Field Project 3 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Field Project 3

Description:

Field Project 3 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: USUA600
Category:
Tags: field | project | say

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Field Project 3


1
Field Project 3
  • Ling 102

2
Reporting
  • What is wrong with that?
  • 85 of the uses of belike were used when
    speaking in a narrative setting

3
Reporting
  • What is wrong with that?
  • 85 of the uses of belike were used when
    speaking in a narrative setting
  • Maybe 85 of the instances of the corpus were
    narrations!
  • Good way of putting it
  • Of the narrative tokens, x used be like and y
    used say
  • Of the not narrative tokens, x used be like
    and y used say

4
Reporting
  • Incorrect
  • of the x variant of the dependent variable (ie.
    VQ) was used in the y variant of the independent
    variable (i.e. gender)
  • Correct
  • of the y variant of the independent variable
    (ie. gender) used the x variant of the dependent
    variable (i.e. VQ).
  • The ppt VQ.pdf explains the same point (slides 36
    to 39)

5
Reporting statistics
  • Incorrect
  • Probability of keeping the null hypothesis

6
Reporting statistics
  • Incorrect
  • Probability of keeping the null hypothesis
  • Correct
  • Probability of wrongly rejecting the null
    hypothesis

7
Reporting statistics
  • Incorrect
  • The null hypothesis is that theres not enough
    information to confirm this correlation between
    males/females and the use of belike

8
Reporting statistics
  • Incorrect
  • The null hypothesis is that theres not enough
    information to confirm this correlation between
    males/females and the use of belike
  • Correct
  • The null hypothesis is that theres not a
    correlation between males/females and the use of
    belike

9
Reporting statistics
  • Does anything look wrong?
  • Chi test statistic 0.51679911
  • This finding is not statistically significant,
    because there is only a 1 in 2 chance I have
    wrongly rejected the null hypothesis

10
Reporting statistics
  • Does anything look wrong?
  • Chi test statistic 0.51679911
  • P-value 0.51679911
  • This finding is not statistically significant,
    because there is only a 1 in 2 chance I have
    wrongly rejected the null hypothesis
  • It is a very big probability!

11
Reporting statistics
  • I came up with 5.01795E-9 as the probability that
    the null hypothesis is true, making the data
    significant

12
Reporting statistics
  • I came up with 5.01795E-9 as the probability that
    the null hypothesis is true, making the data
    significant
  • I came up with 5.01795E-9 as the probability that
    the null hypothesis is true,
  • making the difference between the groups
    significant
  • Meaning that there is a significant correlation
    between x and y

13
Reporting statistics
  • With a p-value of 0.9, we must accept the null
    hypothesis

14
Reporting statistics
  • With a p-value of 0.9, we must accept the null
    hypothesis
  • With a p-value of 0.9, we cannot reject the null
    hypothesis

15
Reporting statistics
  • Women use like VQs a bit more than men, but
    this difference is statistically insignificant

16
Reporting statistics
  • Women use like VQs a bit more than men, but
    this difference is statistically insignificant
  • Women use like VQs a bit more than men, but
    this difference is not statistically significant
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com