Title: Prejudice and Stereotyping Chapter 13
1Prejudice and Stereotyping (Chapter 13)
2Announcements!
- Exam 2 is one week away (Thurs. Oct. 25th )!
This exam covers Chapters 3-6, and 13. - Pick up study guide in class
- Review session for exam will be held next week
exact time and location TBA - Interested in helping to conduct research on
stereotyping and prejudice? Contact Dr. Czopp - E-mail Alexander.Czopp_at_utoledo.edu
3Definitions
- Prejudice (affective component) An unjustifiable
negative feeling or emotional response toward a
group and its individual members.
4Definitions
- Stereotypes (cognitive component) Beliefs about
the personal attributes of a group of people. - Not always negative
5Definitions
- Discrimination (behavioral component) actively
mistreating or neglecting people because of their
group membership.
6What are the sources of prejudice?
- How can the social context give rise to
prejudice? - Two types of explanations
- Motivational
- Cognitive
7What are the sources of prejudice?
- Motivational Source we engage in prejudice,
stereotyping and discrimination to feel good
about oneself and to gain benefits for ones group
8Motivational Source Feeling good and gaining
benefits
- We group people into two categories
- Ingroup - Us - a group who shares a sense of
belonging a common identity. - Outgroup - Them - a group perceived as
distinctively apart from the ingroup.
9 Motivational Source Feeling good and gaining
benefits
- Tajfel (1970) Social Identity Theory
- Part of our identity comes from our group
memberships (social identity) - our social identity can influence our
self-esteem - This can lead to...
- Ingroup bias - the tendency to favor ones own
group (often at the expense of another group)
10Motivational Source Feeling good and gaining
benefits
- Minimal group paradigm
- Klee vs. Kandinsky study
- Overestimater vs. underestimater study
- What if you personally wont benefit? Still favor
ingroup - We will take fewer resources just to beat the
outgroup!
11Minimal Group Paradigm
- Conclusion People favor the ingroup no matter
how trivial the distinction between groups! - No cohesion
- No history
- No dislike
12Motivational Source Feeling good and gaining
benefits
- Realistic group conflict theory prejudice
results from real competition between groups for
limited resources - Justifies why my group has more abundant
resources (dissonance) - Results from feeling that outgroup is denying
us resources - E.g., lynchings and economic conditions
13Motivational Source Feeling good and gaining
benefits
- Scapegoat Theory when self-esteem is threatened,
people are more likely to derogate outgroup
members - Prejudice as Self-Esteem Boost Study
- Participants given positive or negative feedback
on performance - In unrelated study, asked to evaluate Jewish or
Italian woman as job applicant
14Prejudice as Self-Esteem Boost
15What are the sources of prejudice?
- Cognitive source Stereotyping is a cognitive
shortcut used to understanding others.
16Cognitive source The Dark Side of Heuristics
- Outgroup homogeneity effect - perception of
outgroup members as being very similar to one
another and ingroup members as being unique - They are all alike, were diverse.
17Cognitive source The Dark Side of Heuristics
- Own race bias the tendency for people to more
accurately recognize faces of their own race. - They all look alike
- Faces in line-up study
- Why does this happen? Race is salient
18Dissociation Model of Prejudice (Devine, 1989)
- Takes both P and E into account
- Two-step model of prejudice
- Step 1 - Automatic process stereotypes are
automatically activated - Step 2 - Controlled process the application of
the stereotype can be controlled. The
non-prejudiced stop correct the response
19Dissociation Model of Prejudice (Devine, 1989)
- Donald studies
- When primed subliminally, all view Donald as
consistent with stereotype - When primed consciously, only high prejudice view
Donald as consistent with stereotype - Implication we can only override the stereotype
if we have the cognitive resources to do it!