Title: Advanced Energy Program Fuel Cell Program Photovoltaic Program
1Advanced Energy ProgramFuel Cell
ProgramPhotovoltaic Program
- FY 2010 Bidders ConferenceAugust 14, 2009
2Agenda
- Welcome and Introductions
- Ohio Third Frontier
- Commercialization Framework
- Ohio Third Frontier Advanced Energy Program
(OTFAEP)Ohio Third Frontier Fuel Cell Program
(OTFFCP)Ohio Third Frontier Photovoltaic Program
(OTFFCP) - Q A
- Closing Remarks
3Ohio Third Frontier
- Background
- The Ohio Third Frontier was initiated in February
2002 and, with a commitment of 1.6 billion, is
the state's largest-ever economic development
initiative. - Ohios investment has leveraged 4.1 billion in
additional investments from the private sector
and federal government. - Program investments have helped to create 598 new
companies, and more than 8,500 new jobs.
4Ohio Third Frontier
- Vision
- To establish, in targeted areas of technology,
regional and statewide clusters of excellence
that sustain our global competitive advantage in
company and product formation, job creation and
economic growth.
5Ohio Third Frontier
- Objectives
- Guided by a focus on Ohio research and
industrial strengths - Increase the quantity of high quality research
that has commercial relevance to Ohio companies - Expand access and availability of investment
capital to create, grow and attract
technology-based enterprises - Grow and nurture entrepreneurial management
talent supported by organized systems of services
and networking - Address the technical needs of existing companies
pursuing new products and production processes - Contribute to the expansion of a technologically
proficient workforce.
6Ohio Third Frontier
- Focus Areas
- Based on a 2002 study by Battelle and revised by
the Ohio Third Frontier Commission in 2008, the
Ohio Third Frontier embraces five technology
focus areas - Biomedical
- Advanced/Alternative Energy
- Instruments, Controls, Electronics
- Advanced Materials
- Advanced Propulsion
7Ohio Third Frontier FY2010 Programs
- Wright Projects
- R D Center Attraction (New)
- ESP Success /Pre-Seed Follow-on Funds (Modified)
- Advanced Energy Program
- Fuel Cell Program
- Photovoltaic Program (New)
- Medical Imaging Program (New)
- Biomedical Program (New)
- Advanced Material Program (New)
- Sensors Program (New)
- Targeted Industry Attraction Grants
- Third Frontier Internship Program
8Ohio Third FrontierInvestment Highlights
- Statewide Entrepreneurial Signature Program (ESP)
established and organized around 6 regional
networks - 46 pre-seed and seed funds capitalized
- 13 Wright Centers of Innovation (including on
Mega-Center) established - Endowments for 26 Ohio Research Scholars
- More than 80 advanced energy projects supporting
the growth of the fuel cell and photovoltaic
clusters - 3,000 STEM interns placed in over 700 companies
9Commercialization Framework
OTF Cluster Programs
10Ohio Third Frontier Advanced Energy Program,Ohio
Third Frontier Fuel Cell ProgramOhio Third
Frontier Photovoltaic Program
11Program Goal
- To accelerate the development and growth of the
fuel cell, advanced energy and photovoltaic
industries in Ohio and their supply chains by
direct financial support to organizations seeking
to - Commercialize new products, manufacturing
processes or technologies - Adapt or modify existing components or systems
that can reduce the cost and improve the
efficiency of the energy system - Demonstrate the market-readiness of a technology
through a commercially-oriented project that
maximizes incorporation of Ohio components and
are operating under final use conditions.
12Program Objectives
- To help Ohio companies achieve cost and
performance standards that ultimate end-users of
fuel cell, advanced energy and photovoltaic
technologies define as necessary for successful
commercial applications - To support development of fuel cell, advanced
energy and photovoltaic technologies that will
result in the opportunity for significant
employment in Ohio within 3 to 5 years of
completing the project - To help Ohio companies secure additional
financial resources needed to commercialize their
fuel cell, advanced energy and photovoltaic
related products, processes, components, and
systems and - To move fuel cell, advanced energy and
photovoltaic related products, manufacturing
processes, components, and systems to a point in
the commercialization process where the applicant
is ready to demonstrate a commercial prototype or
actually enter the market with a product
13Eligible Purposes
- The OTF will fund grant applications that focus
on the following types of projects - Developing and commercializing new products,
manufacturing processes, or technologies that can
reduce the cost and improve the efficiency of
fuel cell, advanced energy and photovoltaic
technologies or systems or address technical
commercialization barriers. - Adapting or modifying components or systems that
are produced in Ohio for use in sensors that can
reduce the cost or improve the efficiency of fuel
cell, advanced energy and photovoltaic
technologies or address technical or
commercialization barriers. - Commercially oriented demonstration projects in
Ohio of fuel cell, advanced energy and
photovoltaic related technologies that maximize
incorporation of Ohio components and are
operating under final use conditions. Please
note that proof of principle and bench scale
demonstrations are not considered to be
commercial demonstrations. - The OTF will not fund the construction or
operation of production scale facilities.
14Technology Preferences
- Fuel Cell Program
- Preference for competitive fuel cell
technologies, unique components, and balance of
plant. - Competitive fuel cell technologies are those that
can be shown to meet or exceed technical and cost
standards emanating from end users of fuel cells,
the U.S. Department of Energy research,
development, and policy work, and other
recognized national and international
associations dedicated to the fuel cell industry. - Photovoltaic Program
- Technology neutral with respect to the various
photovoltaic technologies. - Advanced Energy Program
- Preference for wind, biomass and energy storage
technologies. - Preference is for work to be done within 2 years
and not more than 3
15Eligible Lead Applicants
- Lead Applicant must be based in Ohio or have a
principal place of business in Ohio, or be an
out-of-state for-profit company that pledges to
locate a principle place of business within Ohio
as a pre-condition to award. - A substantial portion of the project activity and
the benefit from the project must occur in Ohio - Must be a collaborative effort where either the
Lead Applicant or one collaborator must be a
for-profit company, but must be comprised of, in
any mix, two or more independent firms, higher
education institutions, or eligible
not-for-profit or government research
institutions.
16Funding
- In FY10, Development anticipates awarding up to
the following amounts for each program - Fuel Cell Program 10 million
- 8 million Third Frontier Research and
Development (TFRD) 2 million Wright Capital
Fund (WCF) - Photovoltaic Program 10 million
- 8 million TFRD 2 million WCF
- Advanced Energy Program 7 million
- 5 million TFRD 2 million WCF
17Funding
- There are no restrictions of the use of Third
Frontier Research and Development funds (i.e. may
be used for operating or capital purposes) or on
the eligibility of organizations to receive these
funds. - Wright Capital Funds requested for any one
proposal may not exceed the total WCF available. - WCF must be used solely to acquire, renovate, or
construct facilities and purchase equipment that
is part of property of facilities owned by an
Ohio State-supported or state-assisted
institution of higher education or by a
non-profit corporation or a public body that
provides access and use of facilities or
equipment to a collaborating Ohio State-supported
or state-assisted institution of higher
education. - Not more than 20 percent of the total direct
state grant funds requested may be budgeted for
indirect costs. - Un-recovered indirect costs are an allowable form
of cost share.
18Cost Share
- Must be one dollar or more for every one dollar
of State Grant Funds requested (i.e., a ratio of
11). - Preference will be given to proposals that pledge
cost share as discretionary, unrestricted, and
unallocated cash. Such cash must appear on the
financial records of the Lead Applicant. - Must be documented on the budget forms, in the
budget narrative, and in a letter from each
organization contributing cost share signed by a
representative authorized to commit the
organization to the proposed project and the cost
share described. - Must represent a specific new commitment to the
project described in the proposal. - Must be allowable costs that are verifiable and
auditable and consistent with the cost share
guidelines.
19Cost Share
- Resources that have been designated as cost share
for some other award cannot be used as cost share
for an Ohio Third Frontier award. - Cost share must be applied to the project during
the project period. - If an organization has a published indirect cost
rate, un-recovered indirect costs (the difference
between 20 and the published rate) may be used
as cost share. - - If the lead applicant does not have a federally
negotiated and approved indirect cost rate
agreement, then the lead applicant is limited to
using 20 percent of its cost shared direct costs
as cost shared indirect costs and no other
un-recovered indirect costs from the operating
budget may be claimed. - OTF funding may not be used as cost share, and
funds awarded under this RFP may not be used as
cost share against other Third Frontier projects. - Lead applicant will be held to the cost share
ratio proposed.
20Proposal Evaluation Criteria
- The following criteria have been designated with
the highest relevance to and weighting for the
OTFAEP, OTFFCP, and OTFPVP - Level of Scientific Merit
- Alignment of the Proposal with the goals of
Section 2.2 and Section 3 of the RFPs - Quality of responses to the requirements of the
RFPs as outlined in sections 3.3.6 through 3.3.12
of the RFPs. - Compliance with the RFPs
- Past Performance (if applicable)
21Proposal Evaluation Criteria
- 3.3.6 Technical Plan
- 3.3.7 Commercialization Strategy
- 3.3.8 Performance Goals
- 3.3.9 Performance on Prior OTF Awards
- 3.3.10 Experience and Qualifications
- 3.3.11 Budget
- 3.3.12 Collaborator Information/Letters of
Commitment
22Review Process
- Administrative Review
- Third Frontier Commission staff
- Receive and process proposals for administrative
compliance - Forward to external evaluators for technical
review - Technical Review
- External evaluators
- Technical and commercial review
- Establish a competitive range
- Second stage review
- Rank proposals
- Compile recommendations
- Submit recommendations and summary evaluation
statements to Third Frontier Commission
23Review Process
- In addition to the external review, Development
may review applications to assess - Past performance of Lead Applicant and its team
- Proposals strategic fit with prior Third
Frontier investments, other State investments,
Developments strategies, and the Ohio Board of
Regents strategies and - Factual business intelligence relevant to
describing the Ohio economic development
opportunity. - The results of such review will be presented to
the OTFC for its consideration.
24Timeline
- July 31, 2009 RFP Released
- August 25, 2009 by 200 PM LOI due
- September 18, 2009 by 200 PM Proposals due
- September December 2009 Review Process
- Approximately December 2009 Award Announcements
25Exceptional Opportunity Funding
- If the Lead Applicant believes they have an
exceptional opportunity, fitting the intent of
the specific OTF program, but requiring
significantly higher funding than the RFP allows,
then the Lead Applicant may also submit a white
paper that describes - the additional dimensions of the project
- the uses for the larger amount of funding
requested - and a clear justification for why the expanded
scope represents an exceptional economic
development opportunity for Ohio. - Note The core proposal must stand alone and not
depend on the exceptional opportunity white paper
to achieve the benefits required for a successful
project.
26Exceptional Opportunity Funding
- The white paper should consist of a narrative not
to exceed five (5) pages, supplemental budget
forms and a schedule of activities. The white
paper must include the title of the core proposal
and the proposal number assigned by Development. - The supplemental award request must be for no
less than 1 million in additional support. The
request for additional funds is subject to the
11 cost share requirement. - If the Lead Applicants core project is ranked
high enough by the external evaluators to be
recommended for funding, the white paper will be
evaluated and presented to the OTFC. At its
discretion, the OTFC may request additional due
diligence be undertaken that will include
submitting a more complete proposal for the
additional funding. Final decisions on
supplemental awards will occur at the end of the
FY 2010 program year.
27Policy Administrative Questions
- All questions must be submitted via email
- Email OTFFCP2010_at_development.ohio.gov
OTFAEP2010_at_development.ohio.gov OTFPVP2010_at_de
velopment.ohio.gov - Frequently asked questions will be posted on the
Third Frontier web site www.thirdfrontier.com
28Important Changes Updates
- Cost Share 11
- Fuel cell proposals are not eligible to compete
in the OTFAEP RFP. - Development reserves the right to redirect
proposals between the OTFFCP, OTFAEP OTFPVP
based upon the LOI or the Proposal itself. - Be sure to use the current versions of the
proposal and application forms. - All three RFPs were modified on August 11, 2009
29RFP Modifications Clarifications
- From time to time, it may be necessary to modify
or clarify portions of the RFP, as well as the
forms. In that event, we will post a document
titled RFP Modifications and Clarifications to
the RFP page for the particular program on the
Third Frontier website. The document will have
an explanation of any changes. - It is your responsibility to be aware of any RFP
modifications and to ensure that your proposal
conforms with any such modifications.
30Things to Avoid
- Collaborations
- Failure to consider/involve OTF grantees when it
makes sense - Involving OTF grantees when it doesnt add value
- Window dressing and a cast of thousands
- Hollow letters of support
31Things to Avoid
- Cost Sharing
- Not viewing Cost Share as a true half of the
whole - Not addressing Cost Share specifics in the budget
narrative - Missing letters of commitment
- Bait switch
- The ratio you propose is the ratio we hold you to
32Things to Avoid
- Commercialization / Market
- Over/under estimating your position in the
framework - Proposing a program in its infancy
- Not acknowledging the competition
- Not considering/involving end users, suppliers,
manufacturers - Not being industry driven, omitting industrial
leaders - IP boilerplate, or any boilerplate used in your
proposal - Unrealistic impacts
33Things to Avoid
- Administrative Issues
- Late proposals
- Ignoring page limitations
- More than 5 key personnel
- Claiming everything as proprietary information
- Appending material
34Questions?