Title: Non Trade Issues
1Non Trade Issues
- Shashank Priya
- Director, Trade Policy Division
2LABOUR ISSUES IN WTO
- On conclusion of UR, US raised the issue of
linkage between trade and core labour standards
(CLS) - Indias proposal- relationship between trade and
immigration policies be examined in WTO - US did not pursue the issue further for sometime
3Singapore Ministerial Conference
- In 1996 SMC, US proposed to include labour
standards as an agenda in the WTO but failed - SMD endorsed the stand of DCs
- ILO is the competent body to deal with CLS and
WTO affirms its support in promoting such
standards - It rejected the use of labour standards for
protectionist purposes and agreed that the
comparative advantage of countries, particularly
low wage DCs must in no way be put into question - WTO and ILO Sects. would continue their existing
collaboration
4Seattle Ministerial Conference
- Concerted attempts by developed countries to
include labour linkage in WTO agenda - Proposals made for Working Party either inside or
outside WTO - Strong opposition by DCs led by India
- Seattle failed
5Post-Seattle Developments
- No formal proposals in WTO post-Seattle
- EU/US Summit meeting called for linkage
- Trade and Development Act 2000 passed in
US-inclusion of forced/indentured child labour in
definition of forced/indentured labour - Linkage of CLS with GSP Scheme estd.-specifically
ILO Convention 182 (Elimination of worst forms of
child labour) - UNCTAD X Conference of 2000 made no mention of
any work relating to Trade and Labour
6Broad Stand of Countries
- US-set up a working group in WTO to deal with
issues like Trade and Employment, Trade and
Social Protection, including CLS particularly
Child Labour. Favoured use of trade sanctions for
non-implementation of CLS - EC-have a joint ILO/WTO Working Forum on Trade,
Globalisation and Labour issues outside WTO to
promote dialogue between govt. employees, trade
unions etc. Rejected use of trade sanctions
7Indias and other DCs Stand
- Fully committed to observance of CLS and
promotion of labour welfare through domestic
policies - Issue of CLS at international level can be
addressed only by ILO and not WTO - Reject the concept of linkage between trade and
CLS as it can be a protectionist device hindering
the comparative advantage of low wage developing
economies
8Indias and other DCs Stand (contd)
- Use of trade sanctions to implement CLS would be
counter productive as this could aggravate lower
standards and poverty - Poverty is the root cause for lower commitment to
CLS and cannot be tackled by trade sanctions - SMD has clearly rejected the linkage
- ILO is taking effective steps to implement CLS.
E.g. In 1999 the International Labour Conference
unanimously adopted a Convention on the
Elimination of Worst Form of Child Labour.
9Possible Consequences of including labour in WTO
- Possibility of trade sanctions being imposed by
developed countries - Comparative advantage of cheaper labour could be
neutralised in small scale and handloom sectors - Sovereignty of domestic laws could be compromised
- Use of extra territorial authority for
enforcement of various CLS - Possible resort to DSU for any violation of CLS
- Enhanced role for NGOs in WTO through backdoor
- Possibility of financial and technical assistance
provided by developed countries, multilateral
orgns, etc., being linked to adoption of CLS
10Doha Ministerial Declaration
- DMD reaffirmed the declaration made in SMD
regarding internationally recognised CLS - It took note of the work underway in the ILO on
the social dimension of globalisation
11Core Labour Standards and ratification status in
India
- Convention No. 29 concerning forced
labour-ratified - Convention No. 111 concerning discrimination in
employment and occupation-ratified - Convention No. 100 concerning equal
remuneration-ratified - Convention No. 105 concerning abolition of forced
labour-ratified - Convention No. 87 concerning freedom of
association-not ratified because of separate
treatment of govt. servants
12Core Labour Standards and ratification status in
India
- Convention No. 98 concerning collective
bargaining-not ratified because of separate
treatment of govt. servants - Convention No. 138 concerning minimum age of
entry for employment-not ratified - Convention No. 182 concerning elimination of
worst forms of child labour-not ratified
13Trade and Environment debate
- Link between trade and environmental protection
recognised since 1970s - 1972 Stockholm Conference on Human Environment-
GATT Sectt prepared a study titled Industrial
Pollution Control and International Trade
reflected concerns of green
protectionism (environmental protection policies
becoming an obstacle to trade)
14Trade and Environment debate (contd)
- This study led to creation of a Group on
Environmental Measures and International Trade
(EMIT group) in GATT in 1971 - The group to convene only at the request of
Contracting Parties - First request came only in 1991 by members of
EFTA (Austria, Finland, Iceland, Liechstentein,
Norway, Sweden and Switzerland)
15Why Environmental Issues became important by 1991?
- Tokyo Round Agreement on TBT tried to address the
concern how environmental measures could create
obstacles to trade-it called for
non-discrimination in preparation, adoption and
application of technical regulations and
standards - Concern of DCs regarding continued export of DPGs
by developed countries to DCs
16Why Environmental Issues became important by 1991?
- Dispute between Mexico and US (1991) regarding US
embargo on import of tuna from Mexico caught
using purse seine nets which resulted in the
incidental kill of dolphins-Mexico won the case
in GATT - A 1987 report of World Commission on Environment
and Development called Our Common Future
(Brundtland Report) identified poverty as one of
the most important causes of environmental
degradation- Pollution of Poverty could be
combated by greater economic growth through
increased international trade-term sustainable
development coined
17Outcome
- EMIT group focused on effects on environmental
measures (like eco-labelling schemes) on
international trade, relationship between MTS
rules and trade provisions in MEAs, and
transparency of national environmental
regulations with an impact on trade - Ministerial decision of UR on Trade and
Environment (April 1994) led to formation of CTE
as a successor to the EMIT group
18CTE Agenda
- 10 Agenda items seek a balance of issues of
interest to developing and developed countries - Relationship between MTS provisions and trade
measures in MEAs-EC proposed amendment to GATT
Article XX to include protection of the
environment as one of the exceptions to WTO
rules status quo proposed by India, Egypt and
Mexico ASEAN proposed further tightening of
environmental exceptions to reduce disguised
protectionism
19CTE Agenda (contd)
- Relationship between environmental policies
relevant to trade with significant trade effects
and the provisions of MTS-developed countries
wanted to incorporate some principles of CBD in
WTO like Rio principles 17 (encouraging
environmental impact assessment) and 15
(precautionary principle). India insisted on
other principles like 7 (common but
differentiated responsibility of nations towards
environment) and 11 (equivalence in the wake of
differential standards)
20CTE Agenda (contd)
- Relationship between MTS provisions and
environment related border taxes and other
requirements like standards, regulations,
packaging, labelling etc.- India and some other
DCs strongly oppose inclusion of npr-PPMs (
non-product- related-Processes and Production
Methods) in any manner in TBT Agreement. EC wants
to include eco labelling schemes by an amendment
to the TBT Agreement (npr-PPMs are measures that
relate to processes that do not impart any
distinguishing characteristics to the final
product e.g. organic products produced without
chemical fertilisers incorporated PPMs-pesticide
free cotton)
21CTE Agenda (contd)
- Provisions of MTS with respect to transparency of
environmental measures-US has suggested
environmental reviews of national policies under
TPRM. India- environmental reviews of trade
measures are best done at the national level - Relation between dispute settlement mechanism in
MTS and MEAs- EC wants a decision in WTO that any
action under an MEA would be considered as WTO
compatible. India and other DCs do not favour
such a a-priori decision
22CTE Agenda (contd)
- Effect of environmental measures on market
access, particularly of DCs and environmental
benefits of removing trade restrictions and
distortions-discussion has centred around the
issue og agricultural subsidy. India has proposed
safeguarding the market access of DCs from
unwanted trade effects of environmental policies - Export of DPGs-African countries have demanded
disciplines on developed countries to prohibit
export of DPGs
23CTE Agenda (contd)
- Relationship of TRIPS Agreement to (a) TOT and
development of environmentally sound technologies
and (b) MEAs, which contained IPR related
obligations-India has made two proposals (i)
where environmentally sound technologies and
products are mandated in national or
international laws, right holder should be
obliged to make them available on fair terms to
DCs (ii) Harmonise different approaches towards
biological materials and traditional knowledge in
TRIPS and CBD (patent applicant to disclose
source of origin of biological material or TK
accessed for invention)
24Doha Mandate on environment negotiations
- Para 31 of DMD mandates negotiation on
- Relationship between existing WTO rules and
specific trade obligations set out in MEAs - Procedures for regular information exchange
between MEA Sectts and the relevant WTO
Committees - Market access negotiations for environmental
goods and services
25Doha Mandate on environment negotiations (contd)
- Para 32 of DMD mandates CTE to give particular
attention to following agenda of its work - The effect of environmental measures on market
access specially in relation to DCs - The relevant provisions of TRIPS
- Labelling requirements for environmental purposes
26THANK YOU