Title: The QIC Factor Model
1The QIC Factor Model
QIC Strategy 5 October 2006
2Introduction/Overview
- Overview of Queensland Investment Corporation
(QIC) - Overview
- Alpha Beta Approach
- What the Factor Model is and where it fits in
- Why the Factor Model?
- Factor Model Design Principles
- Generation of economic factor paths
- Asset yield/return models
- Portfolio construction based upon client
investment objectives
3Introduction/Overview (cont)
- Economic Scenario Generation
- Asset Models
- Discussion of Academia vs the real world
- Strengths and weakness (general accusations)
- Specific examples of some of the real world
issues - Our attempt to capture the best of both worlds
- Our Approach aiming for the best of both worlds
4Section 1.
5QIC
- QIC is a wholesale funds manager
- 50 Billion under management
- Approximately 80 clients
- Major clients are QSuper and Queensland Treasury
- Government owned but independent from Government
Influence - Pursuing alpha beta separation for our major
client
6Alpha Beta
- ?eta
- A return derived from a broad market or otherwise
defined universe of assets or securities - It is accessible via mechanistic processes which
are transparent and readily defined - All investors receive equivalent returns before
fees and tax - Generally equivalent to market return
- Alpha
- A return derived from skillfully selecting among
markets or securities to build unique portfolios - It is accessible only via proprietary processes
developed and maintained by portfolio managers - Each investor receives a unique return (allowing
for collective investment) - Generally equivalent to active return
7Implications of Alpha Beta
- Alpha Committee
- Decide allocation of alpha risk budget, in line
with client objectives and constraints - Limits on
- Capital used
- Fees (MER)
- Correlation with beta
- Beta Management (Strategy)
- Selection and investment in various betas to meet
client objectives within client constraints - Limits on
- Capital used
- Fees (MER)
- Asset Allocation ranges
8Section 2.
- What the Factor Model is
- and where it fits in
9The QIC Factor Model
- Produces a set of possible return forecasts
(1,000 per asset class)
Australian Equities cumulative return forecasts
10Forecasts are required for portfolio
construction
Client Objectives Scorecard
Asset Return Forecasts
Portfolio Return Forecasts
Potential Portfolios
etc
Asset Allocations
US Equity
AU Equity
AU 3yr Bonds
Sensitivity Analysis / Portfolio Improvement
Cash
11Factor Modeling Overview
- Economic Scenarios
- (paths of cash, inf., growth)
- Asset Return Distributions
- Portfolio Construction
- (vs client scorecard objectives)
12Section 3.
- Why the Factor Model?
- The problems with the existing approach
13Problems with the existing approach
- Markowitz (1952) represents the standard approach
- Many acknowledged weaknesses with the approach
- Assumed IID (at the height of a bubble it could
go either way) - Equilibrium numbers ignore current prices
- Diversification controlled by correlation
correlations change - over time i.e. different periods e.g. 1960-1980,
1980-2000 - over the same time period if measure differently
eg 1yr vs 5yr steps - because of paradigms change (e.g. post Volcker)
- Performance above CPI not intuitively managed
14Correlations change over time
15Correlations change if step size changes.
US 1980-2004
US 1980-2004
16Standard approach replaced with?
- A yield based approach
- With common drivers (factors) affecting asset
yields e.g. - expected inflation, expected cash, expected
growth. - We treat returns not related to these factors as
idiosyncratic to the asset class. - With such an approach
- Correlations can change over time consider the
correlation between cash and 3 year bonds, with a
rate hike - over 1 year - negative correlation
- over 5 years - positive correlation
- Scenarios are considered consistently across all
asset classes e.g. increase in inflation,
increase in inflation risk premium. - Diversification (or lack of) more accurately
modeled
17Section 4.
- Factor Model
- Design Principles
18Design Principles
- Based upon yield modeling (returns are not
modeled directly) - As discussed
- Module Plug Play
- Can change various models, scenarios,
assumptions, sensitivities. Most differences in
valuations can be traced to differences in
assumptions we want to be able to capture this.
This approach also leaves room to grow. - Fair Value model
- Presents a model fair value for any scenario
- If prices double what do we expect for returns
going forward - Consistent across asset classes
- Uniform treatment of increased inflation or
increased volatility of inflation.
19Factor Modeling Overview
- Economic Scenarios
- (paths of cash, inf., growth)
- Asset Return Distributions
- Portfolio Construction
- (vs scorecard objectives)
20Economic Scenario Modeling
- Step1. Create future paths of inflation, cash,
growth for various countries - Expectations and volatilities of the economic
factor paths are provided by the QIC economics
team. 1000 paths are simulated for each country. -
- Step 2. Validate scenarios
- For each simulation
- Ensure sensible intra-country relationships
between real GDP, inflation and real cash. - Ensure sensible inter-country relationship
between real GDP, inflation and real cash..
- 1. Economic Scenarios
-
- 2. Asset Return Distributions
- 3. Portfolio Construction
21Asset Return Modeling
- 1. Economic Scenarios
-
- 2. Asset Return Distributions
- 3. Portfolio Construction
Step 1. Specify asset return yield models
(standard theory). Step 2. Specify values or
models for parameters Step3. Use economic
scenarios to generate yield and return paths
for assets
22Portfolio Construction
- 1. Economic Scenarios
-
- 2. Asset Return Distributions
- 3. Portfolio Construction
Step 1. Map asset return paths into Investment
Objectives Scorecard Step 2. Measure
performance of various portfolios against
scorecard objectives Step 3. Repeat process
changing scenarios/models/parameters to assess
the robustness of portfolios to various
assumptions.
23Section 5.
- Economic Scenario Generation
- The Creation of Sensible Future Economic Factor
Paths
24Economic Factor Path Generation
25Step 1. GDP and GDP Heat
GDPt GDPt-1 MRgdp. (GDPLR - GDPt-1) MRgdp x
GDP Heatt-1 x N(0,1) GDP Heatt a.
(GDPt GDPLR) (1-b) x GDP Heatt-1
26Inter-country GDP Contagion
Contagion effects are applied to real GDP as
follows
The new path for GDP (including contagion) is
used to recalculate GDP Heat (which is then used
to estimate inflation).
27Step 2. Inflation
- Inflation is simulated as a function of GDP heat
(output gap).
28Step 2. Inflation
A traditional Monte Carlo simulation is used to
estimate smoothed inflation (1 yr average) based
upon economists expectations and volatility
bands. Inflation contagion across regions can
then be applied using the same approach as used
for GDP. Final inflation paths are re-adjusted to
fit within economists beliefs.
29Step 3. Real Cash
To obtain real cash we first estimate nominal
cash via a Taylor Rule (based upon Central Bank
policy)
Where inflation heat is defined similar to GDP
heat.
Nominal cash is estimated as a weighted average
of Taylor Cash and cash estimated from a Monte
Carlo Simulation based upon economist forecasts.
30Step 4. Feedback Loop
Finally, we feedback the effects of real cash on
inflation and real GDP
31Example
32Section 6.
- Asset Modeling
- How economics drives asset prices return
distributions
33Is the term premium zero now?
10year Bonds 5
3year Bonds 5
Cash 5
34Term premium is not zero if expected cash is
lower than current levels
10year Bonds 5
3year Bonds 5
Cash 5
Expected Level of cash
Expected average cash over 10yrs 4 therefore
TP 10yr 1.0
Expected average cash over 3yrs 4.5 therefore
TP 3yr 0.5
35Return on Assets Nominal Bonds
- Return on Bonds for a period
- expected inflation over the period
- expected real cash over the period
- inflation risk premium for the period
- real cash risk premium for the period
- risk premium/discount other
- Bond Yield Expected Return over the life of the
bond
Expected nominal cash
Bond risk premium
36Return on Assets Inflation Linked Bonds (ILBs)
- Expected Return on ILB for a period
- expected inflation over the period
- expected real cash over the period
- real cash risk premium for the period
- risk premium/discount other
Expected nominal cash
ILB risk premium
37Return on Assets Equity
- Expected Return on Equity for a period
- expected inflation over the period
- expected real cash over the period
- inflation risk premium for the period
- real cash premium for the period
- growth risk premium for the period
- risk premium/discount other
- Also EY (constant) expected non-retained
earnings growth for the period
Expected nominal cash
Equity risk premium
38Equity Returns other
- Model EY as above
- Model Earnings using trend line (with Dividend
reinvested) - Combine these to get a price series (returns then
are just accounting)
39PE and E Relationship
40EY Model
41Model Forecast
42Consistent Risk Premium from Factor Analysis
- Risk Premia are by definition compensation for
risk. - If two assets have an exposure to a risk factor
then the relative risk premium for each asset
should be proportional to the exposure to that
factor. - Similarly, the more volatile the factor the
higher the risk premium required. - So risk premium in the factor model can change
over time.
Risk Premium from Factor Analysis
43Modeling asset distributions
- By inputting various scenarios for economic
drivers, we get model paths of asset yields and
returns. - We assume reversion to the model consistent with
history i.e. the same historical distribution
(other models could be imposed). - We apply the same historical correlation between
model errors to recreate known relationships ie
5yr and 10yr bonds tend to move together,
modeling totally uncorrelated reversion to
similar models would not be correct.
44Example of modeling
45Small change approach, for radical in change in
approach
- Weve discussed the difference in outcome, but is
the approach too radically different (and perhaps
risky) - Yield vs return biggest difference, after that
still informed by history (though not dominated
by it we want to explain history not rely on it
to repeat). - Basic approach relatively similar after this
change, and changing yields to returns is
relatively simple. - Need to implement this yield vs return approach
in a intelligent and disciplined way. The same
challenge really!
46Summary
- We have developed a yield based approach that
- considers changes to the common drivers of
returns (factors) consistently between asset
classes - uses historical correlations between yield model
errors (the bit not explained by the common
factor model) - creates time varying risk premium
- takes into account current prices
47Section 7.
- Academia vs the real world
48General Accusations
- Academia
- ( Quant. processes)
- Narrow focus
- Impracticable (eg Markowitz)
- Disciplined
- Only as good as its assumptions
- Appearance of certainty
- Market Practice
- Unscientific
- Ill-disciplined
- Broad scope
- Practical
- More snake-oil than substance
- Appearance of certainty
49Real World Problems
- The Tech bubble Being right isnt enough
- Multiple objectives Quantification is subjective
- The Economic Herd
- Attribution focus not right (s/be on process)
- Forecasts not what they seem
50Forecasts arent forecasts
You need to be aware of the how why of some
information
51Section 8.
- Our Approach
- Aiming for the best of both worlds, as we all do
52Our approach
- Try to start with the right questions (not the
available answers) - Happy to be approximately right rather than
precisely wrong - Aim for Consistency
- across asset classes time
- Focus effort towards the most material issues
- And dont get carried away with precision, if
available precision is swamped by unknowns - Try to be aware of own weaknesses
53Some of our questions
- Inflation real cash duration of equities?
- Asset price inflation and CPI inflation?
- Where is asset pricing headed to?
- What should we do differently?
54