Privacy and the Future of Justice Statistics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Privacy and the Future of Justice Statistics

Description:

Free flow of information. Administration privacy policy. Government as a model. Public records. Concluding thoughts. I. 'Free flow of information' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: peters4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Privacy and the Future of Justice Statistics


1
Privacy and the Future of Justice Statistics
  • Peter P. Swire
  • Chief Counselor for Privacy
  • OMB/OIRA
  • National Conf.on Privacy, Technology Criminal
    Justice Information
  • May 31, 2000

2
Overview
  • Free flow of information
  • Administration privacy policy
  • Government as a model
  • Public records
  • Concluding thoughts

3
I. Free flow of information
  • A noble goal, but what does it mean?
  • Security -- free flow to hackers?
  • Intellectual property -- free flow to pirates?
  • Privacy -- free flow to intruders?
  • Moral
  • Many wonderful flows
  • Not all flows are wonderful

4
Free flow in the justice context
  • Common practice -- police have had unlisted phone
    numbers and addresses
  • Police concern about their own and their familys
    safety at home

5
The Durham, N.C. example
  • Law enforcement officer concern
  • After debate, city council decided to make name a
    hidden field for all property records
  • County disagreed -- register of deeds decided to
    keep owners listed, online
  • County tax assessor plans to post blueprints of
    houses -- additional l.e. concern

6
Observations on free flow of information
  • Which flows of information make sense?
  • Do the flows happen automatically in the course
    of putting information on web sites?
  • When should there be thoughtful consideration of
    whether personal information should become
    increasingly available?

7
II. Administration Privacy Policy
  • Support self-regulation generally
  • Sensitive categories deserve legal protection
  • Medical Genetic
  • Financial
  • Childrens Online
  • Government should lead by example

8
Internet Privacy
  • Quantity of policies
  • 15 to 66 to 88 from 1998 to 2000
  • Quality of policies
  • Seek continued improvement
  • Incentives for good action by companies
  • Concern about free riders with no policies

9
Medical Records Privacy
  • HIPAA 1996 called for legislation by 8/99
  • President announced proposed regs 10/99
  • Over 53,000 submissions of comments
  • SOTU promise to make the regs final this year

10
Medical Records (cont.)
  • Fair information practices
  • Notice
  • Patient choice
  • Access
  • Security
  • Enforcement
  • Regs have other provisions, including for law
    enforcement access to medical records

11
Genetic Discrimination
  • February 8 Executive Order
  • Prohibits federal agencies from using genetic
    information in hiring or promotion
  • Call for legislation
  • Extend protections to private sector
  • Apply to purchase of health insurance
  • Genetic information and law enforcement
  • What will be public concerns over time about DNA
    databases?

12
Financial Privacy
  • Financial Modernization enacted in 1999
  • Notice of uses
  • Choice to 3d parties
  • Enforcement
  • Administration Plan announced in April
  • Choice for affiliates, too
  • Opt in for especially sensitive data, including
    medical
  • Other provisions

13
Other Privacy Legislation
  • Childrens Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998
  • FTC rules took effect 4/2000
  • Key is verifiable parental consent
  • Identity Theft law in 1998
  • Pretext Calling law in 1999
  • Opt in for motor vehicle records for marketing
    in 1999

14
Summary on privacy legislation
  • Significant level of legislative activity
  • Significant level of public concern
  • WSJ poll in 9/99
  • Seek balance among multiple goals
  • Privacy and public safety goals
  • Privacy and use of information for economic
    growth
  • Which uses of data are net beneficial, upon
    thoughtful consideration

15
III. Government as a Model
  • Government web sites
  • Government computer security
  • Privacy Impact Assessments
  • Oversight mechanisms

16
Government web sites
  • How is data collected and used at government web
    sites?
  • OMB guidance 6/99 for federal sites
  • All federal agencies had clearly posted privacy
    policies by the end of 1999

17
Government computer security
  • Good security is necessary for privacy
  • Weak security allows access to tax records,
    criminal investigative files, etc.
  • Good security stops hackers and other
    unauthorized users
  • Good security is not sufficient for privacy
  • What can an authorized user do with the data?
  • Post it to the Internet?
  • Privacy policies govern authorized users

18
Privacy Impact Assessments
  • Idea build good security and privacy into new
    information technology systems
  • IRS has been approved as a Federal CIO Council
    best practice
  • FBI and Bureau of Justice Statistics in process

19
PIAs (continued)
  • Structured set of questions
  • What laws apply? Privacy Act? Others?
  • What agency or other policies apply?
  • The friends and family test -- do our practices
    seem reasonable and fair when they become public?

20
Oversight mechanisms
  • New databases and flows of information often
    achieve important public safety and other goals
  • What mechanisms exist to consider privacy and
    other values?
  • There may be public questions in the absence of
    oversight mechanisms?

21
IV. Public Records
  • Many criminal and other court records are public
    records
  • Dialogue with states on public records
  • Recent Supreme Court cases
  • The example of bankruptcy records

22
Supreme Court cases this term
  • United Reporting v. Los Angeles Police
  • State law with stricter limits on marketing than
    for press uses
  • State law upheld
  • Reno v. Condon
  • Federal statute limiting state release of motor
    vehicle records
  • Federal law upheld against federalism challenge

23
Bankruptcy records
  • Whats in the public bankruptcy file?
  • Bank account numbers
  • Social Security numbers
  • Should we place these online for millions of
    Americans?
  • President has asked OMB, Justice Treasury to
    issue a report this year

24
Concluding thoughts
  • Many flows are good, but not all flows are good
  • Take advantage of new technologies to promote
    public safety, economic growth, public education,
    and other values
  • But, thoughtful consideration of the subset of
    flows that are possible but not advisable
  • Home addresses of vulnerable people
  • Bank account numbers of individuals

25
For the justice system(s)
  • Improving technology makes many new flows less
    expensive and more practical
  • PIAs -- your practices should meet the
    requirements of
  • Applicable law
  • Applicable policies
  • Confidence of the public

26
Concluding thoughts
  • In the Information Age, there will be a constant
    stream of issues -- which information flows are
    good?
  • President Clinton has asked how do we keep our
    traditional value of privacy in this era of new
    technology?

27
Conclusion
  • The answer will be in the good will of all of us
    who build the new information systems
  • Medical
  • Genetic
  • Financial
  • Government generally
  • Justice systems in particular
  • We look forward to that challenge
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com