From exercise intention to behaviour and beyond Hagger - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

From exercise intention to behaviour and beyond Hagger

Description:

Limitation of social cognitive theories and introducing volitional processes ... Volitional intentions are those that people feel they want to execute by themselves ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:124
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: damian3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: From exercise intention to behaviour and beyond Hagger


1
From exercise intention to behaviour and
beyondHagger Chatzisarantis, Chapter 3
2
Outline
  • Recap on theory of planned behaviour
  • Limitation of social cognitive theories and
    introducing volitional processes
  • Intention-behaviour relationships
  • Implementation intentions
  • Self-determination theory
  • Transcontextual model
  • Other pre-decisional strategies
  • Continuation intentions
  • Decisional balance
  • Combined strategies
  • Motivational interviewing

3
Applying the TPB to Exercise Behaviour
Attitudes
.30
Intentions
Behaviour
.36
.08
Subjective Norms
.28
Perceived Control
Source Hagger, Chatzisarantis Biddle (2002)
4
Intention-Behaviour Relationships
  • However, Intention-Behaviour relationships are
    often not perfect
  • What does this mean?

Intentions
Behaviour
.36
Less than 1.00!
5
Intention-Behaviour Relationships
  • This means that we often do not do what we intend
    to do!
  • Why?
  • Intention instability Additional information
    comes to light and we change our mind
  • Principle of correspondence Errors in
    measurement of intentions and behaviour
  • Intention formation Poorly formed intentions
  • Self-schema People with tendency to enact
    intentions
  • Volitional and forced intentions Intentions
    based on personal beliefs and others beliefs

6
Limitations of Social Cognitive Theories and
Introducing Volitional Processes
  • Intention stability
  • Intention stability initially considered a
    technical problem by Ajzen (1985) due to
    inherent inaccuracies in measurement
  • More than a technical problem a boundary
    condition and an important property of
    intention (Hagger et al., 2001)
  • Stable intentions are better predictors of
    exercise behaviour
  • Intention stability therefore moderates the
    intention-behaviour relationship (Conner et al.,
    2000)

7
Limitations of Social Cognitive Theories and
Introducing Volitional Processes
  • Scale correspondence
  • Intention-behaviour link strongest When measures
    correspond in terms of Action, Target, Context,
    Time (TACT Ajzen, 1985)
  • Results in exercise show that correspondence rule
    does not fully explain variations in
    intention-behaviour relationship (Hagger et al.,
    2002)
  • Intention formation
  • Poorly formed intentions (i.e., vague, ill
    rehearsed) are vulnerable to change because of
    retrieval and forgetting
  • Well-formed intentions predict behaviour more
    effectively (Bagozzi Yi, 1989)

8
Limitations of Social Cognitive Theories and
Introducing Volitional Processes
  • Self-Schema
  • Self-schema are cognitive generalisations about
    the self derived from past experience
  • People who rate important characteristics
    relevant to the self highly relevant to the
    exercise domain are considered schematics
  • Contrast with non-schematics and aschematics
  • Physically active, exercise regularly, keeps
    in shape rated on describes me-does not describe
    me scales and importance i.e., not at all
    important-very important

9
Limitations of Social Cognitive Theories and
Introducing Volitional Processes
  • Self-Schema

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Source Sheeran Orbell (2000)
10
Limitations of Social Cognitive Theories and
Introducing Volitional Processes
  • Volitional and forced intentions
  • People may intend to do exercise, but their
    intentions may not be based on personal attitudes
    or reasons for engaging in the behaviour
  • People may therefore intend to do something
    because they feel they are forced to (Festinger
    Carlsmith, 1958)
  • Volitional intentions are those that people feel
    they want to execute by themselves
  • Chatzisarantis et al. (1997) found that both
    volitional and forced intentions predicted
    exercise behaviour independent of traditional
    intentions
  • Effect sizes were small so impact was relatively
    weak

11
Implementation Intentions
  • Gollwitzer et al. (1999) Implementation
    intentions Strong effects of simple plans
  • How do we furnish our goals with actions to
    achieve the goals?
  • I intend to achieve goal/outcome X
  • I plan to do behaviour Z will help me to achieve
    X
  • If condition Y arises I will do behaviour Z
  • This does not change intentions, but strengthens
    the intention-behaviour relationship

12
Implementation Intentions
  • Thus implementation intentions act as a moderator
    of the intention-behaviour relationship
  • Under conditions of high implementation
    intentions there will be a strong
    intention-behaviour relationship
  • Thus implementation intentions act in a
    post-decisional manner

13
Implementation Intentions
  • High implementation intentions result in strong
    intention-behaviour relations

Intention
Behaviour

Implementation Intention
Intention
Behaviour
No Implementation Intention

14
Studies Using Implementation Intentions
  • Three studies in health behaviour support use of
    implementation intentions in the field
  • Orbell et al. (1997) Breast self-examination
  • Sheeran and Orbell (1999) Vitamin tablet intake
  • Orbell and Sheeran (2000) Function after surgery
  • Key findings
  • Attitudes, intentions did not change
  • Behaviour engagement changed
  • Intention-Behaviour relation strengthened
  • Studies support the use of implementation
    intentions

15
What Does an Implementation Intention Look Like?
  • Typically use a pen and paper manipulation

You are more likely to exercise for at least 30
minutes per day in the next week if you say when
and where you will exercise and stick to your
plan. In the boxes below write down when and
where you plan to exercise in the next
week When At lunch time after accounts
meeting Where In the gym at work
16
Continuation Intentions
  • Chatzisarantis et al. (2004) figured that
    peoples intentions are inadequate
  • As we approach a behavioural goal the outcome
    becomes less salient
  • Continuation intentions (CI) focus on providing
    intentions to continue beyond the attainment of
    salient outcomes
  • CI of Success Plan to continue with exercise
    program if successful in achieving goals
  • CI of Failure Plan to continue with exercise
    program if unsuccessful in achieving goals

17
Continuation Intentions
  • Goal progress how close a person is to
    achieving their exercise goals
  • Results in exercise found CI of success and
    failure predicted additional variance in
    behaviour compared with intentions alone
  • Perceived goal progress moderated effects of CI
    of success and failure on exercise behaviour
  • High CI success greater exercise engagement BUT
    only under conditions of high perceived goal
    progress

18
Continuation Intentions
CI Success
CI Failure
19
Intention-Behaviour Relationship
  • How else can we strengthen the intention-behaviour
    relationship?

Intentions
Behaviour
.36
Change these!
20
How Do We Change Intentions?
  • Change attitudes, perceived behavioural control
    to affect decision to exercise before it is made
  • Various strategies have been used
  • Attitudes Information giving and personalised
    feedback (Armitage Conner, 2000)
  • Motives from Self-Determination Theory, using
    autonomy support strategies (Chatzisarantis et
    al., 2002 Hagger et al., 2002b)

21
Self-Determination Theory
Type of Motivation
Intrinsic Motivation
Extrinsic Motivation
Intrinsic Motivation
Identification
Introjection
External regulation
Perceived Locus of Causality Scale
For external reinforcement such as gaining
rewards or avoiding punishment.
For avoiding external sources, of disapproval
(guilt) or gaining externally referenced
approval (self-esteem)
For personally-held values such as learning new
skills, resulting in feelings satisfaction High
internalization
For enjoyment, pleasure and fun no discernible
reinforcement.
Defining Features
22
Self-Determination Theory and Exercise
Intrinsic Motivation
Amotivation
Introjected Regulation
External Regulation
Identified Regulation
External Locus of Causality
Internal
I exercise because its fun
I exercise because it helps keep me fit
I exercise because I will feel guilty if I dont
I exercise because I will be punished if I dont
Im not really sure why I exercise
Source Deci and Ryan (1985)
23
Influence of Overarching Motives
from Self-Determination Theory
Attitude
.41
Subjective Norm
Intention
.45
Perceived Control
Source Hagger , Chatzisarantis and Biddle (2002)
BJHP
24
Influence of Overarching Motives
from Self-Determination Theory
Attitude
.41
Subjective Norm
Intention
R2 .32
.45
Perceived Control
Source Hagger , Chatzisarantis and Biddle (2002)
BJHP
25
Influence of Overarching Motives
from Self-Determination Theory
External
R2 .55
Attitude
.41
Introjection
Subjective Norm
Intention
.74
Intrinsic
R2 .32
.45
.37
Perceived Control
.71
R2 .51
Source Hagger , Chatzisarantis and Biddle (2002)
BJHP
26
The Transcontextual Model
Intrinsic Motivation
Intrinsic Motivation
Attitude
Identified Regulation
Identified Regulation
Behavior (R2 .28)
Intention (R2 .63)
Subjective Norm
Perceived Autonomy Support
Introjected Regulation
Introjected Regulation
Perceived Behavioural Control
External Regulation
External Regulation
Time 3 Leisure-Time Context
Time 1 PE Context
Time 2 Leisure-Time Context
Hagger, Chatzisarantis, Culverhouse Biddle
(2003) Journal of Educational Psychology
27
Important Effects in the TCM
Attitude
.27
.20
Perceived Autonomy Support
Autonomous Motives
Autonomous Motives
.39
.49
.25
Behaviour
Intention
.16
.15
Control
.10
Time 3 Physical Activity Behaviour
Time 1 Physical Education Context
Time 2 Leisure-Time Context
p lt .05
28
Guidelines Based on Self-Determination Theory and
Trans-Contextual Model
  • Reeve (2002) puts forward the behaviours which
    promote autonomous motivation
  • Avoid use of external incentives and controlling
    feedback
  • Promoting choice and sense of ownership
  • Focus on task and personal goals rather than
    comparisons with others
  • Provide a personal rationale
  • Feedback that is information related to
    competence focusing on progress

29
Another Example of a Pre-decisional Strategy
Decisional Balance
  • The decisional balance sheet (Wankel, 1984)
    outlines the positive (pros) and negative
    (cons) aspects of exercise
  • Similar to a cost-benefit analysis
  • Exercisers attended 84 classes using DB sheet
    compared with 40 without (Hoyt Janis, 1975)
  • Some have focused on changing stage from
    contemplation to action in TTM (see Prochaska
    DiClemente, 1993)

30
What About Pre- and Post-decisional Strategies in
Combination?
IV2 Decisional balance
Prestwich, Lawton Conner (2003)
IV1 Implementation Intention
31
Results Graphical Representation
Physical activity behaviour
32
Decisional Balance and Implementation Intentions
  • Decisional balance in combination with
    implementation intention exercise
  • Experimental strategies produced a greater
    increase in exercise frequency and total time
    spent exercising per week
  • Volitional groups taken together produced greater
    increase in time spent exercising than the DBS
    alone
  • The DBS may have aided recall of the
    implementation intention or increased commitment
    to it

Source Prestwich, Lawton Conner (2003)
33
Motivational Interviewing
  • A theoretically based exercise promotion
    technique
  • Borrowed from alcohol abuse and smoking clinical
    interview techniques
  • Main proponents Stephen Rollnick and Colleagues
  • Aim to focus on resistant non-exercisers and help
    investigate personally-relevant reasons c.f. Deci
    et al. (1994)

34
Motivational Interviewing
  • Aims
  • To provide information without threatening
    autonomy and without evoking psychological
    reactance
  • To explore conflicts and encourage interviewees
    to express their own reasons for change
  • To use an appropriate strategy according to a
    persons readiness for change

35
Motivational Interviewing
  • Key concepts
  • Ambivalence
  • Problem Pros and Cons associated with change,
    cannot be reconciled
  • Solution MI aims to explore conflict encourage
    people to express their own reasons for
    concern/change
  • Readiness to change
  • Problem People vary on continuum of readiness
  • Solution Moving forward on continuum is desired
    outcome, even if actual behaviour change does not
    occur, key strategies a typical day/good
    things/less good things

36
Strategies in Motivational Interviewing
  • A menu of strategies
  • Raise awareness
  • Provide information
  • The future and present strategy
  • Exploring concerns
  • Helping with decision making

Source Rollnick, Heather Bell (1991)
37
Key Strategies
(1) Raise awareness e.g. have you ever thought
about exercise? and do you know what exercise
can do for you?, avoid scare tactics like if
you dont exercise you might die of a heart
attack! and statements like the less good
things about exercise are.... (2) Provide
information - Providing information in the most
optimal way do not wag your finger (3) The
future and the present strategy - How would you
like things to change in the future and whats
stopping you from doing exercise? (4) Exploring
concerns - provide information about the
behaviour and how they would like it to
change (5) Helping with decision making -
Patients in the preparatory phase require
assistance in making their decision, self
initiation.  
38
Key Strategies
(4) Exploring concerns - provide information
about the behaviour and how they would like it to
change   (5) Helping with decision making -
Patients in the preparatory phase require
assistance in making their decision, self
initiation.
39
Self-determination Theory and Motivational
Interviewing
  • Markland, Ryan, Tobin, Rollnick (2005) and
    Vansteenkiste Sheldon (2006)
  • Initially - intrinsic motivation stated as a core
    aspect of MI, but no theoretical basis
  • Recent authors present a SDT reading of MI
  • Approach in SDT supports psychological needs for
    autonomy, competence, and relatedness
  • Autonomy Clients suggest personal reasons for
    change and experimenter rolls with resistance
  • Competence Clients given clear feedback and
    encouraged to arrive at their own goals
  • Relatedness Clients supported by
    non-judgemental interviewer who expresses empathy.

40
Structure
Autonomy Support
Involvement
  • Motivational interviewing
  • Present clear and neutral information about
    behaviour and outcomes
  • Provide positive feedback
  • Develop appropriate goals
  • Elicit and reinforce self-motivational statements
  • Motivational interviewing
  • Present options
  • Let client make decisions
  • Develop discrepancy to allow client to change
  • Roll with resistance
  • Motivational interviewing
  • Express empathy
  • Demonstrate understanding
  • Avoid criticism and judgement
  • Explore clients concerns

Competence
Self-Determination
Relatedness
Source Markland (2004)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com