Title: Aid for Trade: An African Perspective
1Aid for Trade An African Perspective
- Seminar on Mainstreaming Trade in Development
Casablanca, Morocco, 28-30 May 2006 - Halima Noor-Abdi
- ECA Geneva Advisory Services
2Background
- The Presentation Draws Significantly from
- Aid for Trade An African Perspective Paper by
ECA Geneva Advisory Services - AU in Geneva Minutes of the Retreat of African
Ambassadors and Stakeholders on the WTO Aid for
Trade Initiative - ACP Concept paper on Aid for Trade (28.04.06)
3Outline
- Introduction
- Importance of An African Perspective on Aid for
Trade - Rationale for Aid for Trade
- Task Force on Aid for Trade
- Elements of Aid for Trade and Focus
- Nature of the Aid for Trade Initiative
- Aid for Trade Monitoring, Governance and
Delivery Mechanism - Aid for Trade Architecture and Funding
- Conclusion
4Introduction
- The Hong Kong Ministerial Declaration mandate
incorporated Aid for Trade to the Doha Work
Programme (DWP) in Article 57. - Objective of Aid for Trade can be extracted from
Article 57, and is stated - Provide assistance to developing countries for
building supply-side capacity and trade-related
infrastructure - High political profile for Aid for Trade
Initiative-genesis in G-8 meeting in Gleneagles
mandating the WB/IMF African Finance Ministers
in Abuja - The Aid for Trade Initiative is expected to be a
free standing programme, in practice, it is
likely to be enmeshed with those on the
Integrated Framework (Paras. 48-51) Trade
Facilitation (Para. 33 and Annex E) Small
Economies (Para. 41) LDCs (Para. 47) Technical
Cooperation (Paras. 52-54) and Coherence (Para
56).
5Introduction (Continued)
- The Mandate also states that assistance is should
be such that developing countries - Implement WTO Agreements
- Benefit from opportunities arising from WTO
Agreements and - Expand their trade
- Should not be substitute for the development
benefits of the Doha Round, but a complement
6Importance of African Perspective on Aid for
Trade
- Africa has the highest number of the poorest
countries-Most of the sub-Saharan Africa is in
the World Banks lowest income category of less
than 765 GNI per person per year. - Even middle income African countries have
sizeable sections of the population living in
poverty - Marginilization and falling share of world
tradeshare fallen to 1.1-due to a no. of
reasons including low productivity, high
transaction cost, etc. - Africa was the loser in the implementation of UR
and will lose from implementation of the Doha
Round
7Rationale for Aid for Trade
- Recognition that strengthening developing
countries abilities to trade constitutes a
potentially powerful mechanism to achieve
MDGs-support to poor countries to trade their way
out of poverty - The need to address supply-side constraints in
poor developing countries
8Rationale for Aid for Trade (Continued)
- To realize the potential benefit of trade
liberalization, African countries need assistance
in - Adopting and implementing existing and new WTO
obligations - Benefit from both existing and new market access
opportunities - Addressing supply side constraints that impede
the capacity of African countries to take
advantage of market access - Mitigate some undesirable or detrimental effects
of trade liberalization (help with transitional
costs)
9Task Force on Aid for Trade
- The Director General of WTO as per Article 57 of
Hong Kong Declaration has established a Task
Force - Comprises of 13 countries Barbados, Brazil,
Canada, China, Colombia, the EU, Japan, India,
Thailand and the USA. Amb. Of Sweden is the
Chairperson. - Coordinators of the African Group, LDC and ACP
are also members of the task force
10Elements of Aid for Trade and Focus
- Montreux Retreat Recommendations
- Aid for Trade should be development-oriented
- Should enhance trade policy and regulatory
frameworks - Help countries meet SPS and TBT standards
- Meet implementation costs arising from existing
WTO rules and the outcome of Doha Round including
trade facilitation
11Elements of Aid For Trade and Focus (continued)
- Montreux Retreat Recommendations
- Meet adjustment costs arising from preference
erosion and tariff revenue losses - Promote public-private partnerships
- Enhance entrepreneurship development and
competitiveness - Play a catalytic role and become an engine of
accelerated growth, development and poverty
reduction in Africa and help towards a timely
realization of the MDGs
12Elements of Aid For Trade and Focus (continued)
- Position of the African, Caribbean and Pacific
States (ACP) - Deal with Trade-related economic adjustments
- Preference erosion
- End of textile and clothing quotas
- Loss of tariff revenues
- Rising food prices following reform of
agricultural subsidies - Export earning shortfalls
- social costs-loss of jobs/livelihoods
13Elements of Aid For Trade and Focus (continued)
- Compliance with commitments, rules and standards
of the international trading system - Putting in place domestic regulatory mechanism
and institutional frameworks to support service
liberalization - Putting in place standard setting institutions,
certification agencies, testing laboratories - Complying with TRIPs etc
14Elements of Aid For Trade and Focus (continued)
- Trade- related infrastructure
- Physical infrastructure e.g. roads, ports,
telecommunications, energy and electricity,
transport systems, water supply and sanitation,
etc and - Trade support institutions e.g. customs, trade,
finance, marketing and distribution facilities,
etc.
15Elements of Aid For Trade and Focus (continued)
- Supply-side capacity building
- Targeted support at enterprise and producer
levels - Enhance export-production capabilities and
competitiveness in commodities, manufactures and
services sector - Facilitate entry into new markets (market
diversification) - Investment in new activities
16Elements of Aid For Trade and Focus (continued)
- General and long term need to assist low income
and vulnerable developing countries to expand
their trade from current low absolute levels - Immediate need to assist them, particularly those
already actively engaged and dependent on
international trade (measures by the share of
exports in GDP), to avoid or cope with potential
economic losses, associated with limited
supply-side capacities to adjust rapidly and
beneficially to policy-induced changes, arising
from WTO Agreements
17Nature of Aid for Trade Initiative
- Montreux Recommendations
- National Ownership
- Strengthened in house capacity required
- IF should be enhanced
- DTIS could be used for developing needs
assessment for non African LDCs - ((DTIS of the IF serves as an analytical tool
for diagnosis of the constraints on trade
competitiveness and increased participation in
trade) -
18AG Continued
- Give NEPAD projects maximum attention
- Be used to strengthen and develop trade policy
and enhance trade negotiation capacity at
national, sub-regional and regional level - Strengthen coordination between the key
ministries at the national level such as trade,
finance, agriculture, etc. as well as other
relevant national institutions
19Nature of Aid for Trade Initiative (Continued)
- The ACP Position
- Country specific approach to needs assessment
involving - Diagnostic study at the national level
- An inter-agency technical review of the countrys
trade related needs and gaps in trade-related
assistance - The process should be demand driven
20Nature of Aid for Trade Initiative (Continued)
- complement and not replace existing commitments
- Should be provide for additional resource flows
- Should be substantial, predictable, multi-annual
and long term to have real impact - Effective monitoring mechanism
21Aid for Trade Architecture and Funding
- Montreux Recommendations
- Aid for Trade should be in grant form
- Should be non-debt creating
- Encourage development objectives
- Not involve high transaction costs
- Encourage private-public partnership
- Without conditionalities
22Aid for Trade Architecture and Funding
(Continued)
- Draw useful lessons from good practices and
experiences - Africa ownership of the process
- No top down approach should be taken on
decision-making and implementation - Be based on African initiatives especially NEPAD
23Aid for Trade Architecture and Funding
(Continued)
- ACP Position
- Should be provided primarily in grant form to
avoid debt burden - However, for certain physical infrastructure
development which may be particularly high cost
such as roads, ports, power supply systems etc
could be financed with long-term concessional
loans from regional banks or WB - Such loans should be on terms no less favourable
than those of IFAD and IDA
24Aid for Trade Monitoring, Governance and
Delivery Mechanism
- Montreux Recommendations
- Ensure multi-stakeholder involvement
- Coordination and coherence between different
players - Inclusion of African institutions such as NEPAD
Secretariat, AU, UNECA, AfDB and African
universities
25Aid for Trade Monitoring, Governance and
Delivery Mechanism (Continued)
- ACP Position
- Multilateralize though existing TCB trust funds
such as the IF - Joint WTO/ OECD database would be a useful
monitoring tool - Might be need for an ad hoc party to oversee the
collection and processing of information notified
26Aid for Trade Monitoring, Governance and
Delivery Mechanism (Continued)
- IF model governance structure
- Consolidate existing multilateral TCB Trust Funds
under an umbrella multilateral trust fund
framework - Scaled up resources (address four categories
through separate windows - Resource mobilizations should be modeled on GEF
27Aid for Trade Monitoring, Governance and
Delivery Mechanism (Continued)
- Multi year commitments
- Pledges to be made prior to the conclusion of the
negotiations - Pledges should provide substantial down payment
or front-loading
28The Role of UNECA
- In the AU meeting in Montreux, ECAs comparative
advantage in providing trade-related technical
assistance in certain areas was appreciated - ECA was encouraged to continue to provide such
technical assistance in research, training, etc
29Conclusion
- Challenges For Africa on outcome of the
negotiations on Aid for Trade - Whether it will be owned by recipient countries,
both in terms of content and delivery - Whether the outcome will to a large extent
reflect donor-driven agenda - Whether it will be used to try and buy
concessions from developing countries on the Doha
Round - Whether it will produce additional resource flows
to developing countries and - Whether it will contribute to addressing
supply-side constraints of developing countries
and ultimately development of these countries
30Conclusion