Title: Human Factors
1Human Factors
- Rolla
- Session 3
- September 06, 2001
23 DIFFERENT METHODS OF FINDING THE HEIGHT OF AN
ALPHANUMERIC CHARACTER
- USE TABLE 4-2 ON PAGE 107
- STROKE WIDTH WOULD BE 1/6 TO 1/8,PAGE 103
- WIDTH OF CHARACTER ABOUT 3/5 OF HEIGHT, PAGE 104
33 DIFFERENT METHODS OF FINDING THE HEIGHT OF AN
ALPHANUMERIC CHARACTER
- USE FORMULA GIVEN IN CLASS BE SURE AND ADD THIS
FORMULA TO THE BOTTOM OF PAGE 107 - H 0.0022D K1 K2
- K2 .075 FOR IMPORTANT READINGS
- K2 0 NONIMPORTANT??
- K1 .06 GOOD READING CONDITIONS
- K2 .16 BAD READING CONDITIONS
43 DIFFERENT METHODS OF FINDING THE HEIGHT OF AN
ALPHANUMERIC CHARACTER
- TO FIND THE STROKE WIDTH. FORMULA ON PAGE 107
- FIND HEIGHT BY DIVIDING STROKE WIDTH BY 1/6 TO
1/8, PAGE 103 - WIDTH OF CHARACHER IS 3/5 HEIGHT, PAGE 104
5ASSUMPTIONS YOU MUST MAKE
- HOW CLOSE ARE THE CHARACTERS??1 5 0 150 1 5
0 - MUST BALANCE NUMBERS WITH SCALE FROM FIGURE 5-4,
PAGE 138 - HOW FAR ARE CHARACTERS AWAY FROM SCALE MARKERS???
6REVIEW OF CRITICAL DESIGN FEATURESFOR
QUANTITATIVE DISPLAYS
- USE DIGITAL IF ACCURACY IS REQUIRED.
- REMEMBER NUMBER MUST BE STATIONARY LONG ENOUGH TO
READ - IT IS DIFFICULT TO DETERMINE A TREND
- USE ROUND IF POSSIBLE
- FIXED SCALE MOVING POINTER IS BEST
7REVIEW OF CRITICAL DESIGN FEATURESFOR
QUANTITATIVE DISPLAYS
- NUMBERS SHOULD INCREASE CLOCKWISE FOR ROUND -
LEFT TO RIGHT FOR HORIZONTAL BOTTOM TO TOP FOR
VERTICAL - NUMBERS SHOULD ALWAYS FACE YOU
- POINTERS SHOULD HAVE AN ARROW OF ABOUT 20
DEGREES, PAGE 139 - POINTER SHOULD EXTEND TO THE MIDDLE OF A CIRCULAR
DISPLAY
8REVIEW OF CRITICAL DESIGN FEATURESFOR
QUANTITATIVE DISPLAYS
- POINTER SHOULD NEVER COVER THE NUMBER
- POINTER SHOULD JUST TOUCH THE DIVISION MARKER
NEVER OVERLAP - NEVER USE FRACTIONS IN A SCALE
- THE DISTANCE BETWEEN SCALE MARKERS SHOULD BE
UNIFORM
9REVIEW OF CRITICAL DESIGN FEATURESFOR
QUANTITATIVE DISPLAYS
- FOR OPEN WINDOW DISPLAYS MAKE SURE YOU ALWAYS
CLEARLY SEE TWO MARKED SCALE UNITS ON EITHER SIDE
OF THE POINTER - CAN COMBINE WITH QUALATATIVE MARKINGS BUT
REMEMBER COLORS ARE HARD TO SEE IN LOW
ILLUMINATION-RODS FUNCTION IN LOW LIGHT.
10REVIEW OF CRITICAL DESIGN FEATURESFOR
QUANTITATIVE DISPLAYS
- CAN USE SPECIAL MARKINGS FOR QUALATIVE PART OF
SCALE IF UNDERSTOOD BY MOST OF THE POPULATION
SEE PAGE 146 - ALWAYS USE THE MAXIMUM READING DISTANCE WHEN
DESIGNING.
11RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SIGNAL WARNING LIGHTS PAGE
151
- USE TO WARN OF POTENTIAL DANGEROUS CONDITION
- USE ONLY ONE LIGHT
- USE FLASHING RATE OF 4/SEC
- MAKE SURE BRIGHTER THAN SURROUNDING LIGHTS
12RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SIGNAL WARNING LIGHTS PAGE
151
- LOCATE WITHIN 30 DEGREES OF NORMAL LINE OF SIGHT
- USE RED FOR DANGER USE YELLOW FOR WARNING
- COULD COMBINE WITH SOUND (CHAPTER SIX)
13SOUND
14MEASUREMENT OF INTENSITY
15MEASUREMENT OF FREQUENCY
16DECIBLE COMPARISONPAGE 164
- 30 DECIBELS WHISPER
- 50 DECIBELS UMR LIBRARY,
RESIDENTAL AREA-NIGHT - 80 DECIBELS INSIDE SPORTS CAR 50MPH,
PNEUMATIC DRILL 50 FT - 100 DECIBELS SEVERAL BARS IN COLUMBIA, CUTOFF
SAW
17FREQUENCY AND PERCEPTION OF INTENSITY
18MEASUREMENT OF SOUND(NOISE)
19LOOK AT ANATOMY OF THE EAR
20AUDITORY DISPLAYS USUALLY USED FOR WARNINGS
- HOW MANY???
- JUST NOTICABLE DIFFERENCES
- PAGE 174
- PROBABLY USE JUST ONE
- INTENSITY
- MASKING
- LOOK AT PAGE 170 MARK LAST SENTENCE NEXT TO LAST
PARAGRAPH
21FREQUENCY
- PAGE 180
- MOST COMMERCIAL UNITS ARE NOT PURE FREQUENCIES
AND INTENSITY IS THE MOST IMPORTANT FACTOR - MODULATION
- 1 TO 8 BEEPS PER SECOND
- OTHER SOUNDS
- SEE PAGE 178 TABLE 6-2
22NOISE
- CAN BE MEASURED
- LOSS OF HEARING
- AGE, FIGURE 18-3, PAGE 596
- OCCUPATIONAL, PAGE 598
23OSHA CONTROL OF NOISE EXPOSURE
- NOISE DOSE
- TIME ACTUALLY SPENT AT SOUND LEVEL DIVIDED BY THE
MAXIMUL PERMISSIBLE TIME AT SOUND LEVEL SHOWN ON
PAGE 604 - CONVERT DOSE TO 8 HOUR TIME WEIGHTED AVERAGE,
PAGE 605Â
24ACTION LEVEL
- PERMISSIBLE EXPOSURE LEVEL
- HOW TO HANDLE NOISE PROBLEMS
- ISOLATE
- WEAR EAR PROTECTION
- NRR NOISE REDUCTION LEVEL
- SOUND LEVEL 7 NRR
25PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF NOISE
- STARTLE RESPONSE
- SMALL CHANGES IN HEART RATE
- CHANGES IN BREATHING
- NO AGREEMENT ON LONG TERM EFFECTS
- EFFECTS OF NOISE ON PERFORMANCE
- MIXED BAG STUDIES DIFFER IN RESULTS
- GENERAL CONCLUSIONS, PAGE 601
26TACTUAL DISPLAYS
- FIGURE 6-13, PAGE 183
- IDENTIFICATION OF CONTROLS
- FIGURE 6-14, PAGE 186
- OLFACTORY DISPLAYS
- NATURAL GAS
- COMPUTER ROOM WARNING