Title: Polarimetry of Polarized Positrons K. Peter Schuler
1e Analyzing Power what we know from old GEANT3
simulations
(an archeological excercise with some useful
insights)
E166 Collaboration Meeting Princeton, 22-24 May
2006
e Analyzing Power K. Peter Schüler
2expected and measured e asymmetries
proposal the ominous table 13
measurements
actual conditions were different in several
ways beam energy 50 ? 46.6 GeV
beam current 1 x 1010 ? 0.5 x 1010
lens/spectrometer CsI-detector geometry
background!!!
to what extent will these differences affect the
analyzing power and the expected asymmetries?
E166 Collaboration Meeting Princeton, 22-24 May
2006
e Analyzing Power K. Peter Schüler
3Conditions assumed for GEANT3 simulations
- Positron Beam at Reconversion Target
- quasi-monochromatic with Gaussian ?E/E 20
- zero spatial width and angular divergence
- centered on reconversion target
- Reconversion Target
- 0.5 r.l. W
- 12.5 mm upsteam of active region of iron
- Analyzer Iron
- 50 mm dia. x 75 mm long
- PE 0.07
- CsI-Detector
- angular photon acceptance 8 (layout
4b proposal) - angular photon acceptance 14 (layout
5a) - GEANT3 processes
- bremsstrahlung ()
- annihilation ()
() spin-dependent treatment, - Compton ()
but only through 1st generation - pair production
- photo effect
E166 Collaboration Meeting Princeton, 22-24 May
2006
e Analyzing Power K. Peter Schüler
4Detector Acceptance
layout 4b (proposal) vs. layout 5a
4b covers approximately the central crystal, 5a
covers approximately the full 3x3 crystal array
E166 Collaboration Meeting Princeton, 22-24 May
2006
e Analyzing Power K. Peter Schüler
5synopsis of geometries
layout 4b
layout 5a
E166 Collaboration Meeting Princeton, 22-24 May
2006
e Analyzing Power K. Peter Schüler
6e Analyzing Power (energy-weighted)
E166 Collaboration Meeting Princeton, 22-24 May
2006
e Analyzing Power K. Peter Schüler
7and by numbers
E166 Collaboration Meeting Princeton, 22-24 May
2006
e Analyzing Power K. Peter Schüler
8Positron Beam Polarizations
spectrometer positron asymmetry
() no. of analyzing
pos. pol. current energy ()
? ?? CsI-crystals
power Pe Pe
(A) (MeV) ()
() () ()
() () 100
3.7 0.57 0.17
5 19.0 1 7.0 43 13
120 4.5
0.88 0.10 5
18.0 1 7.0 70 9 140
5.2 1.03
0.08 5 16.8 1 7.0
88 9 150 5.6
0.78 () 0.10 () 5
16.0 1 7.0 70 10
160 6.0 0.83
0.12 5 15.8 1
7.0 75 12 180
6.7 0.89 0.21
5 15.8 1 7.0 80 20
180, ferrofl. 6.7 0.98
0.21 5 15.8
1 7.0 89 20 140
5.2 1.08 0.10
2,4,6,8 ? 7.0
? 140 5.2
1.06 0.07 2,4,5,6,8
16.0 1 7.0 96 9 140
5.2 0.91
0.07 1-9 16.0 1 7.0
81 10
() based on preliminary values shown by
Ralph in Vienna (Nov. 2005) () based on
Zeuthen analysis from 27. Feb. 2006
E166 Collaboration Meeting Princeton, 22-24 May
2006
e Analyzing Power K. Peter Schüler
9Summary
- original GEANT3 analyzing power generated
- in 2003 is essentially still valid for the
actual - experimental conditions in E166
- analyzing power decreases only modestly between
- single central crystal and full 3x3 crystal
array - positron beam polarization is indeed large
E166 Collaboration Meeting Princeton, 22-24 May
2006
e Analyzing Power K. Peter Schüler