Standard Annotation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

Standard Annotation

Description:

Clear credit to where the annotation was done. Community Input by Wiki-style ... Classification: SCOP, CATH, pfam. Ligand: nature, structure; where, relevant? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: sau56
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Standard Annotation


1
Three-Tiered Level of Annotation
  • Standard Annotation
  • Largely automated
  • Provided by KB using Established Standard Sites
  • Clear credit to where the annotation was done
  • Community Input by Wiki-style
  • Structured input with evidence/provenance
  • Unpublished experimental confirmation
  • For solved structure - monitored by PSI Center
  • Registration of contributors
  • Community Input by Free-style
  • More speculative comments and hypotheses
  • Comments on the validity of the annotations

2
What do we mean by annotation?
  • MSAs Pfam UniProt show conserved sites
  • Conserved sites on 3D Structure ET, Consurf,
  • Classification SCOP, CATH, pfam
  • Ligand nature, structure where, relevant?
  • Substrate specificity EC structure of
    substrate
  • Links to publications Synonym Tables of Protein
    Name Link to PubMed using TextMining Consensus
    authors
  • Pathways and networks KEGG ProLinks Strings.
    Ecosite2 HPRD DIP, operon context
  • SNPs databases, map to 3D structure
  • Alternative spice forms
  • Biophyscial features on 3D Structure GRASP
    SurfNet. Markus, PVSoar, NESTS
  • Phylogenetic Tree TREEFAM ARBODRAW
  • Cellular Localization Organ expression locations
  • Disease Relatedness Links to OMIM
  • Link to PSI Material Repository
  • Oligomer state and evidence for this
  • Structure quality assessment various servers

3
Validation of Annotation
  • Weighting system of evidence
  • Experimental, predicted from sequence, predicted
    from structure
  • Published vs Unpublished
  • Clear attribution of source
  • Conflict of annotation

4
Functional Annotations
  • Standard GO annotations
  • Provide wiki to collect new functional terms
  • Consider benchmarking of annotation tools
  • Possibly collaborate with GO group to develop new
    terms

5
Integration and Visualization
  • Major Opportunity for Development

6
Three-Tiered Level of Annotation
  • Standard Annotation
  • Largely automated
  • Provided by KB using standard sites
  • Clear credit to where the annotation was done
  • Community Input by Wiki-style
  • Structured input with evidence/provenance
  • Unpublished experimental confirmation
  • For solved structure - monitored by PSI Center
  • Registration of contributors
  • Community Input by Free-style
  • More speculative comments and hypotheses
  • Comments on the validity of the annotations

7
Adopt a Protein
  • For every protein Selected, search literature
    to find investigators and email to them a
    solicitation to Adopt a Protein (inspired by
    Brenner suggestion on targeting)
  • Uniprot provides example
  • Sign up on web page to adopt protein
  • Expectations need to be carefully managed strong
    caveats
  • Automated - minimal opportunity for direct
    interactions except when solicited

8
Advertisement of Adopt a Protein
  • Advertise the general concept at meeting of
    groups of biologists in specific fields.
  • Nature Gateway
  • Major Biology Center Web Sites (e.g. NCBI)
  • Server Sites (e.g. ExPasy)
  • Literature at Conferences
  • News letters / trade magazines
  • Link from Uniprot / GenBank /PDB to KB site for
    Adopt a Protein
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com