18201860 SOL Review - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

18201860 SOL Review

Description:

Louisiana Territory was divided at the 36 degree, 30 minute parallel; north of ... What was the Supreme Court's decision in the Dred Scott case? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:85
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: ghsGc
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 18201860 SOL Review


1
1820-1860 SOL Review
2
What were the 3 parts of the Missouri Compromise?
3
  • Missouri became a slave state
  • Maine became a free state
  • Louisiana Territory was divided at the 36 degree,
    30 minute parallel north of the line must be
    free territory south of the line could be slave
    territory

4
What were the key points of the Compromise of
1850?
5
  • California became a free state
  • Stronger fugitive slave law
  • Abolished the slave trade, but not slavery
    itself, in the District of Columbia
  • Created the Utah and New Mexico territories
  • Popular sovereignty would decide slavery in Utah
    and New Mexico

6
What was popular sovereignty?
7
The people of a territory would decide whether
they wanted slavery
8
Identify the Kansas-Nebraska Act.
9
  • Created the territories of Kansas and Nebraska
  • Said popular sovereignty would decide slavery in
    both Kansas and Nebraska
  • Since both Kansas and Nebraska were north of the
    Missouri Compromise line, the Kansas-Nebraska Act
    repealed the Missouri Compromise

10
What effect did the Kansas-Nebraska Act have on
the Missouri Compromise?
11
The Kansas-Nebraska Act repealed the Missouri
Compromise.
12
What political party was formed in opposition to
the Kansas-Nebraska Act?
13
The Republican Party
14
What broke out in the Kansas Territory?
15
Civil war between pro-slavery and anti-slavery
settlers
16
What adjective was used to describe Kansas in the
mid-1850s?
17
Bleeding Kansas
18
What was the Supreme Courts decision in the Dred
Scott case?
19
  • Since Dred Scott was a slave, he could not sue in
    federal court.
  • African-Americans were not citizens of the United
    States.
  • Since Congress had no power to prohibit slavery
    in the territories, the Missouri Compromise was
    unconstitutional.

20
What did the Dred Scott decision say about the
Missouri Compromise?
21
The Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional.
22
What power did the Supreme Court use in Dred
Scott v. Sandford?
23
The power of judicial review
24
In Dred Scott v. Sandford did the Supreme Court
rule that Scott should remain a slave or gain his
freedom?
25
Remain a slave
26
Which section liked the Dred Scott decision, the
North or the South?
27
The South
28
Which group(s) liked the Dred Scott decision?
  • Abolitionists?
  • Republicans?
  • Slaves?
  • Slaveholders?

29
Slaveholders
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com