3Phase Theory - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

3Phase Theory

Description:

Old theory can's explain the spatiotemporal patterns Mainly the F-S-J transitions ... All spatiotemporal patterns are the result of interpolation of loop data, how ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: FSZuu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 3Phase Theory


1
3Phase Theory
  • und why all zhe otzher mohdellss arrrh wronghh

Trail 3Phase Theory
2
The beginning
  • Kerner starts working with FD but changes his
    mind due to empirical data
  • Old theory cans explain the spatiotemporal
    patterns Mainly the F-S-J transitions
  • Kerner briefly discusses other theories

3
Kerners critique on existing theories
  • LWR
  • FD is an unperturbed noiseless limit case,
  • Allows any kind of shockwave,
  • Only characteristic WMJ speed
  • Shockwaves are instantaneous,
  • No reaction delay
  • Inability to model self formation of wide moving
    jams

4
Kerners critique on existing theories
  • Models with Moving Jam emergence
  • Some models allow F-J transition but no F-S-J
  • Different behavior on on-ramps than observed
  • Models with variety of vehicles/characteristics
  • No F-S-J transition
  • Multiclass Macroscopic suffer from FD limitation
  • Microscopic simulation does not need multi
    vehicle class (he will show in part III)

5
Why 3Phase theory is qualitative?
  • Qualitative research is one of the two major
    approaches to research methodology in (social)
    sciences. Qualitative research involves an
    in-depth understanding of phenomena and the
    reasons that govern the phenomena (why,how)
  • Hypotheses is a suggested explanation of a
    phenomenon

6
Qualitative 3Phase theory
  • Based on empirical data,
  • Hypotheses are suggested which explain them,

7
Spatio Temporal patterns 3 phases
  • F free flow
  • J wide moving jam,
  • characteristic speed (-16 km/hr), propagates
    upstream through bottlenecks
  • independent on initial conditions or demand
  • S synchronized flow, vehicles have tendency to
    synchronize speed, but diverse spatiotemporal
    patterns

8
Driving behavior
  • Observed common behavioral characteristics of
    drivers in traffic flow (pg 99)
  • A drivers ability to recognize if space gap
    between preceding vehicle is increasing or
    decreasing
  • If space gaps between vehicles are not too large,
    the drivers ability is unchanged even if
    difference in speed between vehicle and preceding
    vehicle is negligible
  • Drivers can maintain a time independent space gap

9
Qualitative 3Phase theory
  • Based on empirical data,
  • Hypotheses are suggested which explain them,

10
Fundamental hypothesis
  • Given Observed spatiotemporal patterns and user
    behavior, a fundamental hypotheses regarding
    synchronized flow is stated
  • Hypothetical steady speed states of synchronized
    flow, i.e., synchronized flow states in which all
    vehicles move at the same distance from one
    another and with the same time-independent speed,
    cover a two-dimensional region in the
    flow-density plane (2D).

11
Fundamental hypotheses
Steady speed state
  • Speed 1n densities

12
Fundamental hypotheses
Steady density state
  • Density 1n speeds

13
Fundamental hypotheses
Free flow
Breakdown phenomena
Synchronized flow
  • Speed is better indicator, but NO characteristic
    speed

14
Fundamental hypotheses
Multi lane
Single lane
  • Multi lane has higher speeds because vehicles can
    overtake -gt gap in metastable region

15
Fundamental hypotheses
Steady speed state
S-up
  • Upper bound due to safe distance, minimal gap
  • Lower bound due to speed adaptation

16
Fundamental hypotheses
Lower boundary Synchronization distance
Speed adaptation
S-low
  • Speed adaptation, if distance gt synchronization
    distance, then vehicle can accelerates until
    desired speed if it cant pass a preceding
    vehicle it will tend to adapt its speed to this
    vehicle (synchronize).

17
Fundamental hypotheses
Wandering effect
Perturbation
  • Fluctuation in braking or acceleration -gt
    perturbation
  • Small enough perturbations do not need to grow in
    SP
  • Steady state does NOT exist in SP -gt dynamic
    synchronized flow state

18
Fundamental hypotheses
Complex dynamic interactions
  • Steady states are hypothetical -gt do not exist
  • SP is a dynamic pattern

19
Fundamental hypotheses
Higher frequency of MJ emergence
  • In higher speeds, WMJ does not need to occur
  • In Lower speeds, frequency of MWJ occurrence is
    higher

20
Empirical basis of 3phase theory
  • Reproducibility
  • Hard to reproduce empirical behavior data w.r.t
    the distance gap, speed adaptation etc
  • Easier to reproduce spatiotemporal patterns
  • Therefore spatiotemporal data is regarded as
    empirical basis for 3Phase theory

21
Empirical basis of 3phase theory
  • 3 Traffic phases F, S, J
  • J propagates upstream through BN with Vg
  • When density high -gt
  • SP flow can lie above line J
  • Onset of congestion is F-gtS transition
  • F-gtJ does not exist!
  • WMJ can occur spontaneously in S-gtJ
  • Low vehicle speed in S -gt higher frequency of
    S-J
  • In S with high speed, J does not necessarily
    occur
  • WMJ occur only due to F-gtS-gtJ

22
Discussion
  • Data collection
  • Kerner says low local speeds are bad measurable,
    and due to heterogeneity density is already a bad
    estimate. Still uses local speed to estimate
    density, how bad is this ? (Kerner gives no
    explanation)
  • All spatiotemporal patterns are the result of
    interpolation of loop data, how sensitive are the
    patterns to interpolation ?
  • All data from one motorway, reproducibility ?

23
Discussion
  • Spatio temporal patterns
  • Terminology is not straightforward
  • The Pinch effect is badly described
  • First in SP, later also in WMJ (pg 45)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com