Efficient Causation vs. Teleology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Efficient Causation vs. Teleology

Description:

Modern biology, like quantum physics, rejects strict determinism ... designer of the boundary conditions of the 'self-organizing system' of nature ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:58
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: jamesg74
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Efficient Causation vs. Teleology


1
Efficient Causation vs. Teleology
2
Herbert Spencer
  • Introduced the phrase survival of the fittest
    in his Principles of Biology (1864)
  • Wrote This survival of the fittest . . . is
    that which Mr. Darwin has called 'natural
    selection', or the preservation of favoured races
    in the struggle for life.
  • Spencer used this phrase to reinforce his social
    theories, which came to be called by the name
    Social Darwinism

3
Darwins Theory of Natural Selection
  • Darwin's theory of natural selection implies no
    concept of progress
  • According to the classical view of science,
    evolution is not a directional process
  • So why do we tend so much to see evolution in
    evaluative terms?

4
Aristotle's 4 Types of "Causes"
5
Teleology
  • The Greek word telos meaning end or completion,
    is behind the philosophical term, teleology,
    meaning the study of the purpose of things
  • Teleology has been discredited by modern
    scientists

6
Efficient Cause
  • According to the classical view of science, the
    only real cause at work in the universe is the
    interactions of atoms according to the strict
    natural laws of physics
  • Physical events are the real causes behind every
    effect
  • All causation is really bottom-up (from the
    atoms)

7
Conflict Religious Critics of Darwinism
  • Behe argues for Intelligent Design (not for
    "young earth creationism")
  • Organisms are like "mousetraps", irreducibly
    complex interlocking systems that don't work if
    you remove any key parts (Eg. flagella of simple
    bacteria are composed of dozens of different
    proteins)
  • Based on William Paley's teleological argument
    (1803), which uses the analogy A watchmaker is
    to watch as God is to universe
  • Avoid using the G-word

8
Conflict Naturalist Critics of Religion
  • Dawkins asks why would the eye be designed so
    inefficiently if it was the product of
    intelligent design?
  • Answer Because evolution is a process that
    always must create "ad-hoc" solutions from
    existing natural structures

9
Independence
  • S.J. Gould NOMA (Non-Overlapping Magesteria)
  • A magesterium is a domain of teaching authority
  • Religion deals with ethical and metaphysical
    claims
  • Science deals only with empirical claims

10
Dialogue
  • Religious critics ask whether it is true that
    nature can be explained fully by efficient
    causation alone
  • What about instances of apparent top-down
    causation (influence of a system on many
    sub-systems)?
  • "internal drives of organisms can initiate
    evolutionary changes (Baldwin Effect) such as
  • soldier termites
  • Whales

11
Integration
  • Modern biology, like quantum physics, rejects
    strict determinism
  • Too many blind alleys in evolution to support a
    deterministic view of God
  • But role of chance in evolution leaves some room
    for possible action of God at a higher level as
    the ultimate top-down cause and as the designer
    of the boundary conditions of the
    self-organizing system of nature
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com