Innovation Management and Failiure - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Innovation Management and Failiure

Description:

CEO quits before quarterly results. Bankrupt August Friday 13, 1999 ... 11 years. Technological limitation and poor design. Unable to use phone indoors ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:82
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: Polit5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Innovation Management and Failiure


1
Innovation Management and Failiure
  • Finkelstein and Sanford- The rise and Fall of
    Iridium
  • Van de Ven- Central Problems In the Management of
    Innovation

2
Learning from Corporate MistakesThe Rise and
Fall of Iridium Sidney Finkelstein and Shade H.
Sandford
3
Concept and development of Iridium
  • Motorola engineer first gets the idea behind
    Iridium in 1985
  • Satellites would allow subscribers to make phone
    calls from any global location
  • Motorola established Iridium as a separate
    company in 1991 and had its initial service in
    November 1998

4
  • Motorola experienced declining sales and needed
    technological success to protect its reputation
  • Motorola invests 6,6 billion for satellite
    design, launch operations and management
  • Strong top management team with many years
    experience from Motorola

5
The Launch
  • Spectacular launch Nov 1, 1998
  • Handset costs 3, 000
  • Cost per minute 3 - 8

6
Results
  • Devastating results by April 99
  • Only 10,000 subscribers
  • CEO quits before quarterly results
  • Bankrupt August Friday 13, 1999

7
Reasons for Iridiums collapse
  • Cellular build-out reduces need for Iridium
  • From concept to development
  • 11 years
  • Manufacturing problems
  • Launching of service before enough phones were
    available
  • Insufficient marketing and sales plans
  • Delay in marketing teams in foreign countries
  • Technological limitation and poor design
  • Unable to use phone indoors
  • Phone the size of a brick

8
What really went wrong?
  • Breathtakingly elegant and innovative technology
  • Untenable business plan
  • Why did they go forward with an increasingly
    flawed business plan?

9
What was the problem?
  • Problem 1
  • Executives made decisions based on the size of
    previous investments
  • Problem 2
  • Staianos leadership a double-edged sword If I
    can make Iridiums dream come true, Ill make a
    significant amount of money.
  • Problem 3
  • The composition and size of the board of Iridium
  • Lessons learned
  • Evaluate long concept-to-development projects
    competitive landscape

10
Discussion
  • 1. How important is diversity and independent
    perspectives in corporate boards?
  • Examples, think Norwegian!
  • 2. Pros and cons with financial commitment.
  • For example a leader with many stock options

11
  • Central problems in the Management of
    Innovation
  • Andrew H. Van de Ven

12
Introduction
  • A conceptual framework
  • Written in 1986
  • FAQ from CEOs
  • What environment/ culture/ infrastructure is
    necessary to be able to innovate?
  • The reason for the massive emphasis on project
    organization and team work?

13
Innovation.
  • is defined as the developement and
    implementation of new ideas by people who over
    time engage in transactions with others within
    the institutional order.

14
Important factors and their problems
  • Ideas and managing them into good currency
  • People and managing attention
  • Transactions and managing part- whole
    relationships
  • Context over time and institutional leadership

15
Managing ideas
  • Ideas are developed over time and in a social and
    political dynamic environment
  • Implementation
  • Good currency

16
Managing Attention
  • Psychological limitations to managing complexity
  • Stability versus creativity/ change
  • Need for Innovation

17
Managing part- whole relationships
  • Multiple functions from idea to reality-
    transaction between the different parts are
    difficult
  • Impeccable micro structures into macro nonsence
  • Self- organizing groups, redundant functions,
    requisite variety and temporal linkage

18
Institutional leadership
  • Need to transform the structure and practices in
    the organizational and institutional environment
  • The goal is to create an infrastructure and
    culture for innovation and organizational
    learning
  • - Negative feedback
  • - Experimentation and selection approach
  • - Preserving uncertainty and diversity

19
Iridium- an alternative interpretation
  • 400 MUSD for 25 of total stock share, 750 MUSD
    in loan guaranties, an option for additional 350
    MUSD
  • 6,6 BUSD in contracts
  • 50 MUSD in contracts per month with Motorola,
    lucrative, should be half
  • SG Cohen has estimated the value of Motorolas
    total exposure to be between 1 1.15 BUSD

20
  • Motorola gained 750 MUSD in profits from Iridium
  • Additional to this, Motorola have the patent
    protection for the satellite technology,
    approximately 1000 patents at the time when
    Motorola was entering the satellite communication
    industry
  • Staiano CEO 1996
  • Lack of focus

21
Final discussion
  • Is Irididium an example of bad management in
    Iridium or good management in Motorola? Could
    this have happened in Telenor- Opera? (How does
    the Iridium leadership differ from Van de Vens
    article?)
  • Who had the financial commitment and strategic
    control in the case of Motorola/ Iridium,
    Telenor/Opera, and what does this say about the
    organizational integration?

22
Everybody
  • Can you relate Iridium and Opera to one of these
    organizational models?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com