Capital - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Capital

Description:

Understand the characteristics of the two most common types of ... Distinguish between authorised share capital and ... Borland's Trustee v Steel Bros & Co ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:122
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: nicola78
Category:
Tags: borland | bros | capital

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Capital


1
Capital Financing of Companies
  • Types of Share Capital
  • Rosemary Craig BA LLB LLM PGCHEP

2
Learning Objectives
  • Understand the characteristics of the two most
    common types of share, the preference share and
    the ordinary share.
  • Distinguish between authorised share capital and
    allotted capital.
  • Understand the meaning of class rights.

3
Types of Shares
  • Borlands Trustee v Steel Bros Co Ltd
    1901
  • A share is the interest of a shareholder in the
    company measured by a sum of money, for the
    purposes of a liability in the first place, and
    of interest in the second, but also consisting of
    a series of mutual covenants entered into by all
    shareholders inter se.

4
Characteristics of a Share
  • Right to dividends declared on shares.
  • Generally a right to vote at general meetings.
  • Right to receive assets.
  • Obligation to subscribe capital of a given
    amount.
  • Rights of membership under the CA 1985
    Memorandum Articles of Association, e. g. right
    to vote attached to ordinary shares.
  • Transferable nature subject to restrictions in
    the articles.

5
Types of Shares
  • All shares will have the same rights if
    there are no differences expressed.
  • Special rights can be attached to different
    shares at the companys option
  • Dividends
  • Return of capital
  • Voting rights
  • Right to appoint a director
  • Any share which has different rights from
    others is grouped with the other shares carrying
    identical rights to form a class.

6
Shares
  • Ordinary carry normal rights.
  • Preference have the right to preferred
    dividends, therefore guaranteed payment of a
    certain amount.
  • Redeemable company has a right to redeem/ buy
    back the shares.
  • Deferred/ founders shares.
  • Non- voting generally issued to first time
    employee (Tesco).

7
Preference Shares priority dividend entitlement
  • Right is merely to receive a dividend at the
    specified rate before any other dividend may be
    paid or declared.
  • Right to receive preference dividend is deemed to
    be cumulative unless the contrary is stated.
  • Holders of preference shares have no entitlement
    to participate in any additional dividend over
    and above their specified rate.
  • In the event of liquidation, a company which has
    arrears of unpaid cumulative preference dividends
    will not entitle preference shareholders to the
    arrears unless
  • (1) a dividend has been declared though not
    yet paid when liquidation commences.
  • (2) the articles expressly provide that in a
    liquidation arrears are to be paid in priority to
    return of capital to members.

8
Preference Shares return of capital
  • Unless otherwise stated preference shares carry
    the same rights as ordinary shares.
  • The result of preference shares priority right to
    return of capital is that
  • (1) the amount paid up on the preference
    shares is to be repaid in liquidation or
    reduction of capital before ordinary
    shareholders.
  • (2) Preference shareholders are not entitled
    to share in surplus assets when the ordinary
    share capital has been repaid.
  • Re Saltdean Estates 1968
  • Preference shareholders will be paid off first
    when the share capital is reduced. House of
    Fraser Plc v ACGE Investments Ltd 1987.

9
Types of Capital
  • Capital is the money businesses use to trade
    with.
  • Share capital members buy shares in the
    company.
  • Loan capital borrowed money. It is a liability
    owed to the creditors. Usually obtained by the
    issue of debentures.
  • Authorised share capital stated in the
    memorandum, this is the value of shares a company
    is authorised to issue.
  • Issued share capital nominal value of the
    shares a company is authorised to issue. This can
    be paid up capital or uncalled capital.
  • Reserve capital S. 120 CA 1985 company can by
    special resolution determine that any of its
    unpaid capital shall not be called up except if
    the company is being wound up. Rationale is to
    protect creditors.

10
Class Rights
  • Determined by the common law, the Companies Acts,
    the Memorandum Articles of Association, or
    terms of resolution authorising issue.
  • Defined as special rights attached to class of
    share e. g. dividend rights, distribution of
    capital on winding up, voting rights.
  • Cumbria Newspapers Group v Cumberland
    Westmorland Herald 1987 extends the concept to
    include special rights conferred on a person as a
    member.

11
Variation of Class Rights
  • Class rights can be varied only if Ss. 125 -127
    CA 1985 have been complied with.
  • A company with only one class of shares can vary
    rights by special resolution under S. 9 CA 1985.
  • S. 17 CA 1985 class rights stated in the
    memorandum can be changed by special resolution
    with right of 15 objection.
  • Standard procedure for variation of class rights
    requires an extraordinary resolution. This must
    be done by a separate meeting of the class, or
    written consent under S. 125 (2) or any other
    procedures laid out in the articles of
    association.

12
Special Situations
  • There are a number of rules in place to deal
    with unusual special situations.
  • S. 125 (2) ¾ majority consent required where
    there is no variation procedure in the articles
    class rights are defined otherwise than by the
    memorandum. Minority has a right of appeal to the
    court.
  • S. 125 (3) ¾ majority consent required if not
    specified in the articles in the case of the
    variation relating to directors power to allot
    shares, or a reduction in capital.
  • S. 125 (4) procedure laid down in memorandum
    articles for class rights must be followed.
  • S. 125 (5) if rights are attached by the
    memorandum no variation procedure is
    prescribed, consent of all members is required to
    alter rights defined in the memorandum.

13
Minority Appeals to the Court
  • S. 127 CA 1985 provides that a minority of
    shareholders may apply to the court to have the
    variation cancelled when class rights are varied
    under a procedure contained in the memorandum and
    or articles.
  • Objectors must hold 15 of issued shares of the
    class in question must not have consented to, or
    voted in favour of the variation, and apply to
    the court within 21 days of the consent being
    given by the class.
  • Under s. 127 (4), the court can either approve
    the variation as made, or cancel it as unfairly
    prejudicial.
  • Re Holders Investment Trust 1971 To prove the
    variation is unfairly prejudicial the minority
    must show that the majority was seeking some
    advantage themselves as members of a different
    class.

14
Application of Variation Rules
  • It is only necessary to follow variation of class
    rights procedure if what is proposed amounts to a
    variation of class rights. The following do not
    constitute a variation
  • 1. To issue chares of the same class to allottees
    who are not already members of the class. White v
    Bristol Aeroplane Co 1953.
  • 2. To subdivide shares of another class with the
    incidental effect of increasing the voting
    strength of that other class. Greenhalgh v
    Arderne Cinemas 1950.
  • 3. To return capital to the holders of preference
    shares. House of Fraser Plc v ACGE Investments
    Ltd 1987.
  • 4. To create issue a new class of preference
    shares with priority over an existing class of
    ordinary shares. Re John Smiths Tadcaster
    Brewery Co Ltd 1953.

15
Minority Protection
  • Protection is afforded under s. 127 CA 1985 where
    class rights have been varied within the meaning
    of the Act.
  • If the minority in a class cannot protect itself
    by establishing that there has been a variation,
    or that the variation was unfairly prejudicial,
    it may still obtain a remedy under the minority
    protection rules.
  • S. 459 CA 1985 court relief can be sought.
  • Rule under Foss v Harbottle.
  • Alterations made bona fide for the company as a
    whole cannot be challenged.

16
  • The End
  • I hope you enjoyed the lecture
  • Any questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com