Information for internationally shared surface waters - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 48
About This Presentation
Title:

Information for internationally shared surface waters

Description:

International Water Assessment Centre (IWAC) / Institute for Integrated Water ... Political institutional behaviour: Use of information is procedural and disorderly ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:44
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 49
Provided by: Geb83
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Information for internationally shared surface waters


1
Information for internationally shared surface
waters
  • Jos G. Timmerman
  • International Water Assessment Centre (IWAC) /
    Institute for Integrated Water Management and
    Waste Water Treatment (RIZA)

2
The Blind Men and the Elephant
  • It was six men of Indostan
  • To learning much inclined,
  • Who went to see the Elephant
  • (Though all of them were blind),
  • That each by observation
  • Might satisfy his mind
  • John Godfrey Saxe (1816-1887)

3
The elephant
4
The elements
  • Rationality
  • Communication
  • Power
  • Trust
  • Public participation
  • Institutions
  • Information production
  • Impact of information
  • Legal aspects
  • Integrated approaches

5
New type of societal problems
  • Wicked problems characterized by
  • large complexity
  • structural uncertainty
  • high stakes
  • steering problems
  • that cannot be handled by current policies and
    current research

6
Post normal science
7
The transformation
  • from
  • supply-driven to demand-driven
  • mono-disciplinary to inter-disciplinary
  • technocratic to participatory
  • objective to subjective
  • certainty to uncertainty
  • predictive to explorative

8
Integrated water assessment
  • Integration over
  • Economic function
  • navigation, agriculture
  • Ecological function
  • ecological health
  • Social function
  • safety, drinking water supply

9
Institutions
  • Regime theory
  • Regime international cooperation between two or
    more states in specific issue areas
  • Multi-level governance theory
  • Governments -gt governance
  • Policy and implementation is no longer monopoly
    of central governments
  • Representatives of trade, industry, local
    communities, NGOs

10
Structuring framework
  • Savenije and
  • Van der Zaag
  • (2000)

11
Water management
  • Water management takes place on many different
    levels local international
  • Communication issues play a role on each level as
    well as between levels.
  • Issues of scale comparison is difficult
  • Cooperation is needed
  • Power does not lead to cooperation
  • Secrecy Hinders building of trust
  • Building of trust requires interactive approaches
    on all levels

12
Rationality
  • Information is an essential basis for decision
    making
  • Use of information is only rational up to a
    certain point
  • Environmental problems are basically social
    problems

13
Norms, beliefs, values Stewardship
14
Norms, beliefs, values Inheritance
15
Culture and habits drive peoples behaviour
16
Communication
  • Information is appreciated in a different way by
    different people
  • Content of the information
  • Appreciation of the information
  • Preconceptions often prevent reception of
    information
  • Cognitive differences
  • Cognitive frames of reference

17
Communication
  • Communication in transboundary water management
    involves many different actors

18
CommunicationFlow of information between actors
  • Type of network determines if the right
    information reaches the right people
  • Communication gateway the formal or informal
    connection between countries

19
Behaviour of institutions
  • Institutions usually have a legal framework
    setting the context
  • External environment requires institutions to
    adapt. History makes institutions behave as they
    do
  • Rational bureaucratic behaviour Use of
    information is orderly and rational
  • Political institutional behaviour Use of
    information is procedural and disorderly

20
Power connected to possession of information
  • Lack of information can hinder appropriate action
  • Upstream countries tend to restrict information
    exchange

21
Trust
  • Common information needed to build mutual trust
  • Building trust in transboundary cooperation is
    hindered by
  • Different legal framework
  • Different historical background
  • Different cultural background
  • Different institutional framework

22
Institutions
  • Differences make institutions reluctant to open
    up access to information
  • Lack of understanding
  • Fear
  • Ignorance
  • Lack of motivation
  • Need for power (especially in political
    institutional behaviour)

23
Public participation
  • Involvement of public
  • Range from inclusionary processes (informed) to
    participatory processes (enables social learning)
  • Dialogue needed builds trust and accountability
  • Drivers for Public Participation
  • Democratic deficit
  • Self-organising citizenship
  • Pragmatism

24
Legal aspects
  • Free access to environmental information (Aarhus,
    EC)
  • What must be provided and by whom?
  • How must it be provided?
  • What level of detail?
  • Human rights privacy
  • Property rights
  • Security

25
Public participation
  • Involving the public decision-making process
    requires full access to information
  • Use of the media
  • Fear of loosing control over the message
  • Clear message cannot be easily changed

26
Decision-making process
  • Focus on socio-economic and policy implementation
    type of information
  • Information has to fit to the expectations of the
    decision maker
  • Socio-economic implications are indispensable for
    decision-making
  • Visualisation (maps) is essential

27
Transboundary commissions
  • Transboundary commissions historically
    expert-based
  • Producers of information are often at the same
    time users of information prod-users
  • Little participation of
  • Decision makers
  • Stakeholders
  • Little communication to outside world
  • Limited size
  • Operate on high, abstract level
  • Consensus is easily reached
  • Practical measures are effectively put into
    practice.
  • (Schröder, Nilsson, 2004)

28
Transboundary commissions
  • Exchange of information
  • Prod-users often have natural science background
  • Technical bias emphasis on physico-chemical and
    biological information
  • Significance of socio-economic information for
    decision-making is generally underestimated
  • Experimental study showed that information on
    social and economic situation is essential in
    decision-making process

29
Information production
Water management
Information utilisation
Information needs
Information strategy
Data analysis
Data collection
30
Information needs
  • Information cycle as a framework does not support
    the flow of information through transboundary
    water management
  • Thorough thinking through of what information is
    really needed
  • Different stakeholders
  • Value of certain types of information
  • What will the information be used for?

31
The specialist
32
Integrated assessment
33
Index or indicator
34
Impact-of-information chain
  • (Denisov and Christoffersen 2000)

35
Technical cooperation
  • Dissemination of information requires
    presentation that provides insight into the
    situation
  • Spatial distribution of e.g. pollution sources
  • Transboundary cooperation is hindered by
  • Differences in technical abilities
  • Different approaches
  • Cooperation in information requires an
    interactive approach involving the relevant actors

36
(Transboundary) River Basin Information System
(RBIS)
  • Many of the EU River Basin Districts will be
    transboundary
  • Participatory approaches needed
  • Web-based non-restricted multi-thematic GIS
    database

37
Integrated water resources management
  • Integrated approach Differences in spatial and
    temporal scales

38
Integrated water assessment in transboundary
water management
  • Set common information goals
  • Integrated approach
  • Participatory processes
  • Full access to information to certify balanced
    dialogue
  • Respond to information needs of the stakeholders
    and public
  • Dialogue becomes a social learning process

39
Integrated water resources management
  • Indicators
  • Indicators on the basis of information needs
  • Indicators are to be directly used in
    decision-making process and consequently highly
    political
  • Cooperation
  • Disciplines differences in definitions
  • Cooperate over borders

40
Integrated water resources management
  • Getting things done
  • Technical perspective more crop per drop
  • Economic perspective free market principle
  • Interactive perspective negotiate values, goals,
    interests
  • Integrated assessment
  • Interdisciplinary approach evaluation of the
    problem is a joint effort
  • Danger of focus on manageable parts
  • Structure problem
  • Preparation is lengthy process. People tend to
    step into the real work.

41
Sharing of international water resources
  • Internationally shared interests facilitate
    sharing international water resources
  • Shared use leads to similar problems, similar
    measures, more effective, less cost
  • International lakes management may be more
    effective
  • Despite international legislation in practice
    upstream-downstream inequality

42
Summary
  • Information is an essential element in
    transboundary water resources management
  • Used to support decision-making
  • Used to evaluate the effects of water resources
    management decisions
  • Information production lags behind developments
    in water management
  • Information still focuses on ecological
    components of water bodies and largely ignores
    the importance of socio-economic data

43
Summary
  • Some aspects that hinder production of adequate
    information are
  • Strong boundaries between different disciplines
    that are not easily overcome
  • Consideration on information needs and the goals
    of information dissemination prior to producing
    information is insufficient
  • The relevant actors are reluctant to participate
    in such processes
  • Differences in institutional behaviour that
    hinders cooperation between these institutions
    and
  • Insufficient tuning of organisational structures
    to the needs of the external environment

44
Summary
  • Even though better information may be produced,
    the use of information will still be limited
    because of
  • Different valuation of information by people with
    dissimilar beliefs, values and norms, and
    different cultural habits
  • Insufficient access to information for all actors
  • Insufficient communication channels
  • Insufficient coordination between the different
    levels and scales

45
Recommendations
  • Public participation is inevitable
  • Sustainable management requires tuning of
    organisational structures -gt Create an enabling
    environment
  • Take time to define and structure the problem
  • Strong sustainability -gt functional diversity -gt
    participatory process -gt encourages better
    information
  • Interactive dialogue and decision-making must be
    actively facilitated to promote social learning
  • Expertise limits capacity to solve problems
  • Test perception of information after transfer

46
More information
  • Book Environmental information in European
    Transboundary Water Management.
  • J.G. Timmerman S. Langaas (Eds.)
  • www.iwapublishing.com
  • www.iwac-unece.org
  • www.mtm-conference.nl

47
Morale
  • O how they cling and wrangle, some who claim
  • For preacher and monk the honored name!
  • For, quarrelling, each to his view they cling.
  • Such folk see only one side of a thing.
  • Udana 68-69
  • Parable of the Blind Men and the Elephant

48
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com