Folie 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Folie 1

Description:

carbohydrates, surfactants. Single droplet drying via levitation ... Addition of surfactant to liquid feed. can reduce protein surface excess at ... eg, surfactants ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:130
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: Lee245
Category:
Tags: folie | surfactant

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Folie 1


1
STABILISING PROTEINS BY SPRAYDRYING WITH
ADJUVENTSGeoffrey LeeFriedrich Alexander
University, Erlangen
  • Why spray dry a protein ?
  • The spray drying process machines process
    conditions
  • Two examples of spray-dried pharmaceutical
    proteins
  • Sources of damage to proteins during spray drying
  • Formulation measures to stabilize proteins
    carbohydrates, surfactants
  • Single droplet drying via levitation
  • Is spray drying a potentially useful process for
    my product ?

2
Why Use Spray Drying for Proteins ?
  • Spray drying (SD) of protein-containing systems
    is not new !
  • Advantages robust, standard equipment, process
    development straightforward, relatively
    inexpensive, scale up Disadvantages needs
    exact in-process control, yield optimization
    required, minimization of deposit formation,
    'continuous' process.
  • Applications of SD proteins in pharmacy -
    inhaleable powders - injectable powders -
    stable, flowable storage-form for bulk protein.

3
The Spray Drying Process
4
Process Variables Control Product Quality
Independent process variables -
Drying Air Inlet Temperature, Tinlet
- Drying Air Relative Humidity, RH
- Drying Air Flow Rate, vda - Liquid
Feed Flow Rate, Vlf - Atomising Air
Flow rate, vaa Dependent variable -
Outlet Air Temperature, Toutlet
5
Laboratory Scale Spray Dryer Niro Mobile Minor
Drying Capacity up to 7 kg/hr Maximum Tinlet
350C 3' x 6' x 6' high
6
Pilot Scale Spray Dryer Niro P6.3
Drying capacity up to 60 kg/hr Chamber 1.6 m x
0.8 m x 60 Size 11.5' x 9' x 15'
7
Micro Spray Dryer Büchi B-290
Drying capacity up to 1.5 kg/h size 500 x 600 x
1000 mm
8
Feasibility of spray drying a protein
  • Product quality (peptide/protein) investigated
    by - activity loss (enzymes) - change in
    aggregation status (HPLC, SEC) - gel
    electrophoresis eg, isoelectric focussing -
    alteration in FT-IR amide bands
  • Example model protein trypsinogen (Tzannis
    Prestrelski, 1999) - ca 15 activity loss on SD
    at Tin/Tout 110oC/70oC - ca 20 loss of
    monomer (SEC)
  • 2 further examples of pharmaceutical proteins
    illustrate
  • use of analytical techniques

9
Example I A low molecular weight peptide
  • Substance Peptide with 20 amino acids ca. 2.5
    kDa
  • SD conditions - Büchi 191 Micro Spray
    Dryer
  • Liquid Feed - 2 mg/mL peptide (very low !)

10
Example I SEM Appearance
Residual Moisture 2.85 w/w
11
Example I Aggregation status HPLC of liquid feed
12
Example I Aggregation status HPLC of Product
13
Example I Secondary structure evaluation with
FT-IR
14
Example II A high molecular weight protein
  • Substance IgG (AMG 162) with MWt ca. 150 kDa
  • SD conditions - Büchi 191 Micro Spray
    Dryer
  • Liquid Feed - 115 mg/mL IgG ? Sorbitol

15
Example II SEM appearance
Residual moisture 4.4/5.0 w/w
16
Example II Aggregation status SEC of liquid feed
17
Example II Aggregation status SEC of product
18
Example II Aggregation status SEC of formulated
product
19
Potential sources of protein damage
Drying air
2. Shearing forces
Nozzle
Atomizing air
1. Adsorption
Liquid feed
3. Liquid/air interface expansion
4. Thermal stress
Drying tower
20
The 2 periods of droplet drying
Various morpholgies
Critical point
Constant-rate phaseT approx. Twetbulb
Falling-rate phase T ? Toutlet
Residence time 1s 25s
eg, Tinlet/Toutlet 130oC/90oC
21
Thermal inactivation of catalase
22
Primary formulation measure to reduce protein
damage
  • Glass-forming carbohydrates or amino acids ? can
    reduce level of protein damage -
    prevent unfolding aggregation - which
    carbohydrate/protein mass ratio ? ? during SD
    water replacement mechanism ? after SD glassy
    immobilisation ?
  • Low residual moisture content ? ensures high
    glass transition temperature, Tg ? important for
    protein storage stability
  • Sufficient storage stability of carrier ? ?
    amorphous systems are hygroscopic ? must
    prevent moisture uptake crystallisation ? also
    deterioration in powder properties

23
Stabilizing effects of trehalose on catalase
24
Secondary formulation measures
  • Addition of surfactant to liquid feed ? can
    reduce protein surface excess at
    water/air interface of atomised liquid feed
  • Use of non-aqueous solvents ? for peptides with
    low aqueous solubility ? higher w/v improves
    particle formation
  • Polymers to taylor particle morphology ? eg,
    dextrans or hydroxy ethyl starches ? eg,
    surfactants

25
Thermal inactivation of lactate dehydrogenase
(LDH) in trehalose

26
Process storage stabilities of LDH in trehalose
27
Improvement of process stability of LDH in
trehalose 0.1 g/g Polysorbat 80
28
Development of a spray drying process for a
protein
  • Laboratory scale SD of protein solution -
    sufficient water solubility alternative
    solvent - does damage to protein occur ?
    (aggregation) - residual moisture content
    OK ? - which process conditions give best
    result ?
  • Which formulation measures are necessary ?
    - do I need a carbohydrate ? Probably yes.
    - which protein/carbohydrate weight ratio ?
    (maximize) - adjustment of required
    particle size useage ?
  • 2. Move to pilot scale machine - depends
    on required process throughput (kg of
    powder per h) - upscale increases
    residence time in chamber - can I use the
    same nozzle setup ?

29
Single droplet drying levitator
30
Single droplet drying levitator
31
Single-droplet drying kinetics of carbohydate
solution
I
II
III
IV
32
Single-droplet drying kinetics of maltodextrin
(20)
33
Single-droplet drying kinetics of
catalase/trehalose
34
Final Particles Removed from Levitator
catalase/trehalose (64)
catalase
35
Summary Conclusions
  • Spray drying is one of a number of processes that
    canbe used for the production of fine particles.
  • It is an established technique where much
    expertise andexperience is available.
  • Development can be performed under GMP
    conditions.
  • The selection of a suitable machine process
    conditionshas a (fairly) sound scientific basis.
  • The product capacity can be adjusted within wide
    boundaries.
  • The powder properties can also be taylored by
    processor formulation.
  • Potential problems some questions need to be
    addressed - how do I obtain a high product
    yield ? - how do I minimize protein damage
    ? - how much stabilizing adjuvent do I need,
    and which one is the best for my protein
    ? - what is the patent situation ?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com