Top Physics at the LHC - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Top Physics at the LHC

Description:

QCD - confinement (only colour singlets propagate over ... [ undoing' the parton shower] Theoretically favoured. Manifestly Infrared and Collinear Safe ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: sabah4
Category:
Tags: lhc | physics | top | undoing

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Top Physics at the LHC


1
Top Physics at the LHC
  • Manchester Christmas Meeting 2006
  • Chris Tevlin

2
Outline
  • Experimental Work
  • Comparison of two jet algorithms for
    reconstructing the top mass
  • Theoretical Work (to do!)
  • Understanding/extending the dipole subtraction
    method
  • Resummation
  • Application of these to ttbar cross section

3
Experimental Work
4
Introduction - Jet Algorithms
  • QCD - confinement (only colour singlets propagate
    over macroscopic distances)
  • No unique method of assigning (colourless)
    hadrons to (coloured) partons
  • Require a sensible definition of a Jet - two of
    the main types of algorithm are
  • Cone Algorithms
  • Cluster Algorithms

5
  • Cone Algorithms
  • Geometrically motivated
  • Fixes the angular extent of a jet with Radius in
    ?-? space (R invariant under boosts along the
    beam direction)
  • Requires some prescription for removing overlaps
    between jets
  • Not manifestly Infrared and collinear safe
    Atlfast!
  • Some Cone Algorithms Unsafe
  • Mid-point Cone Algorithms Safe
  • Clustering Algorithms (KtJet)
  • Kinematically motivated
  • undoing the parton shower
  • Theoretically favoured
  • Manifestly Infrared and Collinear Safe
  • All objects assigned exclusively to one jet

6
Motivation (Theoretical Issues)
  • Infrared safety - the algorithm is insensitive to
    the addition arbitrarily soft partons
  • Collinear safety - the algorithm is insensitive
    to the replacement of any (massless) object by a
    pair of (massless) collinear objects
  • Infrared safety - IR and Collinear safety
  • Some Algorithms are classified as Infrared
    Almost Safe. The algorithm is rendered safe in
    the presence of a detector with finite energy
    resolution and angular granularity - this is
    dangerous for several reasons
  • In order to perform a perturbative calculation
    one would need to know geometry of detector, cell
    thresholds etc
  • Since the angular extent of calorimeter cells,
    and cell energy thresholds are small, each term
    in such a calculation would be large - poor
    convergence!

7
Motivation (Experimental Issues)
  • In the Golden Channel the top mass
    reconstructed from 3 jets
  • By clustering to a specific jet multiplicity, one
    may hope to
  • Remove the soft underlying event (Exclusive Mode)
  • Solve Combinatorial issues
  • Increase the purity of the sample (pay in
    efficiency?)

8
The algorithm (Exclusive Mode)
  • For each object, j, compute the closeness
    parameter djB, (Ej?jB)2 for ?jB?0 and for each
    pair of objects compute the parameters djk
    min(Ej,Ek)2?jk2 for ?jk?0
  • Find the smallest object from djB,djk. If this
    is a djB, remove it from the list of objects.
    Else, if it is a djk combine the two objects
    according to some recombination scheme
  • eg 4momentum addition
  • Repeat stages 1 - 2 until some stopping criteria
    is fulfilled
  • eg some Jet Multiplicity

9
Analysis - Cuts
  • Require
  • gt20GeV missing pT
  • At least one isolated lepton with pTgt20GeV,
    ?lt2.5
  • Remove all isolated leptons from the list of
    objects, and run the jet finder
  • Cone (Radii of 0.4 and 0.7)
  • KtJet (Exclusive Mode - Cluster to 4 jets)
  • Require at least 4 jets with pTgtptcut and ?lt2.5
    Cone like
  • Require 2 b-tagged jets Truth

10
W reconstruction
  • Choice of two light jets as W candidate - for
    events with only two light jets, plot their
    invariant mass
  • Keep W candidates that lie within 5? of the peak
    value, mjj.
  • From the remaining W candidates, the W which
    minimises ?2 is chosen
  • If this W lies in a mass window of ?2?W then it
    is accepted Cone like?

PxCone (R0.4)
KtJet
11
W purity
Before the ?2?W cut
Seems to reconstruct the W better than PxCone
12
Top Reconstruction
  • To reconstruct the top, choose the b quark which
    results in the highest pT top combined with the W
    candidate later on use leptonic top - missing
    pT

KtJet
PxCone (R0.4)
13
Top purity/efficiency
(Slightly) higher purity for low ptcut
Lower efficiency
14
Sub-Event Analysis
  • Merging scales - eg the scale at which the event
    changes from 5 jets to 4jets
  • One can cut on the different merging scales
    (peturbative observables) in the event

Eg ptcut 40GeV Red - good top candidates Blue
- bad top candidates
Cut? ?
15
A fifth jet (Hard Gluon emission)
  • So far always ran KtJet in the Exclusive mode,
    clustering until there were 4 jets
  • The signal (ttbar - Golden Channel) could include
    an additional jet from
  • The emission of a hard gluon - O(?S) effect
  • Extra jets from soft underlying event (In a
    fraction of events the hardest 4 jets may not
    be from the signal)
  • Expect increase in efficiency
  • The emission of a hard gluon will alter the
    structure of the event - sub jet analysis

16
Results - W purity
Before the ?2?W cut
  • Drop in purity
  • expected!
  • Can we improve with
  • Subjet analysis?

17
Results - Top purity/efficiency
Significant increase in efficiency - factor of 2
18
Theoretical Work
19
  • Dipole subtraction Method
  • In general at NLO a jet observable will have two
    contributions
  • Real emissions
  • Virtual loops
  • These graphs are integrated over different
    phase spaces (m parton, m1 parton)
  • A method for canceling all infrared and collinear
    divergences for a general jet observable, that
    could be implemented in a Monte Carlo
  • Nuc. Phys. B 485 (1997) 291-419
  • Nuc. Phys. B 627 (2002) 189-265
  • Possible extension is to a case with a massive
    parton in the initial state (eg tops)
  • Interesting phenomenology?
  • Resummation
  • First measurement of bb cross section at
    Tevatron disagreed with NLO calculation by a
    factor of 2

20
Extras - (1) Mid-point Cone
  • The IR safety of an Iterating Cone Algorithm is
    ensured by considering the mid-point of any pair
    of proto-jets as a seed direction

(Figure courtesy of Mike Seymour)
21
Extras - (2) Infrared Safety
  • At NLO individual Feynman diagrams contain IR
    divergences - in any observable, these should
    cancel (eg the ee-?jets cross section)
  • When we define some observable, eg the 3 jet
    cross section, we must make sure that if a
    diagram with a divergence contributes to this,
    the diagram(s) which cancel it also contribute

3 jet
2 jet
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com