Civil Society Partnerships Programme: Achievements - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 71
About This Presentation
Title:

Civil Society Partnerships Programme: Achievements

Description:

The Latin America Network. The ToT in Africa. Presentations from Other ODI Groups ... The filtering function allows unmanageable amounts of information to be ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:86
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 72
Provided by: nchow
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Civil Society Partnerships Programme: Achievements


1
Civil Society Partnerships Programme
Achievements Looking Ahead
  • CSPP Partners Workshop
  • 13th 15th November 2006
  • ODI, London

2
Overall programme
  • Welcome / Introduction to workshop
  • Introductions and updates
  • General progress
  • Storytelling/Case Studies
  • The Latin America Network
  • The ToT in Africa
  • Presentations from Other ODI Groups
  • Action Research Global Projects
  • Network development
  • The New Global Project
  • ME and Indicators
  • Funding brainstorm
  • Launch of Name and Website
  • Preparation for the Advisers Meeting
  • Presentations to the Advisers

3
  • General Progress
  • (John Young, Naved Chowdhury)

4
Progress so far
  • gt 20 Publications Website
  • gt 1000 Participants at WS Seminars
  • Network established gt 20 core members
  • LA network gt 100 members
  • Demand from international NGOs
  • ? ODI communication capacity
  • 57 public meetings
  • 1.6 million web visitors
  • 15,000 subscribers to newsletter.
  • 2 successful (?) global projects
  • Phase II approved by DFID
  • New research.
  • 5 ARPs approved
  • ToT East Africa
  • Several exchanges
  • Raised profile in ODI better collaboration
  • External advisers more interested
  • Other donors interested

5
Action!
Field trip to CEF partner project, Bangladesh
Presentation at regional workshop, Malawi
Discussing case studies, Sri Lanka workshop
Field trip to Naamacha Secondary School,
Mozambique, to test context analysis tools
6
The Impact Log
  • The CSO Capacity for Policy Engagement paper
    pays attention to a number of concerns and the
    responses to them that we face in our work as
    Advisors facilitating Capacity Building Services.
    Congratulations for this product Jyotsna Roy,
    SPARK-Senior Advisor Local Governance Gender,
    SNV
  • We appreciate our relationship with CSPP and
    ODI. We receive capacity building training on
    research, policy and advocacy work and
    newsletters from you. Thank you for all your good
    work Angel E Musenge Executive Director, Voice
    of the Youth Project, Zambia
  • I found the case studies used in the Sri Lanka
    workshop useful in a workshop we ran in Uganda
    recently to draw lessons on what makes for
    successful advocacy. Adam Platt, Triple Line
    Consulting
  • I found the August issue of the CSPP
    E-newsletter a very useful Keep up the good
    work, it seems like you are developing a really
    useful information sharing and capacity building
    network that will a significant resource for CSOs
    across the world. Gideon Rabinowitz, CUTS
    International

7
Phase II Revised Log Frame
  • Not a major change but
  • Recognition of external and internal objectives
    (purpose)
  • 4 external outputs
  • Facilitating the network
  • Capacity development
  • Collaborative action-research projects
  • Research
  • 3 internal outputs
  • ODI Communication Capacity
  • Capacity to work with CSOs
  • Orientation towards CSOs

8
Narrative Summary
  • Super-Goal
  • Poverty reduced in developing countries
  • Goal
  • Development policy is more pro-poor
  • Purpose
  • Southern CSOs make more use of research-based
    evidence to influence the establishment of
    pro-poor policy, and
  • ODI engages more effectively with southern CSOs
    and other stakeholders to make more use of ODIs
    research-based evidence to influence the
    establishment of pro-poor policy.

9
Narrative Summary
  • Network
  • Interactive community website
  • Information and knowledge exchange
  • General support
  • Capacity-building
  • staff exchange,
  • visiting fellows to ODI and Southern institutes,
  • Southern participants in global policy events
  • Training and ToT
  • Research (lessons disseminated)
  • Ongoing learning
  • How to do it guidelines
  • New research
  • Collaborative projects
  • Small-scale ARPs
  • Continued support to existing projects
  • One new global collaborative project each year

10
Narrative Summary
  • ODI knowledge easily accessible to CSOs.
  • Communications strategy emphasising CSOs
  • Improved ODI website and publications
  • Meetings and events for CSOs
  • Greater engagement with the media
  • ODI staff use research-based evidence better.
  • Build systems and skills in ODI
  • Encourage enhanced networking
  • ODI better able to work with CSOs.
  • Strengthened ODI focus on policy influence and
    working with CSOs
  • Improved incentives for staff
  • Greater engagement of the CSPP in ODI
  • Inputs to other ODI programmes

11
CSPP Network Progress so far
  • What was the network expected to do?
  • Lots of activities have taken place (TOT,
    Website, Newsletter, Action Research Projects,
    Placement, CSPP LA network, participation in
    external events, etc)
  • Lots of enquiry about the network (IDRC, Hewlett,
    AKF, NBD, ICCDA- Inter regional Co-ordinating
    Committee for Development Associations etc)
  • Substantial external demand for support (CEF),
    Transparency International, Infodev

12
Impact and Governance
  • Too early to say whether having big impact on the
    work of the partners.
  • Still hugely ODI Led.
  • Interaction among partners been very limited.
  • Do we need to define levels of network
    membership?
  • Should CD be only for Core partners?
  • How do we find the balance between investing in
    core partners and in broader network members?

13
  • Storytelling/Case Studies
  • (Ben Ramalingam)

14
Stories of change
  • Situation
  • A change or challenge
  • Action
  • Result
  • Lesson

15
Stories of change
  • What was the most significant change that has
    come about as a result of your research into
    policy work in the past 12-18 months?
  • Changes can be
  • positive or negative
  • Related to expanded substantive understanding, a
    process / structural change, or a change in
    relationship
  • Group or individually focused
  • Internal or external

16
As pairs then groups
  • Think of a specific change to which you made a
    contribution in one of your own projects or
    programmes, past or present
  • Reflect and recall the detail before, during and
    after. Write nothing down
  • 1 minute
  • Find someone who havent worked with yet and take
    it in turns to listen to and tell a story
  • Please write nothing down.
  • 4 minutes 2 mins each
  • Use templates to interview your partner and write
    each story up
  • Make sure your images and messages are clear.
  • 10 minutes 5 minutes each
  • Find another pair and tell your partners story
  • 12 minutes 3 minutes each
  • In your new groups of 4, ask What are the five
    concrete actions emerging from this? How might we
    apply these?
  • 10 minutes per group

17
Latin America Network,Vanesa Weyrauch, CIPPEC
  • Lessons Learned
  • How to Establish them in Africa and Asia?

18
TOT in East AfricaVivian Kazi, ESRF
  • Lessons Learned
  • How to capitalise on them?

19
DFIDs Governance and Transparency Fund
  • DFIDs White Paper 3 Governance
  • The ability of citizens to make their voices
    heard and hold their governments to account is
    fundamental to good governance.
  • DFIDs Governance and Transparency Fund designed
    to help citizens hold their governments to
    account, through strengthening the wide range of
    groups that can empower and support them.

20
What the Fund is?
  • 100 million over five years to start in 2007
  • To fund coherent portfolios of projects by
    consortia between 1m and 5m
  • Working through local partnerships and networks
  • NGOs, faith-based groups, TUs, co-operatives,
    media, democracy promotion
  • At least 85 of funds to southern organisations

21
The GT Fund, ODI and its CSPP and other
partners
  • ODI considering putting in a proposal
  • To lead a consortium
  • provide management, ME, comparative research,
    cross-case learning, synthesis, and expertise on
    governance/ transparency/ accountability
  • Working with southern partners
  • Building on the CSPP

22
What do you think?
  • Of interest to CSPP? Of interest to you?
  • What are challenges re governance/ transparency/
    accountability in your country/region?
  • What themes or issues would make good entry
    points for enhancing governance by demanding
    accountability?
  • Media freedoms
  • Budget monitoring
  • Parliamentary engagement
  • others?
  • Questions?
  • http//www.dfid.gov.uk/consultations/gtf-guideline
    s.pdf

23
  • Presentations from ODI Groups

24
Civil Society Partnerships Programme Day 2
  • 14th November 2006

25
Overall programme
  • Welcome / Introduction to workshop
  • Introductions and updates
  • General progress
  • Storytelling/Case Studies
  • The Latin America Network
  • The ToT in Africa
  • Presentations from Other ODI Groups
  • Action Research Global Projects
  • Network development
  • The New Global Project
  • ME and Indicators
  • Funding brainstorm
  • Launch of Name and Website
  • Preparation for the Advisers Meeting
  • Presentations to the Advisers

26
  • Action-Research and Global Projects
  • Introduced by John Young and Ben Ramalingam

27
1. Taking Heads
  • Collaborative Action Research Projects
  • Land Policy - Zambia
  • Regional Government Policy - Peru
  • Policy on Chronic Poverty - Uganda
  • Resettlement Policy - Sri Lanka
  • Trade Policy - Bangladesh
  • Global Projects
  • Economic Partnership Agreements
  • Forum for the Future of Aid

28
All CSPP projects should be viewed as a learning
process
2. Peer Assist Session
UsingKnowledge
Goals
Doing
Results
External networks Colleagues Own knowledge
Information assets
29
2. Peer Assist Session
Learning before projects Start with the
attitude that someone probably already has some
experience of what I am about to do. I wonder
who?
30
2. Peer Assist Session
  • A peer assist is a meeting or workshop where
    people are invited from other groups and
    organisations to share their experience, insights
    and knowledge with a team who have requested some
    help early on in a piece of work
  • A peer assist
  • targets specific challenges
  • gains assistance and insights from people outside
    the team
  • identifies possible approaches and new lines of
    inquiry
  • promotes sharing of learning with each other and
  • develops mini-networks amongst people involved

31
2. Peer Assist Session
  • All peer assists involve the same basic process
  • Project team member (s) presents the project and
    specific problem (s) faced
  • Participants consider the project, and discuss
    issues of general interest
  • Participants consider the specific problem (s)
    and consider what the team might need to do in
    order to address the problem, drawing on options
    and experiences from elsewhere
  • Project team member summarises the contribution
    of the participants, suggests what the team might
    be doing as a result of discussion, and
    circulates a brief follow-up note to participants
    afterwards
  • All participants asked to reflect on what they
    learned, and how they might apply it going
    forward.

32
2. Peer Assist Session
  • We have a half an hour for each peer assists
  • 930-1000 4 projects
  • 1000-1030 3 projects

33
  • Networks (Enrique Mendizabal
  • Ben Ramalingam)

34
Networks just the latest Buzzword?
  • Power does not reside in institutions, not even
    the state or large corporations. It is located in
    the networks that structure society. (Manuel
    Castells, 2004)
  • We are some way from being able to structure
    public and organisational power in ways which
    really harness network potential (McCarthy,
    Miller and Skidmore, 2004)
  • Africas strength lies in social networks which
    are invisible to many outsiders. (Commission for
    Africa, 2005)
  • But what do they actually do?

35
6 Key Functions
Facilitators
Community builders
  • Filters

Investor/providers
Amplifiers
Convenors
36
Community building
  • Community building functions promote and sustain
    the values and standards of a network of
    individuals or groups
  • Some make the transition from community builders
    to amplifiers and conveners.
  • Community building networks often develop strong
    links within the network but none / few weak
    links outside the network

37
Community Building CIVICUS
  • CIVICUS is an international alliance established
    to promote the foundation, growth and protection
    of citizen action throughout the world. It has
    more than 650 members in 110 countries
  • Membership diverse, including networks and
    organisational sectors policy and research,
    grant-making, youth, women, and the environment.
  • Functions Community builder (through unifying
    events, service provision and newsletter/publicati
    ons), filter (Civil Society Watch Index),
    investor/provider (governance capacity for CSOs),
    convenor (to a degree).
  • Structure A hub in the developing world and
    regional offices in the developed world.
  • Special characteristics CIVICUS headquarters and
    operational hub is located in Johannesburg, South
    Africa. It also has offices in Washington, DC and
    in London.
  • More info http//www.civicus.org/new/default.asp

38
Filtering
  • The filtering function allows unmanageable
    amounts of information to be organised and used
    in a productive way
  • Filtering networks can provide decision makers
    with a valuable service
  • There is evidence that NGOs and think tanks can
    fulfil a filtering function
  • NGOs in the UK, for instance, often work to
    filter the evidence from several research sources

39
An Example of Filtering
  • The Development Executive Group
  • The Development Executive Group is a global
    membership organisation which provides members
    with useful information on the international
    development industry, facilitating
    intra-network communications and access to
    resources e.g. experts, contracts
  • Membership firms, non-profit organizations, and
    individual professionals working in the
    international development marketplace.
  • Functions Filter (from outside to the inside),
    community building (among development workers)
    and facilitator (facilitates access to other
    members and resources), provides (acts as a
    broker between donors/clients and members)
  • Structure Strong management hub that filters
    information from the outside to make it relevant
    and useful to its members.
  • Special characteristics emphasis on
    communications between partner members, multiple
    functions
  • More Info http//www.developmentex.com/index.asp

40
Amplifying
  • Amplifiers help take an private / complex idea or
    a message and transfer it to a public or simple
    or understandable- one.
  • Amplification can be used to disseminate a
    message or idea, and can also be part of a two
    way process of communication and feedback

41
Example of Amplifying
  • The Ecumenical Advocacy Alliance
  • The Ecumenical Advocacy Alliance works through an
    education approach to tackle the issues of global
    trade and HIV/AIDS
  • Membership more than 85 churches and
    church-related organizations have joined the
    Alliance and bring a constituency to this common
    work of advocacy of more than 100 million people
    worldwide.
  • Functions Amplifying (the messages of HIV/AIDS,
    conflict and trade through churches),
    facilitating (coordination of actions among
    members)
  • Structure A small coordinating secretariat in
    Switzerland and a global committee. Other members
    are loosely attached.
  • Special characteristics A faith-based membership
    and use of institutional infrastructure of the
    Church provide the network with additional
    organisational strength. Its governance agreement
    does not then need to address too many
    non-executive issues
  • More info http//www.e-alliance.ch/

42
Facilitating
  • Facilitating functions help members carryout
    their activities more efficiently and effectively
  • Facilitator networks, like facilitators at a
    workshop help make things happen but do not need
    to be involved with the members work.
  • This function is often hard to differentiate from
    the others because, in theory, all networks are
    created to facilitate the achievement of any
    particular objective.


43
Example of Facilitating
  • Outcome Mapping Learning Community,
  • Global
  • OMLN is a network of Outcome Mapping users which
    seeks to link all users of the Om methods
  • Membership Individuals from NGOs, UN agencies,
    Grass roots organisations,
  • Functions Facilitator (for people to improve use
    of the OM methodology), community builder (of OM
    users worldwide)
  • Structure A hub and many members but managed
    mostly via the internet and virtual
    communications.
  • Special characteristics The network has been
    developed almost solely relying on online
    interactions
  • More info http//www.outcomemapping.ca

44
Investing and Providing
  • Investing networks offer a channel to provide
    members with the resources they need to carryout
    their main activities
  • Broker investor/provider networks act mostly as
    facilitators connecting, for instance, donors and
    trainers with network members
  • Networks can also be useful to invest or provide
    to third parties e.g. non-members

45
Example of Investing-Providing
  • African Capacity Building Foundation (ACBF)
  • The ACBF, based in Harare, is an independent,
    capacity-building institution
  • Membership 3 sponsoring agencies (AfDB, UNDP and
    the World Bank), the International Monetary Fund
    (IMF), 32 African countries and non-African
    countries and institutions.
  • Functions Investor/provider (capacity building
    and funding), facilitation (networking),
    amplifier (via publications and events), filter
    (of information in support of ACBF researchers)
  • Key structure A steering committee/secretariat
    that carries out the activities of the
    foundations.
  • Special characteristics It covers 2 regional
    organisations and 26 national focal points in 37
    countries in Africa. It offers research grants as
    well as capacity building grants. It offers
    members networking activities as well as
    specialised workshops. It also finances workshops
    carried out by workshops.
  • More info http//www.acbf-pact.org/

46
Convening
  • Convening networks bring together individuals and
    groups from different nationalities, disciplines,
    practices, or from different areas of the aid
    system
  • Issues of authority structures, logistical
    capacities, credibility and media, communication
    and dissemination skills require special
    attention.
  • Convening requires that the audience be more
    carefully defined and must develop context and
    audience specific tools
  • Convening networks allow the development of
    systematic and sustainable linkages between
    researchers, policymakers and practitioners
  • Convening networks need to carryout systematic
    and elaborate assessments of audiences, and also
    need to filter information to respond to a highly
    informed and specialised demand.
  • Sequence of network development may culminate in
    a convening network in which all other functions
    come together.

47
Example of Convening
  • Coalition 2000, Bulgaria anti corruption network
  • Coalition 2000 is an initiative of a number of
    Bulgarian non-governmental organizations aimed at
    combating corruption. It works at the agenda
    setting level drafting an Anti-Corruption Action
    Plan for Bulgaria, as well as implementing an
    awareness campaign and a monitoring system.
  • Membership International and governmental
    institutions, national NGOs and individuals
  • Functions Convenor (brings together various
    sectors and addresses their concerns), filter
    (information on corruption for easy access by all
    users), amplifier (of its work, findings of
    research and media), community building (help
    establish coalitions)
  • Structure A partnership network of partners from
    civil society, government and the private sector.
    Consists of a Policy Forum which sets work plans,
    made to determine the Coalitions work and is
    made up of representatives of all relevant
    institutions a Steering Committee that provides
    direction and oversees the process and a
    Secretariat that provides the management.
  • Special characteristics The network provides
    consensus and coalition building collects
    information, disseminates (mostly to inform and
    shame) and influences policy through direct and
    indirect action.
  • More info http//www.anticorruption.bg/eng/coalit
    ion/about.htm

48
6 Key Functions
Facilitators
Community builders
Investor/providers
  • Filters

Convenors
Amplifiers
49
Functional focus current and ideal
50
Task Existing Balance, Ideal Balance
  • Working alone, then in pairs, then in groups
  • Map the current functional focus of this network
    by allocating 100 marks across the different
    functions
  • Then do the ideal focus
  • In pairs discuss why you gave the current and
    ideal allocation that you did
  • We will come around to get your scores and
    calculate the shared wisdom of the crowd
  • Then in groups of 4-6, discuss what might be
    required to move from the shared Current to
    shared Ideal (suggestions are on reverse of
    worksheet)
  • 5 key points to be recorded, with reports back to
    the group

51
  • The Next Global Project Brainstorm
  • (John Young)

52
Principles
  • The Global projects should
  • Aim to influence a specific policy process
    through
  • Clear identification of policy mechanisms
  • A clear policy engagement strategy
  • Be based on existing evidence (not new research)
  • Have some chance of success (context assessment)
  • Be on an issue where ODI has some expertise and
    experience
  • Have built-in learning and ME

53
Ideas from last year
  • Latin America
  • Debt
  • Trade
  • Internal Migration
  • Asia
  • Trade and Development
  • Reform of Aid System
  • The Economics of Emergencies (HIV/Aids, national
    disasters, epidemics)
  • LDC Trade and Development
  • West Africa
  • Trade,
  • Access to markets,
  • Subsidies
  • Debt cancellation
  • East Southern Africa
  • Trade
  • Debt
  • Aid
  • Environment and Climate Change
  • PRSPs and MDGs
  • HIV/AIDS

54
Need to decide
  • Possible Topics
  • Mechanism for Commissioning / implementation

55
  • ME
  • (John Young)

56
ME in the CSPP
  • Requirement of PPA
  • Focus on delivery of
  • Outputs and purpose
  • Iterative process
  • New Log Frame
  • ME Framework
  • 2 Purposes Internal and External
  • Focus today is on ME of external purpose ie the
    development and work of the network

57
Key Actors and Activities
  • Key actors
  • Academic and PRIs in North South
  • Internal ODI stakeholders
  • Other CSOs (iNGOS, NGOS, GROs, networks,
    foundations etc).
  • High-impact activities
  • Capacity development for CSPP network members
  • Improving the skills of ODI staff
  • Ensuring ODI knowledge is accessible to CSOs
  • Ensuring relevant programme lessons are
    disseminated

58
ME Products
  • Annual Report.
  • Annual Report to DFID
  • DFID Mid-Term Review (late 2007)
  • Annual Partners' Meeting (November)
  • Annual Advisors' Meeting (November)
  • Virtual ½ yearly Advisors' Meeting
  • SMT Meetings in ODI
  • CSPP Management Team Meetings.
  • CSPP Newsletter (quarterly)
  • Web Site (updated regularly)
  • Special Products (eg Baseline Survey, Green Book
    etc).

59
Specific Indicators for
60
Specific Indicators for
61
How would you monitor
  • whether
  • Southern CSOs make more use of research-based
    evidence to influence the establishment of
    pro-poor policy
  • What indicators would you use?
  • How would you Measure them?

62
  • Fundraising
  • (John Young, Naved Chowdhury)

63
Fundraising Opportunities
  • Untied money
  • Hewlett
  • DFID (PPA / GTF)
  • Big Fund
  • Tied Money
  • CEF
  • IDRC
  • DFID (LA Trade / C4C / Kenya)
  • SA Trust

64
  • Launch of Network Name and Website

65
Name of Network
  • Which of the proposed acronyms and names do you
    prefer?

66
Network Website
  • Which of the proposed styles do you think best
    reflects the objectives of the network?
  • Do you have any comments or suggestions on the
    layout and style?

67
Website Design 1 (Savannah)
68
Website Design 2 (Silver)
69
Website Design 3 (Countries)
70
Website Design 4 (Limey)
71
Preparation for Tomorrow
  • Group work
  • Suggestions / Recommendations to Advisers on
    Network
  • Group Presentations to Advisers
  • Travel to Oxford for ODI-INASP Symposium
  • See you tomorrow!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com