Title: FPD Meeting Agenda
1FPD Meeting Agenda
- 1) Introduction, Shutdown, Trigger 20 Andrew
- 2) Grounding Issues 15
Duncan - 3) Software Update 10
Gilvan - 4) DQ statusplans
5 Marcia - 5) Data analysis/mc update 10
Duncan - 6) data samples update 10
Mike - 7) automatic insertion?
- AOB
22004 Issues
- Data taking with integrated Phase II
- Obtaining new elastic data sample
- LMTrigger Commissioning/FPD triggers in global
list - Automatic pot insertion
- Halo/background reduction and modelling
- Detector studies, alignment, resolution, cross
talk, efficiency - Tracking alignment, acceptance, database,
efficiency, lattice uncertainty, MC - Data handling and quality
- L2L3 Trigger
- Physics
Goals - Published results on dN/dT and Z
- Preliminary results on several physics topics
including double pom
3Primary Shutdown Work
- Repair P2I and A2O (light leak?)
- Investigate A1O first step in problems
- A1 muxspare mux tests (A1OA1D motors coupled)
- Camera repairs
- Investigate any cabling/mapping problems
- Replace veto counters and veto PMT'ssurvey
- Survey before and after separator changes
- Trigger Commissioning
- Automatic Pot Insertion
- Ground searchesrepairs
4Shutdown Schedule
- up to 9/20 Grounding Issues
- 9/24 A20,P2I,P1D removed
- 9/25 veto scintillator arrives, to be machined by
Phyillis - 9/25 to 10/7 Detector repairscable tests
- 10/5-10/19 Helio does Mux work, motor adjustment,
castle maintenance - supervises separator work
- 10/7-10/8 FPD survey
- 10/11 Seperator work begins
- 10/25 PMTs arrive need to be tested
- 11/11 Veto counters reinstalled
- Trigger/LM Commissioning throughout
- Automatic Pot Insertion throughout
5Shutdown Issues/Duncan
- Supervise cable tests
- Cable tester tool needed, also accessing TPP
signals - Backplane stabilization
- Cu link repairs/ optical DFE/TM tests
- 3 operational DFEs
- AFE cable replugging
- Sequencer tests
- Keep eye on veto counters
- Grounding issues
- Trigger
6Shutdown Issues
- Andrew
- Veto counter partssupervision
- VME scalars/Elgar
- Trigger progress
- PMT testing facility
- UTA control boxes
- Mike
- Detector removal, repairs, reinstallation
- P2I to A1O
- A2 HV
- Light leak training
- LMBs???
7FPD DAQ and Trigger
8Trigger Team
- Andrew Brandt (Trigger Logic/List/Oversight)
- Duncan Brown (Trigger Implementation)
- Mario Vaz (FPD DFE equations/TM firmware)
- Wagner Carvalho (DFE equations/test vectors)
- Ricardo Ramirez (FPD/DFE Interface)
- Tom Fitzpatrick (FPD/DFE Interface/DFE Timing)
- Brian Cox, Dave Mercer, Scott Kolya (LM)
- Carlos Avila, Luis Mendoza (Stand-alone trigger)
92004 Trigger Strategy
- Input information
- Currently no global run trigger capability
- Vertex board is delayed (may now be finished
during shutdown) - DFE boards and TM work and ready to be
commissioned - Main background not from pileup (multiple
interactions) but from halo spray - Strategy
- Instead of calculating bin of ? and t, use fiber
hit patterns to demand 2 or 3 out - of 3 planes of each detector are hit.
Replaces trigger scintillator, simpler algo - Use multiplicity cut to reject halo spray, code
several multiplicity levels - NOTE fiber ADC threshold must be high enough to
avoid noise, low enough - to retain efficiency and allow vetoing
of halo - One advantage is pot positions not needed at
trigger level - Issues
- Setting ADC threshold, need special run (and
analysis) - Dealing with noisy channels, variable means,
could initially set threshold high, - later load in mean pattern, known hot
channels - Measure efficiency with jet triggers, scint
triggers from special runs - Exposure groups, triggers in global run or
separate global run
10Exposure Groups etc.
- For normalization purposes each trigger is
assigned an exposure group - and live time is measured for that
groupdifferent beam conditions require - different groups
- Only 8 exposure groups (6 used), we have more
combos so must - operate outside exposure groupsnew value
NOLUM - Another issue is dynamic downloading, which
allows multiple global runs - This would allow us to take elastic or other
monitoring data in separate - global run, so as to avoid general reco
streaming and other issues with this - Once FPD DFE/TM is ready we are mostly restricted
to dedicated special - runs until these other issues are resolved
11Interim Plan
- Proceed with DFE/TM debugging during shutdown
- Elizabeth indicates NOLUM work will start in 2
monthstake - 2-4 weeks to complete
- Since current FPD commissioning is special run
intensive and - new elastic triggers with adjacent
spectrometer veto have rates - around 1 Hz, we propose adding an elastic
trigger to global list in - V13.x.
- If we do this carefully it will only take one
exposure group and allow - us to obtain good elastic sample at lums
lt40E30
12Trigger Progress
- DFE/TM chain tested by Duncan with help from
Jamieson and Jeff Temple, works with debugging
Johnson counter firmware. Two of three DFE boards
work, 3rd needs attention from Jamieson. Two
DFE-to-TM Cables also need to be repaired during
shutdown. Will eventually be replaced by optical
links (should happen during shutdown). - Two versions of DFE firmware developed by Mario.
-
- Version 3 1 spectrometer only (U5 chip),
passes fine segment (2/3 and 3/3) and wide
segment - info to TM. This version was simulated,
implemented, and tested successfully at combined
test - stand but failed at platform
-
- Version 4 3 spectrometers on one DFE,
includes some extra bits to simplify TM - algorithms. This version failed some
timing tests upon implementation and needs
further - development
- V3 failures traced to delays between different
inputs to DFE, Tom is working on solution similar
to TM, which waits for all inputs before
processing, in parallel Mario working on V4
firmware. - 4. Ricardo is working on arbiter, which is
necessary for V4 firmware it adds outputs from 3
spectrometers to form 96 bit DFE word sent to TM.
He has produced a 3-chip testbench to - simulate full DFE
- 5. Jeff produced first version of TM firmware
to operate with V3, Mario has version to operate
with V4 (not yet implemented.)
13V3 Trigger Manager (debugging)
- The logic sets the output triggers named
fpd255..0. - Triggers fpd255..101 are set to ground
- Trigger fpd0 is set to VCC
- Triggers fpd96..1 are set to the input signals
A95..0 - fpd100..97 are set according to conditions on
va1, and va2, - which are defined as inputs A30..28 and
A26..24, according to the - mapping we got from Ricardo.
- The triggers are (va1uvx in detector 1)
- fpd97 -- Tight trigger va1va21
- fpd98 -- Loose trigger va1gt0, va2gt0
- fpd99 -- Medium trigger 0ltva1lt5, 0ltva2lt5
- fpd100 -- Dead trigger va1va20
14V4 TM Algorithm
DFE will pass word for each spectrometer
indicating coincidence of two detectors tight
track exactly 1 hit with 3/3 fine segments in
each detector medium gt0 with 2/3 lt20 wide
segement loose gt 0 with 2/3 lt20 wide
segement At TM we would form terms DIFFany
spectrometer track DIFFQany quadrupole
spectrometer track (could be false if gt1 or 2 on
A or P side) DIFFDdipole track ELASAU-PD or
AD-PU or AI-PO or AO-PI DPOMAU-(PU or PI or PO)
or AD-(PD or PI or PO) or AI-(PU or PI or PD) or
AO-(PU or PD or PO)DI -(PU or PD
or PO or PI) OVERAU-DI or AD-DI or AO-DI or
AI-DI (over-constrained track for alignment)
15FPD Trigger List
Tentative L1 FPD trigger list (V14?) 1)
elastic (diag opposite spectrometers) GAPSN 2)
soft diffraction (single spectrometers)GAPS or
GAPN 3) overconstrained track (pbar in quadrupole
dipole spectrometers)GAPN 4) double pom (up-up,
dn-dn etc.)GAPSN if needed 5) CJT(2,3) FPD
Track (DIFFQ or DIFFD) GAPS or GAPN if needed 6)
CEM(1,3)? FPD track GAP? 7) TTK(1,?) FPD track
GAP? 8) MU(1,x) FPD track GAP? Monitors may
be necessary, will need to study with
special runs. Also rates are unknown. If 4
(dpom) it is not low enough to run unprescaled we
would need to repeat 5-8 with two FPD
tracks. Possibly 1-3any monitors are best done
in a separate global run since they will not need
general farm reconstruction.