoking, mental health, independent
living - Better Care For All 18 weeks, HAIs, access,
LTCs, maternity choice, patient satisfaction
10Enablers
- System management levers
- Incentives and levers
- Compliance and assurance programme
- Public and patient empowerment
- Workforce
- New models of care/NHS Next Stage Review
- IMT
11Financial Regime
- Confirmation of PCT allocations
- PbR guidance and tariff for 2008/09
- Expectations on efficiency drivers Better Value
Strategic Objective - Clarification of other planning assumptions
12Business Processes
- Need for more business-like and transparent
approach to planning. - Better alignment of NHS and LA planning
processes. - Clarification of the roles and responsibilities
of each part of the system. - Timetable for local plans to be agreed and
confirmed.
13New NHS Contract For 2008 and beyond
- Roles responsibilities of SHAs and PCTs
- 1420 1450
14Stakeholders
- Practice based commissioners
- PCTs - Co-ordinating
- PCTs Associate
- Specialised Commissioning Groups
- Strategic Health Authorities
- Commissioning service groups / agencies
15Why Co-ordinated Commissioning?
- To support more effective commissioning
- To strengthen performance management of providers
- To clarify roles and responsibilities
- To provide robust governance and accountability
- To ensure consistency in the application of
controls and levers
16GPs / Practice Based Commissioners
- To advise PCTs of commissioning priorities and
agree plans for service redesign, which will
shape PCT contracts - To agree care pathways, treatment protocols and
demand management mechanisms with PCT - To manage demand for secondary care services in
line with agreed protocols - To commit resources through referrals
- To advise PCT of any breaches of standards, eg on
discharge obligations
17Co-ordinating PCT
- Collate and aggregate activity plans
- Ensure associates sign consortium agreement
- Agree contract with provider AND associates
- Set thresholds for performance consequences
with associates - Agree with the provider the appropriate range of
standards and care pathways which must be catered
for to meet associates needs - Lead negotiations and solutions
- Contract Monitoring and review
- Manage contract control mechanisms and
communicate with associates on required actions - Manage information flows between provider and
associates
18Specialised Commissioning Group
- Set activity plans
- Ensure associates sign consortium agreement
- Agree contract with provider
- Set thresholds for performance consequences
- Negotiate contract and find solutions
- Contract Monitoring and review
- Manage contract control mechanisms
- Manage information flows between provider and
associates
19Associate PCT
- Provide Activity Plans
- Sign Consortium Agreement (if agreed)
- Participate in consortium governance as required
- Help CC to have a contract that can be agreed
- Identify any specific care pathway or standards
requirements which they wish to be accommodated
by the provider - Pay the provider
- Participate in monitoring and review mechanisms
as agreed with CC
20Strategic Health Authority
- Define local CC / Associate arrangements
- Mediate on disputes (with Monitor for FTs)
- Adjudicate on disputes involving NHS Trusts
- Resolve disagreements between PCTs
- Ensure contracts are signed within the required
timescale - Ensure contracts meet national and local
requirements before PCT signature - Give permission for variations in contract
duration - Providing SUI schedule
- Ensure consistency of local agreements across SHA
i.e. thresholds and consequences - Receive Exceptions Report
21Commissioning Service Agencies
- To support PCTs in whatever commissioning /
contracting functions they have agreed - To act on behalf of PCTs, not instead of them
- NOT to be signatories to contracts
22Process for contract agreement
- In addition to compiling and monitoring an
aggregate activity profile, the co-ordinating PCT
also needs to liaise with associate PCTs to
establish agreement on the content of the
contract with regard to - Local quality standards
- Prior approval agreements
- Timings for the stages of 18w pathways
- For these elements of the contract, we expect the
following type of process to be followed
1.Co-ordinating PCT drafts proposed contract
content
2.Co-ordinating PCT invites Associate PCTs for
suggested changes
3.Co-ordinating PCT drafts revised contract
content
4.Associate PCTs agree proposed contract content
5.Co-ordinating PCT and Provider review contract
content and identify issues for resolution
6. Co-ordinating PCT liaises with associate PCTs
on issue resolution as necessary
7.Co-ordinating PCT revises contract content as
necessary
8.Associate PCTs sign off revised contract content
9. Co-ordinating PCT and Provider sign contract
23Timescales for contract agreement
24Co-ordination of LDPs and contracts
- Robust and realistic activity planning by
commissioners is key to contracts - being agreed and 18 weeks being delivered.
- The following mechanisms will be established to
ensure this happens - SHAs will robustly assess PCT 18 week LDPs in
terms of whether the activity levels will be
sufficient to deliver 18 weeks. - SHAs will ensure that PCT LDPs reconcile with the
activity profiles across different providers - SHA level LDPs will in turn be robustly reviewed
and signed off by DH - For the 2008/09 planning round a single group
will be established within the DH to oversee LDP
analysis, FIMS, workforce returns and the
implementation of the new contract to ensure
these are reconciled.
25Yorkshire and the HumberContracting so far.
- Embryonic contracting consortia developed for
07-08 contracts (some already established and
functioning)-1 per trust - Some exceptions agreed based on risk/ Existing FT
contracts/ local circumstances - All contracts agreed and signed in time
- Region wide review, learning from experience- by
June sign up to Consortia Model across PCTs
26Lessons learnt around the region
- Pragmatic approaches had be taken to get to sign
off process- some feeling at the expense of
strong commissioning - Need to support commissioning capability to
enable strong contracting - Contracting needs to be driven by robust outcomes
based commissioning, and service models/care
pathways - Need consistency across consortia which also
allows for some local determination of process - Need to closely align to specialised
commissioning processes - Need to develop assurance processes for PCTs
- Need to support contract consortia as an ongoing
process
27Establishing the next stage contract consortia
- Aims of the consortia
- To enable each PCT to undertake effective joint
planning, coordination and contract management
with other PCTs - To develop and improve contracting relations with
providers without losing autonomy or control, and
without accepting liability for the actions of
others - To ensure the effective integration of
specialised services commissioning with the
contract arrangements for each provider - To be consistent with national requirements
28Principles
- Contract consortia should add value through the
PCTs working together - Consortia should be simple, incur minimum
transactional costs. - Consortia should have a fair and equitable method
attributing costs across the PCTs - No control or accountability is ceded to a third
party - All PCTs entitled/ need to have/ own a good
understanding of their component, performance,
and financial consequence, of the contract - Independent commissioning intentions are
translated into contract terms through the
consortia - Consortia are the vehicle for integration of
specialised commissioning with the rest of the
contracting arrangements for the trust
29Multi- commissioner- Individual Purchase Agreement
- Within each contract each commissioner has
- Own contract activity and resource by individual
schedule - Decisions relating to clinical activity volumes,
baselines ,cost per case etc remain
responsibility of individual PCT - Ability to pursue contract remedies
- Signature on contract
- Ability to suspend all or part of services
- BUT the norm will be to maximize benefits form
consortia coordinated arrangements - To enable the above to take place Inter- PCT
arrangements and structures have been agreed by
all the PCTs
30Governance
- PCT Boards have signed up to Establishment
Agreement for Trust Contracting Consortia - Roles and responsibilities of Coordinating and
Associate PCTs - Consortia Leadership and support- CEs chair
- Consistent approach which also allows for local
approaches - For 4 key contracts SCG Director in attendance
- Boards delegate day to day business to a sub
contracting committee which acts as contract
manager - Contract consortia currently limited to
procurement and contracting- could choose to
expand their roles in time- future opportunities
31 32Refreshments14.50 15.05
33Yorkshire Humber SHA Commissioners workshop
1Tuesday 30th October 2007
34New NHS Contract For 2008 and beyond
- Principles of the NHS Contracts
- 1505 1550
35New NHS Contract For 2008 and beyond
36Key Principles
- Legally Binding
- Fair and equitable
- Encourage a partnership
- Practical Future-proof
- Embrace policy
- Provide for remedy before penalty
- Mandate in order to maintain NHS principles
- Allow as much local agreement as is practical
- Keep as simple as possible
- The Co-ordinating Commissioner is the appointed
representative of the Commissioners
37Key Clauses
- Clause 2
- Commencement, Duration, Transition
- Sets the contract term
- 3 years is default
- DH will provide guidance where longer or shorter
contracts may be appropriate - SHA will approve all contract lengths that are
not 3 years - Requires conditions precedent to be satisfied
- Schedule 4 Part 1 which can be added to
- A CP is a contractual obligation that requires
one party to the contract to fulfill its
obligation before another party to the contract
is required to fulfill its contractual
obligation
38Key Clauses
- Clause 4 Schedule 2
- Services
- Obliges the Provider to supply Services
- Service Specifications (Sch2,Pt1 for local
definition) - Activity Plans (Sch3,Pt1, annex1 standard
format, locally completed) - Patient Booking Patient Choice (Sch3,Pt2
mandated) - Quality Standards (Sch3,Pt4A Pt4B some
mandated, some local) - The Law
- Details Providers right to refuse services to a
Patient and the consequences. - Obliges the Provider to ensure it can always
offer Mandated Goods and Services (FT terms of
Authorisation) and Essential Services (Sch2,Pt5
for local definition)
39Key Clauses
- Clause 7
- Prices Payment
- Obliges the Commissioners to pay for the Services
provided - At tariff
- At the agreed price for non-tariff items
- Keeping within the PBR Code of Conduct
- Details payment terms
- 1/12th of the Annual Contract Value on 15th each
month - (This is only obligatory if the Provider has
issued a valid statement of account) - Within 30 calendar days of receipt of invoice for
NCA - Reconciliation rules.
- What to do in the event of a dispute
40Key Clauses
- Clause 8
- Review
- Obliges the Co-ordinating Commissioner and
Provider to meet each month to review the
contract including - The Activity Plan
- The Annual Contract Value
- The locally agreed Schedules
- Performance (including notices)
- Compliance with Quality, Clinical Governance
Demand Management - Complaints, incidents and SUIs
- Information
- Sets out the requirement to plan the following
years activity together
41Key Clauses
- Clause 16
- Quality
- Specifies the standards to which Services must be
performed - The Law
- Good Clinical Practice
- Good Healthcare Practice
- And the standards and recommendations of other
bodies and reports (Standards for Health, SUI
reports, NICE) - Obliges the Provider to have regard for any DH
guidance - Requires an annual clinical quality review is
undertaken and published
42Key Clauses
- Clause 20 Schedule 3 Part 1
- Managing Activity Referral
- The clause obliges the Provider to comply with
Schedule 3 Part 1 which is a central schedule - The Activity Plan (What it is, contents,
thresholds) (annex 1) - Care and Resource Utilisation
- Prior Approval
- Utilisation Management
- Monitoring and reporting of Activity
- Capacity Review (and criteria)
- Activity management following variations and
financial adjustments - 18 Week RTT and consequences of failure
43Key Clauses
- Clause 28
- Dispute Resolution
- Describes the Parties rights and obligations
when in dispute - The obligation to try and resolve internally
- Escalation to the SHA / Monitor if agreed
- Escalation to CEDR
- CEDR mediates the dispute in line with Schedule 9
Dispute Resolution Procedure - If after 20 operational days agreement is not
reached, agreement will be by Independent Binding
Pendulum Adjudication - The Parties still retain their rights to
terminate the contract with 12 months notice
(subject to Mandated and Essential Service
obligations) - NOTE Disputes between PCTs and NHS Trusts will
be arbitrated by the SHA, not CEDR
44Key Clauses
- Clause 29
- Information Requirements
- Describes the Providers Obligations to supply
information - To comply with SUS
- To supply information directly to the
Commissioner in the event of SUS failure - Links to Schedule 5 Information
- Sets rules for new datasets and coding changes
- Sets out the consequences of not supplying
information - The commissioner must demand the information
formally, in writing and stating that retention
will occur if information is not supplied - The Provider will have 5 days to comply
- If the Commissioner(s) actions have caused the
failure the Provider cannot be held accountable
45Key Clauses
- Clause 32
- Performance
- Describes the performance management system for
non-clinical, non-information and non-18 week
breaches of - The contract
- Schedule 3 Part 4B - Performance Indicators sets
out - The indicators (some mandated, some for local
agreement) - Thresholds
- Consequences and
- measurement methodology
- e.g. cancellations, AE waiting targets
- Provides for remedy before penalty
- Exception Report (to Board, Regulators, SHA) may
be the biggest consequence - Provides for local agreement of incentive schemes
46Key Clauses
- Clause 33
- Clinical Quality Review
- Describes the clinical review methodology
- Links to Schedule 3 Part 4A
- Clinical Quality Performance Indicators sets out
- The indicators (some mandated, some for local
agreement) - Thresholds
- Consequences and
- measurement methodology
- e.g. MRSA, C.Difficile..
- Aims to expose, investigate and rectify
- Penalties are only for failure to implement a
rectification plan (regardless of whether it
rectifies the breach) - Is a closed-loop control system for continuous
improvement
47Key Clauses
- Clauses 34 35
- Suspension Termination
- Allow the Co-ordinating Commissioner to suspend,
terminate or partially suspend of terminate. - Set out the criteria for these events
- The partial element is of a Service or a part
of a Service - Allows for restoration of suspended services
- Allows for parties to terminate just because they
want to (only after year one and with 12 months
notice) - Note if a Provider is in breach of contract it
has 60 days from notification to remedy before it
is a termination event - The Provider will be obliged to continue
Mandatory Goods and Services and Essential
Services
48New NHS Contract For 2008 and beyond
- Boundaries for Negotiation
- Mandated terms vs locally negotiable terms
49Mandated Terms
- Cannot be changed unilaterally
- Any requests for change must come via SHA to DH
and will be considered in the overall context of
the contract and the NHS - Will have been subject to consultation with FTN,
NHS Partners, PCT Network, Monitor, 3rd Sector. - Guidance notes will make it clear what is
mandated or otherwise - No point in negotiating these with the Provider
- Some elements may fall away if they are taken up
by a new regulator
50Mandated Elements for Local Negotiation
- These elements are must haves (legally and
commercially) - They must be agreed locally
- Master formats will be supplied if appropriate,
parts of which - should not be changed
- may be changed or
- must be changed guidance will make it clear
- The DH may also set parameters for negotiation
particularly where the parties are likely to
polarise - Consequences
- Thresholds
- Timescales for certain actions (e.g. reacting to
notices) - Many of the Schedules fall into this category
- SHAs will audit to ensure elements are in place
51Elements Entirely for Local Negotiation
- These elements are entirely voluntary
- Guidance will indicate what should be considered
- This is where SHA / Local requirements can be
contracted for - In particular the following can be added to /
added - Performance Standards (Sch3, Pt4B)
- Clinical Quality Performance Indicators
(Sch3,Pt4A) - Format and frequency of Reports (Clinical or
otherwise) - Staffing and/or training requirements
- Prior Approval Utilisation Management Schemes
- Incentive Schemes
- Treatment protocols pathways
- Anything else you might mutually agree as long as
it doesnt conflict with the mandated elements of
the contract (legally the Main Body will take
precedent over the Schedules)
52New NHS Contract For 2008 and beyond
- Effective Activity Profiles and monitoring
53Activity Plans
- The format for the Activity Plan will be
centrally mandated - It will be the form of the 2007/8 Activity Plan
(excel spreadsheet) - This is necessary because a consistent approach
will help all providers and commissioners where
there are any associates - It is recognised that this is not always ideal
but the overall benefits outweigh the cost - Providers or Commissioners can request additional
information be added to the Activity Plan to suit
specific requirements but this should be done
with the agreement of all parties - Commissioners and Providers should be thinking
about their Activity Plans now (the new contract
will not alter the Activity Plan content)
54The Plan and Monthly Profiles
- The Activity Plan includes a monthly forecast of
elective and non-elective care - This activity profile is critical in establishing
monitoring and contract management methodologies - The profile needs to enable 18 week and other
targets (AE waits, cancer waits) to be achieved - The Plan and the profile should take into account
the effect of Utilisation Management schemes and
seasonality. - The Plan allows for the setting of upper limits
for activity e.g. - Conversion rates
- Average cost per unit of activity
- Consultant to consultant referral rates
- Where the Plan or the Ratios are exceeded the
commissioner MAY be able to apply financial
deductions
55The Effective Plan
- Should be a realistic forecast of activity
required - It should not under-estimate
- in this case the Provider may not be accountable
for targets being missed, and can require that
the Plan is reviewed and commissioners may not be
able to apply deductions where the plan or ratios
are breached - It should not over-estimate
- in this case more activity than required may be
completed but any monitoring tools will not tag
this as a breach of a target. - The informatics required to monitor it should be
in place - A monthly review of performance against the plan
should be in place with defined outputs (actions,
timescales and responsibilities)
56The importance of the Plan
- A well conceived Activity Plan will
- Enable providers to plan efficiently
- Provide visibility of expectation
- A good monitoring system will
- Allow the effectiveness of Prior Approval and
Utilisation Management schemes to be measured and
improved - Provide advance warning of activity changes that
may pressurise targets or provider capacity - Necessitate that provider and commissioner work
together to achieve provision of activity within
budget across the whole health economy - Together the Plan and monitoring can enable a
health economy to drive improvements and
efficiencies to mutual benefit.
57Yorkshire Humber SHA Commissioners workshop
1Tuesday 30th October 2007
58New NHS Contract For 2008 and beyond
- Overview of Second Workshop
- 1550 1600
59Basis
- Expect the style to be more workshop than
presentation probably mixing live QAs with
presentations - Expect them to be all day events
- Our ideas are set out overleaf
- We are open to ideas on content
60Current Plan
61- What would you like ?
- Who should come ?
62- Questions Discussion
- Next Steps Further Support
63Thank you for attendingPlease remember to hand
in your badge for recycling