Title: SoTL and Assessment
1SoTL and Assessment
- Sandi Regan
- Hayat Weiss
- Tom Laughlin
2Assessment
- Formative Assessment Tasting the punch, can
make changes to final product - Summative Assessment Final product, less
flexibility
3Assessment
- Purpose is to engender competence
- Norms
- Process is connected to learners world, frames
of reference, and value. - Demonstration of learning
- multiple ways to represent knowledge and skills
- allows for attainment of outcomes at different
points in time. - Self-assessment is essential to the overall
assessment process - (Wlodkowski Ginsberg, 1995)
4How much evidence is enough?
- Tendency to ask too broad a question
- Need to define in ways that can be measured
- Problems determining adequate measurement
- Being intimidated by educational research
emphasis - SoTL involves creation of new genres
- Being explorers rather than settlers
5Games of LearningPiaget Comes Alive
Sandi Regan
6Questions
- How can students construct their own ways of
learning? - What methods can help students develop genuine
knowledge that they can retain and apply to their
work with children?
7 Howard Gardner stated
- Understanding is itself a complex process that
is not well understood a sufficient grasp of
concepts, principles or skills so that one can
bring them to bear on new problems and
situations, deciding in which ways ones present
competencies can suffice and in which ways one
may require new skills or knowledge. - (Wiggins, 1998)
8One Method Doesnt Fit All
- Active Learning
- Multiple Intelligences
- Model Teaching
- Constructivism
9Learning is constructing meaning.
constructivism maintains that students are
active agents in the learning process, exploring,
testing, and probing in the pursuit of knowledge,
understanding, and ultimately, personal meaning.
The learner is curious, independent, and
diligent Chickering and Gamson (2002)
10Early Childhood Theory Puzzle or Game Assignment
- create a visual game for other students that
focuses on the concepts and/or stages of an
particular early childhood development theory or
many theories - Piagets Cognitive Development
- Eriksons Psychosocial Development
- Maslows Hierarchy of Needs
- Behaviorism
- Bronfenbrenners Ecological Systems, etc.
11Goals for Students for Game/Puzzle Assignment
- Learn about theories by creating game
- Provide information and help other students to
learn and genuinely understand the theories by
playing each games - Explore multiple views of theories by playing
other students games
12Assessments
- Theory game or puzzle checklist
- Verbal feedback
- Pretests and posttests
- Second posttest
- Students assessments
13(No Transcript)
14Students Assessments of Creating and Playing
Each Others Games
- Verbal Feedback
- Ongoing Student Remarks
- Survey
15Question 1
How helpful was creating your theory game in
helping you understand that particular theory?
16Students Indications (43 people answered
survey.)
- Scale
- ___________________________________
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 - no effect helpful very helpful
- of people
- 1 2 14 1 2 3
2 18
17- Question 2
- How helpful was doing the game activities in
Early Childhood Growth Development class in
helping you understand ECE theories?
18Students Indications (43 people answered
survey.)
___________________________________ 1
2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 no effect
helpful very helpful of people
1 14
3 4 21
19Samples of Students Quotes
- Key information given helped bring the learned
info to the front of my mindI definitely
recommend developing questions about a theory and
setting up flashcards to use with the answers on
back. I learn best if I am teaching someone
else. - Sometimes I get confused on different theories
and the stages, but by doing this I now can
recognize Freuds stages. Its a lot easier to
learn when you are enjoying yourself. - Because unlike reading information, I was forced
to present information which caused me to
actually use it while designing my poster. After,
it just became known to me as knowledge.
20Added Benefits Playing The Games
- Student initiated conversations about the
theories - longer and deeper discussions about the theories
- OPPORTUNITIES
- to address misunderstandings students had of
theory concepts - to discuss the errors in some games or students
answers that were incorrect in a laidback,
relaxing atmosphere
21Getting more mileage
- How can you connect your assessment approach with
other initiatives at your college or in your
discipline?
22Value of SoTL Approach
- Informs teaching in ongoing way
- Makes classroom more interesting and relevant for
everybody - Share with other colleagues keep ideas vibrant
- Recognize value of keeping student evidence over
time - Decreases isolation and boredom
23Scholarship of Teaching and LearningIn a
Mathematics ClassroomAlgebra I
- Hayat Weiss
- Middlesex Community College
24Student Placement Results
- Placed into Developmental English 55
- Placed into Developmental Reading 29
- Placed into Developmental Math 82
- Honors 10
25Algebra I Background Context
- Longstanding problem of course completion in my
Algebra classes from 1986 until 1999 - Course completionPassing course with D- or
better - I did not differentiate between F and W grades
- Completion was slightly over 50 and varied from
class to class anywhere between 27 and 77 -
-
26Interventions to Improve Course Completion in
Algebra
- Interventions prior to 1999
- Called students after they missed 3 classes
- Sent warning letters
- Met with students individually in my office
- In 1999, I joined the Collaborative Intervention
Teams project. - In Fall 02, I joined the Carnegie Community of
Practice
27The Collaborative Intervention Teams Model
- Number of Teams across the college per semester
4-10
28Team Participants
- Faculty Members from different disciplines
Math, English, Technology,.. - LD Specialists
- Academic and Career Counselors
- Health Services Staff
- Academic Support staff
29The Way Teams Functioned
- Teams consisted of a faculty member and one
other person. - Teams were autonomous. Each team worked out its
own plan of action. - All teams met as a group once or twice during the
semester to exchange ideas and report on their
activities.
30Algebra Team ModelFaculty Learning Specialist
- Learning specialist responsibilities
- Attend every class except test days
- Administer learning tools during second week of
semester - -Study Habits Assessment Survey
- -Learning Styles Inventory
- Help students individually.
31Student Tutor (only 2 semesters)
- Student tutor responsibilities
- Attend class once a week
- Check homework and return to students during
same class - Interact with students as time allowed
- Our data showed that collecting homework made no
difference in course completion. Needs
revisiting.
32Students response to having an assistant in
the classroom
- Survey results
- 11 said it made a strong difference
- 45 said it made somewhat of a difference
- 44 said it made no difference
- Two representative comments
- _If I did not remember most of it from HS
Math, I might have been more interested. That is
what I get for not reviewing for the placement
test. - _One might be able to explain things better
for you.
33Additional Interventions
- Feedback form
- Faculty decided to seek feedback regularly
from students and devised a form that students
were asked to fill every 4 weeks. - Changed approach to teaching some topics,
especially word problems (in Fall 02)
34Feedback Form
- Students set realistic, concrete goals for
themselves - They measure their study time and keep track of
their grades - They practice making positive statements
- They look for occasions to reward themselves
- They go over the old forms to see if they
accomplished their goals. - Students tell us how we can help them
35Benefits and Drawbacks of Feedback Form
- Benefits
- -Students stay involved in their own learning
- -The language emphasizes a positive attitude
- -Students evaluate their performance every few
weeks, so no surprises at the end of the semester - -Students own responsibility is continuously
reinforced - Drawbacks
- -Takes too much time and too much effort
- -Sometimes we cannot do what they ask for (ex.
give less homework) - -Boring and repetitive.
36Outcomes and implications(from Administration)
- MA 1103 Algebra I - Spring 1999
37Outcomes and implications(from Administration)
- MA 1101 Fundamentals of Math -Spring 1999
38Outcomes and implications(from Administration)
- EN 1101 Basic Writing - Spring 1999
39Questions
- Are these interventions making any difference in
student learning? - What is student learning? How do we measure it?
- What is the best way to measure outcomes in a
systematic way? - Do these efforts have any effect on course
completion?
40Analysis
- I compared completion rates between Regular
classes and Collaborative classes starting in F99 - I compared completion rates in all classes prior
to F99 and in all classes (the two types grouped
together) from F99 on.
41Comparative data
42Statistical Values F99-S02
43Regular Classes Vs Collaborative Fall 99-S02
- Regular classes box plot on top and collaborative
below - .56 .665 .75
- .47 .75
-
- .54 .64 .71
- .48 .78
Regular
Collaborative
44 NO Difference between the two types of classes!
- Completion regular classes pr .6393
- Completion collaborative classes pc .627
- It seems no difference but lets check
- Hypothesis test Ho pr pc
- Ha pr gt pc
- P-value .41
- Assuming Ho is true, we have a 41 chance of
getting such results due to normal variation.
Therefore, there is No significant difference.
45What Happened?All that work for nothing?
- Did more students with learning disabilities sign
up in the collaborative classes? - Could it be that there is a crossover effect
between the collaborative courses and the regular
classes? - In other words, did some of the methodology
affect my other Algebra classes?
46How do I check it out?
- The number of disabilities students did not seem
to be a factor - How do I check for crossover effect?
- I compared data prior to Fall 99 with data from
Fall 99 on.
47Is there a difference between F93-S99 and F99-S03
48Is the Difference Between the Proportions
Significant?
- Completion F93-S99 p1171/ 337 .507
- Completion F99-S03 p2 184/ 291 .632
- Is the difference significant or is it due to
chance and normal variation? - Hypothesis test Ho p1 p2
- Ha p1 lt p2
- The test resulted in a P-value .0008
- Assuming that p1 p2 there are 8 chances in
10,000 of getting such results. That is very
rare therefore we conclude that there is a
significant improvement in course completion.
49Where is the Improvement Most Apparent? Box
plots F93-S99 F99-S03
- .44 .5 .62
- .27
.78 - .54 .65
.74 - .47
.78
F93-S99
F99--S03
50Conclusion
- It seems that there is a crossover effect
- The learning specialist became more comfortable
with the course and was able to help all students
outside of class, not just the students signed up
in the collaborative course. - Interventions did make a difference
- Maximum rate stayed the same. No Algebra class
got better than 78 completion rate. - The bottom 3 quarters were pushed up
dramatically. - The lowest completion rate went up from 27 to
47.
51Electronic Communication in a Basic Writing
Classroom What Do Students Gain?
- Tom Laughlin
- Middlesex Community College
- Bedford, MA
52Other Basic Writing Instructors Experiences
Using Computers in Classrooms
- Computer-related assignments increase student
involvement in their own educations -
- Provides variety and adds interest
- Positively influenced students attitudes
- Students feel they are learning the technology of
the future - Contributes to the social needs of some students,
builds community
53Other Basic Writing Instructors Experiences
Using Computers in Classrooms
- More comfortable learning environment for
nonverbal, shy, socially marginalized students - Students are not limited to the improvisational,
spontaneous style required in most classroom
discussions - Helps create a more student-centered classroom
54Other Basic Writing Instructors Experiences
Using Computers in Classrooms
- Fosters collaborative learning
- Encourages writing for an audience other than the
teacher - Students develop confidence and learning skills
that help them in other classroom environments
55My Interests
- Exploring ways that synchronous and asynchronous
communication might enhance my students written
communication
56My Hopes
- To increase students comfort with electronic
communication - To increase the fluency of students written,
electronic communication - To improve the quality of students written,
electronic communication
57Alexander W. Astin, The Civic Challenge of
Educating the Underprepared Student (2000)
- As educators we value being smart much more than
we do developing smartness we forget that our
institutions primary mission is to develop
students personal capacities, not merely to
select and certify those students whose
intellectual talents are already well developed
by the time they reach us.
58Wlodkowski Ginsberg,Diversity and motivation
(1995)
- Self-assessment allows us to gain perspective on
how we understand ourselves as learners, knowers,
apprentices in a discipline, and citizens in a
complex and paradoxical world
59Cross Steadman, Classroom Research
Implementing theScholarship of Teaching (1996)
- Research on teaching and learning in classrooms
cannot exclude those who are most involved and
most affected, namely teachers and students.
60Changes to my Basic Writing class
- Met 1 day / week in networked classroom held
electronic discussions - Developed electronic assignments
- Involving students in readings, discussions (oral
and electronic), self-reflection, and written
formal papers about electronic communication
61Changes to my Basic Writing class
- A formal essay assignment asked students to
explore the advantages and/or disadvantages of
electronic communication in college by using own
personal experiences in our class (and perhaps
in other classes at MCC)
62My Questions
- Will the use of written, electronic
communication in my basic writing classes - a) increase students comfort with written,
electronic communication? - b) increase the length of students written,
electronic communication? - c) improve the quality of students written,
electronic communication?
63Assessments
- Pre and Post Surveys - Comfort levels
Experience levels - Length of written electronic entries
- Quality of written electronic entries
- Student reflections
64STUDENT SURVEY ON COMPUTERS ELECTRONIC
COMMUNICATIONComfort Levels
- 3) How comfortable are you using a computer?
- 7) How comfortable are you with meaningful
electronic written - communication and/or serious electronically
written discussions? - 8) If a college course you were considering
expected some written - electronic communication (such as electronic
chat, discussion boards, etc.), how might this
influence your signing up for that course? - 9) If a job you were considering expected some
written electronic - communication (such as electronic meetings,
emailed reports, - electronic discussions with co-workers or
supervisors, etc.), how might this influence your
job application?
65RESULTS Â 1)
Comparisons between pre and post surveys of
students regarding comfort levels Â
Survey Chart 1
66STUDENT SURVEY ON COMPUTERS ELECTRONIC
COMMUNICATIONExperience Levels
- 4) How much experience have you had using a
computer for writing? - 5) Have you used electronic communication (such
as email, chat, etc.)? - 6) How much experience have you had with
electronic communication (any type of
communication with others using computers)?
67RESULTS Â Comparisons between pre and post
surveys of students regarding experience levels Â
Survey Chart 2 Â
68STUDENT SURVEYOpen-Ended Questions Regarding
Benefits" and Disadvantages"
- 10) What do you see as some possible benefits for
you and/or others when communicating
electronically? - 11) What do you see as some possible
disadvantages for you and/or others when
communicating electronically?
69Students Pre-survey Responses to Open-Ended
Questions
- Benefits - rather general focused on
- a) improving typing and computer skills
- b) being more familiar with current technology
70Students Post-survey Responses to Open-Ended
Questions
- Benefits - tended to be more specific
- and focused on
- a) more openness in expressing thoughts and
feelings than with oral communication - b) ease when using electronic communication
71Students Pre- and Post-survey Responses to
Open-Ended Questions
- Disadvantages
- a) varying typing speeds
- b) limitations on individual access to technology
- c) use of electronic communication to the
detriment of oral communication - d) lack of verbal and physical cues
- e) impersonal nature of electronic communication
72 Comparisons of the length of students written,
electronic entries Â
Word Count Chart - Males
Word Count Chart - Females
73Basic Writing Exit Criteria
- 1)Â A relatively well developed and expressed main
idea - 2)Â A sense of introduction, conclusion, and
organization - 3)Â Most paragraphs developed around appropriate
topic sentences - 4)Â Sufficient relevant supporting details
- 5)Â Few if any fragments or run-ons that suggest
lack of sentence sense - 6)Â A reasonable grasp of rules for commas and
apostrophes - 7)Â Few serious spelling errors
74Quality Comparison Chart samplePlease indicate
the degree of change between Sample 1A and Sample
1B for each of the criteria.
75Comparisons of the quality of students written,
electronic entries
Writing Quality Chart
76Basic Writing Exit Criteria
- 1)Â A relatively well developed and expressed main
idea - 2)Â A sense of introduction, conclusion, and
organization - 3)Â Most paragraphs developed around appropriate
topic sentences - 4)Â Sufficient relevant supporting details
- 5)Â Few if any fragments or run-ons that suggest
lack of sentence sense - 6)Â A reasonable grasp of rules for commas and
apostrophes - 7)Â Few serious spelling errors
77Student quotes from formal papersSheila wrote
- Electronic communication, in my class, gives
students an opportunity to express their feelings
and opinions without any concerns. I have found
that students respond more often when they are on
the computer rather than sitting in class in
front of other students. Maybe the computer
gives them a sense of security, and allows them
to speak more freely. I know that I am much more
comfortable talking on a computer than in front
of most people. Some people in my class are quiet
and shy. When they get on the computer they seem
to talk much more with other students.
78Vicky wrote
- Another advantage to electronic communication I
have experienced is class discussion using a
discussion board. As I looked back at some of
my responces I noticed some were long and very
detaild. If I was to have this discussion in
class face-to-face with other people I would not
have been confident enough in myself, to say as
much as I did in the discussion board.
Electronic communication gives me the chance to
say how I feel without having to say it to
someones face.
79Pete wrote (one of the less vocal students in
class)
- my computer voice makes it easier to discuss
controversial issues. When I write someth ing on
paper, I feel it can be saved and critisized
for ever. This makes me nervous.
80Phil wrote
- Electronic communication is a very important
tool in college. Using the computer seems to
make some of the pressure of just writing a paper
go away. For example, in the Blackboard
Discussion Board my classmates and I seem to be
more open, and have more fun writing. I believe
this helps to take some stress and anxiety away,
and leads to better writing.Another big
advantage of communication by computer is you
get almost instant feedback from your classmates.
This can be helpful in many ways. I use the
feedback to look over what I wrote and see if I
can improve on it. I hope to see more teachers
and students taking advantage of this important
tool we call the computer. I know it will help
students communicate better with their teachers,
and other students. When you get the chance to
hear other peoples opinions and comments, you can
teach yourself to be a better writer.
81Denise wrote
- I dont think it is the same as our journals. We
didnt write a complete response. We would say
one thing and wait for response, then add to it
later. It was more like we were talking about
it, not writting about it.
82Pete wrote
- The first thing I notice is I tend to write
less on the computer. I think this can be very
helpful because you get to the point quicker.
In my opinion the topic can be made clearer by
keeping it short and to the point.
83Evan wrote
- Although there is much to praise on Electronic
Communication there are some possible
disadvantages. One being when people talk to
each other online or type to each other if you
will there is no structure no rules really. You
can even drop vowels in words. Some people think
that this hurts the people that are online
particularly young people. They fear that the
person will forget all rules that apply in
English.
84Denise wrote
- I noticed people using abreviations or acronyms
when electronically chatting. When I first
signed online, people were typing ASAP or
TTYL. I did not know what was going on. I had
to learn another jargon all over again, just like
the first day of school. These abreviations and
acronyms made it faster and easier to type, but
typeing faster makes us forget correct
punctuations and capital letters. - In my opinion, I agree with electronic
communication if you use it right. No one said,
When you go online to chat, forget everything
you learned in English growing up. It does help
us keep in touch with distant friends and
relatives, but we do not have to type like we
never were taught to write.
85My Questions
- Will the use of written, electronic
communication in my basic writing classes - a) increase students comfort with written,
electronic communication? - b) increase the length of students written,
electronic communication? - c) improve the quality of students written,
electronic communication?
86Providing Classroom Experiences with Synchronous
Electronic Communication
- Helped develop greater comfort positive
experiences with technology meaningful
electronic communication - Helped students fluency in writing
- Contributed to an improvement in the quality of
their written expression
87Benefits of this SoTL work for me
- Reinforced my interest in the benefits of
electronic written communication as part of
developmental writing courses - Thinking more about norms for electronic
communication - More conscious of gender differences in my
classes - Rethinking assessment measures
88Electronic Communication in a Basic Writing
Classroom What Do Students Gain? Thomas S.
Laughlin Associate Professor of English,
Middlesex Community College In Explorations
from a Community of Practice The Scholarship of
Teaching and Learning at Middlesex Community
College, Spring 2004 Available through
www.middlesex.mass.edu/carnegie
89Â Explorations from a Community of Practice The
Scholarship of Teaching and Learning at Middlesex
Community College, Spring 2004
CONTENTS Introduction
90Tutorial on Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
- from Indiana University, Bloomington
- http//webcenter1.aahe.org/sotl_tutorial/home.html
91Framing the Question (Goal Approach)
- 1. Define a goal
- 2. Ask and answer questions to refine the goal
(Colleagues are usually helpful.) - 3. Create a succinct summary of a specified
goal - 4. Ask what evidence would reveal that the
goal is achieved? - 5. Frame possible researchable questions
92Making Vague Questions Answerable Using
Operational Definitions
- Less framed
- Do students who help others learn an academic
discipline learn it better themselves? - Â
- Do students learn more in small classes?
- More framed
- Do students in CMSC 250 who tutor students in
CMSC 150 perform better on the CMSC 250 final
exam than students who do not tutor but have
similar grades in CMSC 150? - Do students in sections of Phys 118 enrolling
fewer than 50 students perform better on the
departmental final exam than students from
sections enrolling more than 75 students?
93Typical Measures Associated with Quantitative and
Qualitative Methods
- Quantitative
- course exam, project, paper scores
- survey scores (Likert)
- frequencies of multiple choice test item
responses - scores on standardized scales and tests
- counts (participation, web requests, office
visits) - measures of time use
- institutional research data (GPAs, grades,
admissions scores, frequency distributions of
demographics)
- Qualitative
- performances (possibly recorded on tape)
- interviews (possibly recorded on tape)
- focus groups
- student projects, term papers, essay items or
exams - reflective statements
- journals
- reports of others (counselors, etc.)
94Some Helpful Web sites
MCCs CASTL Group COPPER Cluster
Web www.middlesex.mass.edu/carnegie/ Explorations
from a Community of Practice http//www.middlesex
.mass.edu/carnegie/MCCCG/CGPublications.htm
COPPER Blog http//middlesex.blogs.com
Tutorial on the Scholarship of Teaching
Learning http//webcenter1.aahe.org/sotl_tutorial/
home.html Knowledge Media Lab Gallery
http//gallery.carnegiefoundation.org/
95(No Transcript)