An Energy Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless LANs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

An Energy Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless LANs

Description:

An Energy Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless LANs – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:125
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: ackr
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: An Energy Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless LANs


1
An Energy Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless LANs
2
Contents
  • Introduction
  • Power Saving Mechanism (PSM) for DCF in IEEE
    802.11
  • Related Work
  • Proposed DPSM (Dynamic PSM) Scheme
  • Key Features of DPSM
  • DPSM Operation
  • Rules for Dynamic ATIM window adjustment
  • Performance Evaluation
  • Conclusion

3
Introduction
  • Energy conserving mechanisms at various layers
  • Routing layer
  • MAC layer
  • Transport layer
  • Energy efficient MAC protocol
  • For wireless LAN
  • By putting the wireless interface in a doze
    state
  • Measured power consumption
  • awake transmit (1.65 W), receive (1.4 W), idle
    (1.15 W)
  • doze (0.045 W)

4
PSM for DCF in IEEE 802.11
  • Two components in IEEE 802.11
  • PCF (Point Coordination Function)
  • DCF (Distributed Coordination Function)
  • Power Saving Mechanism for DCF
  • Time is divided into Beacon Interval
  • All nodes are in awake state during an ATIM
    window
  • All nodes use the same ATIM window size

5
Related Work
  • Adjust Beacon Interval and ATIM window Woesner,
    1998
  • Simulation results for the PSM
  • Enforce nodes to enter doze state Cano, 2001
  • Use RTS/CTS for traffic indication message (per
    packet basis)
  • Costs of doze-to-active transition
  • SPAN Elects a group of coordinators Chen,
    2001
  • Stay awake and forward traffic for active
    connections
  • Use advertised traffic window following an ATIM
    window
  • PAMAS use two separate channels Singh, 1998
  • Separated transmission of control packet / data
    packet
  • Nodes determine when to power off and the duration

6
Dynamic Power Saving Mechanism
  • PSM with fixed ATIM window size
  • Affects throughput energy consumption
  • Small window size
  • Not enough time available to announce traffic
  • Degrading throughput (potentially)
  • Large window size
  • Less time for actual data transmission
  • Higher energy consumption
  • DPSM dynamically adjust the size of ATIM window

7
Key Features of DPSM
  • Dynamic adjustment of ATIM window
  • Each node uses a different ATIM window size
  • Longer dozing time (more energy saving)
  • Enter the doze state after announced packet
    delivery
  • Remained duration in the beacon interval is
    longer than 1600 µs

8
DPSM Operation
  • Announcing one ATIM frame per destination
  • Sender Informs the number of packets pending for
    Receiver
  • If the announced packets are not delivered in a
    beacon interval
  • Stay up in the next beacon interval
  • Sender delivers remained packets without ATIM
    frame
  • Enter the doze state after successful packet
    transmission
  • Increasing and decreasing ATIM window size
  • Finite set of ATIM window sizes
  • The smallest ATIM window size ATIMmin
  • Each allowed window level
  • Different nodes using different ATIM window size

9
DPSM Operation (cont.)
  • Backoff algorithm for ATIM frame
  • ATIM frame transmitted using CSMA/CA mechanism
  • Initial cw value is picked in the range 0,
    cwmin
  • If an ATIM-ACK is not received
  • Doubles the value of cw and selects a new backoff
    interval
  • If the ATIM window ends
  • Use doubled cw value in the next beacon interval
  • i.e., cw will not be reset to cwmin
  • To decrease the probability of collision

10
DPSM Operation (cont.)
  • Packet marking
  • Set retry limit for ATIM frame in a beacon
    interval as 3
  • If ATIM-ACK has not been received after 3
    transmission
  • Transmitted packet is marked and re-buffered
    for another try
  • The node is free to send ATIM frame to another
    node
  • Re-buffered packet can stay in buffer for at most
    2 beacon interval
  • Marking gt dynamic increase of ATIM window size

11
DPSM Operation (cont.)
  • Piggybacking of ATIM window size
  • Each node announces its own ATIM window size
  • Nodes may be aware of some or all of other ATIM
    window sizes
  • Packets pending to be transmitted are sorted
  • the size of ATIM window at their destination
  • Destination node with small size of ATIM window
    gets preference
  • If unknown, it is assumed to be equal to ATIMmin
  • ATIM frames are transmitted in the sorted order
  • Queues for each level of ATIM window
  • Re-buffered packet has a higher transmission
    priority

12
Rules for Dynamic ATIM Window Adjustment
  • Increasing rules
  • The number of pending packets that could not be
    announced during the ATIM window
  • If the number of pending packets is more than 10
  • Overheard information
  • If neighbors window size is at least two levels
    larger
  • Receiving an ATIM frame after ATIM window
  • Receiving a marked packet

13
Rules for Dynamic ATIM Window Adjustment
  • Decreasing rules
  • When the current ATIM window is big enough
  • No window increasing rule is satisfied
  • If a node has successfully announced one ATIM
    frame to all destinations that have pending
    packets

14
Performance Evaluation
  • Performance metrics
  • Aggregate throughput over all flows
  • Aggregate throughput per unit of energy
    consumption
  • Simulation model
  • Simulator ns-2 with the CMU wireless extensions
  • Number of nodes 8, 16, 32, or 64
  • Simulated flows half of nodes
  • Network environment LAN (one-hop network)
  • Traffic CBR, 512 bytes packet in 2Mbps channel
  • Beacon Interval 100 ms
  • ATIM window size 2 ms 50 ms

15
Simulation Results
  • Aggregate Throughput (Fixed network load)

16
Simulation Results
  • Aggregate Throughput per joule (Fixed network
    load)

17
Simulation Results
  • Network load vs. ATIM window size
  • The number of pending packets is the main factor
    for a node to increase its ATIM window

18
Simulation Results
  • Dynamic network load

19
Conclusion
  • The ATIM window size in PSM in IEEE 802.11
  • Affects the throughput and the amount of energy
    saving
  • The network load is directly related to ATIM
    window size
  • Fixed ATIM window size can not achieve optimal
    performance
  • Dynamic PSM can
  • Adapt its ATIM window size according to observed
    network conditions
  • Improve energy consumption without degrading
    throughput
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com