2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary

Description:

2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary. Colloque pour l'actuaire d sign 2006. Canadian ... 2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary. Colloque pour l'actuaire ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: Actua7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary


1
Canadian Institute of Actuaries
LInstitut canadien des actuaires
  • 2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary
  • Colloque pour lactuaire désigné 2006

2
PD-7 Report of the Task Force on
MaterialityReview of Current Practices
  • Patricia Hladun
  • Office of the Superintendent of Financial
    Institutions

3
Overview
  • 150 AARs and 52 DCAT reports as at year-end 2004
    were reviewed
  • AARs and DCATs were reviewed separately due to
    significant differences in the standard
    magnitudes and bases
  • methods or measures considered were those present
    in at least 5 of the reports

4
AAR - use of materiality
  • used as a guideline to determine the significance
    of an omission, understatement or overstatement
    in the data used to form the opinion
  • a decision, assumption, selection, or inference
    the actuary made would be changed or influenced
    or a decision of a user of the valuation who has
    a reasonable knowledge of business or economic
    activity would be changed or influenced
  • a subsequent event (such as an error in the data
    discovered after issuing the report) having an
    impact in results of less than x may not require
    a revision to the valuation

5
AAR - use of materiality
  • reasonable range was occasionally calculated in
    addition to materiality
  • data reconciliation was often held at a tighter
    tolerance than the stated materiality standard

6
AAR - summary of methods
  • We categorized the approaches into the following
    methods
  • 61 rule of thumb
  • 24 judgment with validation
  • 8 judgment
  • 6 external auditors standard
  • 1 no standard

7
AAR rule of thumb
  • Also considered were
  • the MCT/BAAT ratio and
  • the auditors materiality standard

8
AAR rule of thumb
9
AAR judgment with validation
10
AAR pure judgment
  • Some or all of the following were considered
  • value of the unpaid liabilities
  • surplus position of the company and the margins
    on solvency tests
  • external auditors materiality level
  • position of Head Office Account
  • potential users of the financial statements
  • net written premium and growth in written
    business
  • potential impact of errors on future premium
    levels and retro-assessments
  • net income after tax

11
AAR auditors standard
  • 9 reports indicated that the materiality standard
    was equivalent to the auditors standard and did
    not provide any additional validation
  • many actuaries indicated that the materiality
    standard had been discussed with the external
    auditor
  • in some cases the actuary decreased the standard
    from that indicated by the rule of thumb to the
    auditors standard

12
AAR external review comments
  • Comments focused on the following issues
  • the standard is larger than typically seen
  • the standard is more narrow than typically seen
  • the standard is only justified by the current
    large asset base
  • the actuarys standard is larger than the
    auditors standard
  • no explanation of the derivation of the standard
    is included in the AAR
  • no statement of discussion of the standard with
    the auditor is included
  • carried liabilities are materially greater than
    the AAs estimate but there is no disclosure in
    the notes to financial statements

13
DCAT - use of materiality
  • used as a guideline to determine the significance
    of an omission, understatement or overstatement
    in the data used to form the opinion
  • should become more rigorous in examining a
    scenario where the solvency margin is closer to
    the minimum threshold
  • used to determine the level of rigor required in
    the analysis

14
DCAT - summary of methods
  • We categorized the approaches into the following
    methods
  • 42 standard based on a measure or verified
    against a measure
  • 33 judgment
  • 25 no standard

15
DCAT notable measures
16
DCAT external review comments
  • all comments on the materiality standard, except
    one, stated that the AA did not refer to a
    standard in the report
  • the lone other comment stated that the selected
    materiality standard in the pre-release report
    was too low but that it was increased in the
    final version of the report.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com