An Inside Look on Opposition - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

An Inside Look on Opposition

Description:

Marc RICHTER QMD / PMU (OHIM) Workshop 'Economic Analysis of Trade Marks ... in the medium term, exploiters to be warned and/or penalised in the short term ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:73
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: marcri
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: An Inside Look on Opposition


1
An Inside Look on Opposition
and the Interaction Effects with the Outside
World
Marc RICHTER QMD / PMU (OHIM) Workshop
Economic Analysis of Trade Marks and
BrandsAlicante, Spain, June 2008
2
Table of Contents
  • OHIM, QMD and PMU
  • OHIM / Market interaction
  • An example Opposition Forecast
  • Whats next?

2
3
OHIM, QMD and PMU
  • The Acronyms
  • OHIM Office for Harmonization in the Internal
    Market (aka the Office)
  • QMD Quality Management Department
  • PMU Performance Management Unit
  • The Structure
  • OHIM (President Wubbo de Boer)
  • QMD (Director Juan Ramón Rubio)
  • Service 1 (Head of Service Andrea di Carlo)
  • Performance Management Unit
  • René Havermans
  • Luis Miguel López Santos
  • Marc Richter
  • Service 2 (Head of Service Rainer Tretter)

4
OHIM, QMD and PMU
  • QMD Mission
  • ...contribute to the efficient management of the
    Office's resources and to maximise clients'
    satisfaction.
  • PMU Mission
  • Offer the OHIM, and in particular its Management,
    an effective statistical reporting tool which
    assists decision making.
  • Offer the OHIM and particularly its senior and
    middle managers
  • quantitative analysis of main processes,
    proposing and maintaining performance
    indicators
  • detection and explanation of deviations and
    anomalies in the production flows or in defined
    quality standards to establish corrective
    actions.
  • analysis of the impact changes in the
    processes, technologies or in user behaviour may
    have on production flows and defined quality
    standards.
  • Develop an OHIM Work Plan with quantifiable
    objectives for all the Offices activities

5
OHIM, QMD and PMU
  • A word on statistics
  • 1770, science dealing with data about the
    condition of a state or community, from Ger.
    Statistik, popularized and perhaps coined by Ger.
    political scientist Gottfried Aschenwall
    (1719-72) in his Vorbereitung zur
    Staatswissenschaft (1748), from Mod.L.
    statisticum (collegium) (lecture course on)
    state affairs, from It. statista one skilled in
    statecraft, from L. status (see state (n.1)).
  • Source www.etymonline.com
  • OHIM Statistics and Reporting
  • 300 reports maintained by PMU alone
  • Analyses based exclusively on descriptive
    statistics in 99 of the cases
  • Upcoming New Core Business System EUROMARC
    ? Report migration, indicator consolidation,
    error margin quantification where applicable

6
OHIM, QMD and PMU
OHIM Incoming Business Community Trade Mark
(CTM) filings
7
OHIM, QMD and PMU
OHIM Incoming Business Registered Community
Design (RCD) filings
8
OHIM / Market interaction
  • OHIM / Market interaction

9
OHIM / Market interaction
Communication model (PMU Internal Draft)
Attitude
Former PMU boundary
Policy
10
OHIM / Market interaction
  • 2001 CTM e-filing CTM online
  • From 2003 e-business strategy
  • RCD e-filing RCD online
  • E-communication
  • Online access to files
  • My Page
  • 2005 Fee reduction for e-filing
  • 2007 Future Working Methods for the 2010 horizon

11
OHIM / Market interaction
2007 Potential loophole in OHIM policies permits
non-payment exploit under certain
circumstances 2008 Policy loophole to be closed
in the medium term, exploiters to be warned
and/or penalised in the short term
12
An Example Opposition Forecast
  • An Example Opposition Forecast

13
An Example Opposition Forecast
  • Scope of Analysis
  • Pre-analysis Trigger A CTM Application is
    published
  • Process Trigger One (or more) Oppositions are
    received (OPP-REC)
  • Process Flow Standardised, but with high
    case-by-case variance due to individual case
    difficulty, parties involved etc.
  • Process End EUROMARC Status 262 Decision to be
    taken ? The hard part of work for the Office

Processual delays
In (OPP REC)
Out (St. 262)
14
An Example Opposition Forecast
15
An Example Opposition Forecast
16
An Example Opposition Forecast
17
An Example Opposition Forecast
18
An Example Opposition Forecast
19
An Example Opposition Forecast
  • Misleading data in PMU report At time of first
    analysis, 262 ratios seemed to be approx.
    constant
  • A ratio forecast approach shows the real
    progression, along with a (possible) behavioral
    change

20
An Example Opposition Forecast
2006 262 ratio growth forecast(for validation
purposes, conservative error estimates) 2002-OPPs
29.00 ? 30.75 D 1.75 ( 0.25
) 2003-OPPs 27.00 ? 30.50 D 3.50 (
0.50 ) 2004-OPPs 17.00 ? 28.00 D 11.00 (
2.00 ) 2005-OPPs 1.00 ? 18.00 D 17.00
( 2.00 ) 2006-OPPs 0.00 ? 1.25 D
1.25 ( 0.50 )
21
An Example Opposition Forecast
2006 262 ratio growth forecast (for validation
purposes) 2002-OPPs D 1.75 ( 0.25 ) of
9,861 OPPs ? 173 ( 25) 2003-OPPs D 3.50
( 0.50 ) of 9,986 OPPs ? 350 (
50) 2004-OPPs D 11.00 ( 2.00 ) of 10,801
OPPs ? 1188 ( 216) 2005-OPPs D 17.00 ( 2.00
) of 17,493 OPPs ? 2974 ( 350) 2006-OPPs D
1.25 ( 0.50 ) of 14,000 ( 5,000) OPPs ?
175 ( 97) 4860 ( 426 / 8.8)
Result 2006 5192 ( 6.8)
Linear propagation of uncertainty
22
An Example Opposition Forecast
2007 262 ratio growth forecast(for validation
purposes, conservative error estimates) 2003-OPPs
31.00 ? 33.00 D 2.00 ( 0.25
) 2004-OPPs 29.00 ? 34.00 D 5.00 (
0.50 ) 2005-OPPs 17.50 ? 29.00 D 11.50 (
1.50 ) 2006-OPPs 1.00 ? 21.00 D 20.00
( 2.00 ) 2007-OPPs 0.00 ? 1.25 D
1.25 ( 0.50 )
23
An Example Opposition Forecast
2007 262 ratio growth forecast (for validation
purposes) 2003-OPPs D 2.00 ( 0.25 ) of
9,986 OPPs ? 200 ( 25) 2004-OPPs D 5.00
( 0.50 ) of 10,801 OPPs ? 540 (
54) 2005-OPPs D 11.50 ( 1.50 ) of 17,493
OPPs ? 2012 ( 262) 2006-OPPs D 20.00 ( 2.00
) of 14,223 OPPs ? 2845 ( 284) 2007-OPPs D
1.25 ( 0.50 ) of 15,500 ( 2500) OPPs ? 194
( 84) 5791 ( 400 / 6.9)
Result 2007 6077 ( 4.9)
24
An Example Opposition Forecast
2008 262 ratio growth forecast 2004-OPPs 33.50
? 35.50 D 2.00 ( 0.25 ) 2005-OPPs
29.75 ? 33.50 D 3.75 ( 0.50
) 2006-OPPs 21.00 ? 32.00 D 11.00 ( 1.50
) 2007-OPPs 2.00 ? 23.00 D 21.00 (
2.00 ) 2008-OPPs 0.00 ? 1.25 D 1.25
( 0.50 )
25
An Example Opposition Forecast
2008 262 ratio growth forecast 2004-OPPs D
2.00 ( 0.25 ) of 10,801 OPPs ? 216 (
27) 2005-OPPs D 3.75 ( 0.50 ) of 17,493
OPPs ? 656 ( 87) 2006-OPPs D 11.00 (
1.50 ) of 14,223 OPPs ? 1565 ( 213) 2007-OPPs
D 21.00 ( 2.00 ) of 16,633 OPPs ? 3493 (
333) 2008-OPPs D 1.25 ( 0.50 ) of 20,600
( 3500) OPPs ? 258 ( 113) 6188 ( 421
/ 6.8)
Applying an empiric correction factor 6485 (
104.8 )
26
An Example Opposition Forecast
Whats the 262 arrival ratio expectation for
todays oppositions?
27
An Example Opposition Forecast
Gap Cases in progress or closed w/o
decision on substance
Whats the 262 arrival ratio expectation for
todays oppositions?
28
Whats next?
  • Whats next?

29
Whats next?
  • PMUs medium to long term goals
  • Automating more standard analyses
  • Better consideration of cause-and-effect chains
  • Even more visualisation and process orientation
  • More consideration of the OHIM / Market
    interaction
  • Generally Collaboration and exchange Attitude
    of constant improvement
  • Specifically All-out attack on
    Oppositions Classifications of typical
    behaviour

30
Whats next?
Data Domain Allocation Map (PMU Internal Draft)
Origin (Paper, WIPO. e-file)
P/S?
CTM
OPP
Type (word,fig)
Surveillance letter?
Dossier
Classes
Grounds
Earlier rights
Dept/Serv
Examiner(s)
Experience
Ratios
Numbers
Complaint?
Appeal?
USS?
Quality
Multis
Seasonality
Admissibility
Industry
Licencee???
Evolution
Duration
Cooling-off
Abuse?
Adversarial part
Opponent
Behaviour if loser?
Size
Proof of use
Applicant
Behaviour if opposed?
Nationality
marks
Decisionmaking
Settlements
Language
Wins
Representative?
Specialty
Country
Opps
31
Whats next?
  • Opposition attack Iterative Methodology(PMU
    Internal Draft)
  • Brainstorming to maps
  • Maps as stimulus to generate (additional)
    questions
  • Pivoting checklists for explorative analysis
    (more questions)
  • Questions to clusters
  • Clusters to (testable) hypotheses
  • Test results to models
  • Models to forecast / decision support systems

P
32
Information ? ( 34) 965 13 9100
(switchboard) ? ( 34) 965 13 8711 (personal
extension) ? ( 34) 965 13 9143 (QMD
fax) ? Marc.RICHTER_at_oami.europa.eu ? Marc
Richter Office for Harmonization in the
Internal Market (Trade Marks and
Designs) Avenida de Europa, 4 E-03008
Alicante SPAIN
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com