Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 95
About This Presentation
Title:

Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS

Description:

To provide states and localities with the resources and ... Acquisition, new construction & signification rehab 10 years. Non significant rehab 3 years ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 96
Provided by: hud
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS


1
Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS
  • Competition Overview
  • May 28, 2008
  • Presented by
  • Office of HIV/AIDS Housing
  • Benjamin Ayers

2
HOPWA Program Purpose
  • To provide states and localities with the
    resources and incentives to devise long-term
    comprehensive strategies for meeting the housing
    and related supportive service needs of
    low-income persons with HIV/AIDS

3
HOPWA Client Outcomes
  • Assist HOPWA Clients in establishing or
    maintaining stable housing, reduce risks of
    homelessness and improve access to care

4
Application Package Instructions
  • Down load 2 packages from www.grants.gov
  • Instructions-required HOPWA application forms and
    NOFA
  • Application Package- SF 424

5
Application Submission Date
  • Validated by grants.gov by 115959 PM, Eastern
    Time on
  • July 18, 2008
  • 72 hour validation period

6
Other Available Funding
  • Formula Grants in 127 St/local 267,417,000
  • National Technical Assistance
  • 820,000
  • This Competition after funding renewals Approx
    8,000,000

7
Definitions
  • Chronically homeless
  • Lease or occupancy agreement
  • Non-profit organization
  • Permanent supportive housing
  • Transitional housing

8
Award Information
  • Projects awarded announced by 09/31/2008
  • Max. grant 1,430,000
  • ROI 30,000 1,460,000
  • Min. grant 500,000
  • Average award 1,200,000

9
Eligibility
  • Long-term
  • States units of general local government
    (non-formula)
  • Balance of state areas Units of general local
    government (not a formula grantee)

10
Eligibility
  • Special Project of National Significance (SPNS)
  • States, units of general local government,
    nonprofits

11
Program Requirements (12)
  • General provisions
  • General section provisions apply
  • Section III.C.
  • National Environmental Policy Act
  • Facility project cant commit or spend HUD or
    local funds
  • Tenant based rental assistance supportive
    services, operating costs and administrative
    costs excluded

12
Program Requirements
  • Performance goals
  • Planned Yearly outputs outcomes
  • 80 Housing stability, reduced risk of
    homelessness, increasing access to care
  • Optional local project goals

13
Performance Goals - Outputs
  • Measure actual achievements against anticipated
    achievements, report on housing outputs
    outcomes
  • of units or households assisted TBRA, STRMU,
    Facilities
  • of house holds that achieved outcomes

14
Performance Goals-Outcomes
  • HOPWA Outcomes
  • housing stability, reduced risks of homelessness,
    improved access to care
  • Annual client assessment
  • Status in ongoing arrangements, stable, temporary
    or other results

15
Program Requirements
  • Use of drop down logic model
  • HOPWA facility use period
  • Acquisition, new construction signification
    rehab 10 years
  • Non significant rehab 3 years

16
Program Requirements
  • Disbursement of funds
  • 3 years spend
  • 5 years recapture
  • Execution of grant agreement obligation of
    awards
  • Selected applicants 6 months

17
Program Requirements
  • Site control in 1 year
  • Acquisition or leasing
  • Rehabilitation or new construction
  • Begin 18 months
  • Complete by end of agreement

18
Program Requirements
  • Project operations
  • Drawdown w/ 6months
  • Proportionate to operating period
  • Delays loss of funding

19
Program Requirements
  • Section 3-Housing Urban Development ACT of 1968
  • New construction rehabilitation
  • Employment economic opportunities
  • Address number in narrative
  • Report in annual reporting

20
Program Requirements
  • Executive Order 13166
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP)
  • General Section IV
  • Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
  • General Section III

21
Eligible Activities
  • Proposed project activities
  • Activities budget amounts tied to housing
    outputs and outcomes

22
Eligible Activities
  • Housing Assistance
  • Main focus of housing
  • Permanent housing w. legal right to continue in
    unit
  • Transitional with linkages to Permanent w/ 24
    months

23
Eligible Activities
  • Housing Assistance
  • Leasing including master leasing
  • Tenant Based Rental assistance (TBRA) scattered
    site vs. project based
  • Short-term Rent Mortgage Utility assistance
    (STRMU)

24
Eligible Activities
  • Supportive Services
  • Enhance access to mainstream
  • No more than 35 of budget
  • No services-only facilities
  • No funds for medications (may be shown as
    leveraging)
  • Appropriate for client

25
Eligible Activities
  • Permanent Housing Placement
  • Include application fees, credit reviews,
    reasonable security deposits not exceeding 2
    months
  • Does not include other move-in items e.g.
    furniture, minor repairs (may be shown as
    leveraging)

26
Eligible Activities
  • Housing Information
  • Disseminating local housing resource information
    to potential clients

27
Eligible Activities
  • Other
  • Subject to HUDs approval
  • Address expected beneficial housing impact w/
    performance outputs client outcomes
  • Based on a Need not addressed by HOPWA Activities

28
Eligible Activities
  • New Soliciting Return on Investment (ROI) cost
    analysis methodologies
  • Cost comparison on effectiveness efficiency
  • Dollars saved per dollars invested, benefits per
    dollars invested, or both
  • Result in effective ROI, equal ROI, and a less
    than effective ROI

29
Eligible Activities
  • (ROI) cost comparison
  • Direct HOPWA housing activity outcome
  • Supportive service activity outcome
  • Both outcome
  • Delineate the investment the return

30
Eligible Activities
  • Dollars saved per dollars invested TBRA vs.
    long-term institutional care
  • Investment (cost of supportive housing)
  • return (cost savings for maintaining the client
    in the community)

31
Eligible Activities
  • Benefit per dollars invested TBRA compared to
    possible institutional placement
  • Improved quality of life measured by households

32
Eligible Activities
  • Benefit/result (achieving better relative health,
    greater family stability, and improved life
    outcomes)
  • investment (cost of improved quality of life)

33
Eligible Activities
  • ROI Methodologies address
  • Cost saving related to other public and private
    systems of housing care and related support.
  • Greater efficiencies in service delivery for
    types and levels of support.

34
Eligible Activities
  • (ROI) cost analysis methodologies
  • One time funding up to 30,000 (justify request)
  • Earn up to 5 points under rating factor 5
    achieving new results

35
Eligible Activities
  • Resource Identification
  • Establish, coordinate, develop housing
    assistance resources in your community

36
Application Submission
  • NOFA Copies application forms
    http//www.grants.gov/search/search.do?oppId13003
    modeVIEW
  • Download Adobe Reader 8.1.2 pure edge viewer
    from grants.gov for use of Adobe formatted
    program forms

37
Application Submission
  • New Fax Numbers
  • 800-894-4047
  • 215-825-8796
  • Third party letters, certifications other
    required documentation
  • Help at support_at_grants.gov or
  • (800) 518-4726

38
Application Forms
  • SF-424 equal opportunity Survey
  • HUD 96010 Logic model
  • HUD 2990 Cert on RC/EZ/EC-II, if applicable
  • HUD 2880 Applicant/receipt disclosure/update
    report
  • SFLLL Disclosures lobbying

39
Application Forms
  • HUD 40110-B HOPWA Application Budget (3-part
    form)
  • HUD 27300 HUD communities Initiative Form (Reg
    Barrier)
  • must provide backup citation
  • HUD-2991 Certification of consistency
    w/consolidation plan

40
Application Content
  • Proof of Nonprofit status of applicants
    sponsors AIDS purpose
  • Documentation of leveraging
  • Commitment letters on file
  • Narratives for each section

41
Application Content
  • Executive summary
  • Brief overview of project
  • Capacity of applicant sponsors narrative
  • relevant organizational experience to proposed
    activities

42
Application Content
  • Need/extent problem narrative
  • Unmet need description
  • Relevant statistical data
  • Compliments existing projects
  • Responds to community planning processes

43
Application Content
  • Soundness of approach
  • Model qualities
  • Responsiveness
  • Coordination narrative
  • Public Policy priorities

44
Application Content
  • Achieving results program evaluation narrative
  • Logic Model supplemental narrative
  • ROI description of cost effectiveness and
    efficiency analysis plan

45
Application Submission
  • Submitted, received validated electronically by
    Grants.gov
  • No later than July 18, 2008
  • 115959 PM Eastern time

46
Funding Restrictions
  • Program activities directly benefiting eligible
    persons at least 500,000 not more than
    1,300,000
  • ROI activities additional funding maximum of
    30,000

47
Funding Restrictions
  • Grant administrative costs for grantee a maximum
    of 3
  • Grant administrative costs of project sponsors- a
    maximum of 7
  • Grantees cannot add the 7 for project sponsors
    if carrying out activities w/o project sponsor

48
Funding Restrictions
  • Supportive Services budget line item can be no
    more than 35

49
Funding Restrictions
  • Total maximum grant amount
  • 1,430,000
  • 30,000 ROI
  • 1,460,000

50
Funding Restrictions
  • Three-year use period
  • No proposals dependent on prospective
    Determinations

51
Ineligible Activities
No funding for personal items
  • Grooming
  • Clothing
  • Pets
  • Financial assistance
  • Consumer credit payments
  • Entertainment activities

52
Ineligible Activities
No funding for personal items
  • Property taxes
  • Personal vehicle maintenance repairs
  • Condominium fees
  • Other non-housing-related costs

53
Ineligible Activities
  • Data collection on project outcomes

54
Other Submission Requirements
  • Electronic Submission
  • Waivers to electronic submission (see General
    Section IV F 3)

55
Other Submission Requirements
  • If electronic submission waived, paper
    applications due by
  • July 18, 2008, 115959 PM EST
  • No 15 day grace period on receipt
  • No proof of timely submission as alternative

56
Application Selection
  • Five Rating Factors
  • Capacity
  • Need/Extent of Problem
  • Soundness of Approach
  • Leveraging
  • Achieving Results Program Evaluation

57
Rating Factor 1
  • Capacity (20 Points)
  • Minimum of 14 points required for funding
    eligibility

58
Rating Factor 1
  • Capacity-Past Experience Knowledge
  • Proposed activities
  • Serving individuals households w/ HIV/AIDS
  • Monitoring evaluating programs
  • Fiscal responsibility

59
Rating Factor 2
  • Need/Extent of the Problem
  • (15 points)
  • 5 points awarded based on AIDS cases per capita
    AIDS incidence
  • 10 points Description of unmet housing need

60
Rating Factor 2
  • Need/Extent of the Problem
  • Housing need not addressed by other projects in
    the area
  • Unresolved or emerging issues/need for
    alternative forms of assistance

61
Rating Factor 2
  • Need/Extent of the Problem
  • projects enhancement to communitys Consolidated
    Plan other planning processes
  • Prove need Subpopulation targets statistics
    data sources

62
Rating Factor 3
  • Soundness of Approach (45pts.)
  • 15 for responsiveness
  • 5 for coordination
  • 7 for public policy priorities
  • 18 for model qualities
  • 45

63
Rating Factor 3 Soundness of Approach
  • Responsiveness (15 points)
  • Response to unmet need Persons served by each
    activity for each year
  • Housing units provided by type year

64
Rating Factor 3 Soundness of Approach
  • Responsiveness
  • Roles, responsibilities
  • Organizations providing leveraged resources
  • How leveraged resources are used

65
Rating Factor 3 Soundness of Approach
  • Responsiveness- Housing Activities
  • Access to permanent supportive housing
  • Use of permanent housing placement

66
Rating Factor 3 Soundness of Approach
  • Responsiveness- Housing Activities
  • Description of housing site
  • Development operations plan
  • Operational procedures

67
Rating Factor 3 Soundness of Approach
  • Responsiveness- Supportive Service Activities
  • Plan for delivering supportive services

68
Rating Factor 3 Soundness of Approach
  • Responsiveness- Supportive Service Activities
  • How agreements provide access to mainstream
    programs
  • How project plans ensure client participation

69
Rating Factor 3 Soundness of Approach
  • Responsiveness- Other approvable activities
  • Not at 24 CFR 574.300
  • Only approved by HUD
  • Describe the need
  • Describe the benefits
  • Report annually

70
Rating Factor 3 Soundness of Approach
  • Coordination (5 points)
  • Coordination of activities with other
    organizations prior to application submission
  • Developed project through consultation w/ other
    stakeholders

71
Rating Factor 3 Soundness of Approach
  • Coordination w/ other HUD-funded programs
    programs outside of Con. Plan
  • Coordinated client assistance w/ mainstream
    resources
  • All parties aware of service delivery each
    others roles in stabilizing the clients

72
Rating Factor 3 Soundness of Approach
  • Public Policy Priorities (7pts.)
  • 1pt describe use of universal design
    visitablility
  • 1pt participation of non-profit grassroots
    community-based (including faith-based)

73
Rating Factor 3 Soundness of Approach
  • Public Policy Priorities
  • 1pt promote energy efficiency energy star
    products
  • 2pt completion of regulatory barriers policy
    questionnaire
  • 2pt target of chronically homeless

74
Rating Factor 3 Soundness of Approach
  • Model Qualities (18 Points)
  • Meet HUD policy priorities
  • Method of project management oversight
  • Your evaluation plan What you measure how

75
Rating Factor 3 Soundness of Approach
  • Model Qualities
  • Exemplary service delivery management connected
    to other HOPWA funded projects
  • Activities expand knowledge in serving eligible
    persons

76
Rating Factor 3 Soundness of Approach
  • Model Qualities-descriptive budget
  • How funding is used the related use of
    leveraging
  • How BLIs relate to planned activities
  • Clarity completeness of summary statement

77
Rating Factor 4
  • Leverage (5 Points)
  • Minimum of 1 point for funding eligibility
  • Address secure community resources, achieve
    program purposes ensure sustainability of
    housing efforts

78
Rating Factor 4
  • Leverage
  • Committed at the time of application submission
  • Points based on amount of commitments

79
Rating Factor 4
Leveraging Chart/List
  • Organizations name address
  • Type of commitment
  • Dollar value
  • Date of letter
  • Authorized representative
  • Contact information

80
Rating Factor 5
  • Achieving Results Program Evaluation(15 points)
  • Logic Model 10 pts.
  • ROI methodology 5 pts

81
Rating Factor 5
  • Achieving Results Program Evaluation- Logic
    Model (HUD-96010)
  • Measure actual achievements against anticipated
    achievements
  • Commitment to obtaining goals
  • Commitment to ensuring performance assessment

82
Rating Factor 5
  • Achieving Results Program Evaluation- ROI
    Methodology
  • 1 pt description of methodology rational
  • 1 pt identify service to be addressed why
  • 1 pt description of expected benefit / outcome

83
Rating Factor 5
  • Achieving Results Program Evaluation- ROI
    Methodology
  • 1 pt submission of data collection analysis
    plan
  • 1 pt description of capacity to conduct ROI

84
Rating Factor 5
  • Achieving Results Program Evaluation- Top
    scoring
  • HOPWA housing output measures
  • HOPWA client outcome goals
  • Increase housing stability

85
Rating Factor 5
  • Achieving Results Program Evaluation- Top
    scoring
  • Reduce risks of homelessness
  • Improve access to care
  • ROI activities

86
Application Review
  • HUD reviewers- CPD staff at Headquarters in
    Field Offices
  • Reviews Selection Process
  • Threshold reviews (Field Office)
  • Substantive reviews (headquarters)

87
Application Review
  • Rating Selection process
  • HUD rates applicants in rank order according to
    rating factors
  • Total of 100 points w/ 2 bonus points for
    completing HUD-2990 (RC/EZ/EC-II) form

88
Rating Selection Process
  • Expiring renewal projects funded first
  • (CPD Notice 08-03)
  • applicants selected by rank order

89
Rating Selection Process
  • HUD will not fund applications
  • Scored below 75 points
  • Capacity scored below 14
  • Leveraging score of zero
  • Conditional Selection

90
Rating Selection Process
  • Tie breaker score higher in the following order
  • Factor 3-responsiveness
  • Factor 1-capacity
  • Factor 2-need
  • Factor 5-evaluation
  • Factor 4-leveraging

91
Application Review
  • Estimated Announcement of Awards
  • September 30, 2008

92
Award Administration
  • Applicant Notification
  • Award modifications
  • Applicant Debriefing
  • 30 days after announcements for 120 days

93
Agency Contacts
  • Technical assistance for downloading application
    package
  • 800-518-Grants or
  • support_at_grants.gov
  • Program information contact your area HUD field
    office- see listings www.hud.gov/offices/adm/gran
    ts/fundsavail.cfm

94
For More Information
  • Office of HIV/AIDS Housing
  • HOPWA_at_HUD.GOV
  • HUD Website for AIDS Housing
  • http//www.hud.gov/cpd/offices/aidshousing
  • For area formula programs see
  • local/index.cfm

95
Helpful Hints
  • Read study the NOFA
  • Clarity in your presentations
  • Check consistency, completeness of plans,
    accuracy of budgets leveraged documentation
  • Keep within program limits
  • Dont be late
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com