Advanced Energy Program Fuel Cell Program Photovoltaic Program - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Advanced Energy Program Fuel Cell Program Photovoltaic Program

Description:

13 Wright Centers of Innovation (including on Mega-Center) established ... Wright Capital Funds requested for any one proposal may not exceed the total WCF ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:99
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: Deve65
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Advanced Energy Program Fuel Cell Program Photovoltaic Program


1
Advanced Energy ProgramFuel Cell
ProgramPhotovoltaic Program
  • FY 2010 Bidders ConferenceAugust 14, 2009

2
Agenda
  • Welcome and Introductions
  • Ohio Third Frontier
  • Commercialization Framework
  • Ohio Third Frontier Advanced Energy Program
    (OTFAEP)Ohio Third Frontier Fuel Cell Program
    (OTFFCP)Ohio Third Frontier Photovoltaic Program
    (OTFFCP)
  • Q A
  • Closing Remarks

3
Ohio Third Frontier
  • Background
  • The Ohio Third Frontier was initiated in February
    2002 and, with a commitment of 1.6 billion, is
    the state's largest-ever economic development
    initiative.
  • Ohios investment has leveraged 4.1 billion in
    additional investments from the private sector
    and federal government.
  • Program investments have helped to create 598 new
    companies, and more than 8,500 new jobs.

4
Ohio Third Frontier
  • Vision
  • To establish, in targeted areas of technology,
    regional and statewide clusters of excellence
    that sustain our global competitive advantage in
    company and product formation, job creation and
    economic growth.

5
Ohio Third Frontier
  • Objectives
  • Guided by a focus on Ohio research and
    industrial strengths
  • Increase the quantity of high quality research
    that has commercial relevance to Ohio companies
  • Expand access and availability of investment
    capital to create, grow and attract
    technology-based enterprises
  • Grow and nurture entrepreneurial management
    talent supported by organized systems of services
    and networking
  • Address the technical needs of existing companies
    pursuing new products and production processes
  • Contribute to the expansion of a technologically
    proficient workforce.

6
Ohio Third Frontier
  • Focus Areas
  • Based on a 2002 study by Battelle and revised by
    the Ohio Third Frontier Commission in 2008, the
    Ohio Third Frontier embraces five technology
    focus areas
  • Biomedical
  • Advanced/Alternative Energy
  • Instruments, Controls, Electronics
  • Advanced Materials
  • Advanced Propulsion

7
Ohio Third Frontier FY2010 Programs
  • Wright Projects
  • R D Center Attraction (New)
  • ESP Success /Pre-Seed Follow-on Funds (Modified)
  • Advanced Energy Program
  • Fuel Cell Program
  • Photovoltaic Program (New)
  • Medical Imaging Program (New)
  • Biomedical Program (New)
  • Advanced Material Program (New)
  • Sensors Program (New)
  • Targeted Industry Attraction Grants
  • Third Frontier Internship Program

8
Ohio Third FrontierInvestment Highlights
  • Statewide Entrepreneurial Signature Program (ESP)
    established and organized around 6 regional
    networks
  • 46 pre-seed and seed funds capitalized
  • 13 Wright Centers of Innovation (including on
    Mega-Center) established
  • Endowments for 26 Ohio Research Scholars
  • More than 80 advanced energy projects supporting
    the growth of the fuel cell and photovoltaic
    clusters
  • 3,000 STEM interns placed in over 700 companies

9
Commercialization Framework
OTF Cluster Programs
10
Ohio Third Frontier Advanced Energy Program,Ohio
Third Frontier Fuel Cell ProgramOhio Third
Frontier Photovoltaic Program
  • Fiscal Year 2010

11
Program Goal
  • To accelerate the development and growth of the
    fuel cell, advanced energy and photovoltaic
    industries in Ohio and their supply chains by
    direct financial support to organizations seeking
    to
  • Commercialize new products, manufacturing
    processes or technologies
  • Adapt or modify existing components or systems
    that can reduce the cost and improve the
    efficiency of the energy system
  • Demonstrate the market-readiness of a technology
    through a commercially-oriented project that
    maximizes incorporation of Ohio components and
    are operating under final use conditions.

12
Program Objectives
  • To help Ohio companies achieve cost and
    performance standards that ultimate end-users of
    fuel cell, advanced energy and photovoltaic
    technologies define as necessary for successful
    commercial applications
  • To support development of fuel cell, advanced
    energy and photovoltaic technologies that will
    result in the opportunity for significant
    employment in Ohio within 3 to 5 years of
    completing the project
  • To help Ohio companies secure additional
    financial resources needed to commercialize their
    fuel cell, advanced energy and photovoltaic
    related products, processes, components, and
    systems and
  • To move fuel cell, advanced energy and
    photovoltaic related products, manufacturing
    processes, components, and systems to a point in
    the commercialization process where the applicant
    is ready to demonstrate a commercial prototype or
    actually enter the market with a product

13
Eligible Purposes
  • The OTF will fund grant applications that focus
    on the following types of projects
  • Developing and commercializing new products,
    manufacturing processes, or technologies that can
    reduce the cost and improve the efficiency of
    fuel cell, advanced energy and photovoltaic
    technologies or systems or address technical
    commercialization barriers.
  • Adapting or modifying components or systems that
    are produced in Ohio for use in sensors that can
    reduce the cost or improve the efficiency of fuel
    cell, advanced energy and photovoltaic
    technologies or address technical or
    commercialization barriers.
  • Commercially oriented demonstration projects in
    Ohio of fuel cell, advanced energy and
    photovoltaic related technologies that maximize
    incorporation of Ohio components and are
    operating under final use conditions. Please
    note that proof of principle and bench scale
    demonstrations are not considered to be
    commercial demonstrations.
  • The OTF will not fund the construction or
    operation of production scale facilities.

14
Technology Preferences
  • Fuel Cell Program
  • Preference for competitive fuel cell
    technologies, unique components, and balance of
    plant.
  • Competitive fuel cell technologies are those that
    can be shown to meet or exceed technical and cost
    standards emanating from end users of fuel cells,
    the U.S. Department of Energy research,
    development, and policy work, and other
    recognized national and international
    associations dedicated to the fuel cell industry.
  • Photovoltaic Program
  • Technology neutral with respect to the various
    photovoltaic technologies.
  • Advanced Energy Program
  • Preference for wind, biomass and energy storage
    technologies.
  • Preference is for work to be done within 2 years
    and not more than 3

15
Eligible Lead Applicants
  • Lead Applicant must be based in Ohio or have a
    principal place of business in Ohio, or be an
    out-of-state for-profit company that pledges to
    locate a principle place of business within Ohio
    as a pre-condition to award.
  • A substantial portion of the project activity and
    the benefit from the project must occur in Ohio
  • Must be a collaborative effort where either the
    Lead Applicant or one collaborator must be a
    for-profit company, but must be comprised of, in
    any mix, two or more independent firms, higher
    education institutions, or eligible
    not-for-profit or government research
    institutions.

16
Funding
  • In FY10, Development anticipates awarding up to
    the following amounts for each program
  • Fuel Cell Program 10 million
  • 8 million Third Frontier Research and
    Development (TFRD) 2 million Wright Capital
    Fund (WCF)
  • Photovoltaic Program 10 million
  • 8 million TFRD 2 million WCF
  • Advanced Energy Program 7 million
  • 5 million TFRD 2 million WCF

17
Funding
  • There are no restrictions of the use of Third
    Frontier Research and Development funds (i.e. may
    be used for operating or capital purposes) or on
    the eligibility of organizations to receive these
    funds.
  • Wright Capital Funds requested for any one
    proposal may not exceed the total WCF available.
  • WCF must be used solely to acquire, renovate, or
    construct facilities and purchase equipment that
    is part of property of facilities owned by an
    Ohio State-supported or state-assisted
    institution of higher education or by a
    non-profit corporation or a public body that
    provides access and use of facilities or
    equipment to a collaborating Ohio State-supported
    or state-assisted institution of higher
    education.
  • Not more than 20 percent of the total direct
    state grant funds requested may be budgeted for
    indirect costs.
  • Un-recovered indirect costs are an allowable form
    of cost share.

18
Cost Share
  • Must be one dollar or more for every one dollar
    of State Grant Funds requested (i.e., a ratio of
    11).
  • Preference will be given to proposals that pledge
    cost share as discretionary, unrestricted, and
    unallocated cash. Such cash must appear on the
    financial records of the Lead Applicant.
  • Must be documented on the budget forms, in the
    budget narrative, and in a letter from each
    organization contributing cost share signed by a
    representative authorized to commit the
    organization to the proposed project and the cost
    share described.
  • Must represent a specific new commitment to the
    project described in the proposal.
  • Must be allowable costs that are verifiable and
    auditable and consistent with the cost share
    guidelines.

19
Cost Share
  • Resources that have been designated as cost share
    for some other award cannot be used as cost share
    for an Ohio Third Frontier award.
  • Cost share must be applied to the project during
    the project period.
  • If an organization has a published indirect cost
    rate, un-recovered indirect costs (the difference
    between 20 and the published rate) may be used
    as cost share.
  • - If the lead applicant does not have a federally
    negotiated and approved indirect cost rate
    agreement, then the lead applicant is limited to
    using 20 percent of its cost shared direct costs
    as cost shared indirect costs and no other
    un-recovered indirect costs from the operating
    budget may be claimed.
  • OTF funding may not be used as cost share, and
    funds awarded under this RFP may not be used as
    cost share against other Third Frontier projects.
  • Lead applicant will be held to the cost share
    ratio proposed.

20
Proposal Evaluation Criteria
  • The following criteria have been designated with
    the highest relevance to and weighting for the
    OTFAEP, OTFFCP, and OTFPVP
  • Level of Scientific Merit
  • Alignment of the Proposal with the goals of
    Section 2.2 and Section 3 of the RFPs
  • Quality of responses to the requirements of the
    RFPs as outlined in sections 3.3.6 through 3.3.12
    of the RFPs.
  • Compliance with the RFPs
  • Past Performance (if applicable)

21
Proposal Evaluation Criteria
  • 3.3.6 Technical Plan
  • 3.3.7 Commercialization Strategy
  • 3.3.8 Performance Goals
  • 3.3.9 Performance on Prior OTF Awards
  • 3.3.10 Experience and Qualifications
  • 3.3.11 Budget
  • 3.3.12 Collaborator Information/Letters of
    Commitment

22
Review Process
  • Administrative Review
  • Third Frontier Commission staff
  • Receive and process proposals for administrative
    compliance
  • Forward to external evaluators for technical
    review
  • Technical Review
  • External evaluators
  • Technical and commercial review
  • Establish a competitive range
  • Second stage review
  • Rank proposals
  • Compile recommendations
  • Submit recommendations and summary evaluation
    statements to Third Frontier Commission

23
Review Process
  • In addition to the external review, Development
    may review applications to assess
  • Past performance of Lead Applicant and its team
  • Proposals strategic fit with prior Third
    Frontier investments, other State investments,
    Developments strategies, and the Ohio Board of
    Regents strategies and
  • Factual business intelligence relevant to
    describing the Ohio economic development
    opportunity.
  • The results of such review will be presented to
    the OTFC for its consideration.

24
Timeline
  • July 31, 2009 RFP Released
  • August 25, 2009 by 200 PM LOI due
  • September 18, 2009 by 200 PM Proposals due
  • September December 2009 Review Process
  • Approximately December 2009 Award Announcements

25
Exceptional Opportunity Funding
  • If the Lead Applicant believes they have an
    exceptional opportunity, fitting the intent of
    the specific OTF program, but requiring
    significantly higher funding than the RFP allows,
    then the Lead Applicant may also submit a white
    paper that describes
  • the additional dimensions of the project
  • the uses for the larger amount of funding
    requested
  • and a clear justification for why the expanded
    scope represents an exceptional economic
    development opportunity for Ohio.
  • Note The core proposal must stand alone and not
    depend on the exceptional opportunity white paper
    to achieve the benefits required for a successful
    project.

26
Exceptional Opportunity Funding
  • The white paper should consist of a narrative not
    to exceed five (5) pages, supplemental budget
    forms and a schedule of activities. The white
    paper must include the title of the core proposal
    and the proposal number assigned by Development.
  • The supplemental award request must be for no
    less than 1 million in additional support. The
    request for additional funds is subject to the
    11 cost share requirement.
  • If the Lead Applicants core project is ranked
    high enough by the external evaluators to be
    recommended for funding, the white paper will be
    evaluated and presented to the OTFC.  At its
    discretion, the OTFC may request additional due
    diligence be undertaken that will include
    submitting a more complete proposal for the
    additional funding.  Final decisions on
    supplemental awards will occur at the end of the
    FY 2010 program year.

27
Policy Administrative Questions
  • All questions must be submitted via email
  • Email OTFFCP2010_at_development.ohio.gov
    OTFAEP2010_at_development.ohio.gov OTFPVP2010_at_de
    velopment.ohio.gov
  • Frequently asked questions will be posted on the
    Third Frontier web site www.thirdfrontier.com

28
Important Changes Updates
  • Cost Share 11
  • Fuel cell proposals are not eligible to compete
    in the OTFAEP RFP.
  • Development reserves the right to redirect
    proposals between the OTFFCP, OTFAEP OTFPVP
    based upon the LOI or the Proposal itself.
  • Be sure to use the current versions of the
    proposal and application forms.
  • All three RFPs were modified on August 11, 2009

29
RFP Modifications Clarifications
  • From time to time, it may be necessary to modify
    or clarify portions of the RFP, as well as the
    forms. In that event, we will post a document
    titled RFP Modifications and Clarifications to
    the RFP page for the particular program on the
    Third Frontier website. The document will have
    an explanation of any changes.
  • It is your responsibility to be aware of any RFP
    modifications and to ensure that your proposal
    conforms with any such modifications.

30
Things to Avoid
  • Collaborations
  • Failure to consider/involve OTF grantees when it
    makes sense
  • Involving OTF grantees when it doesnt add value
  • Window dressing and a cast of thousands
  • Hollow letters of support

31
Things to Avoid
  • Cost Sharing
  • Not viewing Cost Share as a true half of the
    whole
  • Not addressing Cost Share specifics in the budget
    narrative
  • Missing letters of commitment
  • Bait switch
  • The ratio you propose is the ratio we hold you to

32
Things to Avoid
  • Commercialization / Market
  • Over/under estimating your position in the
    framework
  • Proposing a program in its infancy
  • Not acknowledging the competition
  • Not considering/involving end users, suppliers,
    manufacturers
  • Not being industry driven, omitting industrial
    leaders
  • IP boilerplate, or any boilerplate used in your
    proposal
  • Unrealistic impacts

33
Things to Avoid
  • Administrative Issues
  • Late proposals
  • Ignoring page limitations
  • More than 5 key personnel
  • Claiming everything as proprietary information
  • Appending material

34
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com