Title: Public Policy in Private Markets
1Public Policy in Private Markets
2Last time
- Why public policies for private markets?
- The perfectly competitive market as a benchmark
- Rationales for government intervention (mkt
power, imperfect info, mkt failures)
3Today
- Steps in the policy process
- Sources of possible government failure
- A short regulatory history
- Aims and review of antitrust laws
4Steps in the Policy Process
- Problem Recognition
- Policy Formation
- Policy Application
- Policy Enforcement
5Important tool cost-benefit analysis
Total Costs
Total Benefits
Maximum Net Benefit
Environmental quality
Q
6Important tool cost-benefit analysis
Marginal Costs
Marginal Benefit
Environmental quality
Q
7Important tool cost-benefit analysis
- Do not carry out a policy if costs gt benefits.
Benefit/cost ratio gt 1 - Typically, a policy will not make everyone better
off - Some lose, some win
- Ideally compensate losers with gains
- Inevitably some will not be made better off
8Important tool cost-benefit analysis
- Dynamic analysis future benefits and costs need
to be discounted - Projects that have negative flows in the first
years and positive flows in later years are
particularly affected (positive numbers are
discounted more heavily) - However, future gains may also be larger as
society may be more concerned in the future
9Cost-Benefit Analysis Important Points
102. Policy Formation
- What type of approach yields best mix of costs
and benefits? 2 parts - a. Choice of Policy focus economic issues do
we want to affect, S, C or P? - Example High concentration in the RTE cereal
industry that leads to high prices and profits.
Focus - Structure reduce CR by some means
- Conduct regulate advertising, product
introductions - Performance regulate prices (profits)
112. Policy Formation
- b. Choice of Policy Instrument regulation
mechanism - Example Suppose a structural approach is taken.
Two possible policy instruments - Antitrust case against leading firms. Goal
breakup - Direct Regulation. By Act of Congress tell
Kellogg to split in 3 companies. - Precedent 1930s bills to split commercial and
investment banking
123. Policy Application
- Legislation is general. Federal agencies write up
the specific regulations - Example
- Congress tells FDA to ensure that drugs in the US
are safe (general legislation) - FDA has to specify scientific research protocols
to be used in showing what is safe or not.
13Costs Benefits Alternative regulations
Desirable? Overlap?
Secret process
Public Discussion
14(No Transcript)
15More of a passive role
Infrequent
Regulation can be later reviewed by courts
164. Policy Enforcement
- Policing and enforcement structure.
- Amount of resources
- Law is normally written so that maximum level of
voluntary compliance is achieved.
17What are government costs?
- Important points
- Cost to society of regulation approx. 9.2 of
GDP - 6,900 per household
- Largest costs are the Environmental Protection
Agencys (EPA) - Paperwork costs are 1/3 of total costs
18What are government costs?
- Important point Social regulation and homeland
security
19What are government costs?
- Important point lt0.1 of working population
20Source of possible government failure
- 1. Problem Recognition
- Whose voice is heard
- Concerned parties may lack information and/or
incentive - Special interest groups may be effective in
having their voice be heard, even if that problem
may not be too important - Focus particular problems are solved (more
rapidly) whereas others may not fit the
bureaucracy structure
21Source of possible government failure
- 2. In Policy Formation
- Policy may not be timely. Crisis atmosphere
- Policy may not be precise it may miscalculate
- May not be sufficient. Hard to anticipate all
ramifications
22Source of possible government failure
- 3. In Policy Application
- With general legislation, policies are formulated
at agencies. - Process may be skewed by special interest
lobbying - Red tape. Examples
- Red dye 3 (used in cherries) has been under
consideration since 1960 - Organic rules took 10 years.
23Source of possible government failure
- 4. In Policy Enforcement
- Inadequate resources inefficient enforcement
(possible inequitable) - Delay
- Examples ATT case was in courts for 8 years. RTE
case in courts for 10 years
24Source of possible government failure
- To summarize
- Government is not perfect
- Markets are not perfect
- Both are part of our daily lives
- Our goal understand them both
25A Brief Regulatory History
- Pre-1880s
- Economy made up of local markets
- Transportation system was not developed
- Few corporations were allowed for specific
purposes e.g. railroads
26A Brief Regulatory History
- 1880s-1905
- States began letting companies incorporate freely
- Large industrial and transportation companies
start to control national markets - Abuses of market power became visible
27A Brief Regulatory History
- 1880s-1905
- Reform movement especially aimed at abuses by
railroads - Interstate Commerce Commission Act (1887)
Railroad regulation - Sherman Act (1890) Monopoly, price fixing
28A Brief Regulatory History
- The Joint Executive Committee (1880-1886)
- Cartel that controlled Eastbound freight
shipments from Chicago - Publicly acknowledged agreement
- 73 of shipments were grain
29(No Transcript)
30A Brief Regulatory History
- 1880s-1905
- Acts not fully enforced for 15-20 years
(conservative Supreme Court) - Period ends with massive mergers (1897-1903)
- US Steel, Du Pont, American Tobacco, National
Biscuit (Nabisco)
31A Brief Regulatory History
- 1905-1915
- Progressive era
- 1906 Federal Food and Drug Act
- Under Sherman Act Roosevelt sues 45 companies
and Taft 75 - 1911
- Standard Oil (Rockefeller) is obligated to break
up the company in more than 36 units (Mobil,
Amoco, Exxon, etc.) - American Tobacco
32A Brief Regulatory History
- 1905-1915
- Progressive era
- Sherman Act was not clear as to what was illegal,
so in 1914 - FTC Act, outlawed unfair business practices
- Clayton Act, regulates mergers, price
discrimination, exclusive dealing agreements
33A Brief Regulatory History
- 1915-1925
- Quiet period
- 1925-1938
- Active regulatory period due to stock market
crash in 1929 and the Great Depression - Firms allowed to cooperate (cartelization) under
National Recovery Act (later deemed
unconstitutional) e.g. strengthening of trade
associations
34A Brief Regulatory History
- 1938-1945
- Return to strong enforcement
- 1938 Robinson-Patman Act, deals further with
price discrimination - Many antitrust cases are brought forward
- 1950s
- Cellar-Kefauver Act, strengthens merger
regulation of Clayton Act (asset purchases)
35A Brief Regulatory History
- 1960-1980
- Era of SOCIAL regulation
- Environment, health, safety, equal opportunity,
etc - Based on intra-firm decisions (how and what firms
produce) rather than on market performance
36A Brief Regulatory History
- 1980-today
- Era of deregulation
- Airlines (Airline Deregulation Act, 1978),
telecommunications (1996), railroads (Staggers
Rail Act of 1980), trucking, banking (Garn-St
Germain Depository Institutions Act,1982 ) - Also, an era of product regulations
- Not much increase in antitrust regulation
37Aims of antitrust laws
- 1. Maintenance of Workable Competition
- (STRUCTURE)
- Not perfect competition (unrealistic)
- Rather as competitive a structure as possible
(given basic conditions) - What is workable?
- Difficult to define (but you get the idea)
38Aims of antitrust laws
- 2. Ensure Fair Business Practices
- (CONDUCT)
- Again, What is fair?
- Equal opportunity, ethically acceptable
- What conduct yields the best performance?
39Aims of antitrust laws
- 3. Promote desirable performance
- (PERFORMANCE)
- Right mix of products (e.g. not too unhealthy)
- Lowest possible price