Framework for Monitoring

1
Framework for Monitoring Evaluating the
HRD Strategic Framework for the Public Service

• National HRP/D Steering Committee
• 17 September 2009

2
Rationale Purpose

• Tracking tool for the HRD Strategic Framework
• Promote implementation of HRDSF
• Giving managers space to manage
• Recognition of GWME other systems
• More supportive developmental
• Building a performance orientation in HRD
• Development of learning organisations in the PS

3
Structure of the ME Template

• Outcomes based and results oriented
• Greater accountability transparency
• Track progress demonstrate impact of
  intervention
• Responds to four pillars of the HRDS
• Hybrid qualitative and quantitative indicators
• Should not overburden departments

4
Key Considerations

• Does it provide a structure for ME?
• Are the nature of indicators appropriate?
• Can it help improve performance?
• Can it strengthen HRD Implementation?
• Is it practicable
• What should be reporting milestones?
• Can it be web-based?

5
HRD Planning Cycle
6
Implementing a Strategic Framework for HRD Vision
2015 in the Public Service
Step 1 Conduct Stakeholder Review
Legal and Political Mandate
Step 2 Design Conceptual Framework
Step 3 Design Strategic Framework
Step 10 Annual Performance Review Report
Step 4 Guidelines to Implement Step by Step
Step 9 Annual Consultative Conference
Step 5 Annual HRD Implementation Plans
Step 8 Steering Committee
Step 6 Monitoring and Evaluation Tools
Step 7 Bi-annual Reviews
6
7
National Departments Compliance Levels
8
Schematic vision of roll out
2008
2009-2010
2011 onwards
indicative
Quality improvement and analysis phase
Systems improvement
Framing phase ME Framework And Tool
Fellowship
Refinement
Adoption
Embracement Victory
9
(No Transcript)
10
Governance indicators
The process by which those in authority are
selected, affirmed and replaced (Voice and
accountability political stability absence of
violence)
Governance indicators

• Differ along many other dimensions
• Are aggregated into distinct indices
• Measure different aspects on the quality of
  governance, incl.

The capacity of government to formulate and
implement policies (Govt effectiveness
regulatory quality and the predictability of
policymaking)
The respect of citizens state for institutions
that govern interactions among them (Rule of
law control of corruption/severity of
corruption bureaucratic efficiency).
11
Social indicators

• Health and Food Security (efforts to maintain and
  improve the nutritional health of the population)

• Housing and basic services (access to
  housing/shelter, water, sanitation, electricity)

• Human Resource Development (approached from the
  education system of indicators point of view)

Social indicators consist of six categories,
namely

• Social Cohesion (includes groups and networks
  trust and solidarity collective action
  co-operation information and communication
  inclusivity empowerment and political action

• Poverty and Inequality (includes Gini-coefficient
  and Human Poverty Index)

• Human Development (as measured by the Human
  Development Index).