Title: ACCT 102 Management Accounting Lecture 12
1ACCT 102Management AccountingLecture 12
Decision Making and Relevant Information
2Identifying Relevant Costs
- Future costs and future revenues that differ
among decision alternatives. - Compare to indicate how they differ under each
alternative. - Sunk costs are never relevant.
3Identifying Relevant Costs
- Focus on future costs and future revenues that
differ among decision alternatives. - Organize them in a manner that clearly indicates
how they differ under each alternative.
4Identifying Relevant Costs
Ace Welding Company
The Model I welding machine used in the
manufacture of Mountain bicycle frames is 2 years
old and has a remaining useful life of 4 years.
It cost 90,000 when new and has an estimated
salvage value of zero dollars.
5Identifying Relevant Costs
Ace Welding Company
Management is evaluating the desirability of
replacing the Model I with a new Model II welding
machine. The new machine cost 80,000, has a
useful life of 4 years, and a predicted salvage
value of zero.
6Identifying Relevant Costs
Buy Model II
Keep Model I
Total revenue 800,000 800,000
Both options are the same, so Total revenue is
not relevant.
7Identifying Relevant Costs
Buy Model II
Keep Model I
Direct materials 120,000 120,000
Both options are the same, so Direct materials
costs are not relevant.
8Identifying Relevant Costs
Buy Model II
Keep Model I
Conversion 160,000 200,000
Conversion costs are relevant
9Identifying Relevant Costs
Buy Model II
Keep Model I
Conversion 160,000 200,000 Selling and
distribution 40,000 40,000
Selling and distribution expenses are not
relevant.
10Identifying Relevant Costs
Buy Model II
Keep Model I
Conversion 160,000 200,000 Selling and
distribution 40,000 40,000 Inspection and
adjustment 6,000 20,000
Inspection and adjustment costs are relevant
11Identifying Relevant Costs
Buy Model II
Keep Model I
Conversion 160,000 200,000 Selling and
distribution 40,000 40,000 Inspection and
adjustment 6,000 20,000
Depreciation is not relevant.
12Identifying Relevant Costs
Buy Model II
Keep Model I
Conversion 160,000 200,000 Selling and
distribution 40,000 40,000 Inspection and
adjustment 6,000 20,000 Depreciation 84,000 84,00
0 Disposal value - 35,000
Disposal value of Model I is relevant
13Identifying Relevant Costs
Buy Model II
Keep Model I
Conversion 160,000 200,000 Selling and
distribution 40,000 40,000 Inspection and
adjustment 6,000 20,000 Depreciation 84,000 84,0
00 Disposal value - 35,000 Cost of Model
II 80,000
Cost of Model II is relevant.
14Identifying Relevant Costs
Buy Model II
Keep Model I
Conversion 160,000 200,000 Selling and
distribution 40,000 40,000 Inspection and
adjustment 6,000 20,000 Depreciation 84,000 84,0
00 Disposal value - 35,000 Cost of Model
II 80,000 Machine maintenance 800 9,600
Machine maintenance costs are relevant
15Identifying Relevant Costs
Buy Model II
Keep Model I
Conversion 160,000 200,000 Selling and
distribution 40,000 40,000 Inspection and
adjustment 6,000 20,000 Depreciation 84,000 84,0
00 Disposal value - 35,000 Cost of Model
II 80,000 Machine maintenance 800 9,600
All other items are the same for either decision,
so they are irrelevant.
16Identifying Relevant Costs
Differential Analysis of Relevant Costs
Buy Model II
Keep Model I
Conversion 160,000 200,000 Inspection and
adjustment 6,000 20,000 Disposal value -
35,000 Cost of Model II 80,000 Machine
maintenance 800 9,600 Totals
costs 211,800 229,600
17Future Revenues
Future revenues, which are inflows of resources
from the sale of goods and services, are relevant
if they differ between alternatives
18Outlay Costs
Outlay costs are costs that require future
expenditures of cash or other resources.
Outlay costs that differ under the decision
alternatives at hand are relevant outlay costs
that do not differ are irrelevant.
19Sunk Costs
Sunk costs result from past decisions that cannot
be changed.
Aside from tax consequences, sunk costs are never
relevant.
What are sunk costs?
Note Sunk costs are never relevant!
20Sunk Costs
- Sunk costs may cause ethical dilemmas
- Although the book value of an old item has no
economic significance (i.e. not relevant), the
accounting treatment of past costs may make it
difficult for managers to regard them as
irrelevant. - The possibility of recording an accounting loss
may place managers in an ethical dilemma. Fearing
the loss will lead to superiors questioning his
or her judgment, a manager might prefer to use
the old item, as opposed to replacing it and be
forced to record a loss. - Cumulative effect of many such decisions will be
harmful to the long-run economic health of the
organization
21Disposal and salvage values
- Disposal and Salvage Values
- Cash inflows from the disposal of assets is a
relevant cash inflow - Any salvage value at the end of the useful life
of the assets will also be relevant - A loss on disposal may have a favorable tax
impact if the loss can be offset against taxable
gains or taxable income
22Predicting Relevant Costs
- Analyst must know what to look out for, and this
knowledge will help guide the search for the few
pieces of relevant information contained in
voluminous set of data - Predicting relevant costs may involve an
examination of past cost trends - It is more difficult to predict costs when
technology changes
23Predicting Relevant Costs
What is a cost prediction error?
It is the difference between a predicted future
cost and the actual amount of the cost when it is
incurred.
24Summary
- Under relevance costing, only costs and revenues
that differ under each alternative should be
considered
25Summary
- Predicting relevant costs may involve an
examination of past cost trends - It is more difficulty to predict costs when
technology changes - Apart relevant costs and revenues, other
quantitative factors such as long-run profit
should be considered - Qualitative factors such as legal, ethical and
social implications of decisions must also be
recognized